C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

self-aligning rocker arms vs. adjustable pushrod guides?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2017, 09:56 PM
  #1  
ryank9398
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
ryank9398's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2016
Location: Watertown South Dakota
Posts: 138
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default self-aligning rocker arms vs. adjustable pushrod guides?

I'm rebuilding my motor with AFR heads and Comp 268XFI roller. The heads came with adjustable guide plates. I previously had full roller self-aligning rocker arms in 1.6 ratio, part number 555-20145 from Jegs. I saw in the instructions that the guide plates were not compatible with self-aligning rockers. Forgive my ignorance, but why not? Pictures of mockup:






Old 10-07-2017, 11:04 PM
  #2  
383vett
Race Director
 
383vett's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Location: moraga ca
Posts: 17,570
Received 1,541 Likes on 1,042 Posts

Default

You use one or the other, not both. The guideplate might want to push the pushrod past the aligning retainer. Bad things will then happen.
The following users liked this post:
ryank9398 (10-09-2017)
Old 10-09-2017, 09:18 PM
  #3  
ryank9398
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
ryank9398's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2016
Location: Watertown South Dakota
Posts: 138
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Thanks 383Vett.
So I took the guide plates off and was able to get this marking on the pushrods. I didn't have the head torqued down. Never done this before, is my procedure correct and is this result ok?

Old 10-10-2017, 04:41 AM
  #4  
gerardvg
Melting Slicks
 
gerardvg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 3,453
Received 188 Likes on 169 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 383vett
You use one or the other, not both. The guideplate might want to push the pushrod past the aligning retainer. Bad things will then happen.


Been there done that with a previous car, had a professional engine builder put together a high performance 351 cleveland engine.
Around a week later clanking noises......... turned out he forgot you need hardened push rods with guide plates ......oil was full of shiny metal flakes.

The engine spun well over 8,500 rpm .... sounded awsome ... then after 3 months BANG a valve retainer collet's failed to do with wear and roller rocker geometry ....
Yes high RPM sounds fantastic but wear is shocking, new lesson replace collets every 2 months and pushrod length is critical.

Needless to say my 383 has forged Crank Rods and forged pistons but fairly mild camshaft running standard rockers..

There is no sweeter sound than a V8 revving to 8,500 rpm....... but i am once bitten twice shy. Am happy with a blower and low rpm hp torque , should last many many years
Old 10-10-2017, 07:13 AM
  #5  
Kubs
Le Mans Master
 
Kubs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 8,867
Received 1,741 Likes on 939 Posts
2023 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2022 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by ryank9398
Thanks 383Vett.
So I took the guide plates off and was able to get this marking on the pushrods. I didn't have the head torqued down. Never done this before, is my procedure correct and is this result ok?
What procedure did you use? Did you use a solid lifter or a really weak checker spring to make sure you're not collapsing the lifter while taking measurements? Did you measure with an adjustable pushrod?

Looks like your pushrods are a tad too long.
Old 10-10-2017, 02:03 PM
  #6  
rklessdriver
Safety Car
 
rklessdriver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Dale City VA
Posts: 3,592
Received 399 Likes on 262 Posts

Default

Normally you would want to pick either SA rockers of guide plates..... but on this combo you can actually run both with no issues....

The AFR heads with the 8mm valve stems won't positively align the SA rockers because the distance between the "guide wings" on the rocker is set up for 11/32 valves (.343) the 8mm stem (.315) this will allow the rocker to slide back and forth .028" ..... this is too much play to properly align the rocker arm and the rocker arms will come off the valve stems when actually running at higher RPM.

The normal interference that occurs when trying to use both SA rockers and guide plates won't happen because as I said there is plenty of rocker arm "wiggle room" (.028') on the valve stem so the guide plate will actually do all the aligning.
Will
The following users liked this post:
ryank9398 (11-09-2017)
Old 10-10-2017, 03:42 PM
  #7  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,986
Received 465 Likes on 368 Posts

Default

My 1987 GTA actually came from the factory with self aligning rockers arms and the pushrod guides in the cast iron heads. It worked fine since both of them were lined up correctly. the car had over 100,000 miles on it with no issue.
Old 11-09-2017, 11:01 PM
  #8  
ryank9398
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
ryank9398's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2016
Location: Watertown South Dakota
Posts: 138
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rklessdriver
Normally you would want to pick either SA rockers of guide plates..... but on this combo you can actually run both with no issues....

The AFR heads with the 8mm valve stems won't positively align the SA rockers because the distance between the "guide wings" on the rocker is set up for 11/32 valves (.343) the 8mm stem (.315) this will allow the rocker to slide back and forth .028" ..... this is too much play to properly align the rocker arm and the rocker arms will come off the valve stems when actually running at higher RPM.

The normal interference that occurs when trying to use both SA rockers and guide plates won't happen because as I said there is plenty of rocker arm "wiggle room" (.028') on the valve stem so the guide plate will actually do all the aligning.
Will
Thank you very much, this makes sense to me. I have been setting this up with a bunch of feeler gauges, trying to set lash with clearance between the valve stem and the pushrod guides.

By the way, what do you think of my rocker geometry/pushrod length?
Old 11-10-2017, 06:43 PM
  #9  
rklessdriver
Safety Car
 
rklessdriver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Dale City VA
Posts: 3,592
Received 399 Likes on 262 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ryank9398
Thank you very much, this makes sense to me. I have been setting this up with a bunch of feeler gauges, trying to set lash with clearance between the valve stem and the pushrod guides.

By the way, what do you think of my rocker geometry/pushrod length?
Your pattern on the valve stem looks fine. However, the pushrod measurement you end up with will be too long because the valve springs will bottom the hyd lifter out when checking and when the engine is actually running the lifter plunger will rise and move the rocker to a point further towards the exhaust side of the valve tip as well increasing the width of the pattern.

You need to figure out how much the lifter plunger is collasping and subtract that from your pushrod measurement.

Or redo the pattern with light checker springs... or take an old lifter, dissasemble the plunger assembly and shim it upunder the cup to act as a soild lifter.

Will

Get notified of new replies

To self-aligning rocker arms vs. adjustable pushrod guides?




Quick Reply: self-aligning rocker arms vs. adjustable pushrod guides?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 AM.