About to drive 2 hours to buy this car, Should I? 1997 for 14K
#1
About to drive 2 hours to buy this car, Should I? 1997 for 14K
I have been on the hunt for a Corvette ever since I sold my 2004 GTO. I have been looking at a few C5's and C6's in my under 20k price range.
I found this 1997 M6 coupe for 14k and it caught my eye. It was the color I wanted, Red, M6, and even a targa top. Yet the age of the car as well as being the first year of product has me a little scared.
Should I hold out and get something better? Or jump on this one if it is really clean?
Car specs
1997, Red, M6, 75k miles, clean car fax
$14,000 Good Price?
Cars dot com link
I found this 1997 M6 coupe for 14k and it caught my eye. It was the color I wanted, Red, M6, and even a targa top. Yet the age of the car as well as being the first year of product has me a little scared.
Should I hold out and get something better? Or jump on this one if it is really clean?
Car specs
1997, Red, M6, 75k miles, clean car fax
$14,000 Good Price?
Cars dot com link
#2
Race Director
**** no. that's way too much for a 75k mile 97. if he'll take 10 cool, if not spend 15 on an 01+
here's a 54k mile 2004 with an ask of 16.5 that hasn't sold for months
http://seattle.craigslist.org/oly/cto/3609795568.html
even if you paid full price, anyone and i mean anyone that knows c5's would gladly pay 2500 if they could zap their 97-98 car into a 2004
if you live in cali that 04 i posted is an easy 2 day drive as well, fly into seatac and make a road trip of it
here's a 54k mile 2004 with an ask of 16.5 that hasn't sold for months
http://seattle.craigslist.org/oly/cto/3609795568.html
even if you paid full price, anyone and i mean anyone that knows c5's would gladly pay 2500 if they could zap their 97-98 car into a 2004
if you live in cali that 04 i posted is an easy 2 day drive as well, fly into seatac and make a road trip of it
#3
Agree with these guys... That is a rip off, their hard to find at a decent price because so many people put the miles on them and expected their vehicle to remain an "investment". Or they build a bond with the car and don't want to sell.
#4
Race Director
#5
Race Director
nother 01 in his state on the same site for the same price as that 97
http://www.cars.com/go/search/detail...C=BYSpdB728dyb
no idea on the mileage but the seats aren't worn too bad which is a good indicator of really high mileage. even a 6spd too.
http://www.cars.com/go/search/detail...C=BYSpdB728dyb
no idea on the mileage but the seats aren't worn too bad which is a good indicator of really high mileage. even a 6spd too.
#8
Race Director
Be patient and keep an eye on the "C5s For Sale" here on the forum. Consider buying from a private party, there are a lot better deals to be had at more reasonable prices.
#10
Administrator
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
Posts: 342,707
Received 19,233 Likes
on
13,933 Posts
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-
'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
You should be able to get into a newer car than a '97 for $14K. Keep looking or offer the seller a lot less money for that one.
#12
I agree it's a bit high but it's also at a dealer that's why it's like that however if you get some kind of warranty with it might be worth it gotta way your options
Ps. Don't listen to the nay Sayers about the 97-98 vettes being bad plenty of guys on here have them and never had a problem there's more guys on here with the newer ones with problems but there all the same
Ps. Don't listen to the nay Sayers about the 97-98 vettes being bad plenty of guys on here have them and never had a problem there's more guys on here with the newer ones with problems but there all the same
#13
Race Director
It's not to say 97-98's are bad, but 2001+ are better. That is a fact, and there is no arguing that. For a small premium of, say, 2 or 3 grand, there is no doubt a 2001+ is a better buy in the long run. The lack of an EBCM fix alone would steer me away from a 97-00. My 2 cents.
#14
It's not to say 97-98's are bad, but 2001+ are better. That is a fact, and there is no arguing that. For a small premium of, say, 2 or 3 grand, there is no doubt a 2001+ is a better buy in the long run. The lack of an EBCM fix alone would steer me away from a 97-00. My 2 cents.
But hey everybody has there own opinion just sayin more guys on here with newer ones with problems than older ones fact
#15
Race Director
Fact: 01-04 EBCMs can be fixed.
Being the mid-cycle refresh, the 2001 model year also included a lot of updates.
#17
More rocking seat problems bottom line there all the same no different at all until gm says it it's not a fact
The only fact is the older the car the more susceptible to problems but that's with anything
#19
Drifting
#20
Burning Brakes
007