View Poll Results: Mast or PRC
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll
Head Choice
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Point Pleasant wv
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Head Choice
I'm getting ready to order my heads but I am having a hard time choosing heads.I like the Mast 305 LS7 heads but they flow 388 . I also have been looking at PRC LS7 285cc they flow 415. Help me choose!
#2
ISIS SUCKS FAT CHOAD
Just curious what kind of power are you after? What are these heads going on?
#4
Tech Contributor
My recommendation: Don't get too caught up with flow #'s.
Flow benches are different. Even using the same bench, many people are guilty of only looking at the highest lift #'s. Sometimes even #'s that aren't achieved with the cam being used. Look at the #'s across the board. Regardless, the MAST heads are top notch and unparalleled in my book.
Flow benches are different. Even using the same bench, many people are guilty of only looking at the highest lift #'s. Sometimes even #'s that aren't achieved with the cam being used. Look at the #'s across the board. Regardless, the MAST heads are top notch and unparalleled in my book.
#5
Melting Slicks
With the money spent on ERL Superdeck, top it off with the MAST heads. They are some of the absolute best LSx heads available, might actually be the best... lol
#6
ISIS SUCKS FAT CHOAD
AGreed with both.
As bret said, to hell with peak flow numbers. Hell, some manufacturers will give u flow numbers at 1.000. (just a marketing thing)
Also mast heads are probably the best out there so if u can afford em and u already have the engine combo u have then go for it.
As bret said, to hell with peak flow numbers. Hell, some manufacturers will give u flow numbers at 1.000. (just a marketing thing)
Also mast heads are probably the best out there so if u can afford em and u already have the engine combo u have then go for it.
Last edited by MVP'S ZO6; 11-02-2011 at 11:59 PM.
#8
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Point Pleasant wv
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My current setup I have 15lb plus max out the gauge with the biggest pulley I can run.(4.730) I'm going back to a 4.00, so it should be around 20lb.
#9
ISIS SUCKS FAT CHOAD
Also, how are you calculating your approximate boost level? Reason I'm asking is because if your guessing based on your old engine and the current pully size, your going to be off on your boost numbers because of the larger engine Ect.
Last edited by MVP'S ZO6; 11-03-2011 at 02:48 PM.
#10
jobberone
At 20 lbs you will be fine with the MAST heads 4 bolt pattern. Just use a good gasket and overtorque 4-5 lbs at most. You may see less boost pressure with the MAST heads but increased flow and HP.
#11
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
#12
CF Senior Moments Member
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Oklahoma City Oklahoma
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
What is your static compression ratio going to be and what are your cam specs?
Also, how are you calculating your approximate boost level? Reason I'm asking is because if your guessing based on your old engine and the current pully size, your going to be off on your boost numbers because of the larger engine Ect.
Also, how are you calculating your approximate boost level? Reason I'm asking is because if your guessing based on your old engine and the current pully size, your going to be off on your boost numbers because of the larger engine Ect.
Mine went from 12.5 on a stock LS1 to around 6 -7 on a forged 402 !!
#13
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Point Pleasant wv
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lower boost would be better for me! Yes just estimating boost. Compression will be 9.6. Cam specs are Ragin Racin V2Blower cam 232/256 114 .660/.660.
#16
ISIS SUCKS FAT CHOAD
She's gonna idle like a pro stocker with that cam. Should pull like a freight train though. What lobe are you using? Is there any advance ground into the cam? If so, how much?
Another question (cylinder head choice pending of course) did any one calculate how much Vacuum your engine will have with that cam? Also, your probably not going to make 1,000 with that blower pully.
Another question (cylinder head choice pending of course) did any one calculate how much Vacuum your engine will have with that cam? Also, your probably not going to make 1,000 with that blower pully.
#18
Le Mans Master
#19
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Point Pleasant wv
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
She's gonna idle like a pro stocker with that cam. Should pull like a freight train though. What lobe are you using? Is there any advance ground into the cam? If so, how much?
Another question (cylinder head choice pending of course) did any one calculate how much Vacuum your engine will have with that cam? Also, your probably not going to make 1,000 with that blower pully.
Another question (cylinder head choice pending of course) did any one calculate how much Vacuum your engine will have with that cam? Also, your probably not going to make 1,000 with that blower pully.
#20
jobberone
That cam is on the edge for hyd use although people do it. You may have some vacuum issues with that small a motor for that cam. You may consider speaking to some aftermarket lifter guys about using the LS7 lifters with it.
I think you can make the power you want with a much smaller cam, lessen the need for bigger springs, lighten the load on the valvetrain, not have vacuum issues, idle easier and have less driveability problems.
I think you can make the power you want with a much smaller cam, lessen the need for bigger springs, lighten the load on the valvetrain, not have vacuum issues, idle easier and have less driveability problems.