C5 Scan & Tune Corvette Onboard Diagnostics, Service Advice, Dyno Tuning, Fuel Management, Tuning Software, LS1 Edit, AutoTap, Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

Remote Tuning an LS3 swapped C5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2018, 02:11 PM
  #21  
mikehimself
Instructor
 
mikehimself's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Posts: 103
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I thought that the 2000 ECU's were the newer style (like 04). There isn't much configurability in the old style ECU's.
Old 07-04-2018, 11:40 PM
  #22  
0Chuck CoW
Former Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,792
Received 243 Likes on 183 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14

Default You would be better off.....

Originally Posted by nsogiba
No option for "resonant" on sensor type for a 2000 C5 file. Only "Engine" and "Cylinder".

It's definitely not burst knock because I zero'd out the table that pulls burst knock timing and still get it.

You would be better off with a later model E38 ecm, harness, and knock sensors.

I've played with too many peoples "converted" engine swaps and it never works out right.

Simply put, there is no way to properly use LS1 knock sensors and an LS1 pcm to correctly/safely

detect knock when using a later model block.

EVERYONE messes with it, but there's simply no reliable way to do it right.

I've turned down more than a few jobs like this because they waste tons of time and in my opinion

never turn out right..... Considering all the money and time you put into them.

I always use an LS1 based stroker motor and change the heads to get it working right.

This way everything works out right.

Chuck CoW
Old 07-18-2018, 09:27 PM
  #23  
Jason Zajac
Instructor
 
Jason Zajac's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2015
Location: Elma, New York
Posts: 129
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW
You would be better off with a later model E38 ecm, harness, and knock sensors.
Definitely a horrible idea
Old 08-06-2018, 04:59 PM
  #24  
RonSSNova
Safety Car
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 4,244
Received 322 Likes on 263 Posts

Default

Chuck is exactly correct.
You will **** around with this forever and never know if it’s correct.
Brst bet is to turn them off and keep the tune conservative.
The following users liked this post:
Chuck CoW (08-10-2018)
Old 08-06-2018, 05:14 PM
  #25  
nsogiba
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
nsogiba's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 1,891
Received 289 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova
Chuck is exactly correct.
You will **** around with this forever and never know if it’s correct.
Brst bet is to turn them off and keep the tune conservative.
After messing with all the sensitivity tables with dozens of my own iterations I have to agree, even now I'm still getting KR here and there and have no clue why.

What is considered a "safe" timing figure under WOT for a stock headed LS3/L92 with a 228/237 cam on 93 pump gas?
Old 08-07-2018, 10:19 PM
  #26  
RonSSNova
Safety Car
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 4,244
Received 322 Likes on 263 Posts

Default

I tune my stuff. My LS1 which is just above 11:1 runs best with around 20-22 at TQ peak. Which is about 5200 in my case. Above that you can ramp it up with rpm.
A dyno will be handy. If you get it into knock, power will drop.
People say read the plugs, ok, I doubt you would see subtle knock.

I really wanted to put a 6.2 in my C5, but stroking the LS1 to 383 just makes more sense.

Last edited by RonSSNova; 08-07-2018 at 10:19 PM.
Old 08-08-2018, 08:19 PM
  #27  
Caveboy
Drifting
 
Caveboy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane CA
Posts: 1,551
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

So I should rebuild and install a stroker kit in my LS1 instead of upgrading to LS3?

Last edited by Caveboy; 08-08-2018 at 08:24 PM.
Old 08-10-2018, 04:18 AM
  #28  
0Chuck CoW
Former Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,792
Received 243 Likes on 183 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14

Default You want a bigger motor, build an LS1 stroker or put LS3 heads and intake on it.....

Originally Posted by RonSSNova
Chuck is exactly correct.
You will **** around with this forever and never know if it’s correct.
Brst bet is to turn them off and keep the tune conservative.

Thank you for lending support here.... It's SIMPLY NOT WORTH IT to mess around....

You want a bigger motor, build an LS1 stroker or put LS3 heads and intake on it....or BOTH...... VERY SIMPLE.

Installing a block that can not make use of the knock sensors EXACTLY HOW GM PROGRAMMED THEM.... IS STUPID.

Chuck CoW

Old 08-10-2018, 04:22 AM
  #29  
0Chuck CoW
Former Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,792
Received 243 Likes on 183 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14

Default Trust me...... I've tried it.

Originally Posted by nsogiba
After messing with all the sensitivity tables with dozens of my own iterations I have to agree, even now I'm still getting KR here and there and have no clue why.

What is considered a "safe" timing figure under WOT for a stock headed LS3/L92 with a 228/237 cam on 93 pump gas?
Trust me...... I've tried it.

If you're having problems with 6 DEG KR up top..... you have KNOCK SENSOR PROBLEMS.

I've tuned a million of these ECMS and I've seen it many times.

Chuck CoW
Old 08-10-2018, 12:46 PM
  #30  
nsogiba
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
nsogiba's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 1,891
Received 289 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW
Thank you for lending support here.... It's SIMPLY NOT WORTH IT to mess around....

You want a bigger motor, build an LS1 stroker or put LS3 heads and intake on it....or BOTH...... VERY SIMPLE.

Installing a block that can not make use of the knock sensors EXACTLY HOW GM PROGRAMMED THEM.... IS STUPID.

Chuck CoW
I don't appreciate being called stupid, especially when I'm not the only one that has ever ran a Gen 4 motor using a Gen 3 PCM (as verified by yourself in the next post). Awfully unprofessional of you given the public nature of your post

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW
Trust me...... I've tried it.

If you're having problems with 6 DEG KR up top..... you have KNOCK SENSOR PROBLEMS.

I've tuned a million of these ECMS and I've seen it many times.

Chuck CoW
If you've done a million of these setups, do you have a meaningful suggestion for this application?
The following users liked this post:
sydneyACE (02-18-2020)
Old 08-10-2018, 01:33 PM
  #31  
0Chuck CoW
Former Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,792
Received 243 Likes on 183 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14

Default Nobody called you stupid.....

Nobody called you stupid.....

Delete your post and I'll help you any way I can.

Chuck CoW
Old 08-10-2018, 05:45 PM
  #32  
Podium
Burning Brakes
 
Podium's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 979
Received 101 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW
Thank you for lending support here.... It's SIMPLY NOT WORTH IT to mess around....

You want a bigger motor, build an LS1 stroker or put LS3 heads and intake on it....or BOTH...... VERY SIMPLE.

Installing a block that can not make use of the knock sensors EXACTLY HOW GM PROGRAMMED THEM.... IS STUPID.

Chuck CoW
How is he going to use Ls3 heads on a ls1 bore?


I would run an Ls3 before a ran a ls1 based stroker. Ls1 anything is a waste of time with how cheap the 4 inch+ stuff is IMO.
The following users liked this post:
sydneyACE (02-18-2020)
Old 08-10-2018, 05:46 PM
  #33  
Podium
Burning Brakes
 
Podium's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Posts: 979
Received 101 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova


I really wanted to put a 6.2 in my C5, but stroking the LS1 to 383 just makes more sense.
Until a cam only 08+ c6 kicks your *** lol
Old 08-10-2018, 10:30 PM
  #34  
0Chuck CoW
Former Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,792
Received 243 Likes on 183 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14

Default Inexpensive.....

Originally Posted by Podium
How is he going to use Ls3 heads on a ls1 bore?


I would run an Ls3 before a ran a ls1 based stroker. Ls1 anything is a waste of time with how cheap the 4 inch+ stuff is IMO.
Inexpensive..... 6.0 iron block with stroker or even 6.0 by itself.... with LS3 heads and you have a very durable motor which will behave like an LS3 without the

problems using an LS1 ecm and sensors....

Or, just a 383 LS1 block and 243 heads..... Done right, you don't have to have big dollars in it.

For those reading this, you can't put LS3 heads on a stock bore LS1 as the valves will hit the cyl sleeves and the only

other option is to re-machine to shift the head dowels but not really worth it.

Many options, but again NOT worth using an LS2 or LS3 block where the knock sensors will NEVER work right.

Chuck CoW
Old 08-13-2018, 12:45 AM
  #35  
Jason Zajac
Instructor
 
Jason Zajac's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2015
Location: Elma, New York
Posts: 129
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW

Installing a block that can not make use of the knock sensors EXACTLY HOW GM PROGRAMMED THEM.... IS STUPID.

Chuck CoW
Technically any modification to the engine aside from OEM parts pretty much invalidates “exact how GM programmed them.” They are just piezoelectric microphones tuned to a certain frequency and mV or detection. They can be made to work with lots of work but your best bet is to figure out max timing via spark hook test and back it off a bit.
Old 08-19-2018, 04:30 PM
  #36  
RonSSNova
Safety Car
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 4,244
Received 322 Likes on 263 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Podium
Until a cam only 08+ c6 kicks your *** lol
My 346 holds its own just fine against NA C6 cars.

Its just tired, so I thought I’d upgrade. I’ve got a 28k mile LS1 block at the ready for a 4” crank.
Old 08-22-2018, 02:30 AM
  #37  
Caveboy
Drifting
 
Caveboy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane CA
Posts: 1,551
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

So if I have a 99, it is an bad idea to swap in a ls3?

Get notified of new replies

To Remote Tuning an LS3 swapped C5

Old 09-08-2018, 06:12 PM
  #38  
Caveboy
Drifting
 
Caveboy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane CA
Posts: 1,551
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Ttt
Old 09-12-2018, 01:16 AM
  #39  
Jason Zajac
Instructor
 
Jason Zajac's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2015
Location: Elma, New York
Posts: 129
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Caveboy
Ttt
It is fine just find a good tuner and don't worry about it
Old 09-12-2018, 01:48 PM
  #40  
0Chuck CoW
Former Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,792
Received 243 Likes on 183 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14

Default Build a stroked LS block....

Originally Posted by Jason Zajac
It is fine just find a good tuner and don't worry about it

Build a stroked LS1 or 6.0 iron block.... otherwise Knock sensors won't work. Everyone who knows better.... knows this.

The guys with non existent knock sensors...or knock sensors in the wrong location or otherwise in the wrong block/ecm configuration

are wasting time, money, and possibly much more.

Chuck CoW


Quick Reply: Remote Tuning an LS3 swapped C5



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 PM.