Cats or no Cats on LG streets
#1
Pro
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cats or no Cats on LG streets
Hey guys thinking of getting headers and cant decide if i want cats or not. I was hoping to get some input, the headers im looking at are LG steets. Thanks Chadd
#2
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: North Dallas Forty Orange County, Ca.
Posts: 3,111
Received 113 Likes
on
59 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13, '15,'21
When I was first considering my LG Pros I had the same thoughts, but when it came down to it, the decision was really very simple. As enthusiasts we seem to always be looking for the performance angle. Many times weighing economy vs horsepower. In this case I think it's also about social responsibility, horsepower vs environment. At the end of the day for this case I don't think there's really enough performance to be gained by running without cats. On the other hand the increased pollution as a result of this is not worth it. I doubt there's anyone running a car on the street that can really feel the difference.
Most around here are probably not old enough to remember the days when you couldn't see 100 yards because the air was so thick with smog. If you are it's my guess you'll not have to think very long before making your choice. My vote will always be to leave all smog equipment intact and performing as intended.
My $.02 FWIW
Most around here are probably not old enough to remember the days when you couldn't see 100 yards because the air was so thick with smog. If you are it's my guess you'll not have to think very long before making your choice. My vote will always be to leave all smog equipment intact and performing as intended.
My $.02 FWIW
#4
Le Mans Master
When I was first considering my LG Pros I had the same thoughts, but when it came down to it, the decision was really very simple. As enthusiasts we seem to always be looking for the performance angle. Many times weighing economy vs horsepower. In this case I think it's also about social responsibility, horsepower vs environment. At the end of the day for this case I don't think there's really enough performance to be gained by running without cats. On the other hand the increased pollution as a result of this is not worth it. I doubt there's anyone running a car on the street that can really feel the difference.
Most around here are probably not old enough to remember the days when you couldn't see 100 yards because the air was so thick with smog. If you are it's my guess you'll not have to think very long before making your choice. My vote will always be to leave all smog equipment intact and performing as intended.
My $.02 FWIW
Most around here are probably not old enough to remember the days when you couldn't see 100 yards because the air was so thick with smog. If you are it's my guess you'll not have to think very long before making your choice. My vote will always be to leave all smog equipment intact and performing as intended.
My $.02 FWIW
#5
If social responsibility a concern of yours, this is not the hobby for you.
If you actually emissions test a car running no cats it doesn't really put out a whole hell of a lot more emissions than one with cats. It's not like if you take off your cats baby seals around the world will randomly start dying.
If person A with cats drive 20,000 miles a year and person B w/o cats drives 5,000 miles a year, you better believe A is being a lot less socially responsible.
Obviously if everyone did it, it would have a significant impact, but with current laws in place, that will never happen.
The best way to be socially responsible is to stop driving altogether and live somewhere that is completely self sustainable, which is obviously not possible in the US.
If you actually emissions test a car running no cats it doesn't really put out a whole hell of a lot more emissions than one with cats. It's not like if you take off your cats baby seals around the world will randomly start dying.
If person A with cats drive 20,000 miles a year and person B w/o cats drives 5,000 miles a year, you better believe A is being a lot less socially responsible.
Obviously if everyone did it, it would have a significant impact, but with current laws in place, that will never happen.
The best way to be socially responsible is to stop driving altogether and live somewhere that is completely self sustainable, which is obviously not possible in the US.
#7
Pro
Thread Starter
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for all of the input guys. But yes I do live in California. But Im in the military so my car is reg. in Ohio so we dont smog there. Anyways, intresting thoughts but one main question after all of them is does it sound so much different? I mean w/o cats is it really annoyingly loud?
#8
Burning Brakes
thanks for all of the input guys. But yes I do live in California. But Im in the military so my car is reg. in Ohio so we dont smog there. Anyways, intresting thoughts but one main question after all of them is does it sound so much different? I mean w/o cats is it really annoyingly loud?
I'd say don't get cats.
#9
Melting Slicks
thanks for all of the input guys. But yes I do live in California. But Im in the military so my car is reg. in Ohio so we dont smog there. Anyways, intresting thoughts but one main question after all of them is does it sound so much different? I mean w/o cats is it really annoyingly loud?
Okay, I am getting off my soap box. I just hope you do the right thing
#11
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: naugatuck ct
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have to think about what kind of air your leaving for your children and grandchildren to breath.If everyone said a little pollution won,t hurt we will have no good air left before you even realize it.get the cats.
#12
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: North Dallas Forty Orange County, Ca.
Posts: 3,111
Received 113 Likes
on
59 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13, '15,'21
If social responsibility a concern of yours, this is not the hobby for you.
If you actually emissions test a car running no cats it doesn't really put out a whole hell of a lot more emissions than one with cats. It's not like if you take off your cats baby seals around the world will randomly start dying.
If person A with cats drive 20,000 miles a year and person B w/o cats drives 5,000 miles a year, you better believe A is being a lot less socially responsible.
Obviously if everyone did it, it would have a significant impact, but with current laws in place, that will never happen.
The best way to be socially responsible is to stop driving altogether and live somewhere that is completely self sustainable, which is obviously not possible in the US.
If you actually emissions test a car running no cats it doesn't really put out a whole hell of a lot more emissions than one with cats. It's not like if you take off your cats baby seals around the world will randomly start dying.
If person A with cats drive 20,000 miles a year and person B w/o cats drives 5,000 miles a year, you better believe A is being a lot less socially responsible.
Obviously if everyone did it, it would have a significant impact, but with current laws in place, that will never happen.
The best way to be socially responsible is to stop driving altogether and live somewhere that is completely self sustainable, which is obviously not possible in the US.
#13
I'd have to agree with several people on here and say to go the high flow cats route. I couldn't imagine owning such a nice car as a late model Corvette and driving around creating such a smell without running cats. The power gain from running catless is not something that you're going to feel, as you're generally only talking a 3-5 horsepower gain at most, and that's all to be had on the top end mainly.
Keeping high flow cats will retain some low-end torque (which I prefer over 3-5 extra horsepower on the top-end, personally) and your inside of your car and your clothes won't smell like a '70 Chevelle.\
A good quality high-flow cat can also be more efficient in reducing emissions than your stock cats. If you don't want to risk failing emissions (if you have emissions inspections where you live) but want optimum performance then high flow cats is ultimately the way to go. If the car is strictly a drag car then I would recommend catless in that case, and only that case. Hope that helps!
Keeping high flow cats will retain some low-end torque (which I prefer over 3-5 extra horsepower on the top-end, personally) and your inside of your car and your clothes won't smell like a '70 Chevelle.\
A good quality high-flow cat can also be more efficient in reducing emissions than your stock cats. If you don't want to risk failing emissions (if you have emissions inspections where you live) but want optimum performance then high flow cats is ultimately the way to go. If the car is strictly a drag car then I would recommend catless in that case, and only that case. Hope that helps!
#14
If you are going to care about the INSIGNIFICANT amount of extra emissions from a few automotive enthusiasts, why stop there?
Has anyone ever seen how an emissions test is run or cared enough to look at the numbers? The parameters are so broad that often times newer vehicles can pass without catalytic converters at all.
I guess we should ban drag racing on this forum too because all the 9 and 10 second cars running race gas on here are ruining the air for our kids too, right?
Some of you need to use your brains and think about how big the planet is and realize that a few car guys running no cats is not the problem with air pollution.
I'd be willing to bet a significant amount of you complaining probably drive 50 miles to work every day too.
#15
Drifting
I love reading the responses regarding cats and the enviorment, so entertaining. One guy is going to club a baby seal and the other is hugging a tree. You guys are funny, thanks.
No cats will be louder and exhaust will smell.
No cats will be louder and exhaust will smell.
#16
Burning Brakes
Wow... I thought we were on the Corvette board not the Prius board!
I've never noticed the rotten egg smell from any of my cat-less cars.
When I think about any extra emissions from a car without cats I think about the research that shows how many contaminants and harmful byproducts come from the manufacturing of catalytic converters!!!!
I also look at just one school bus next to me or an 18-wheeler pulling away from a stoplight pumping HUGE amounts of caustic dark black smoke into the air... I'm pretty sure my relatively small ~6 liter produces less over it's entire life than trucks like that in a month!
I've never noticed the rotten egg smell from any of my cat-less cars.
When I think about any extra emissions from a car without cats I think about the research that shows how many contaminants and harmful byproducts come from the manufacturing of catalytic converters!!!!
I also look at just one school bus next to me or an 18-wheeler pulling away from a stoplight pumping HUGE amounts of caustic dark black smoke into the air... I'm pretty sure my relatively small ~6 liter produces less over it's entire life than trucks like that in a month!
Last edited by jhelms; 08-08-2008 at 02:40 PM.
#18
Safety Car
That's EXACTLY my point!
If you are going to care about the INSIGNIFICANT amount of extra emissions from a few automotive enthusiasts, why stop there?
Has anyone ever seen how an emissions test is run or cared enough to look at the numbers? The parameters are so broad that often times newer vehicles can pass without catalytic converters at all.
I guess we should ban drag racing on this forum too because all the 9 and 10 second cars running race gas on here are ruining the air for our kids too, right?
Some of you need to use your brains and think about how big the planet is and realize that a few car guys running no cats is not the problem with air pollution.
I'd be willing to bet a significant amount of you complaining probably drive 50 miles to work every day too.
If you are going to care about the INSIGNIFICANT amount of extra emissions from a few automotive enthusiasts, why stop there?
Has anyone ever seen how an emissions test is run or cared enough to look at the numbers? The parameters are so broad that often times newer vehicles can pass without catalytic converters at all.
I guess we should ban drag racing on this forum too because all the 9 and 10 second cars running race gas on here are ruining the air for our kids too, right?
Some of you need to use your brains and think about how big the planet is and realize that a few car guys running no cats is not the problem with air pollution.
I'd be willing to bet a significant amount of you complaining probably drive 50 miles to work every day too.
You are absolutely full of
If the billions of people on this planet took your attitude .... we'd all be dead by tomorrow.
You are not some "elite" person allowed to pollute the planet because no one else can .... you are the problem .... not the solution.
Bottom line ... you're a freakin' moron.
#19
I bought my car with LG Streets and cat delete pipes. It also came with hi-flow cats.
In less than two weeks I was putting the cats in.
To me, it was all about the smell. I could fill up a room with exhaust stench after a 10 minute drive.
The sound difference was not noticable and I noticed no performance difference.
In less than two weeks I was putting the cats in.
To me, it was all about the smell. I could fill up a room with exhaust stench after a 10 minute drive.
The sound difference was not noticable and I noticed no performance difference.
#20
Burning Brakes
I have the LG Pros with the hi-flo cats. One of the magazines tested both with and without and virtually no differences in HP. I'm not a tree hugger but if there's no diff in HP why wouldn't you and I don't have to change anything if I go for emissions testing which I had to do yearly in TN but not here in FL so far.