When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
After reading some of the replies after mine, maybe I'd change my opinion. If not having cats is going to make you smell gas inside the car and make you smell like gas after driving, then THAT would be enough to make me stay with the cats on my car.
I am glad I heard this info. I never heard this before......
Thanks
There's some great info being passed along here, thanks again to everyone for their imput. I believe this will be a great resource thread for those researching the subject.
For about 2 months, I ran without cats on a modified '96 Trans Am with long tubes. Even tuned, the smell was HORRIBLE and the sound was very "raspy". I put RT high-flows on afterwards and it removed the harsh exhaust notes and removed the stink issue entirely. The car sounded killer and only dyno'd ~6rwhp less. I will never again go without cats on a car unless it's track-only.
IMO, a raspy, stinky exhaust does not fit the image of a late model street-driven Corvette. Track cars are a different story. My C5 runs LG Pro LTs with Random Tech HF cats and a set of quad Borla Stingers. This setup is music to my ears and receives TONS of compliments!
For about 2 months, I ran without cats on a modified '96 Trans Am with long tubes. Even tuned, the smell was HORRIBLE and the sound was very "raspy". I put RT high-flows on afterwards and it removed the harsh exhaust notes and removed the stink issue entirely. The car sounded killer and only dyno'd ~6rwhp less. I will never again go without cats on a car unless it's track-only.
IMO, a raspy, stinky exhaust does not fit the image of a late model street-driven Corvette. Track cars are a different story. My C5 runs LG Pro LTs with Random Tech HF cats and a set of quad Borla Stingers. This setup is music to my ears and receives TONS of compliments!
I say go with the cats!
Be careful. I have posted this as my position in the past and got flamed for it
At any rate, the OP lives in a county with emissions testing, so my advice to him would be to at least research testing stations near him and verify what his "limitations" are before making his decision
Be careful. I have posted this as my position in the past and got flamed for it
At any rate, the OP lives in a county with emissions testing, so my advice to him would be to at least research testing stations near him and verify what his "limitations" are before making his decision
OBDII Testing is a standard plug in and go. As long as there's no intense visual inspection he's fine. The visual has to be intense as you can't see crap under the car if it's lowered at all.
I say run no cats. I haven't run them for 3 years and no issues.
OBDII Testing is a standard plug in and go. As long as there's no intense visual inspection he's fine. The visual has to be intense as you can't see crap under the car if it's lowered at all.
I say run no cats. I haven't run them for 3 years and no issues.
I am just giving the OP the benefit of arming himself with information. In Texas, they only do emissions testing in the counties with large populations. Since he lives in the county that happens to count the State capital as one of its cities, it would be foolhardy to assume that inspectors won't do a visual. This is what he needs to verify before possibly removing his cats
I personally wouldn't run my car without them (the gas smell and the associated hassles that come with taking them off) but that is just me
After reading some of the replies after mine, maybe I'd change my opinion. If not having cats is going to make you smell gas inside the car and make you smell like gas after driving, then THAT would be enough to make me stay with the cats on my car.
I am glad I heard this info. I never heard this before......
Thanks
I've ridden in, and driven behind a good number of C5;'s without cats and most (not all) stink! Even wtih a good tune. My car even with hi-flow cats smells fairly strong upon start up until the hi-flow cats warm up (which obviously takes longer than the stockers).
You dont gain all that much HP running no-cats....maybe in the olden days of the great muscle cars when technology was not as great and things were not computer tuned.....but anything under a 20 HP gain is not worth the sacrifice IMO.
For more fun, search for cats are for sissy's, I was pretty bored that day
You certainly touched as few nerves with that one! There have been very good points made by all on this matter. I feel that it will be in my best interest to install the cats with the LT's. Inspection here is visual and having never thought of the odor aspect I believe this is a no-brainer.
Hence "IMO". I'll never change my stance on it either. Flame away!
I respect the position of those that don't want to run cats. IMHO
it is not the idea thing to do, but I understand the motivation behind it. There are a couple of guys in my unit that have Vettes and don't run cats (high-flow or OEM) and get away with it because they don't do emissions testing in my part of Texas.
Running catless is not my bag, and I really don't think it gains you much unless you are building and all-out, dedicated track car, but if you can get away with it, who am I to criticize......
Do you have a list of tracks that are isolated from the same atmosphere the rest of us live under?
If no, what's the difference?
I mean, You say I need to trailer my catless car 6 miles to the local track, but you have no problem if I run it WOT for 50 miles there? Does that make any sense at all?
It sounds like you're trying to be politically correct, but have no idea why.
There is a BIG *** difference and yes I know why. A race car runs far a short time,,especially if it's a drag car.You are running a street carone hellava lot longer,doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out you'r poluting a lot more driving every day for hours and miles at a time vs a car that runs a little once every once in a while.With modern technology there is no reason to go catless.With a properly designed and tuned system there is no gain worth talking about.
There is a BIG *** difference and yes I know why. A race car runs far a short time,,especially if it's a drag car.You are running a street carone hellava lot longer,doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out you'r poluting a lot more driving every day for hours and miles at a time vs a car that runs a little once every once in a while.With modern technology there is no reason to go catless.With a properly designed and tuned system there is no gain worth talking about.
Why not go with hi-flow cats and be done with it. In many cases, guys with no cats get tired of the sound and especially the stink, plus the difference in hp is very small. Very hard to justify no cats on a street car.
There is a BIG *** difference and yes I know why. A race car runs far a short time,,especially if it's a drag car.You are running a street carone hellava lot longer,doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out you'r poluting a lot more driving every day for hours and miles at a time vs a car that runs a little once every once in a while.With modern technology there is no reason to go catless.With a properly designed and tuned system there is no gain worth talking about.
So you can't answer the question as it was asked.? I didn't even use any big words or anything...
Please don't tell me about my gross polluting car that gets daily driven for hours a day...blah blah blah.
My odometer reads exactly 104 miles more than it did last October.
Of those 104 miles, would you care to guess how many were on track, and how many off? And can you then explain which of those miles polluted the environment more? That was all I asked to begin with.
Please don't think that the use of hi flow cats is being "responsible" as mentioned above.
I was not only able to see straight through a brand new Random Technologies Hi-Flow cat but I could make out exactly what I was looking at on the other end. They are about as useful as a hood seal on your Corvette.
That is how they are designed to work!!!That is a ceramic substrait that is plated with the precious metal catalyst agents that when they heat up to operating temperature burn and or chemically alter the exhaust to less harmful substances.This is not a totally new design.Ford used this type of element from 1975.These are just newer improved and larger cross section versions,,thus the High Flow capability.If you don't believe it Put an exhaust "sniffer" with and without.I've studied this since the beginning,,In the old days I was a no cat rebel,In those days it did make a difference,,but over 30 years of technology and engineering development dose make a difference.1 or 200 miles of racing a year by a handful is insignificant to the atmosphere.Hundreds or thousands of cars driving thousands of mile every year will make a difference. Think about it!!
So you can't answer the question as it was asked.? I didn't even use any big words or anything...
Please don't tell me about my gross polluting car that gets daily driven for hours a day...blah blah blah.
My odometer reads exactly 104 miles more than it did last October.
Of those 104 miles, would you care to guess how many were on track, and how many off? And can you then explain which of those miles polluted the environment more? That was all I asked to begin with.
Thanks
OK OK since you insist on making an issue of it,and since I am not a tree hugging environmental fanatic,I will concede your point especially since it is not really relevant to the point I was trying to make.Yes it makes no difference to me if you drive it to the track,and 104 mi per year is a micro amount in the grand picture.Personally I would not want to go through the trouble of prepping a car and then drive it to the track,but that's irrelevant.I have no issue with racing and race cars,I've grown up around a race track.My dad was taking me to races before I was old enough to stay awake through the program. But the main point remains and this is what I was aiming at:: I still think that in this day and age it is stupid and irresponsible to drive a primarily street driven car without cats. There are already some racing organizations that have emission standards and don't be shocked to one day see NASCAR running "clean" cars.
So you can't answer the question as it was asked.? I didn't even use any big words or anything...
Please don't tell me about my gross polluting car that gets daily driven for hours a day...blah blah blah.
My odometer reads exactly 104 miles more than it did last October.
Of those 104 miles, would you care to guess how many were on track, and how many off? And can you then explain which of those miles polluted the environment more? That was all I asked to begin with.
Thanks
The OP has a '98 with 80,000 miles, which is roughly 8,000 miles per year - a lot more than 208 miles per year. Nobody cares about the fact that you don't drive your car. We're talking about a street car with cats vs. a street car without cats at around 8,000 miles per year.
Even if we were talking about a track car, it's not going to be driven anywhere near as much as a street car, and WOULDN'T be as bad catless as your average daily driven street car would be catless.
As far as arguing about 104 miles catless or catted, nobody cares. No big words there, either.