Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

True HP rating of the LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2009, 08:46 PM
  #21  
versatile
Drifting
 
versatile's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Qualicum Beach British Columbia
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by futuretech
Mine dyno'd at 315 rwhp with Vararam and Dyno tune.
Thats your dyno tune talking! Your Vararam gives exactly 0hp on a dyno because the car has to be moving to RAM AIR through the Vararam.
You would likely pic up another 15 - 20 when in motion
Old 07-19-2009, 08:47 PM
  #22  
JCamaro
Burning Brakes
 
JCamaro's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Nouvelle Ecosse
Posts: 877
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by versatile
Thats your dyno tune talking! Your Vararam gives exactly 0hp on a dyno because the car has to be moving to RAM AIR through the Vararam.
You would likely pic up another 15 - 20 when in motion
Agreed,

Still good numbers for the mods listed
Old 07-19-2009, 09:15 PM
  #23  
Silverbullet00
Race Director
 
Silverbullet00's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Norman Oklahoma - The Only State in the Union with no Blue Counties!
Posts: 18,643
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Mustang Dyno numbers stock

298 rwhp 302 wrtq


lt headers and tune

313 rwhp 323 wrtq


I then installed the B2VR and could feel the diff.


Oh, I also have the performance hood seal!
Old 07-19-2009, 09:20 PM
  #24  
JCamaro
Burning Brakes
 
JCamaro's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Nouvelle Ecosse
Posts: 877
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silverbullet00
Mustang Dyno numbers stock

298 rwhp 302 wrtq


lt headers and tune

313 rwhp 323 wrtq


I then installed the B2VR and could feel the diff.


Oh, I also have the performance hood seal!
Yeah the stock airbox would be choking out those LT headers.

Any CAI + LT's should be good for 30-40 rwhp so that'd be 35-50 crank hp.

Old 07-19-2009, 09:43 PM
  #25  
MNCrystalRed2011
Pro
 
MNCrystalRed2011's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Richfield MN
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bone stock, except of a K&N filter, I dynoed at 321 HP and 342 lb/ft on a DynoJet.
Old 07-19-2009, 09:46 PM
  #26  
Dominic Toretto
Race Director
 
Dominic Toretto's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: 972 and 405
Posts: 11,467
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Manufacturers only list flywheel horsepower as actual wheel horsepower is influenced by TOO MANY variables such as:

Chassis dyno used
Ambient temps
Elevation
Drivetrain
Condition of engine
and probably some other factors I can't think of off the top.

-Alex
Old 07-20-2009, 04:36 AM
  #27  
STEEL
Pro
 
STEEL's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

99 frc with 36,000 miles only mods where corsa cat-back and dual K&N air intake on a dynojet dyno made 328hp/332tq
Old 07-20-2009, 04:51 AM
  #28  
ljthe2nd
Melting Slicks
 
ljthe2nd's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: North Port Fl
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by road pilot
300 rwhp is enough hp for any one (everyone). Stay stock
this is your last warning.
Old 07-20-2009, 05:36 AM
  #29  
travelingypsye
Melting Slicks
 
travelingypsye's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Indianapolis In
Posts: 2,956
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Prior to having the head/cam install, I had my 99 A-4 dyno tuned. It went from 299hp to 326hp. I had a twin cone intake & corsa pacecars. Torque went from 291 to 328. The best $300 I ever spent.
Old 07-20-2009, 07:32 AM
  #30  
DevilDog II
Race Director

 
DevilDog II's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 10,789
Received 888 Likes on 553 Posts
Oldtimer

Default

Originally Posted by blacksedan87
There was a time that 300 rwhp was a pretty impressive number...
When I first completed my cars about 7 years ago and made over 500 hp, those numbers were pretty good. Compared to what many modded cars are making today, it's nothing.
Old 07-20-2009, 11:56 AM
  #31  
V-man
Instructor
 
V-man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Leominster MA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

Originally Posted by csdunaway
the 345HP is refferring to flywheel HP. There are losses going through the drivetrain. My bone stock 99 with an automatic dynoed at a mere 275 HP the first time I had it checked.

(now it is double that )
You've obviously installed a hood seal to get that results!!!
Old 07-02-2018, 01:16 AM
  #32  
Capterics
Intermediate
 
Capterics's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2016
Location: Fairview, OR.
Posts: 33
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default HP vs TQ

Originally Posted by VinnyT
I know they rate the Base Vette LS1 at 345hp, but how accurate is that? Any big deviations seen?

There are too many variables, yet one factor that is missing is "Torque". You see, the closer the HP = TQ makes a Huge difference in performance.
Yes there is a large difference between B and F Horsepower because of the load. The LS1 is equal in 350 HP and 350 ft. lbs.TQ. That said, when your at
1/4 throttle to 3/4, the response is extremely precise and almost chilling.
Old 07-02-2018, 08:35 AM
  #33  
grampi50
Le Mans Master
 
grampi50's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,460
Received 548 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blacksedan87
There was a time that 300 rwhp was a pretty impressive number...
It still is an impressive number for a 3200 lb. car. All of today's cars that have more power also weigh a LOT more...

The following users liked this post:
Capterics (07-02-2018)
Old 07-02-2018, 08:37 AM
  #34  
grampi50
Le Mans Master
 
grampi50's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,460
Received 548 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Capterics
There are too many variables, yet one factor that is missing is "Torque". You see, the closer the HP = TQ makes a Huge difference in performance.
Yes there is a large difference between B and F Horsepower because of the load. The LS1 is equal in 350 HP and 350 ft. lbs.TQ. That said, when your at
1/4 throttle to 3/4, the response is extremely precise and almost chilling.
Yep, and it's even better when torque is higher than HP, as is the case with '01-'04 LS1...

Old 07-02-2018, 09:05 AM
  #35  
calvins
Safety Car
 
calvins's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Rotonda West, FL 2015 Z51 M7 3LT
Posts: 4,428
Received 246 Likes on 111 Posts
Oldtimer

Default

You do realize that this thread is about 10 years old, right?
Old 07-02-2018, 11:09 AM
  #36  
meadowz06
Race Director
 
meadowz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: birmingham Alabama
Posts: 15,525
Received 960 Likes on 572 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09 and '13

Default

Originally Posted by JCamaro
Better math would be

315/0.85~370.6 hp

the 15% conversion factor for manuals needs to be factored in by divisor rather than multiplied.

but you got the right idea

Also, It's my belief that GM used that crappy 4 3/4" hole breathing stock air box to get the LS1 DOWN to 345hp(I've seen it posted on the forums as well so I won't take all the credit), as soon as you remove that terrible flow restriction, you'll find most people can pick up 15 rwhp just from a true CAI.
There is NO set percentage for the calculation. Every situation is different.
Old 07-02-2018, 02:13 PM
  #37  
grampi50
Le Mans Master
 
grampi50's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,460
Received 548 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by calvins
You do realize that this thread is about 10 years old, right?
So?

Get notified of new replies

To True HP rating of the LS1

Old 07-02-2018, 02:18 PM
  #38  
Vetteman Jack
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Vetteman Jack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
Posts: 342,914
Received 19,287 Likes on 13,963 Posts
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-
'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran


Default

Originally Posted by blacksedan87
Typically - 15% drivetrain loss for the manual trans, about 20% for the automatic cars.

So take your flywheel HP or torque numbers (factory numbers) and divide by 1.15 and you'll be pretty close.
I agree, but I usually use around 18% loss for an A4.
Old 07-02-2018, 02:25 PM
  #39  
Smoken1
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Smoken1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,617
Received 971 Likes on 783 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23


Default

Originally Posted by grampi50
So?
So, Did the planets ever align right for you?
Old 07-02-2018, 02:26 PM
  #40  
bobs77vet
Race Director
 
bobs77vet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Arlington Va Current ride 04 vert, previous vettes: 69 vert, 77 resto mod
Posts: 11,863
Received 255 Likes on 225 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by calvins
You do realize that this thread is about 10 years old, right?
i think debates/questions/comments about a cars HP and Torque are timeless....and always relevant

The following 2 users liked this post by bobs77vet:
Capterics (07-02-2018), MSgtrock (07-08-2018)


Quick Reply: True HP rating of the LS1



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.