When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Does anything here mess around with tuning? I have been messing around with my 95 via Tunercat to get more engine braking, but haven't quite got it where I want. Looking for suggestions. Thanks!
Last edited by Ranger72; Feb 21, 2023 at 10:58 PM.
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
Probably an obscure question. Back in 2010, I looked at this. It's been a long time ago but I'm thinking I decided to leave it alone. If your 95 idle is controlled with an IAC, there may/may not be an issue running it above idle RPM w/o fuel supply. Put another way, letting the ECM control idle and fuel (without robbing it of fuel) didn't accomplish much (MPG) and, in turn, didn't warrant a big enough reason to change what GM intended.....possibly with sudden stop/accel back-to-back? Though I also thought there were good reasons to use it. After all, why put it in there as a manageable parm?
IIRC, it might also be I abandoned it because my new 383 engine had zero popping -- much better than stock. This (and other reasons) led me to believe fuel control was coded reasonable close. (He says KNOWING it's a bit rich...LOL)
Google DFCO (decel fuel cut off). If you don't find advice that way (or here), try on 3rd gen too.
I used tuner cat too but didn't change dfco. I do remember turning it off to see what coasting was like. A thought would be to enable it higher speed but that may cause more issues that it's worth.
Engine braking is mostly due to throttling. You can close the IAC faster (increase the throttle following slope/gain) and reduce the min throttle opening so that it will barely idle. DFCO does help a bit, but it is only a minor influence.