Billet Dynaspark Distributor Status>>>
Thank you all for your input...
Regards and God Bless,
Phil Rickard, President
Dynotech Engineering, Inc.
Thank you all for your input...
Regards and God Bless,
Phil Rickard, President
Dynotech Engineering, Inc.
We hope you get the picture. Your product is in demand at least from our group. Keep us informed as you progress in the opti upgrading.
I'm quite an advocate of getting the high voltage out of the Opti-Spark. That's why number 3 is of great interest to me.
My suggestions on a model like this one with a coil for each plug:
1) Since it would not have a high-voltage section, you do not need the large diameter of the OEM Opt-Spark -- it is needed on the OEM style with the high voltage inside for separation distance to adjacent high-voltage components.
Make it just big enough for the Optical sensor part. It might be feasable to make it small enough to take off the engine without pulling the dampener and water pump.
2) Use a completely sealed unit with no rubber seals and/or gaskets of any kind, maybe even Hall-effect sensor couple from the camshaft to eliminate that seal-- it would be throw away when it fails, there would be no way for moisture to enter it.
As an added note: for one similar to a OEM type with the high-voltage inside, it might be possible to use a slight positive pressure inside temporarily when hosing down the engine to prevent water from entering -- the owner would have to connect a small pump to it to keep the water out.
I put sealer around my OEM Opti-Spark. Just before I wash down my engine, I pull a slight vacuum on the Opti-Spark with a hand vacuum pump while plugging the hose, where the air enters the Opti-Spark from the air cleaner snorkle, with a vacuum gauge. I watch to see how long the vacuum lasts after pumping the hand-pump. I figure, if air can't get in, moisture can't either. I have never had a problem when it can maintain a vacuum.
Tom Piper
original OE equipped, non-vented dist. applications. Shares all of the
refinements, improvements and components of the Gen II design. Production
pending outcome of results from this contact.
I am going to keep watching and make the decsion about Option 1 when the time comes.
The other thing that would help is some kind of agreement with local installers about warranty. The GM Opti comes with a warranty of some kind (not sure what) that covers install as part of the package. If you could set up some local installers that would honor a 3 year warranty, parts and labor, I bet the sales would pick up.




The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I'm leaning on having the new sealed opti acting like a crank trigger sensor with coils.
Your products and theories seem admirable. The C4 market NEEDS an alternative to the opti-spark. All car guys are interested in a higher output, hotter distributor thats also waterproof, performs worth the money, and looks good while adding to our confidence. If I was in need (and will probably soon be) of a new distributor sytem, I would definatly buy your product, no doubt about it.
How about a monthly payment plan in order to make this easier for us. After all, this is the C4 forum. Most of us are middle class car guys who make each purchasining decision carefully and tactfuly. Work with us and we will work with you.
:cheers:




I'd buy it but for $500........man.....that's still steep......not crying but think of all the beers that could buy....... :jester
Kitt
It looks to me like every failure mode in the original design has been addressed in the Dynaspark. When my "early" OEM Optispark fails (again)and I spend many hours removing it & it's priced under say $700...assuming they're sold, I will buy & install your well-designed product. It beats the OEM hands down. Peace of mind and less frequent repairs & labor are worth a lot to me. Personally, I do not wish to alter my car to accept multiple coilpacks....but I can see how those with serious mods or blowers would want it. Such a design may not be legal for stock class racing...a hobby of many LT1/4 enthusiasts. I feel your original design is major overkill for normally-aspirated applications under 450 HP. I am confident it addresses the fundamental weakness of the LT series motors. My only negative comment is.......the anodizing. Hey, the Optispark is hidden. If it costs 50 cents extra for plating, no thanks. As you noticed, others see it as fluff...which takes away from the unit's overall reputation. It solicits negative feedback from those who believe form follows function. I think the only folks who notice anodizing will be fellow racers going over your car with a fine tooth comb in "tech", when they file & win a protest for illegal upgrade/mod.
I feel the Gen I Dynaspark will sell like hotcakes, compared to Gen II. The OEM Gen I failure rate is much higher. Very few folks are willing to retrofit Gen II to a Gen I car, so they go with OEM (again and again and again...).
I would not expect significant demand for the multi-coil solutions. Those willing to convert a Gen I car to Gen II for reliability may buy them, but IMHO, that group is small.
I hope you can continue to support all LT1 and LT4 cars with at least one solution. Optispark, coilpack setup, whatever.
[Modified by Rick93Z07, 4:26 PM 5/29/2003]
Were can I get more info, what I would need to install and the 'how to install'?
:confused:
I didn't know anything about this product until now. How do I get more info, what I need for installation and the 'how to hook up' details?
:confused:




















