A 427 Chevy or 468, which is better?
#1
Navigator
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2010
Location: Tomball Texas
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A 427 Chevy or 468, which is better?
I was wondering, which engine combo (400, 454, 434, 427, or 468) would be able to make a broad torque range, and still rev to a redline of 8000. Don't want a big block, just a large small block.
#2
Race Director
A larger displacement motor will not need to rev to 8000. The larger cubes means more power and more torque. A smaller displacement motor will have lighter components and can rev higher to make up for the lack of cubic inches. In drag racing, a big block can effortlessly run quick times while a small block has to rev like crazy to run the same numbers.
#3
Safety Car
A 450 to 500 cubic engine is going to have a hard time making peak hp through typically available cylinder heads whereas a 427 with it's shorter stroke and lighter internals will have a better chance pulling past 7000 rpm using those same heads (and lasting).
#4
Pro
#5
Safety Car
427 is popular in both sbc and bbc configurations. Typically a 427 sbc is a 4.125" bore x 4.00 stroke, That bore is the standard bore most aftermarket blocks and stock chevy 400's came with...... but a 427 can also be an overbore with the 3.875" stroke. 434's are typically sbc, with a 4.155 bore x 4.00 stroke. 427 big blocks, while popular back in the 60's and 70's are not popular these days simply because time has passed them by in the cubic inch department. Nowadays, even a 540 ci is considered small in some circles.
All your selections can make a broad torque range. However, 8000 rpm is another issue..... starting with typically hyd valvetrain limitations. Although certainly doable, your streetability would be greatly compromised in building such a motor. I recommend you define your application and you'll get a much better idea of real-world combinations that can help you achieve your goals. I think you might find, that your goals are probably easily reached with an affordable and easy to work with 383.... of which multiple people here are even capable of building for you.
#6
Melting Slicks
Just a few notes, a 454 is traditionally a big block, not a small block, albeit small blocks nowadays can be made to 454 ci, it is not all that common. I'll also say, big cube sbc are typically challenged in the rod vs stroke department, hence rpm range can be compromised in durability and reliability. It is doable though. A 468 is typically just a .030" over bored 454 big block.
427 is popular in both sbc and bbc configurations. Typically a 427 sbc is a 4.125" bore x 4.00 stroke, That bore is the standard bore most aftermarket blocks and stock chevy 400's came with...... but a 427 can also be an overbore with the 3.875" stroke. 434's are typically sbc, with a 4.155 bore x 4.00 stroke. 427 big blocks, while popular back in the 60's and 70's are not popular these days simply because time has passed them by in the cubic inch department. Nowadays, even a 540 ci is considered small in some circles.
All your selections can make a broad torque range. However, 8000 rpm is another issue..... starting with typically hyd valvetrain limitations. Although certainly doable, your streetability would be greatly compromised in building such a motor. I recommend you define your application and you'll get a much better idea of real-world combinations that can help you achieve your goals. I think you might find, that your goals are probably easily reached with an affordable and easy to work with 383.... of which multiple people here are even capable of building for you.
427 is popular in both sbc and bbc configurations. Typically a 427 sbc is a 4.125" bore x 4.00 stroke, That bore is the standard bore most aftermarket blocks and stock chevy 400's came with...... but a 427 can also be an overbore with the 3.875" stroke. 434's are typically sbc, with a 4.155 bore x 4.00 stroke. 427 big blocks, while popular back in the 60's and 70's are not popular these days simply because time has passed them by in the cubic inch department. Nowadays, even a 540 ci is considered small in some circles.
All your selections can make a broad torque range. However, 8000 rpm is another issue..... starting with typically hyd valvetrain limitations. Although certainly doable, your streetability would be greatly compromised in building such a motor. I recommend you define your application and you'll get a much better idea of real-world combinations that can help you achieve your goals. I think you might find, that your goals are probably easily reached with an affordable and easy to work with 383.... of which multiple people here are even capable of building for you.
#7
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes
on
2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
Check out tpi421Vettes sig, hes living proof of that, no high rpms for him just brute power . Maybe he can put something together for you :
#8
Le Mans Master
I'm no expert by any means but aren't 8K rpm motors the kind where you have to take the valve covers off every week to make adjustments? Valve train which will see 8K rpm on a regular basis is probably worth its weight in gold. Makes my head spin just thinking of the price.
And that's not even getting to the rest of the car. Assuming one put together such a big cube high rev car. From a simplicity standpoint finding the weakest link in the chain becomes very easy. Your chain would consist of two links: the engine and the rest of the car. Guess which one is the weak link?
And that's not even getting to the rest of the car. Assuming one put together such a big cube high rev car. From a simplicity standpoint finding the weakest link in the chain becomes very easy. Your chain would consist of two links: the engine and the rest of the car. Guess which one is the weak link?
#9
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes
on
2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
Wallet or credit limit which one is weaker
#10
Race Director
#11
Navigator
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2010
Location: Tomball Texas
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks, I was thinking of something that will kill at the track and get 9's at the strip with some afr 235 eliminator. Saw those in a hotrod article (http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...ads/index.html), but it might not be as steerable as I want. If you guys have any suggestions on heads, that'll be great. I though Revving high could help on passing, and be fun on weekends.
#13
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes
on
2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
9s at 140+ is one hell of a street car
#14
Le Mans Master
You, my boy, have a LOT to learn. Now before you ruffle up your feathers, I'm not belittling you, it's a known fact that reliability lies in a much lower rpm range than you are looking at. There is no substitute for cubic inches. Build it big, build it simple, and run hell out of it all season.
#15
Race Director
Jim (TPI421) can set you up with a great engine combo. He has the knowlege and skill. He can also get you a great deal on AFR heads. He has built many motors for forum members. His C4 would be well into the 9's if he didn't live in 5500+da country. Willie
#16
Navigator
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2010
Location: Tomball Texas
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
383vette are 421's the only engine he builds, or just his preferable one? And what are the price difference between him and summit? And Midnight, yes I know I have little experience, but i know theres no replacement for displacement. i was just wondering what set up created the best balance of Horsepower, torque and "safe" RPMs
#17
Melting Slicks
383vette are 421's the only engine he builds, or just his preferable one? And what are the price difference between him and summit? And Midnight, yes I know I have little experience, but i know theres no replacement for displacement. i was just wondering what set up created the best balance of Horsepower, torque and "safe" RPMs
#18
Race Director
383vette are 421's the only engine he builds, or just his preferable one? And what are the price difference between him and summit? And Midnight, yes I know I have little experience, but i know theres no replacement for displacement. i was just wondering what set up created the best balance of Horsepower, torque and "safe" RPMs
#20
Melting Slicks
I have done 421's from mild to wild. A 421 with a baby 222/230 cam old AFR 195's, that made 416 rwhp 440rwtq and got 23mpg, and would pass emissions. And it ran 12.40's with a DA of 7500ft. And on the other end of the spectrum I have done 500+rwhp N/A 421's. What ever you want or can afford!
A 421 with a 6.0" rod will give you a good compression height of 1.0625 and a pretty good ratio for a big inch SBC. And that will help longevity.
A 421 with a 6.0" rod will give you a good compression height of 1.0625 and a pretty good ratio for a big inch SBC. And that will help longevity.
Last edited by tpi 421 vette; 11-29-2010 at 08:44 PM.