Remote Tuning an LS3 swapped C5 - Page 2 - CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

Notices
C5 Scan & Tune Corvette Onboard Diagnostics, Service Advice, Dyno Tuning, Fuel Management, Tuning Software, LS1 Edit, AutoTap, Diablo

Remote Tuning an LS3 swapped C5

Reply

 
 
 
Old 06-29-2018, 02:11 PM
  #21  
mikehimself
CF Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Posts: 73
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I thought that the 2000 ECU's were the newer style (like 04). There isn't much configurability in the old style ECU's.
mikehimself is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2018, 11:40 PM
  #22  
Chuck CoW
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,455
Thanked 157 Times in 123 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14
Default You would be better off.....

Originally Posted by nsogiba View Post
No option for "resonant" on sensor type for a 2000 C5 file. Only "Engine" and "Cylinder".

It's definitely not burst knock because I zero'd out the table that pulls burst knock timing and still get it.

You would be better off with a later model E38 ecm, harness, and knock sensors.

I've played with too many peoples "converted" engine swaps and it never works out right.

Simply put, there is no way to properly use LS1 knock sensors and an LS1 pcm to correctly/safely

detect knock when using a later model block.

EVERYONE messes with it, but there's simply no reliable way to do it right.

I've turned down more than a few jobs like this because they waste tons of time and in my opinion

never turn out right..... Considering all the money and time you put into them.

I always use an LS1 based stroker motor and change the heads to get it working right.

This way everything works out right.

Chuck CoW
Chuck CoW is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2018, 09:27 PM
  #23  
Jason Zajac
CF Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2015
Posts: 72
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW View Post
You would be better off with a later model E38 ecm, harness, and knock sensors.
Definitely a horrible idea
Jason Zajac is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2018, 04:59 PM
  #24  
RonSSNova
CF Senior Member
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 3,353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 51 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Chuck is exactly correct.
You will **** around with this forever and never know if its correct.
Brst bet is to turn them off and keep the tune conservative.
RonSSNova is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RonSSNova For This Useful Post:
Chuck CoW (08-10-2018)
Old 08-06-2018, 05:14 PM
  #25  
nsogiba
CF Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
nsogiba's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 1,659
Thanked 210 Times in 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova View Post
Chuck is exactly correct.
You will **** around with this forever and never know if its correct.
Brst bet is to turn them off and keep the tune conservative.
After messing with all the sensitivity tables with dozens of my own iterations I have to agree, even now I'm still getting KR here and there and have no clue why.

What is considered a "safe" timing figure under WOT for a stock headed LS3/L92 with a 228/237 cam on 93 pump gas?
nsogiba is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2018, 10:19 PM
  #26  
RonSSNova
CF Senior Member
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 3,353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 51 Times in 50 Posts
Default

I tune my stuff. My LS1 which is just above 11:1 runs best with around 20-22 at TQ peak. Which is about 5200 in my case. Above that you can ramp it up with rpm.
A dyno will be handy. If you get it into knock, power will drop.
People say read the plugs, ok, I doubt you would see subtle knock.

I really wanted to put a 6.2 in my C5, but stroking the LS1 to 383 just makes more sense.

Last edited by RonSSNova; 08-07-2018 at 10:19 PM.
RonSSNova is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2018, 08:19 PM
  #27  
Caveboy
CF Senior Member
 
Caveboy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane CA
Posts: 1,317
Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
Default

So I should rebuild and install a stroker kit in my LS1 instead of upgrading to LS3?

Last edited by Caveboy; 08-08-2018 at 08:24 PM.
Caveboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 04:18 AM
  #28  
Chuck CoW
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,455
Thanked 157 Times in 123 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14
Default You want a bigger motor, build an LS1 stroker or put LS3 heads and intake on it.....

Originally Posted by RonSSNova View Post
Chuck is exactly correct.
You will **** around with this forever and never know if its correct.
Brst bet is to turn them off and keep the tune conservative.

Thank you for lending support here.... It's SIMPLY NOT WORTH IT to mess around....

You want a bigger motor, build an LS1 stroker or put LS3 heads and intake on it....or BOTH...... VERY SIMPLE.

Installing a block that can not make use of the knock sensors EXACTLY HOW GM PROGRAMMED THEM.... IS STUPID.

Chuck CoW

Chuck CoW is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 04:22 AM
  #29  
Chuck CoW
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,455
Thanked 157 Times in 123 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14
Default Trust me...... I've tried it.

Originally Posted by nsogiba View Post
After messing with all the sensitivity tables with dozens of my own iterations I have to agree, even now I'm still getting KR here and there and have no clue why.

What is considered a "safe" timing figure under WOT for a stock headed LS3/L92 with a 228/237 cam on 93 pump gas?
Trust me...... I've tried it.

If you're having problems with 6 DEG KR up top..... you have KNOCK SENSOR PROBLEMS.

I've tuned a million of these ECMS and I've seen it many times.

Chuck CoW
__________________
Call NOW to reserve your AutoCal today!
- CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT AutoCal! -

WE ARE AN EDELBROCK AUTHORIZED E-FORCE
SUPERCHARGER DEALER and INSTALL FACILITY.


CLICK HERE: To go to the full magazine story.


Chuck CoW is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 12:46 PM
  #30  
nsogiba
CF Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
nsogiba's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 1,659
Thanked 210 Times in 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW View Post
Thank you for lending support here.... It's SIMPLY NOT WORTH IT to mess around....

You want a bigger motor, build an LS1 stroker or put LS3 heads and intake on it....or BOTH...... VERY SIMPLE.

Installing a block that can not make use of the knock sensors EXACTLY HOW GM PROGRAMMED THEM.... IS STUPID.

Chuck CoW
I don't appreciate being called stupid, especially when I'm not the only one that has ever ran a Gen 4 motor using a Gen 3 PCM (as verified by yourself in the next post). Awfully unprofessional of you given the public nature of your post

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW View Post
Trust me...... I've tried it.

If you're having problems with 6 DEG KR up top..... you have KNOCK SENSOR PROBLEMS.

I've tuned a million of these ECMS and I've seen it many times.

Chuck CoW
If you've done a million of these setups, do you have a meaningful suggestion for this application?
nsogiba is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 01:33 PM
  #31  
Chuck CoW
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,455
Thanked 157 Times in 123 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14
Default Nobody called you stupid.....

Nobody called you stupid.....

Delete your post and I'll help you any way I can.

Chuck CoW
Chuck CoW is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 05:45 PM
  #32  
Podium
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 323
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW View Post
Thank you for lending support here.... It's SIMPLY NOT WORTH IT to mess around....

You want a bigger motor, build an LS1 stroker or put LS3 heads and intake on it....or BOTH...... VERY SIMPLE.

Installing a block that can not make use of the knock sensors EXACTLY HOW GM PROGRAMMED THEM.... IS STUPID.

Chuck CoW
How is he going to use Ls3 heads on a ls1 bore?


I would run an Ls3 before a ran a ls1 based stroker. Ls1 anything is a waste of time with how cheap the 4 inch+ stuff is IMO.
Podium is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 05:46 PM
  #33  
Podium
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 323
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova View Post


I really wanted to put a 6.2 in my C5, but stroking the LS1 to 383 just makes more sense.
Until a cam only 08+ c6 kicks your *** lol
Podium is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 10:30 PM
  #34  
Chuck CoW
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,455
Thanked 157 Times in 123 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14
Default Inexpensive.....

Originally Posted by Podium View Post
How is he going to use Ls3 heads on a ls1 bore?


I would run an Ls3 before a ran a ls1 based stroker. Ls1 anything is a waste of time with how cheap the 4 inch+ stuff is IMO.
Inexpensive..... 6.0 iron block with stroker or even 6.0 by itself.... with LS3 heads and you have a very durable motor which will behave like an LS3 without the

problems using an LS1 ecm and sensors....

Or, just a 383 LS1 block and 243 heads..... Done right, you don't have to have big dollars in it.

For those reading this, you can't put LS3 heads on a stock bore LS1 as the valves will hit the cyl sleeves and the only

other option is to re-machine to shift the head dowels but not really worth it.

Many options, but again NOT worth using an LS2 or LS3 block where the knock sensors will NEVER work right.

Chuck CoW
Chuck CoW is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 12:45 AM
  #35  
Jason Zajac
CF Member
 
Member Since: Nov 2015
Posts: 72
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW View Post

Installing a block that can not make use of the knock sensors EXACTLY HOW GM PROGRAMMED THEM.... IS STUPID.

Chuck CoW
Technically any modification to the engine aside from OEM parts pretty much invalidates exact how GM programmed them. They are just piezoelectric microphones tuned to a certain frequency and mV or detection. They can be made to work with lots of work but your best bet is to figure out max timing via spark hook test and back it off a bit.
Jason Zajac is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 04:30 PM
  #36  
RonSSNova
CF Senior Member
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 3,353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 51 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Podium View Post
Until a cam only 08+ c6 kicks your *** lol
My 346 holds its own just fine against NA C6 cars.

Its just tired, so I thought Id upgrade. Ive got a 28k mile LS1 block at the ready for a 4 crank.
RonSSNova is offline  
Reply With Quote
 
 
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Remote Tuning an LS3 swapped C5


Sponsored Ads
Vendor Directory

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: