C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

My 91 Corvette goes 11.37 @ 122, video inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2013, 11:52 PM
  #21  
Tom400CFI
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
 
Tom400CFI's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Park City Utah
Posts: 21,544
Received 3,181 Likes on 2,322 Posts

Default

Yes, I did neglect to give props; that white car and it's driver are one efficient combo! Couple wicked runs in this thread!
Old 09-01-2013, 12:17 PM
  #22  
mcm95403
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
mcm95403's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 6,851
Received 223 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

Great video neat - what intake is on that engine?
Old 09-01-2013, 05:07 PM
  #23  
neat
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
neat's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,014
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tom400CFI
Good point about the elevation. That dose skew my "calibrations" some times!

I was thinking of a C6 ZR1 as a benchmark though, which has 640 chp, ~3400 lbs and aren't those trapping right around 130? I could be off there.

I do feel that C4's are more efficient on a drag track than C6's though.
From what I've seen, the ZR1's are making about 550 at the tire stock. And blower cars never run the numbers that NA or nitrous cars do with equivalent HP. Also the cars in the videos weighs 3220.
Old 09-01-2013, 05:13 PM
  #24  
neat
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
neat's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,014
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
350 with a small cam and shot running 10s is damn good no matter how you look at it.

Course good air driving and setting the car up figure in there too but ET still is what it is. Good stuff
Sea level doesn't hurt, that's for sure.

The silver car in the videos doesn't have much in the way of suspension or anything. Just KYB replacement shocks from a parts store and 4.09 gears. It was on the stock half shafts, outer stub axles, control arms, toe rods, etc...

However, it did still have the dual mass in it. I think the dual mass (with centerforce disk and pressure plate) is part of what kept it from breaking the rear end when it left. The damn car went a best of 1.51 sixty foot, and routinely went 1.55.

My car, on the other hand, would shatter rear end parts if I looked at it wrong. Half shafts, ring / pinion, outer stub axles, etc... I broke multiples of all that stuff, and I wasn't going anywhere near 1.5 short times. However, I had ditched the dual mass and my theory is that I was smacking the parts harder than jonecap because of that.

He ran an progressive nitrous controller in it for awhile, but it ended up getting turned off to bring in the whole hit at the line.
Old 09-01-2013, 05:13 PM
  #25  
neat
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
neat's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,014
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mcm95403
Great video neat - what intake is on that engine?
It's a miniram.
Old 09-01-2013, 11:38 PM
  #26  
tpi 421 vette
Melting Slicks
 
tpi 421 vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: S.L.C. UT
Posts: 3,067
Received 115 Likes on 67 Posts

Default

Nice job Josh
Old 09-06-2013, 05:44 AM
  #27  
neat
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
neat's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,014
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Thanks Jim!
Old 09-06-2013, 09:01 AM
  #28  
9T3VETTE
Drifting
 
9T3VETTE's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,412
Received 156 Likes on 109 Posts

Default

Very nice!
Old 09-06-2013, 09:54 PM
  #29  
COPO
Burning Brakes
 
COPO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Taft TN
Posts: 1,125
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

People under estimate the C4 . Thanks for sharing!!
Old 09-06-2013, 10:09 PM
  #30  
lcvette
Melting Slicks
 
lcvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 1999
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

that car was fun to watch at Fayetteville! what was it like launching on the full hit?
Old 09-08-2013, 08:09 PM
  #31  
neat
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
neat's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,014
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I sold it before running it at the track on the bottle, so I never got to mess around spraying it out of the hole on a prepped track. On the street the 315 nittos struggled to maintain traction in first gear under the extra power of nitrous; so how it feels coming out of the hole with everything set on 'kill' - I couldn't tell you. I would assume it'd be pretty righteous (it made 600 RWTQ on the gas) but who knows.

I spent a lot of time dialing in the rear suspension and alignment working on getting the car to hook. It's still one of the fastest slow speed roll cars I've ever experienced. Most stick shift cars that make any kind of power, they really struggle to get it to hook on a street tire. That car, on the motor (415 RWHP, 395 RWTQ), and on 315 nittos, wouldn't break the radials loose in first unless I started to fiddle with the clutch pedal. It was pretty neat to run it up to about 3500 in first, let all the way off the gas (causing the car to compression brake a bit, and set the passengers weight forward) and then just stand on that bastard. The throttle response was incredible, the car would hook it, and the passenger would be slammed into the seat like most people have never experienced. I had more people get wide eyed and start grabbing for panic handles in that car than anything else I've owned.

I actually split my father-in-laws head open with it. I did the thing I described above with him in the passenger seat. He is kinda tall (6'4") and bald, and when I landed on the loud pedal it bounced his head off the halo behind the seats. He had just finished telling me how fast his new Hyundai Santa Fe was...

It was a fun car for sure.

Last edited by neat; 09-08-2013 at 08:12 PM.
The following users liked this post:
yakmastermax (08-30-2023)
Old 09-08-2013, 09:18 PM
  #32  
1985 Corvette
Le Mans Master
 
1985 Corvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 5,167
Received 387 Likes on 236 Posts

Default

Neat, thanks for the video. I'm in the slow process of doing the 383 thing now (you've been there, done that). Your numbers power-wise sound like where I may end up. Mine will just be a powder puff street car, so I know it won't be scorching the quarter like yours, though I wouldn't mind doing the 11 inch ZR-1s out back.

That 2-3 shift was great, I'd be happy as hell to land one of those. I kept rewinding it to check that out alone. What type of spray setup were you running? I'd rather not say how many times I watched that LT4 video. I need to quit watching these nitrous Vette videos, I don't even have the car together and I like the idea of it. These gen 1 and 2 blocks are still alive and kicking.
Old 09-08-2013, 09:47 PM
  #33  
neat
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
neat's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,014
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I was on 9.5 inch wide sawblades, no ZR1 wheels for me. The nitto drag radials run pretty narrow, so the 315's fit a 9.5 really well.

The car was on motor in the video, no spray set up. The set up I eventually put on it was just some stuff I had laying around. I used NX solenoids, some no name bottle, and some lines from the local hydraulic hose store.



Quick Reply: My 91 Corvette goes 11.37 @ 122, video inside



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.