C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Larger or just Wider contact patch?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2009, 11:01 PM
  #1  
LMB-C6
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
LMB-C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 2,673
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default Larger or just Wider contact patch?

I remember reading in one of the car rags way back that increasing the width of a tire doesn't necesarily give more traction because the total area of the contact patch stays the same. Put another way, if you have a narrower tire the contact patch may look like a square, changing to wider tires makes the contact patch look like a rectangle - but the total area is the same. So are you really getting anything other than a factor?
Old 03-21-2009, 11:09 PM
  #2  
wolfdogs
Le Mans Master
 
wolfdogs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Stafford VA, home of our wolf den. No house break ins to date.
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

wrong. if you are running the right psi for the weight of the vehicle for a given tire size, the contact patch will be bigger and will remain the right dimension. You must also run the right design rim width for the tire in order to achieve that contact patch. A lot of folks make that mistake on the rim width. All they do is mushroom the tires tread surface by not running the right width.
Old 03-22-2009, 12:06 AM
  #3  
VettedCandidate
Melting Slicks
 
VettedCandidate's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,999
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'm sorry, haven't we heard of slicks? Wider, less air, stickier=bigger contact patch, right?
Old 03-22-2009, 12:35 AM
  #4  
ALLEGRO
Le Mans Master
 
ALLEGRO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Memphis Tennessee
Posts: 6,670
Likes: 0
Received 135 Likes on 84 Posts

Default

Its all about "pounds per square inch."

If two tires, one wider than the other, are at the same inflation pressure, they will support the same amount of vehicle weight, with the same amount of contact to the ground.

If the car weighs 4000lbs, and each corner is the same weight, then each tire supports 1000 lbs. If the inflation pressure is 33.3 psi, then each tire would need a support base (contact patch) of 30 square inches to equal the 1000lb weight.

The "thirty" inches of contact patch can be 6 inches wide and 5 inches long (skinny tire), or 10 inches wide and three inches long (wider tire).

Either way, there is 1000 pounds excerted on the tire, and in response the tire is pushing back a 33.3 pounds per square inch, requiring 30 square inches of support base to do the job.

Class is OVER
Old 03-22-2009, 08:06 AM
  #5  
Paul330
Instructor
 
Paul330's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: NH
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ALLEGRO
Its all about "pounds per square inch."

If two tires, one wider than the other, are at the same inflation pressure, they will support the same amount of vehicle weight, with the same amount of contact to the ground.

If the car weighs 4000lbs, and each corner is the same weight, then each tire supports 1000 lbs. If the inflation pressure is 33.3 psi, then each tire would need a support base (contact patch) of 30 square inches to equal the 1000lb weight.

The "thirty" inches of contact patch can be 6 inches wide and 5 inches long (skinny tire), or 10 inches wide and three inches long (wider tire).

Either way, there is 1000 pounds excerted on the tire, and in response the tire is pushing back a 33.3 pounds per square inch, requiring 30 square inches of support base to do the job.

Class is OVER
The above would be completely true if the tire's material was infinitely flexible. But it is not (especially not with run-flats). A wider tire will have a larger contact patch.
Old 03-22-2009, 08:15 AM
  #6  
owebo
Team Owner
 
owebo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Posts: 133,592
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11, '16

Default

Originally Posted by Paul330
The above would be completely true if the tire's material was infinitely flexible. But it is not (especially not with run-flats). A wider tire will have a larger contact patch.
You need to re-read ALLEGRO's post....It is completely true....There is no gray area in physics....

A wider tire, given the same conditions, will have a different shaped contact patch with the SAME area as the one you are comparing it to...
Old 03-22-2009, 08:27 AM
  #7  
Red Rochester
Le Mans Master

 
Red Rochester's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Rochester New York
Posts: 8,515
Received 255 Likes on 135 Posts

Default

The bigger the tire the greater the contact area .
Old 03-22-2009, 08:35 AM
  #8  
owebo
Team Owner
 
owebo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Posts: 133,592
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11, '16

Default

Originally Posted by Red Rochester
The bigger the tire the greater the contact area .
How is that? Can you explain it to us here?
Old 03-22-2009, 08:42 AM
  #9  
da-googoo-man
Racer
 
da-googoo-man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: New York NY
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Not to further complicate the issue but we are speaking of contact patch dimensions under a static loading condition. Depending upon speed relative to down force, g load, shoulder and side wall compliance/pliability, heat and the dynamic distribution of those many factors, the contact patch areas are decreased, increased and deformed as the vehicle is in motion. Given the above it may be wise to examine the aesthetic verses the practical benefits relative to driving style and needs. Tire technology is so
Old 03-22-2009, 08:47 AM
  #10  
owebo
Team Owner
 
owebo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Posts: 133,592
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11, '16

Default

Originally Posted by da-googoo-man
Not to further complicate the issue but we are speaking of contact patch dimensions under a static loading condition. Depending upon speed relative to down force, g load, shoulder and side wall compliance/pliability, heat and the dynamic distribution of those many factors, the contact patch areas are decreased, increased and deformed as the vehicle is in motion. Given the above it may be wise to examine the aesthetic verses the practical benefits relative to driving style and needs. Tire technology is so
Static conditions are directly related to dynamic, so lets stay with static to keep it simple.....
Old 03-22-2009, 09:10 AM
  #11  
glacierbay2
Racer
 
glacierbay2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Morganton NC
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What about a simple picture? A 200 pound man with size 6 shoe prints will have a smaller contact patch than a 200 pound man with size 10 shoes. His weight is irrelevent; the amount of weight divided across his contact patch is dependent on the surface area of the patch--bigger patch, less psi within the patch, but total psi remains the same. Yes? I were walking across quicksand, I want to have big feet.
Old 03-22-2009, 09:35 AM
  #12  
avizandum
Pro
 
avizandum's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Farmington MI
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ALLEGRO
Its all about "pounds per square inch."

If two tires, one wider than the other, are at the same inflation pressure, they will support the same amount of vehicle weight, with the same amount of contact to the ground.

If the car weighs 4000lbs, and each corner is the same weight, then each tire supports 1000 lbs. If the inflation pressure is 33.3 psi, then each tire would need a support base (contact patch) of 30 square inches to equal the 1000lb weight.

The "thirty" inches of contact patch can be 6 inches wide and 5 inches long (skinny tire), or 10 inches wide and three inches long (wider tire).

Either way, there is 1000 pounds excerted on the tire, and in response the tire is pushing back a 33.3 pounds per square inch, requiring 30 square inches of support base to do the job.

Class is OVER


Setting physics aside (but not sure it's this simple), why does the lighter ZR1 get wider tires and pull more Gs? Additionally look how wide competition cars run tires...
Old 03-22-2009, 09:44 AM
  #13  
AORoads
Team Owner
 
AORoads's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 46,104
Received 2,481 Likes on 1,944 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
"In honor of jpee"

Default

I'm sure it exists somewhere, but I'd be interested in seeing the total contact "patch" of a typical, stock Corvette. And then, let's see what a properly "wheeled" and plus sized or or wider tires make as far as a contact patch.

Maybe this info exists on tirerack or Fed. DOT somewhere. I had read that the typical car (not necesarily the C6) has something like the equivalent of one, 8 1/2"x11" piece of paper for all 4 tires. Of course, that could be for a Cobalt.
Old 03-22-2009, 09:54 AM
  #14  
haljensen
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
haljensen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LMB-C6
I remember reading in one of the car rags way back that increasing the width of a tire doesn't necesarily give more traction because the total area of the contact patch stays the same. Put another way, if you have a narrower tire the contact patch may look like a square, changing to wider tires makes the contact patch look like a rectangle - but the total area is the same. So are you really getting anything other than a factor?
How about some common sense? A 27" bicycle tire doesn't have the same amount of rubber on the road as a 285/35/19 (26.7"). I don't care what double talk or "theory" you use.
Old 03-22-2009, 09:58 AM
  #15  
wolfdogs
Le Mans Master
 
wolfdogs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Stafford VA, home of our wolf den. No house break ins to date.
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Im a tire engineer/testing engineer by trade, 30+ years, Fed. Govt. I have seen the variances in contact patches in testing, depending on the tires aspect ratio vs width. We conduct that on a "drive over glass plate". We vary the psi. Varience in as little as 3 psi can change the size of the contact patch.

Always remember, the tire is nothing but a pressure vessel. The air is what carries the load.

Todays radial tires are quite flexable, and lighter than previous radials due to the incorporation of denser, lighter components. When you go up in size, you increase the "pressure vessals interior volume" therefore the correct psi for the weight over the tire become critical in order to achieve the largest contact patch but also maintain the proper flexing action that the tires construction was built to accomplish. Sure, a low psi will give you a larger contact patch...but too low of a psi will create too much flex and can lead to premature tire failure.
Old 03-22-2009, 09:58 AM
  #16  
Grateful
Instructor
 
Grateful's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

here's a simple way to solve this... wet/paint a section of your front and back tire. roll your car to make an imprint on the road then measure and do the math.
Old 03-22-2009, 10:08 AM
  #17  
owebo
Team Owner
 
owebo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Posts: 133,592
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11, '16

Default

Originally Posted by haljensen
How about some common sense? A 27" bicycle tire doesn't have the same amount of rubber on the road as a 285/35/19 (26.7"). I don't care what double talk or "theory" you use.
Physics and common sense are often at odds with many people.....You do care, or you wouldn't have posted....it is a sign of an open mind....

Many wanna be engineers become business majors when the concept of the circle is factored into the lesson plan.....

Get notified of new replies

To Larger or just Wider contact patch?

Old 03-22-2009, 10:16 AM
  #18  
Wayne O
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Wayne O's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Tucson Arizona
Posts: 23,313
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I wasn't a physics major but I'd rather have wider (than narrower) tires running a road course. The shape of the contact patch relates to the profile or aspect ratio of the wheel/tire. Our low profile tires have short wide contact patch for superior cornering and traction (not just for ). More conventional higher profile tires have a longer, narrower contact patch which would be better for a car plowing through snow.

Originally Posted by glacierbay2
What about a simple picture? A 200 pound man with size 6 shoe prints will have a smaller contact patch than a 200 pound man with size 10 shoes. His weight is irrelevent; the amount of weight divided across his contact patch is dependent on the surface area of the patch--bigger patch, less psi within the patch, but total psi remains the same. Yes? I were walking across quicksand, I want to have big feet.
Like I've heard, if you were to fall off a ten story building your best chance for survivability would be to land flatout...splayed on the ground to distibute the weight with less lbs per sq in.
Old 03-22-2009, 10:22 AM
  #19  
FortMorganAl
Le Mans Master
 
FortMorganAl's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Currently somewhere in IL,IN,KY,TN,MO,AR,MS,AL, or FL
Posts: 8,514
Received 228 Likes on 187 Posts

Default

http://www.performancesimulations.co...on-tires-1.htm

It seems patch size is NOT directly related to anything.
Old 03-22-2009, 10:22 AM
  #20  
FM
Racer
 
FM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Newport News VA
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ALLEGRO
Its all about "pounds per square inch."

If two tires, one wider than the other, are at the same inflation pressure, they will support the same amount of vehicle weight, with the same amount of contact to the ground.

If the car weighs 4000lbs, and each corner is the same weight, then each tire supports 1000 lbs. If the inflation pressure is 33.3 psi, then each tire would need a support base (contact patch) of 30 square inches to equal the 1000lb weight.

The "thirty" inches of contact patch can be 6 inches wide and 5 inches long (skinny tire), or 10 inches wide and three inches long (wider tire).

Either way, there is 1000 pounds excerted on the tire, and in response the tire is pushing back a 33.3 pounds per square inch, requiring 30 square inches of support base to do the job.

Class is OVER
Class isn't quite over because static and dynamic stresses are not the same. When a lateral force is exerted on the tire, the wider, shorter contact patch of the wider tire distorts less and more of the rubber stays in contact with the road. Similarly, a slick tire with the same size contact patch will give better traction (on a dry surface) because without the grooves there is more rubber per square inch in contact with the road.

Rubber is funny stuff, and modern tire technology is very complex. The only way to know for sure how two tires compare is to test them.


Quick Reply: Larger or just Wider contact patch?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 PM.