Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which is faster a 2005 Mustang GT or a 2004 Corvette c5 coupe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2016, 05:38 PM
  #1  
RedSkull3000
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
RedSkull3000's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Posts: 53
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Which is faster a 2005 Mustang GT or a 2004 Corvette c5 coupe

In 0-60mph and the 1/4 time which would be faster? I'm still assuming the Corvette.
Old 03-07-2016, 06:25 PM
  #2  
Sea Vette
Instructor
 
Sea Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: San Diego Kalifornistan
Posts: 181
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Mustang
https://www.0-60specs.com/ford-mustang-0-60-times/

Corvette
https://www.0-60specs.com/chevrolet-...te-0-60-times/

Looks like the Vette wins.
Old 03-07-2016, 06:34 PM
  #3  
RSbeast
Burning Brakes
 
RSbeast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,128
Received 256 Likes on 165 Posts

Default

Owned both, no contest.

Stock 3vs are dirt slow
Old 03-07-2016, 06:51 PM
  #4  
JR-01
Le Mans Master
 
JR-01's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 8,900
Received 1,063 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sea Vette
The site shows 2001 Chevrolet Corvette
Convertible RWD 6M 4.5 sec 13.1 sec @ 111 mph


I don't think so.
Old 03-07-2016, 07:16 PM
  #5  
Sea Vette
Instructor
 
Sea Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: San Diego Kalifornistan
Posts: 181
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JR-01
The site shows 2001 Chevrolet Corvette
Convertible RWD 6M 4.5 sec 13.1 sec @ 111 mph


I don't think so.
Take it up with Car and Driver
Old 03-07-2016, 07:30 PM
  #6  
RSbeast
Burning Brakes
 
RSbeast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,128
Received 256 Likes on 165 Posts

Default

My coupe ran like that *shrugs*
Old 03-07-2016, 07:51 PM
  #7  
pentavolvo
Le Mans Master
 
pentavolvo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Dyer IN
Posts: 8,718
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Cruise-In IX Veteran

Default

Own an 05 GT with some bolts ons and a 5speed, any c5 should walk it
Old 03-07-2016, 07:59 PM
  #8  
Pappy11
Pro
 
Pappy11's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2014
Location: Brighton Tennessee
Posts: 740
Received 88 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

Buddy of mine has a 06 mustang he said he wanted no part of my 02 vert
Old 03-07-2016, 08:16 PM
  #9  
Forcedvert
Melting Slicks
 
Forcedvert's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,764
Received 371 Likes on 318 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JR-01
The site shows 2001 Chevrolet Corvette
Convertible RWD 6M 4.5 sec 13.1 sec @ 111 mph


I don't think so.
well it seems there should be a story here
Old 03-07-2016, 08:23 PM
  #10  
Vetteman Jack
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Vetteman Jack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
Posts: 342,961
Received 19,298 Likes on 13,971 Posts
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-
'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran


Default

I'd give the nod to the Vette when comparing those two years.
Old 03-07-2016, 08:24 PM
  #11  
JR-01
Le Mans Master
 
JR-01's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 8,900
Received 1,063 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcedvert
well it seems there should be a story here
I just found it hard to believe my C5 would beat a 1969 Corvette 427 435 hp 4 speed 3.70- 13.8@106.8
Old 03-07-2016, 08:26 PM
  #12  
RSbeast
Burning Brakes
 
RSbeast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,128
Received 256 Likes on 165 Posts

Default

A 69 corvette anything is a dog.

13.8 @ 106 is what a well driven ls1 fbody runs; on a slow pass.
Old 03-07-2016, 08:31 PM
  #13  
JR-01
Le Mans Master
 
JR-01's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 8,900
Received 1,063 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RSbeast
A 69 corvette anything is a dog.

13.8 @ 106 is what a well driven ls1 fbody runs; on a slow pass.
Learn something everyday.
Old 03-07-2016, 09:00 PM
  #14  
RSbeast
Burning Brakes
 
RSbeast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,128
Received 256 Likes on 165 Posts

Default

It ran good in 1969; respectfully. But horsepower ratings were gross and not net. A big block vette is probably an honest 350hp; maybe a hair less. Then you're on an 8" bias ply.

My dad had an l46 (350/350) 69 stingray. It'd be lucky to get out of the 15s.

Can you improve on those cars? Sure; esp with today's technology. But they aren't even in the same realm as modern muscle or sports cars. You'll be tearing up fragile old driveline trying to do anything.

I've gone 13.4s at a slow track in a clapped stock 99 z28. My c5 went 12.9 with mufflers; they aren't even stellar times at a fast track. Hell my crap slow 3v went 13.9 @ 101 there.

The baddest of the bad in the 60s off the floor were high 12 sec cars. Only thing worth writing home over is a 427 Cobra.
Old 03-07-2016, 09:06 PM
  #15  
04DarkShadowGT
Racer
 
04DarkShadowGT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Fort Wayne Indiana
Posts: 260
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Vette is lighter, has more hp, and more tq. Seems fairly obvious unless the driver of the corvette is clueless. The mustang would need a ton of work to keep up, either fully built NA motor or boost.
Old 03-07-2016, 09:13 PM
  #16  
JR-01
Le Mans Master
 
JR-01's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 8,900
Received 1,063 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RSbeast
It ran good in 1969; respectfully. But horsepower ratings were gross and not net. A big block vette is probably an honest 350hp; maybe a hair less. Then you're on an 8" bias ply.

My dad had an l46 (350/350) 69 stingray. It'd be lucky to get out of the 15s.

Can you improve on those cars? Sure; esp with today's technology. But they aren't even in the same realm as modern muscle or sports cars. You'll be tearing up fragile old driveline trying to do anything.

I've gone 13.4s at a slow track in a clapped stock 99 z28. My c5 went 12.9 with mufflers; they aren't even stellar times at a fast track. Hell my crap slow 3v went 13.9 @ 101 there.

The baddest of the bad in the 60s off the floor were high 12 sec cars. Only thing worth writing home over is a 427 Cobra.
I remember going to the drags in the early 70s and watching the stock Hemis and big block Chevys and thinking how fast they were. It's amazing that my 15K used car is faster than the muscle cars of that era.
Old 03-07-2016, 09:13 PM
  #17  
Forcedvert
Melting Slicks
 
Forcedvert's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,764
Received 371 Likes on 318 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RSbeast
It ran good in 1969; respectfully. But horsepower ratings were gross and not net. A big block vette is probably an honest 350hp; maybe a hair less. Then you're on an 8" bias ply.

My dad had an l46 (350/350) 69 stingray. It'd be lucky to get out of the 15s.

Can you improve on those cars? Sure; esp with today's technology. But they aren't even in the same realm as modern muscle or sports cars. You'll be tearing up fragile old driveline trying to do anything.

I've gone 13.4s at a slow track in a clapped stock 99 z28. My c5 went 12.9 with mufflers; they aren't even stellar times at a fast track. Hell my crap slow 3v went 13.9 @ 101 there.

The baddest of the bad in the 60s off the floor were high 12 sec cars. Only thing worth writing home over is a 427 Cobra.

If you never took one of those old cars to the track back then you don't realize just how good cars are today, my 69 396 chevelle ran 14.01 and it was fast in the late 80's for a car without lots of money in it ( paid $1000.00 for it).

Last edited by Forcedvert; 03-07-2016 at 09:14 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To Which is faster a 2005 Mustang GT or a 2004 Corvette c5 coupe

Old 03-07-2016, 09:21 PM
  #18  
JR-01
Le Mans Master
 
JR-01's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 8,900
Received 1,063 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcedvert

If you never took one of those old cars to the track back then you don't realize just how good cars are today, my 69 396 chevelle ran 14.01 and it was fast in the late 80's for a car without lots of money in it ( paid $1000.00 for it).
I drove a few muscle cars back in the 70s. 70 Formula 400 365 hp, 455 Super Duty Trans am. 70 Z28 350 Hp, 440 Charger, 383 Cuda, SS 396 Chevelle. They all seemed really fast back then.
The following users liked this post:
calvins (03-07-2016)
Old 03-07-2016, 09:54 PM
  #19  
Forcedvert
Melting Slicks
 
Forcedvert's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,764
Received 371 Likes on 318 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JR-01
I drove a few muscle cars back in the 70s. 70 Formula 400 365 hp, 455 Super Duty Trans am. 70 Z28 350 Hp, 440 Charger, 383 Cuda, SS 396 Chevelle. They all seemed really fast back then.


Yep
You had a lot of nice cars

Last edited by Forcedvert; 03-07-2016 at 09:59 PM.
Old 03-07-2016, 10:05 PM
  #20  
JR-01
Le Mans Master
 
JR-01's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 8,900
Received 1,063 Likes on 805 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcedvert


Yep
You had a lot of nice cars
I just drove them, they were my buddies cars. I had a 66 Mustang GT with a built 289 and a '68 Mustang GT 390..


Quick Reply: Which is faster a 2005 Mustang GT or a 2004 Corvette c5 coupe



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 PM.