Cold Air Intake Increase HP?
My question is how could the HP possibly increase this much and if it can't how can the manufacture of the custom air intake make this claim?
Seems to me that the engine will draw in the same volume of air w/o boost.
I was running 107mph 1/4 mile traps bone stock, added headers and trapped 109, finally adding Vararam+tune got me up to 115mph. I'm sure the tune was a big part of it, but the intake definitely gained.
Last edited by Lockettk; Feb 4, 2015 at 11:43 AM. Reason: Typo
However, with a combined set of mods, an intake can increase airflow and volume, hence the air pump analogy... so, yes, they actually do produce gains but are more prevalent upon the addition of other mods
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
When you have done that, you are 75% of the way to a Vararam installation. Great installation video on Youtube (see link on Vararam site). Just add an air gun to spritz the radiator and you are all the way there.
Cheap thrills :-)
A cylinder can only hold so much volume and that is with a mix of air and fuel which is only in grams/cylinder, yet the intake manifold holds quarts of air and the intake runners can only allow as much air mass as the runner size. Increasing MAF, smooth air bridge or a larger TB cannot make the runners of cylinders flow or pack in more volume then their size is.
A cylinder can only hold so much volume and that is with a mix of air and fuel which is only in grams/cylinder, yet the intake manifold holds quarts of air and the intake runners can only allow as much air mass as the runner size. Increasing MAF, smooth air bridge or a larger TB cannot make the runners of cylinders flow or pack in more volume then their size is.
Also agree that the volumes you noted are fixed, but that isn’t the point.
The point is increasing air density – more specifically how the intake tract can decrease that density and hence power.
We know that we control engine power through the throttle body. The throttle body is nothing more than a variable intake tract restriction. We can feel and hear its effect on the engine. We can also see its effect on engine vacuum or Manifold Air Pressure (MAP).
An undersized throttle body at WOT will flow like a properly sized one that isn’t fully opened. The rest of the intake tract can have the same effect.
A well designed engine like the LS1 will be in the neighborhood of 100% Volumetric Efficiency (VE) at peak HP operating conditions, closer to or even over 100% at peak torque. At 100% VE percentage changes in pressure will have a 1:1 effect on percentage changes in airflow.
If you can read your engine’s MAP sensor data you can get a feel for how much power and torque you may be leaving on the table. With the key in the run position but engine not started see what the MAP sensor is reporting. It should be close to 100 kPa. Then while recording MAP sensor data take the car out and get it to WOT and look at the MAP data. It will be a little bit less than the non-running level, unless of course your engine is boosted or has a VERY effective ram air setup. The difference is going to be close to the % of power being choked by the intake tract. It’s theoretically possible to eliminate most of that pressure loss. It is that potential to eliminate most of that pressure loss that an aftermarket intake may (or may not) provide you.
My car isn’t stock. I’m pretty darn sure it has a cam in it. I know it has long-tube headers. I know it doesn’t have cats. I know it has a loud aftermarket exhaust. I know it has the Weiand/Lingenfelter intake manifold. I know it has the zip-tie air intake mod. And I know my MAP sensor is telling me I’ve got airflow restrictions costing me over 5% MAP.
If my dyno run this summer was correct, and assuming a 20% automatic transmission drivetrain loss, my engine is putting out close to 480 HP. If I could eliminate all of the MAP loss I should be getting over 500 HP out of my engine.
So the point is a restrictive air intake tract is like a less then fully opened throttle body. It’s sort of like putting a brick under your accelerator pedal. Whether or not anyone’s car, stock or not stock, can benefit from any aftermarket air intake I can’t tell you. What I can tell you is that there is a way to pretty well quantify what’s being left on the table.
Last edited by enoniam; Feb 6, 2015 at 02:04 PM.
A lawyer would point to the phrase, "can increase up to" Quite different from "will increase". Jerry Jones "can" sign over the Dallas cowboys to me, anytime he wants. Will he do that is another question.
As another poster mentioned, without a starting point, measurements mean little. Tough to beat a modern fuel efficient factory design without changing the tradeoffs or , the more common road to improvement, more money in the part.
A lawyer would point to the phrase, "can increase up to" Quite different from "will increase". Jerry Jones "can" sign over the Dallas cowboys to me, anytime he wants. Will he do that is another question.
As another poster mentioned, without a starting point, measurements mean little. Tough to beat a modern fuel efficient factory design without changing the tradeoffs or , the more common road to improvement, more money in the part.
Hmmm... nice postulate but it doesn't work. The stock system on a C5 is nowhere near optimized, and thus it is not all that difficult to beat. Enoniam is correct, and my thought is that he is simply trying to point to the fact that there is H.P. to be recouped from being able to reduce the losses from a restrictive system. The caveat is that there is no way that he, nor anyone else, can guarantee that every system will give "x" amount of increase on every C5 under every condition. No one can. What we can say is that there are solutions that have been dynoed and shown to improve H.P. in comparison to the stock system on different C5's with differing amounts of work done to them; from totally stock to seriously wild. Why? Because the stock system leaves a lot on the table. It's horribly restrictive in comparison to even what the stock TB can flow. Increasing the CFM capabilities of the Air Intake, MAF, Bridge and even the TB show some very nice CFM gains; gains that have been shown to increase H.P.
Check this thread out for further quantified, independent test data...
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...fications.html



















