C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

why the push to solid valves and dual springs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2014, 03:28 AM
  #1  
dagon138
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
dagon138's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default why the push to solid valves and dual springs?

I'm in the middle of research for heads and cam setups for my ls6 and I keep on seeing head vendors using valve-trains heavier than stock like Solid Valves, Dual springs.

I understand for certain cams specs its necessary to go to duals. But it seems to be go to everyone become burnt on beehive springs (ls6 issues and early comp cams 918)?

What about all this heavy solid valve stuff? I even see the ls7 guys getting pushed to get rid of their Ti valves.

Why would GM go to trouble to put the $ into creating a lighter valve-train unless it help performance or reliability?
Old 01-17-2014, 11:46 AM
  #2  
Mattie Num Nums
Melting Slicks
 
Mattie Num Nums's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: Frisco Texas
Posts: 2,312
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

GM goes through the trouble of saving money and using the same parts for as many vehicles as possible
Old 01-17-2014, 12:18 PM
  #3  
VGLNTE1
Le Mans Master
 
VGLNTE1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Morton illinois
Posts: 6,226
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14-'15
Default

Solid valves are stronger, and dual springs are worlds better than regular beehives.
Old 01-17-2014, 12:50 PM
  #4  
Pfadt Racing
Safety Car
 
Pfadt Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dagon138
I'm in the middle of research for heads and cam setups for my ls6 and I keep on seeing head vendors using valve-trains heavier than stock like Solid Valves, Dual springs.

I understand for certain cams specs its necessary to go to duals. But it seems to be go to everyone become burnt on beehive springs (ls6 issues and early comp cams 918)?

What about all this heavy solid valve stuff? I even see the ls7 guys getting pushed to get rid of their Ti valves.

Why would GM go to trouble to put the $ into creating a lighter valve-train unless it help performance or reliability?
The ls7 guys have become fearful of the exhaust valves dropping which probably explains position. It really depends on goals. I think (don't quote me on this, but I can check with the engineers) that there are some dynamic advantages to a single beehive spring.

Pfadt Race Engineering
888-972-2464
info@pfadtracing.com

Old 01-17-2014, 01:04 PM
  #5  
vettenuts
Team Owner
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: At the beach in little Rhody
Posts: 22,024
Received 186 Likes on 169 Posts

Default

Not sure what cam you plan to use, but if I were in your shoes I would have someone very reputable (AI comes to mind) work you 243's and keep the stock valves. Then I would personally install PSI 1500ML and shim accordingly depending on total lift. IMO, the only reason to go to solid valves with your heads is if you went larger. But I would prefer very light with beehives and the largest OD pushrod I could fit.

Get notified of new replies

To why the push to solid valves and dual springs?




Quick Reply: why the push to solid valves and dual springs?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 PM.