Crashes caused by EBCM failure?
#41
Drifting
OK, read most of this and I have some questions.
1 - What were the road conditions? This time of year can be quite slippery especially with a 400HP car with (I assume) summer tires.
2 - As soon as he "Enabled TC or AH"? TC and AH are enabled by default. You need to disable it even to enter Comp mode. Did he disable it? Then stomp on the gas in 4th gear? That would prevent TC to save the rear from coming around which is what happens when the wheels break loose. Many people disable TC/AH to experience the full power of the car.
3 - Never heard any similar issue on this forum. I've seen complaints of the EBCM faults, but none relating to crashes. As indicated if the system detects any sensor faults it will disable TC/AH AND in most cases ABS as well.
4 - The Black Box (Airbag Control Module) will store data prior to the airbags deploying. It will provide information that should confirm that the EBCM was operating erroneously as well as what the driver inputs were.
Just because witnesses saw him traveling at ~ 70 MPH does not mean they can say whether there was a sudden throttle increase that resulted in the car breaking it's rear end as they wouldn't have seen him accelerate. Many experienced driver's on this forum have reported that is what happens when they disable AH/TC and decide (while moving) to open it up a bit. The back end swung around before they knew what hit them and they ended up down a ditch. I can't say this is what happened to your friend but it would one of my lines of investigation unless there was clear evidence of a mechanical or systems failure.
1 - What were the road conditions? This time of year can be quite slippery especially with a 400HP car with (I assume) summer tires.
2 - As soon as he "Enabled TC or AH"? TC and AH are enabled by default. You need to disable it even to enter Comp mode. Did he disable it? Then stomp on the gas in 4th gear? That would prevent TC to save the rear from coming around which is what happens when the wheels break loose. Many people disable TC/AH to experience the full power of the car.
3 - Never heard any similar issue on this forum. I've seen complaints of the EBCM faults, but none relating to crashes. As indicated if the system detects any sensor faults it will disable TC/AH AND in most cases ABS as well.
4 - The Black Box (Airbag Control Module) will store data prior to the airbags deploying. It will provide information that should confirm that the EBCM was operating erroneously as well as what the driver inputs were.
Just because witnesses saw him traveling at ~ 70 MPH does not mean they can say whether there was a sudden throttle increase that resulted in the car breaking it's rear end as they wouldn't have seen him accelerate. Many experienced driver's on this forum have reported that is what happens when they disable AH/TC and decide (while moving) to open it up a bit. The back end swung around before they knew what hit them and they ended up down a ditch. I can't say this is what happened to your friend but it would one of my lines of investigation unless there was clear evidence of a mechanical or systems failure.
Last edited by JC in XTC5; 12-06-2006 at 12:19 AM.
#42
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: PNW Cougar Country WA
Posts: 3,341
Received 459 Likes
on
324 Posts
2021 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
C6 of Year Finalist (stock) 2019
I don't see how anyone can expect to solve a question(s) or problem(s) like this here on the Forum. If your friend thinks he has a case tell him to hire an attorney who can find an automotive expert to support what "he" thinks happened. At some point that's what he would have to do to get any money out of anybody. Would probably cost him more than the car and get nothing.
Otherwise take the insurance money and buy a Honda.
I personally don't believe any car would react that way if he were slaming the breaks on to prevent it.
Otherwise take the insurance money and buy a Honda.
I personally don't believe any car would react that way if he were slaming the breaks on to prevent it.
Last edited by NOWUCME; 12-06-2006 at 01:51 AM.
#43
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 14,372
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17
Originally Posted by gpracer1
Dude, fix the sensor. It cant cost more than your life!!
Originally Posted by Y2Kvert4me
I'm lazy. Pushing the button on the console to shut it off is easier.
#44
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by JC in XTC5
OK, read most of this and I have some questions.
2. He normally disables TC/AH to keep the car from acting up. He doesn't remember disabling TC/AH before this incident.
3. Quote myself from an earlier post in this thread:
Originally Posted by Blue Angel
Random individual brake caliper activation is WELL DOCUMENTED on this and other forums... read this post as suggested early on in this thread:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...th+EBCM+issues
Read posts #38, #92, #104, #117, #198, #220 (good one!), and I'm sure there will be more to come... Locking right front wheel at 107 MPH (Post #220) states this problem pretty clearly I think.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...th+EBCM+issues
Read posts #38, #92, #104, #117, #198, #220 (good one!), and I'm sure there will be more to come... Locking right front wheel at 107 MPH (Post #220) states this problem pretty clearly I think.
#46
Supporting Vendor
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Supporting the Corvette Community at Abel Chevrolet in Rio Vista, CA 707-374-6317 Ext.123
Posts: 14,498
Received 1,425 Likes
on
597 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08
Originally Posted by Blue Angel
4. Airbags did not deploy, but someone suggested that the box would record even if it thought the car was going to crash from sensor inputs. The yaw sensor should have been going crazy when this happened. We are going to look at having this box read at a local dealer and see what it says.
#47
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Plano Texas
Posts: 37,329
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
8 Posts
CI 6-7-8-9 Veteran
CI-VI Car Show Winner
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13
While the following is not Corvette related, it provides, first hand, some activities that your friend should undertake if he is going to pursue legal action:
I had an accident in my Jeep Grand Cherokee Ltd on 1-17-04.
I was hit from behind while stopped at a stop light.
The force of the accident broke the back of the drivers seat - thus I ended up in the rear seat.
I have undergone 10 major surgeries, with at least two more required due to the seat back breaking.
A few months following the accident, and from comments the doctors treating me made, I decided to do some investigation on the history of seat back failures.
In the meantime I had the Jeep fixed, but for some reason I felt compelled to keep the broken seat.
During the time prior proceeding my investigation I also sold the Jeep (I was definitely afraid to ride in it after the accident). As a note, I also owned another Jeep grand Cherokee Ltd, and sold it for the same reason.
Following my investigation (WEB searches) I found the seat breaking to be a common occurrence. In addition, vehicle manufactures have never given consideration to this issue - they appear to provide a person hitting another vehicle/object plenty of protection via seat & shoulder belts, air bags, break- away steering wheels, etc., but minimal consideration to protecting one that is hit from the rear.
I eventually contacted a law firm that specializes in the matter of broken seat backs.
The first question was "do I have the vehicle"?
Next "has the vehicle been repaired"?
Next "has the vehicle been in your, or another's possession since the accident"?
It is PARAMOUNT that your friend NOT ALLOW anyone to repair the vehicle if he is going to solicit legal assistance.
It is also imperative that he not allow the vehicle to be out of his immediate control (physical) UNLESS the location where it is located provided security for the vehicle (I.e., no one could mess with it while it was there).
And most important - pictures, pictures, pictures, along with signed and notarized statements from any wittinesses that saw the accident.
Find a good, well established lawyer/law group that specializes in the specific area of vehicle safety issues, preferable one that has a track record with the Vette issue your friend feels contributed to his particular situation.
Hope this assists, and if the unit in the Vette was a contributing factor to the accident, I hope he pursues the matter via legal means.
I had an accident in my Jeep Grand Cherokee Ltd on 1-17-04.
I was hit from behind while stopped at a stop light.
The force of the accident broke the back of the drivers seat - thus I ended up in the rear seat.
I have undergone 10 major surgeries, with at least two more required due to the seat back breaking.
A few months following the accident, and from comments the doctors treating me made, I decided to do some investigation on the history of seat back failures.
In the meantime I had the Jeep fixed, but for some reason I felt compelled to keep the broken seat.
During the time prior proceeding my investigation I also sold the Jeep (I was definitely afraid to ride in it after the accident). As a note, I also owned another Jeep grand Cherokee Ltd, and sold it for the same reason.
Following my investigation (WEB searches) I found the seat breaking to be a common occurrence. In addition, vehicle manufactures have never given consideration to this issue - they appear to provide a person hitting another vehicle/object plenty of protection via seat & shoulder belts, air bags, break- away steering wheels, etc., but minimal consideration to protecting one that is hit from the rear.
I eventually contacted a law firm that specializes in the matter of broken seat backs.
The first question was "do I have the vehicle"?
Next "has the vehicle been repaired"?
Next "has the vehicle been in your, or another's possession since the accident"?
It is PARAMOUNT that your friend NOT ALLOW anyone to repair the vehicle if he is going to solicit legal assistance.
It is also imperative that he not allow the vehicle to be out of his immediate control (physical) UNLESS the location where it is located provided security for the vehicle (I.e., no one could mess with it while it was there).
And most important - pictures, pictures, pictures, along with signed and notarized statements from any wittinesses that saw the accident.
Find a good, well established lawyer/law group that specializes in the specific area of vehicle safety issues, preferable one that has a track record with the Vette issue your friend feels contributed to his particular situation.
Hope this assists, and if the unit in the Vette was a contributing factor to the accident, I hope he pursues the matter via legal means.
#48
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by RichieRichZ06
Blue Angel...Most dealers will not be able to access the info. It is not the same as reading recorded info off thePCM from the Tech II. There is different equipment that is needed to do so and supposedly the dealer can not do it without being instructed to by a higher power.
If there's anything else you can find out regarding how we could be able to access this information it would be greatly appreciated! Do you work for cash under the table?
Thanks for your help!
#49
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by AC54ME
I have undergone 10 major surgeries, with at least two more required due to the seat back breaking.
A guy I know was rearended by a military LAV (Light Armor Vehicle) while sitting at a stoplight in his late 80's pickup that only had a bench seat, no headrests. His head was cut open at the back from hitting the box of the truck after it went through the rear window. Those LAVs weigh anywhere from 20,000 lbs on up and it was travelling at over 60 km/h (37 MPH) when it hit. His truck stopped 150 feet past the intersection after hitting a parked car. He was unconsious.
He now walks with a cane, wears a neck brace and has some kind of spinal injections once a week to "numb" his lower body. His left arm feels like it's on fire most of the time.
The Canadian Gov't or Military put up red tape on his case for over 10 years, basically hoping he'd either die or get caught doing something to prove he wasn't injured by the many undercover spies that were following him. The case finally settled, but his life is forever ruined.
Originally Posted by AC54ME
It is PARAMOUNT that your friend NOT ALLOW anyone to repair the vehicle if he is going to solicit legal assistance.
It is also imperative that he not allow the vehicle to be out of his immediate control (physical) UNLESS the location where it is located provided security for the vehicle (I.e., no one could mess with it while it was there).
And most important - pictures, pictures, pictures, along with signed and notarized statements from any wittinesses that saw the accident.
Find a good, well established lawyer/law group that specializes in the specific area of vehicle safety issues, preferable one that has a track record with the Vette issue your friend feels contributed to his particular situation.
Hope this assists, and if the unit in the Vette was a contributing factor to the accident, I hope he pursues the matter via legal means.
It is also imperative that he not allow the vehicle to be out of his immediate control (physical) UNLESS the location where it is located provided security for the vehicle (I.e., no one could mess with it while it was there).
And most important - pictures, pictures, pictures, along with signed and notarized statements from any wittinesses that saw the accident.
Find a good, well established lawyer/law group that specializes in the specific area of vehicle safety issues, preferable one that has a track record with the Vette issue your friend feels contributed to his particular situation.
Hope this assists, and if the unit in the Vette was a contributing factor to the accident, I hope he pursues the matter via legal means.
I've taken pics of the car, his injuries, the accident scene... maybe I'll take more of the car just for the sake of having them.
A lawyer was reccomended. We'll have to see about this one... it's going to take a pretty strong case to justify legal action against anyone. If anything, the cost of repairing the car and the charges laid against the driver are the only things we'd like to see come out of this. Nobody's looking to get rich here.
Thank you for your great advice. It may not be Corvette specific, but it sure will keep him from making any mistakes with the "evidence".
#50
Drifting
You know,this is BS. So many want to question and instantly insist that the driver was at fault. What should be stated first of all is that the damn AH/TCS problem should be fixed by GM. Is there any denying that the ABS function doesn't work once these lights come on? It is a proven fact that ABS shortens the distance to come to a complete stop versus non-ABS. It is also a proven fact that ABS is instrumental in stopping in harsh weather conditions. So, given this information and also given the fact that it is a well known problem with the C5s why hasn't GM stepped up to the plate to fix/correct the problem? Money is the answer!! Now let's just suppose that we have a driver who isn't as big of a Corvette enthusiast than most on this forum, and let's assume that this person has the lights come on. Well, more than likely this same person won't realize that he/she no longer has ABS capabilities. SO this person takes his car for a drive and during this drive he/she has to apply the brakes to avoid an accident. Well now instead of being able to stop before he has the accident he now is ## feet into the accident. My point is that his car no longer stops the way it should be stopping if he had a proper working ABS system. We get recalls all the time from stuff alot more trivial than this. As stated earlier, it will take accidents reported as a result of this problem. GM could step up to the plate and admit that it has a problem and do a voluntary repair/recall to for the problem. This forum is a small number of the total Corvettes sold but it does represent some of your more enthusiastic owners. GM uses this board to gain insights into what is going on in the Corvette world and thus they know about this problem. They need to step up to the plate and do the right thing. It might just work out in their favor and show the general public that they do care about your safety!!!
#51
Race Director
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 16,477
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
15 Posts
CI 6-7-8-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '03
Originally Posted by Blue Angel
A lawyer was reccomended. We'll have to see about this one... it's going to take a pretty strong case to justify legal action against anyone.
He knew the car had a problem with the AH system, and as you said "normally shut AH off" because of this....but knowing that it had a problem, HE decided to drive the car anyways, and may have "forgot" to turn the faulty system off before driving that particular time.
That puts the blame squarely on his shoulders, not GM's.
Even if he could get the data off the SDM, and it somehow proved it wasn't driver error that spun the car out, it is still his fault for continuing to drive it knowing it was malfunctioning.
I can believe the AH system has the potential to do this, and it's sad it had to happen this way...but if you want to ignore problems with your car, you do so at your own risk.
#52
Supporting Vendor
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Supporting the Corvette Community at Abel Chevrolet in Rio Vista, CA 707-374-6317 Ext.123
Posts: 14,498
Received 1,425 Likes
on
597 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08
Originally Posted by NocarbutaVetteforme
You know,this is BS. So many want to question and instantly insist that the driver was at fault. What should be stated first of all is that the damn AH/TCS problem should be fixed by GM. Is there any denying that the ABS function doesn't work once these lights come on? It is a proven fact that ABS shortens the distance to come to a complete stop versus non-ABS. It is also a proven fact that ABS is instrumental in stopping in harsh weather conditions. So, given this information and also given the fact that it is a well known problem with the C5s why hasn't GM stepped up to the plate to fix/correct the problem? Money is the answer!! Now let's just suppose that we have a driver who isn't as big of a Corvette enthusiast than most on this forum, and let's assume that this person has the lights come on. Well, more than likely this same person won't realize that he/she no longer has ABS capabilities. SO this person takes his car for a drive and during this drive he/she has to apply the brakes to avoid an accident. Well now instead of being able to stop before he has the accident he now is ## feet into the accident. My point is that his car no longer stops the way it should be stopping if he had a proper working ABS system. We get recalls all the time from stuff alot more trivial than this. As stated earlier, it will take accidents reported as a result of this problem. GM could step up to the plate and admit that it has a problem and do a voluntary repair/recall to for the problem. This forum is a small number of the total Corvettes sold but it does represent some of your more enthusiastic owners. GM uses this board to gain insights into what is going on in the Corvette world and thus they know about this problem. They need to step up to the plate and do the right thing. It might just work out in their favor and show the general public that they do care about your safety!!!
#1: This is far from a well known fact. Just because there are a few stories on CF about it, does not make it well known to anybody. Remember, CF is just a sampling of Corvette owners. Also the stories that you read on here are somewhat jaded because you normally only hear of the bad stuff, which can "snowball" out of control. Once a few people read one mans story it all the sudden becomes a major issue that everybody is having.
#2: By your reasoning, everybody on CF should know about every aspect of their car because of the stories they read on here. So if the ABS/AH/TC light is on, most people know that there is a problem with the car and it may be a safety issue due to them being so enthusiastic about their cars.
#3: If GM reads about 3 or 4 people having this problem, they are not going to recall every car. In the other EBCM thread that people keep referring back to, there is less than a handfull of people that have had this problem. Just for simple math lets say that there is only 750,000 C5's on the road and even 75 people have the problem. That is only .0001 % of people that have experienced the problem and only a small fraction of them resulted in an accident. You probably have a better chance of getting hit by the idiot on the freeway next to you on the way home from work.
Remember, this was all just to give the opposite point of view and I do not absolutley believe one way or the other what actually happened.
I truely hope that this gets worked out by the owner of the car and if the car was at fault, then he is compensated very well by it. I am very glad that it did not turn out worse and that he is OK. I will be staying tuned for the outcome, as I have stated before, this had peaked my interests.
#53
Supporting Vendor
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Supporting the Corvette Community at Abel Chevrolet in Rio Vista, CA 707-374-6317 Ext.123
Posts: 14,498
Received 1,425 Likes
on
597 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08
Originally Posted by Blue Angel
I've taken pics of the car, his injuries, the accident scene... maybe I'll take more of the car just for the sake of having them.
#54
Le Mans Master
Actually its 75 people .01%
750 people would be 0.1%
7500 1.0%
But who is counting.
What are they gonna recall anyhow? The ECBM or the yaw sensor, Or any of the other sensors that can contribute.
They cant recall the ABS system because one wheel bearing/sensor went bad and wasnt replaced and driven anyhow.
750 people would be 0.1%
7500 1.0%
But who is counting.
What are they gonna recall anyhow? The ECBM or the yaw sensor, Or any of the other sensors that can contribute.
They cant recall the ABS system because one wheel bearing/sensor went bad and wasnt replaced and driven anyhow.
#55
I'm "Apache" a psycho dog
While this is a very interesting read, i would much rather have the Black Box facts, that may well have the answers as to what happened.
I would think the ins co would want to see it also especially if they have a police report leaning towards some type of mech failure and/or driver error that maybe will take the liability of the claim from them.
If the ins co or police to not access the Black Box i as owner would start the procedure to do so, especially if i knew i did nothing wrong.
I would think the ins co would want to see it also especially if they have a police report leaning towards some type of mech failure and/or driver error that maybe will take the liability of the claim from them.
If the ins co or police to not access the Black Box i as owner would start the procedure to do so, especially if i knew i did nothing wrong.
#56
Drifting
Originally Posted by RichieRichZ06
I am playing Devils Advocate here only so don't jump my chit over it, but...
#1: This is far from a well known fact. Just because there are a few stories on CF about it, does not make it well known to anybody. Remember, CF is just a sampling of Corvette owners. Also the stories that you read on here are somewhat jaded because you normally only hear of the bad stuff, which can "snowball" out of control. Once a few people read one mans story it all the sudden becomes a major issue that everybody is having.
#2: By your reasoning, everybody on CF should know about every aspect of their car because of the stories they read on here. So if the ABS/AH/TC light is on, most people know that there is a problem with the car and it may be a safety issue due to them being so enthusiastic about their cars.
#3: If GM reads about 3 or 4 people having this problem, they are not going to recall every car. In the other EBCM thread that people keep referring back to, there is less than a handfull of people that have had this problem. Just for simple math lets say that there is only 750,000 C5's on the road and even 75 people have the problem. That is only .0001 % of people that have experienced the problem and only a small fraction of them resulted in an accident. You probably have a better chance of getting hit by the idiot on the freeway next to you on the way home from work.
Remember, this was all just to give the opposite point of view and I do not absolutley believe one way or the other what actually happened.
I truely hope that this gets worked out by the owner of the car and if the car was at fault, then he is compensated very well by it. I am very glad that it did not turn out worse and that he is OK. I will be staying tuned for the outcome, as I have stated before, this had peaked my interests.
#1: This is far from a well known fact. Just because there are a few stories on CF about it, does not make it well known to anybody. Remember, CF is just a sampling of Corvette owners. Also the stories that you read on here are somewhat jaded because you normally only hear of the bad stuff, which can "snowball" out of control. Once a few people read one mans story it all the sudden becomes a major issue that everybody is having.
#2: By your reasoning, everybody on CF should know about every aspect of their car because of the stories they read on here. So if the ABS/AH/TC light is on, most people know that there is a problem with the car and it may be a safety issue due to them being so enthusiastic about their cars.
#3: If GM reads about 3 or 4 people having this problem, they are not going to recall every car. In the other EBCM thread that people keep referring back to, there is less than a handfull of people that have had this problem. Just for simple math lets say that there is only 750,000 C5's on the road and even 75 people have the problem. That is only .0001 % of people that have experienced the problem and only a small fraction of them resulted in an accident. You probably have a better chance of getting hit by the idiot on the freeway next to you on the way home from work.
Remember, this was all just to give the opposite point of view and I do not absolutley believe one way or the other what actually happened.
I truely hope that this gets worked out by the owner of the car and if the car was at fault, then he is compensated very well by it. I am very glad that it did not turn out worse and that he is OK. I will be staying tuned for the outcome, as I have stated before, this had peaked my interests.
A rebuttal of your anwers is a follows:
1. Actually the members on this board represent a very good cross-section of Corvette owners who happen to know more about Corvettes than your typical owners hence why you see so many questions being asked and so many answers from alot of experts. And since this topic is about a problem you can eliminate the need for any positive posts pertaining to this topic, which of course you couldn't have a positive post about losing your ABS.
2. Based on the fact that you have more informed Corvette owners on this site than the tpical owner I would venture to say that they are more in tune to what constitutes a problem. Your average owner wouldn't necessarily realize that they have lost their ABS when in fact your avg member on this site would ask to find out if they had a problem.
3. As for the number being small, well that number doesn't have to be large when it comes to life and death. Actually the number doesn't have to be actual events that have happened but simply for the possibility of the actions to take place/occur. If the number involved one of my family/ friends then that number would be one too many especially when it is a known problem. I can further venture to say that GM knows of the problem hence why some dealers are willing to correct the problem on a Goodwill Policy. Here is another good example, not everyone experienced the famous Column Lock but GM issued a recall to fix the problem. We have also had recalls for seatbelt issues. Both of these issues involved safety and involved recalls because of the potential for disaster not because it happened but because it could happen.
And just to let you know, I'm not jumping your chit over it. Just as you are approaching the view as the devils advocate I am simply looking at it as that if the potential for death or injury could occur then the problem needs to be corrected. And if I was going to take on the opposite point of view I would use your arguments. But if there is any reasonble doubt then you have to agree on the side of the people who are experiencing this problem.
Hey it was good talking to you btw. I too want to find out the outcome of this problem. And I hope that the thread starters friend gets better.
#58
Supporting Vendor
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Supporting the Corvette Community at Abel Chevrolet in Rio Vista, CA 707-374-6317 Ext.123
Posts: 14,498
Received 1,425 Likes
on
597 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08
Originally Posted by NocarbutaVetteforme
Oh no, I think everyone is entitled to their opinion and being the devils advocate of a topic is actually a very good thing. How else can you have a logical discussion if you don't have questions? If you do a search of the topic on "ABS AH you will get a pretty good listing of how many people have experienced this problem. There are actually 14 pages on the thread in question but the total for all people who have experienced this issue hasn't been totaled. But to get the correct corrolation, you can't use the total number of C5 Corvettes as a representative of the total amount of members on the forum. The actual total number of C5s produced is 214651. Now I have no idea of how many people we have on the forum but if we say that we have 10% of the total number of C5s as a starting point then we have 21465 as a number we can use to represent the number of C5 forum members. Now I don't have the exact number of members who have experienced this but if we take the number of people who experienced this on page one of that thread and then multiply that by the number of pages we get a rough estimate of 168. Now if you take that percent and then use it against the total number of C5s you get a total of 1680. Now the number of members who have experienced this problem is actually larger than this due to the fact I only used one thread for my numbers. The more members we add to this total the higher number we get as a rough estimate.
A rebuttal of your anwers is a follows:
1. Actually the members on this board represent a very good cross-section of Corvette owners who happen to know more about Corvettes than your typical owners hence why you see so many questions being asked and so many answers from alot of experts. And since this topic is about a problem you can eliminate the need for any positive posts pertaining to this topic, which of course you couldn't have a positive post about losing your ABS.
2. Based on the fact that you have more informed Corvette owners on this site than the tpical owner I would venture to say that they are more in tune to what constitutes a problem. Your average owner wouldn't necessarily realize that they have lost their ABS when in fact your avg member on this site would ask to find out if they had a problem.
3. As for the number being small, well that number doesn't have to be large when it comes to life and death. Actually the number doesn't have to be actual events that have happened but simply for the possibility of the actions to take place/occur. If the number involved one of my family/ friends then that number would be one too many especially when it is a known problem. I can further venture to say that GM knows of the problem hence why some dealers are willing to correct the problem on a Goodwill Policy. Here is another good example, not everyone experienced the famous Column Lock but GM issued a recall to fix the problem. We have also had recalls for seatbelt issues. Both of these issues involved safety and involved recalls because of the potential for disaster not because it happened but because it could happen.
And just to let you know, I'm not jumping your chit over it. Just as you are approaching the view as the devils advocate I am simply looking at it as that if the potential for death or injury could occur then the problem needs to be corrected. And if I was going to take on the opposite point of view I would use your arguments. But if there is any reasonble doubt then you have to agree on the side of the people who are experiencing this problem.
Hey it was good talking to you btw. I too want to find out the outcome of this problem. And I hope that the thread starters friend gets better.
A rebuttal of your anwers is a follows:
1. Actually the members on this board represent a very good cross-section of Corvette owners who happen to know more about Corvettes than your typical owners hence why you see so many questions being asked and so many answers from alot of experts. And since this topic is about a problem you can eliminate the need for any positive posts pertaining to this topic, which of course you couldn't have a positive post about losing your ABS.
2. Based on the fact that you have more informed Corvette owners on this site than the tpical owner I would venture to say that they are more in tune to what constitutes a problem. Your average owner wouldn't necessarily realize that they have lost their ABS when in fact your avg member on this site would ask to find out if they had a problem.
3. As for the number being small, well that number doesn't have to be large when it comes to life and death. Actually the number doesn't have to be actual events that have happened but simply for the possibility of the actions to take place/occur. If the number involved one of my family/ friends then that number would be one too many especially when it is a known problem. I can further venture to say that GM knows of the problem hence why some dealers are willing to correct the problem on a Goodwill Policy. Here is another good example, not everyone experienced the famous Column Lock but GM issued a recall to fix the problem. We have also had recalls for seatbelt issues. Both of these issues involved safety and involved recalls because of the potential for disaster not because it happened but because it could happen.
And just to let you know, I'm not jumping your chit over it. Just as you are approaching the view as the devils advocate I am simply looking at it as that if the potential for death or injury could occur then the problem needs to be corrected. And if I was going to take on the opposite point of view I would use your arguments. But if there is any reasonble doubt then you have to agree on the side of the people who are experiencing this problem.
Hey it was good talking to you btw. I too want to find out the outcome of this problem. And I hope that the thread starters friend gets better.
The only argument that I have for you is GM knows about EBCM's that stop working, but not so much about a vehicle activating the brakes on it's own. The faulty EBCM for 99% of the people only results in a message on the DIC and possibly the ABS not working. RICH
#60
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Lake Oswego, Near Portland Oregon
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by gpracer1
I think you guys are mixing ABS with AH/TC. They are not the same.
ABS is antilock braking system. It has to do with only you pressing the brake pedal and any wheel locking up. It pulses the pressure to the locked wheel to allow it to turn and not skid. This system is totally independant of the others.
Traction control closes the throttle when the wheels spin.
Active Handling can apply the brakes to any wheel at any time that the computer deems necessary to keep the car going in the intended direction based on many different inputs. It just happens that it uses the abs sensors in the wheels to measure whether any of the wheels are spinning or sliding.
Lets say you turn left really hard and the front end slides....The car knows how many G's you are pulling and knows what the steering angle is and should be, and knows which wheel is spinning faster than the others. So it decides to drag the left rear wheel brakes to make you turn better. Kinda like turning brakes on a sandrail. Etc, etc.
As far as this accident, who knows. He is lucky to be alive whether it was his fault or the cars fault.
ABS is antilock braking system. It has to do with only you pressing the brake pedal and any wheel locking up. It pulses the pressure to the locked wheel to allow it to turn and not skid. This system is totally independant of the others.
Traction control closes the throttle when the wheels spin.
Active Handling can apply the brakes to any wheel at any time that the computer deems necessary to keep the car going in the intended direction based on many different inputs. It just happens that it uses the abs sensors in the wheels to measure whether any of the wheels are spinning or sliding.
Lets say you turn left really hard and the front end slides....The car knows how many G's you are pulling and knows what the steering angle is and should be, and knows which wheel is spinning faster than the others. So it decides to drag the left rear wheel brakes to make you turn better. Kinda like turning brakes on a sandrail. Etc, etc.
As far as this accident, who knows. He is lucky to be alive whether it was his fault or the cars fault.
This brings up another issue, that of the fact that the cars are set up to have understeer...I had to change springs, sway bars and go to wider wheels and tires in the front to make the car handle neutral in a corner. I am gratefull that my C5 does not have AH....part of the selection process when I was looking for my car. If I buy a second C5 and it happens to have AH I will do whatever it takes to totally disable it. ABS is fine, especially in the wet, as it can not increase brake application, or create a brake application on its own. I am very lery of having a bunch of low cost sensors and a computer known to have irregularitues decide to apply MY brakes all on it's own. Perhaps its time to ask some of our GM technical types how to disable the AH and leave the ABS intact. Could it be as simple as disconnecting servo activating wires at the AN brake actuators? I am not real pleased with the traction control either. I shut it off every time I start the car. I have found it to get into the way and actually prevent me from scooting out a dangerous situation more than once. I almost got hit once when the engine dropped to idle just as I REALLY needed it to push really hard.