C5 Forced Induction/Nitrous C5 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Centrifugal, Twin Screw & Roots Blowers, Twin Turbo Kits, Intercoolers, Wet & Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Flex fuel on the C5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2017, 01:03 PM
  #61  
Milan
Safety Car
 
Milan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,702
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5 Liter Eater
The purpose of this thread is to discuss retrofitting a C5 with another compatible PCM with the flex fuel tables and setting up the tables to do just that; determine the ethanol content and alter stoich to in-tern alter fueling based on the content. Also to add or remove timing based on ethanol content.

Sure an aftermarket system with closed loop WOT is better but there are plenty of gen4 PCM guys making tons of power on varying levels of corn and the PCM adjusts fuel and timing based on the ethanol content in closed loop or open loop. Granted it's not correcting fueling at WOT in open loop but it knows the ethanol content and it knows how to adjust the fuel so if you're commanding .8 lambda you get it on pump or corn or anywhere in between. I haven't seen mine differ much. EG if I dial my tune in on 93 and then run the same boost on corn I don't have to alter my VE.
LOL bro did you even read the first post?

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it should be or it's the optimal way. The factory PCM is great for the average supercharged car but with the standalone options out there now I don't see the purpose of keeping the stock ECU for anything but gauges when approaching something like this.

OP already has a Halltech, 99% sure Bret makes a PnP harness for it...I have no clue why people in here are harping on the getting flex fuel to work with the factory PCM when there is a proven solution out there that is a million times better. I have no clue what his prices are but in the grand scheme of making power I'm sure it's pretty affordable....
Old 07-13-2017, 05:42 AM
  #62  
Rkreigh
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Rkreigh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, USA VA
Posts: 9,777
Received 707 Likes on 543 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Milan
LOL bro did you even read the first post?

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it should be or it's the optimal way. The factory PCM is great for the average supercharged car but with the standalone options out there now I don't see the purpose of keeping the stock ECU for anything but gauges when approaching something like this.

OP already has a Halltech, 99% sure Bret makes a PnP harness for it...I have no clue why people in here are harping on the getting flex fuel to work with the factory PCM when there is a proven solution out there that is a million times better. I have no clue what his prices are but in the grand scheme of making power I'm sure it's pretty affordable....
you are absolutely right but let me tell you where the interest lies. As the OEM ecms get more sophisticated they start to "sneak up" on the capability of the Haltech S2000 at a lower price point and I don't want to spend 4k every time I build a car. In this case I've got a sunk cost so I'm for sure going to use the Haltech, but as the OEM system could be upgraded to do things like

tranny control (already there, and programmable, missing from haltech)

dual wide bands (with more sophistication I'd love to see an OS that could do true wide band fuel corrections, a big plus on the aftermarket stuff)

flex fuel (already there)

so if I could somehow "bridge the gap" and get more out of the OEM solution it sure looks good.

the Haltech stuff is top shelf, but it also broke the bank a bit as well.

thanks for the feedback! It's a viable option to take a more modern ECM and "backdate it" into the C5 architecture and make everything work. Shucks, will all the complexity of this stuff I see some folks just piggy back a whole separate fuel system and set of injectors and another dedicated ECM (could be stock) to run pure alchy with another pump

since the c5 fuel system is such a pain, this seems to be a cool approach.

this is something I'm also interested in learning more about for the newer direct injection engines (I have a sky redline and hope to have a c7 or 8 someday) as this helps the direct injection cars that have maxed out the fuel systems. I'm interested in tuning when you "layer" a standalone ECM and injectors on top of the factory system

folks in fla built a cool turbo c7 on the z06 platform where they used a standalone haltech and additional 8 injectors on a custom intake to provide fueling under boost and they used pure meth

seems to me best of both worlds and easier to fit into the corvette design. OEM tuning with wide band and direct injection alchy under wide band control for fuel under boost

complicated I know, but indulge me
Old 07-13-2017, 03:34 PM
  #63  
Milan
Safety Car
 
Milan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,702
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rkreigh
you are absolutely right but let me tell you where the interest lies. As the OEM ecms get more sophisticated they start to "sneak up" on the capability of the Haltech S2000 at a lower price point and I don't want to spend 4k every time I build a car. In this case I've got a sunk cost so I'm for sure going to use the Haltech, but as the OEM system could be upgraded to do things like

tranny control (already there, and programmable, missing from haltech)

dual wide bands (with more sophistication I'd love to see an OS that could do true wide band fuel corrections, a big plus on the aftermarket stuff)

flex fuel (already there)

so if I could somehow "bridge the gap" and get more out of the OEM solution it sure looks good.

the Haltech stuff is top shelf, but it also broke the bank a bit as well.

thanks for the feedback! It's a viable option to take a more modern ECM and "backdate it" into the C5 architecture and make everything work. Shucks, will all the complexity of this stuff I see some folks just piggy back a whole separate fuel system and set of injectors and another dedicated ECM (could be stock) to run pure alchy with another pump

since the c5 fuel system is such a pain, this seems to be a cool approach.

this is something I'm also interested in learning more about for the newer direct injection engines (I have a sky redline and hope to have a c7 or 8 someday) as this helps the direct injection cars that have maxed out the fuel systems. I'm interested in tuning when you "layer" a standalone ECM and injectors on top of the factory system

folks in fla built a cool turbo c7 on the z06 platform where they used a standalone haltech and additional 8 injectors on a custom intake to provide fueling under boost and they used pure meth

seems to me best of both worlds and easier to fit into the corvette design. OEM tuning with wide band and direct injection alchy under wide band control for fuel under boost

complicated I know, but indulge me
Even on the C7 the GM stuff is pretty far behind what other OEMs are doing. I've built a couple single turbo 335's and the N54 ECU from 07 is a lot faster and has much more functionality than what the C7 has.

With that said, standalone is still superior to anything an OEM ECU is going to offer you. The BMW N54/N55 platform is also direct injected and facing many of the same challenges that the C7 guys are currently facing. IMO, there is no good way to make power on the DI engines. Everything that's out there right now is a bandaid, and you are either shortening the life of your HPFP, or having to do/add port injection which faces it's own draw backs.

Personally, I don't think DI will truly catch on, at least not for performance vehicles. OEMs are being forced into producing cars with it because of CAFE laws, but I think all the reliability issues with it will just force a move into electric cars sooner rather than later. That's why I don't think there will ever be a better car made then the C6 ZR1....
Old 07-13-2017, 05:05 PM
  #64  
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
 
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 8,472
Received 38 Likes on 32 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11

Default

Bro I did. The thread is about adding flex fuel capability to a C5 and it was said there was another 3rd gen PCM that could work with a C5 with some rewiring that has flex fuel tables. Obvi an aftermarket ECU is more capable but if the OP just wants flex fuel it can be done either way, and Halltech has it's own "quirks".

There's nothing wrong with flex fuel on a factory PCM that supports it. It's going to change fuel and spark based on the ethanol content based on the appropriate tables just like an aftermarket ECU would, it's just not going to do closed loop WOT. Now if your argument is that the amount of work to get it working on a C5 with a different 3rd gen PCM is a similar level of effort to installing an aftermarket ECU, so why bother, then I agree.

Originally Posted by Milan
LOL bro did you even read the first post?

Just because it can be done doesn't mean it should be or it's the optimal way. The factory PCM is great for the average supercharged car but with the standalone options out there now I don't see the purpose of keeping the stock ECU for anything but gauges when approaching something like this.

OP already has a Halltech, 99% sure Bret makes a PnP harness for it...I have no clue why people in here are harping on the getting flex fuel to work with the factory PCM when there is a proven solution out there that is a million times better. I have no clue what his prices are but in the grand scheme of making power I'm sure it's pretty affordable....
Old 07-13-2017, 05:51 PM
  #65  
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
 
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 8,472
Received 38 Likes on 32 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11

Default

Originally Posted by Milan
That's why I don't think there will ever be a better car made then the C6 ZR1....
Old 07-14-2017, 10:52 AM
  #66  
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
 
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 8,472
Received 38 Likes on 32 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11

Default

IMO, there is no good way to make power on the DI engines.
The only issue (aside from carbon buildup) with DI is that no one makes larger DI injectors and even DI pump upgrades are hard to come by. So power is limited without adding a secondary injection system. But you're saying you'd rather own a C6 because you can throw huge injectors in it to hit a power goal rather than own, say, a Procharged C7Z because you'd have to add a secondary injection system to meet that same goal? Big power GTR's have an extra set of injectors (most also running on corn) and later model (~'12+) UR Lambos and R8's are DI and use secondary injectors in the intake plenum. Granted these are using aftermarket ECU's to accomplish this, and we know you're a fan of aftermarket ECU's so why not like DI for big power? DI affords more timing and leaner mixture. It's more efficient than spraying fuel onto an intake valve. It's a good thing.

Last edited by 5 Liter Eater; 07-14-2017 at 10:53 AM.
Old 07-14-2017, 11:14 AM
  #67  
Milan
Safety Car
 
Milan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,702
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5 Liter Eater
The only issue (aside from carbon buildup) with DI is that no one makes larger DI injectors and even DI pump upgrades are hard to come by. So power is limited without adding a secondary injection system. But you're saying you'd rather own a C6 because you can throw huge injectors in it to hit a power goal rather than own, say, a Procharged C7Z because you'd have to add a secondary injection system to meet that same goal? Big power GTR's have an extra set of injectors (most also running on corn) and later model (~'12+) UR Lambos and R8's are DI and use secondary injectors in the intake plenum. Granted these are using aftermarket ECU's to accomplish this, and we know you're a fan of aftermarket ECU's so why not like DI for big power? DI affords more timing and leaner mixture. It's more efficient than spraying fuel onto an intake valve. It's a good thing.
You are only saying that because you haven't built a big power DI car. Do you know anyone with a Lambo and/or R8? If you do then you know how "reliable" they are. People see the videos of them on 1320video and think that they are doing pulls 24/7 and not having any issues, it's not the case.

Your argument is weak because when you port inject a DI car, it's no longer a DI car. So your "more timing and leaner mixtures" thing goes out the window. Furthermore, a DI cylinder head isn't designed to have fuel sprayed into it, and most of the ones making a ton of power get to the point where there is more fueling coming from the secondary injection then the actual direct injection.

Can you tell me which aftermarket ECU is being used to control DI engines in a standalone setting?
Old 07-14-2017, 12:20 PM
  #68  
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
 
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 8,472
Received 38 Likes on 32 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11

Default

Yes I personally know (EG: hang out with, have on my phone, go to meets and races with) more people with >1500 HP GTR's, Lambos/R8's, Vipers and Porsches than I can count on both hands. And I myself own a TT R8 albeit only making 750 on stock ECUs. What's your point? Big power cars break, fact. It has nothing to do with DI or corn or what PCM they're using.
You're right RE: secondarily injecting a DI motor. Can't really call it DI anymore, and it's not designed for it, which is akin to people spraying meth through an LS intake and tuning it on meth so it's effectively being used as a fuel.

UR/Calvo/DP all use Motec, and Prospeed (formerly D3) is even migrating from ProEFI to Motec. Some lesser known shops use Syvecs.

Last edited by 5 Liter Eater; 07-14-2017 at 12:20 PM.
Old 07-14-2017, 12:29 PM
  #69  
Milan
Safety Car
 
Milan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,702
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5 Liter Eater
UR/Calvo/DP all use Motec, and Prospeed (formerly D3) is even migrating from ProEFI to Motec. Some lesser known shops use Syvecs.
So Pro EFI/Motec/Etc. is controlling EVERYTHING on the R8/Lambo? Or is it just controlling the secondary injection?
Old 07-14-2017, 01:13 PM
  #70  
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
 
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 8,472
Received 38 Likes on 32 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11

Default

RE: Motec/Syvecs - Everything, down to the DCT trans.

Last edited by 5 Liter Eater; 07-14-2017 at 01:14 PM.
Old 07-21-2017, 05:48 AM
  #71  
Rkreigh
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Rkreigh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, USA VA
Posts: 9,777
Received 707 Likes on 543 Posts

Default

I'd like to understand the draw backs better of putting another computer and additional injectors on top of the DI factory ecm?

seems like it's the way to go other than the funky piston tops and fuel distribution issues that will cause. (no bueno)

the ideal scenario is just bigger DI injectors and pumps but right now they are made out of unobtanium

back to the c5, what after market ecm integrates with the c5 best?

the holley dominator seems to be more popular and controls the auto tranny.

I'd also like to know if anyone up here on the east coast (hint ECS) is willing to install the haltech s2000 on the c5 without breaking the bank!

like to hear more about adding additional injectors and tuning for that with a factory ecm plus the additional standalone adding fuel with a wide band controller.

tell me more about this approach, up and down sides!! thx
Old 07-21-2017, 04:21 PM
  #72  
5 Liter Eater
Le Mans Master
 
5 Liter Eater's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 8,472
Received 38 Likes on 32 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11

Default

As mentioned it's spraying fuel through an intake that wasn't designed to. Although in the case of the UR V10's the injectors are inside the plenum so it's not having to negotiate through most of the intake. I'm not sure this is the case with the C7's that get additional injection. For a C5/C6 it's totally unnecessary as you can install >=2k injectors in the stock location and, with some scaling, even control them with the stock PCM, or use an aftermarket PCM.
Old 10-02-2017, 07:22 AM
  #73  
Rkreigh
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Rkreigh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, USA VA
Posts: 9,777
Received 707 Likes on 543 Posts

Default

OK, I'm convinced that the Haltech S2000 is the way to go and now I'm focused on seeing if Brett has support for the wiring harness

that would be great!

I have a fresh short block ready to go and now is the time to start to get ready for spring!

Thanks for the advice

I'm also interested in upgrading the fuel system. I'm looking at a bosch 450 intank, and another magnafuel external commanded by the Hatech to take care of the fueling

I'm using FIC 127 bosch injectors, and plan on plumbing direct port alchy with the haltech controlling the pump pressure and actifvation
with the amp box on a channel

also working on a turbo system upgrade at the same time with 6 bolt heads. should be fun.
Old 10-05-2017, 11:53 PM
  #74  
LTstewy8
Racer
 
LTstewy8's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rkreigh
OK, I'm convinced that the Haltech S2000 is the way to go and now I'm focused on seeing if Brett has support for the wiring harness

that would be great!

I have a fresh short block ready to go and now is the time to start to get ready for spring!

Thanks for the advice

I'm also interested in upgrading the fuel system. I'm looking at a bosch 450 intank, and another magnafuel external commanded by the Hatech to take care of the fueling

I'm using FIC 127 bosch injectors, and plan on plumbing direct port alchy with the haltech controlling the pump pressure and actifvation
with the amp box on a channel

also working on a turbo system upgrade at the same time with 6 bolt heads. should be fun.
When you talk to Bret about the haltech, ask him about his multiple Walbro 450 pump setups.
Old 10-06-2017, 05:18 AM
  #75  
Rkreigh
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Rkreigh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, USA VA
Posts: 9,777
Received 707 Likes on 543 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LTstewy8
When you talk to Bret about the haltech, ask him about his multiple Walbro 450 pump setups.
good tip maybe I need to do a road trip

this thing will need some fuel!!
Old 10-07-2017, 08:55 AM
  #76  
BLOWNBLUEZ06
Tech Contributor
 
BLOWNBLUEZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Forney Texas
Posts: 10,911
Received 69 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rkreigh
OK, I'm convinced that the Haltech S2000 is the way to go and now I'm focused on seeing if Brett has support for the wiring harness

that would be great!

I have a fresh short block ready to go and now is the time to start to get ready for spring!

Thanks for the advice

I'm also interested in upgrading the fuel system. I'm looking at a bosch 450 intank, and another magnafuel external commanded by the Hatech to take care of the fueling

I'm using FIC 127 bosch injectors, and plan on plumbing direct port alchy with the haltech controlling the pump pressure and actifvation
with the amp box on a channel

also working on a turbo system upgrade at the same time with 6 bolt heads. should be fun.
Nobody makes a true plug and play C5 setup because the PCM plug manufacturer either doesn't exist or doesn't offer them. Many have tried to pursue getting plugs done with no good result. It seems to be cost prohibitive. My method allows you to jump over to your aftermarket ECU and jump back in a relatively short period of time if you want or need to for any reason. It's time consuming, but it works well. I also have a front wheel speed sensor kit that I make for C5's and C6's that's needed for traction control strategies to work best.

Old 10-08-2017, 08:28 PM
  #77  
Podium
Burning Brakes
 
Podium's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 979
Received 101 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLOWNBLUEZ06
Nobody makes a true plug and play C5 setup because the PCM plug manufacturer either doesn't exist or doesn't offer them. Many have tried to pursue getting plugs done with no good result. It seems to be cost prohibitive. My method allows you to jump over to your aftermarket ECU and jump back in a relatively short period of time if you want or need to for any reason. It's time consuming, but it works well. I also have a front wheel speed sensor kit that I make for C5's and C6's that's needed for traction control strategies to work best.

What do you mean 'jump back and forth"? Just wondering. Also, can you not use the abs signal for traction control? I may have to give you a call on heltch st up and pricing.

Get notified of new replies

To Flex fuel on the C5

Old 10-08-2017, 10:52 PM
  #78  
BLOWNBLUEZ06
Tech Contributor
 
BLOWNBLUEZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Forney Texas
Posts: 10,911
Received 69 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Podium
What do you mean 'jump back and forth"? Just wondering. Also, can you not use the ABS signal for traction control? I may have to give you a call on Haltech set up and pricing.
I often prefer to set "stand alone" EFI ECU's up in a way where they can be reverted back to allow the stock PCM to operate the car in a relatively easy way. It takes extra time, but some car owners consider it worthwhile.

While playing with the C5's electronics, I quickly figured out how to tap into the factory wheel speed sensor, but tapping into it while allowing it to remain a part of the factory ABS didn't come so easily and I chose not to invest the time because I already had a good idea in place for an independent sensor. Besides, the last thing I want to do is have someone expect me to accept full liability for interfering with the factory ABS system after they have a bad day with their car.

I have sold systems to people that had no real experience with wiring and zero experience with tuning. The difference between me and the rest is typically the fact that I support my sales with unparalleled support, spending hours on the phone. I also include all the little tools and parts to help create the best chance for success. Believe it or not, I prefer to sell less so that I'm able to support customers completely.

Let me know if I can help.

Old 10-09-2017, 01:23 AM
  #79  
Podium
Burning Brakes
 
Podium's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 979
Received 101 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLOWNBLUEZ06
I often prefer to set "stand alone" EFI ECU's up in a way where they can be reverted back to allow the stock PCM to operate the car in a relatively easy way. It takes extra time, but some car owners consider it worthwhile.

While playing with the C5's electronics, I quickly figured out how to tap into the factory wheel speed sensor, but tapping into it while allowing it to remain a part of the factory ABS didn't come so easily and I chose not to invest the time because I already had a good idea in place for an independent sensor. Besides, the last thing I want to do is have someone expect me to accept full liability for interfering with the factory ABS system after they have a bad day with their car.

I have sold systems to people that had no real experience with wiring and zero experience with tuning. The difference between me and the rest is typically the fact that I support my sales with unparalleled support, spending hours on the phone. I also include all the little tools and parts to help create the best chance for success. Believe it or not, I prefer to sell less so that I'm able to support customers completely.

Let me know if I can help.


Thanks for the break down. My biggest things is getting a standalone and keeping the factory gauges. I will be in touch for sure!
Old 11-21-2017, 05:11 PM
  #80  
hodge9386
Instructor
 
hodge9386's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2014
Posts: 246
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TTBlueZ06
first of all you need an 04 express van pcm "p59" with any of these serv number and hardware no.

2004: Serv. No. 12586243 with Hwd. No. 12583659
2005-2006: Serv. No. 12589462 with Hwd. No. 12589161
2007: Serv. No. 12602801 with Hwd. No. 12589161

since you arent converting to a cable throttle body (i presume) then all you need to do now is get a tune for your setup and to get the flex fuel sensor and to pin it to the computer. If you are going to use the oil pressure switch and oxygen sensors then you need to do the following :
"If you have a RED/BLUE connector PCM, you CAN use this pcm on a 03+ harness (GREEN/BLUE connector) with cable throttle, with a few simple modifications. The only thing that needs changed, other then what was talked about above, is some of the oxygen sensor wiring. On the 2003+ blue/green connector PCM's, the PCM supplies a GROUND for the oxygen sensor heater's, and 12v+ comes from the fuse block. In the 99-02, power and ground is fed directly to the o2 sensor heaters. To make the changes needed to 2003+ blue/green harness, to work with a blue/red computer is this:

REMOVE: BLUE PCM connector pins: 24,27,64,67. These should all be black with white stripes. These were extra ground wires provided to the 03+ pcm so it could control ground to the o2 heaters. The 99-02 pcm does not need these. Just pull the pins out, don't cut anything yet, we need to hook these to a few other wires we pull out of the PCM connectors.

Next we need to remove the wires from the PCM connector that go to the oxygen sensor heater control. There are 4 wires, one for each oxygen sensor. If you are only using front oxygen sensors in you conversion, omit anything to do with Sensor 2.

Bank 1 Sensor 1 - BLACK/WHITE - GREEN connector pin 72

Bank 1 Sensor 2 - BROWN - GREEN connector pin 52 - after CAT o2 sensor

Bank 2 Sensor 1 - LT GREEN - GREEN connector pin 74

Bank 2 Sensor 2 - RED/WHITE - GREEN connector pin 53 - after CAT o2 sensor

Now, you should have 4 ground wires, and 2 (or 4) oxygen sensor heater control wires pulled from the PCM connectors.

You need to locate the 4 tan oxygen sensor low reference wires going into the BLUE pcm connector. If just using front o2 sensors, its BLUE pins 26 and 29. If also using rear o2 sensors, add pins 25 and 28. These wires will always be TAN and may have a white stripe. The easiest way I can think of to splice into these, is pull the pin out (REMEMBER WHERE IT GOES BACK) remove some insulation with a knife, solider on a wire, and slip some heat shrink up and past the terminal and shrink the heat shrink down over the splice. Then reinstall the pin in its original location. Leave about 12" of wire loose for each wire you splice into. Do this for all the o2 sensors you will be using.

So at this point. You should have 4 black/white ground wires loose. 2 to 4 oxygen sensor heater control wires loose, and 2 to 4 wires going to each of the TAN wires. All of these wires need hooked together in a big splice pack. First get some larger heat shrink, 1/4 or 5/16 should work. Put about 4 inch long piece of heat shrink over all 4 ground wires. Next strip off about 1-2 inches of insulation off all your wires. Start hooking them together end to end, you should be able to solider all these together, and slip the heat shrink over when done.

The last step, is to make the connectors fit inside the PCM. This will require cutting the rib off the GREEN plastic terminal cover, so it will fit in the RED pcm socket.

You will need to use oxygen sensors for a 2002 chevy truck, 5.3L, will be a white plastic connector, and will plug right into the 03+ harness without changing plugs."


You will need a FF sensor and this pigtail connector

you will need to plumb this sensor in the return line to prevent any restriction as its a 3/8" diameter orifice.

once plumbed, the wiring will need to be plugged in the sensor and the other end will be cut off.

wire A will go in pin 56 in the BLUE connector in your computer.

wire B (the middle one) goes to a switched power source.

Wire c goes to just any ground.

The rest you will need your tuner to activate the sensor and populate the flex fuel tables. After you have done this, your tuner should be able to work out the kinks and all that good stuff, you should have flex fuel capability, 3 bar, and fueling and timing on the fly.

So this is good info but im a little confused. The op was talking about taking a car with a red/blue harness and pcm and converting to use a blue/green pcm and wanting to know what needed to be changed to do so. Did you just get the red/blue green/blue thing confused when typing this or do we just need to work backwards off this to put a blue/green pcm in our cars?


Quick Reply: Flex fuel on the C5



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 AM.