ZR-1 vs Cayman S
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
ZR-1 vs Cayman S
In the October issue of Motor trend, they rate the best driver's cars. Cayman S came in first. The ZR1 came in 6th, one spot behind the Mustang. They commented on the ZR1 using the same steering wheel as a Chevy Cobalt and the poor unsupportive seats in the ZR1.
#2
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Northwestern Connecticut
Posts: 2,615
Received 154 Likes
on
114 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
I read that, so the ZR1 was the best performing of all the cars, but they just don't like it., the boxster with a roof is better? I couldn't figure that out myself, glad it was a free mag not something I paid for!
#3
Le Mans Master
Since the Cayman came in first we definitely know for a fact that styling had nothing to do with the ratings in any way, shape, or form.
I saw the magazine while the girlfriend was shopping. I had to look at the cover twice as I thought I picked up a comic book.
#4
Team Owner
As mentioned in the previous post, the Motor Trend in this case should be a comic book. Who in their right mind would pick a Cayman over a ZR1.
#5
The point of that article was not how fast each car went, but how each car went fast. A "driver's car" is not necessarily the one that puts up the best numbers on the stopwatch; it is the car that connects with the driver via the steering wheel, suspension, shift lever, and gas pedal. Does the chassis want to dance, and is the engine the life of the party? Power is just one, not the only, part of the vehicle's soul. How it works in concert with the other aspects of the vehicle significantly alters the experience of the car. Balance is key. This is a subjective thing but keep in mind Motor Trend had a panel of people drive all of these cars back to back, which is something we cannot do. Some people will think the ZR1 is the better driver's car, but this panel did not. To each his own... which is why we are all on a Corvette forum.
I do not have an issue with their ranking, but I do have an issue with what cars are not present. Where is the Lotus Elise? Why no BMW M3? Why not the more accessible base Corvette or Z06 instead of the ZR1? Why is the CTS-V and Jaguar even in that test? What about a GTR or a Viper? And if the Cayman is better than the 911, why not invite one in and put that to rest?
I do not have an issue with their ranking, but I do have an issue with what cars are not present. Where is the Lotus Elise? Why no BMW M3? Why not the more accessible base Corvette or Z06 instead of the ZR1? Why is the CTS-V and Jaguar even in that test? What about a GTR or a Viper? And if the Cayman is better than the 911, why not invite one in and put that to rest?
#7
The point of that article was not how fast each car went, but how each car went fast. A "driver's car" is not necessarily the one that puts up the best numbers on the stopwatch; it is the car that connects with the driver via the steering wheel, suspension, shift lever, and gas pedal. Does the chassis want to dance, and is the engine the life of the party? Power is just one, not the only, part of the vehicle's soul. How it works in concert with the other aspects of the vehicle significantly alters the experience of the car. Balance is key. This is a subjective thing but keep in mind Motor Trend had a panel of people drive all of these cars back to back, which is something we cannot do. Some people will think the ZR1 is the better driver's car, but this panel did not. To each his own... which is why we are all on a Corvette forum.
I do not have an issue with their ranking, but I do have an issue with what cars are not present. Where is the Lotus Elise? Why no BMW M3? Why not the more accessible base Corvette or Z06 instead of the ZR1? Why is the CTS-V and Jaguar even in that test? What about a GTR or a Viper? And if the Cayman is better than the 911, why not invite one in and put that to rest?
I do not have an issue with their ranking, but I do have an issue with what cars are not present. Where is the Lotus Elise? Why no BMW M3? Why not the more accessible base Corvette or Z06 instead of the ZR1? Why is the CTS-V and Jaguar even in that test? What about a GTR or a Viper? And if the Cayman is better than the 911, why not invite one in and put that to rest?
#9
Melting Slicks
The car magazines are getting worse every year.... must be why I got a renewal notice from Car & Driver for $12 for 2 years.... 50 cents an issue...LOL
Some of the latest comparisons are just ridiculous.... The Audi and the P car don't have eough power to spin the damn tires....so it must be a better driver. That is how I understood the article. Whatever....
I don't buy cars based on what someone my father's age likes. ( no offense to anyone)
Some of the latest comparisons are just ridiculous.... The Audi and the P car don't have eough power to spin the damn tires....so it must be a better driver. That is how I understood the article. Whatever....
I don't buy cars based on what someone my father's age likes. ( no offense to anyone)
#10
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: The Beautiful Inland Empire WA.
Posts: 5,933
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
If the road test was for "user friendliness" and the panel was regular consumers, I can see a monster like the ZR1 finishing where it did.
But, if they only tested the "regular" Mustang -- perhaps the GT,as I suspect they did, but did not test the more hairy chested 500 KR -- then the test has no validity.......and why the Cayman and not the top of the line 911 Turbo?
I know that my brother would prefer his Ford Focus to my Corvette -- but what's the point in even saying that????
This test sounds beyond rediculous going in.....and moronic coming out....
But, if they only tested the "regular" Mustang -- perhaps the GT,as I suspect they did, but did not test the more hairy chested 500 KR -- then the test has no validity.......and why the Cayman and not the top of the line 911 Turbo?
I know that my brother would prefer his Ford Focus to my Corvette -- but what's the point in even saying that????
This test sounds beyond rediculous going in.....and moronic coming out....
#11
Safety Car
The biggest gripe I have about the comparison is they complained about the ZR1 saying it was hard to operate at 10/10ths, partially because of the huge power it was putting out. It didn't inspire confidence, but left the drivers "white knuckled".
They said this while admitting that it was 5 seconds faster around the road course than the next fastest car.
So why not back off the throttle??? If you're driving it at 9/10ths (or wherever you need to drive it to still be the fastest around the track), would it be an easier car to drive? Would it have scored higher?
Or take the Cayman S, bump up the output by a couple hundred horsepower, and try to dive it at 10/10ths, and see if that is still just as easy/rewarding/whatever of a drive.
They said this while admitting that it was 5 seconds faster around the road course than the next fastest car.
So why not back off the throttle??? If you're driving it at 9/10ths (or wherever you need to drive it to still be the fastest around the track), would it be an easier car to drive? Would it have scored higher?
Or take the Cayman S, bump up the output by a couple hundred horsepower, and try to dive it at 10/10ths, and see if that is still just as easy/rewarding/whatever of a drive.
#13
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: The Beautiful Inland Empire WA.
Posts: 5,933
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
The biggest gripe I have about the comparison is they complained about the ZR1 saying it was hard to operate at 10/10ths, partially because of the huge power it was putting out. It didn't inspire confidence, but left the drivers "white knuckled".
They said this while admitting that it was 5 seconds faster around the road course than the next fastest car.
So why not back off the throttle??? If you're driving it at 9/10ths (or wherever you need to drive it to still be the fastest around the track), would it be an easier car to drive? Would it have scored higher?
Or take the Cayman S, bump up the output by a couple hundred horsepower, and try to dive it at 10/10ths, and see if that is still just as easy/rewarding/whatever of a drive.
They said this while admitting that it was 5 seconds faster around the road course than the next fastest car.
So why not back off the throttle??? If you're driving it at 9/10ths (or wherever you need to drive it to still be the fastest around the track), would it be an easier car to drive? Would it have scored higher?
Or take the Cayman S, bump up the output by a couple hundred horsepower, and try to dive it at 10/10ths, and see if that is still just as easy/rewarding/whatever of a drive.
Last edited by C6NRED; 09-11-2009 at 03:14 PM.
#14
Melting Slicks
The point of that article was not how fast each car went, but how each car went fast. A "driver's car" is not necessarily the one that puts up the best numbers on the stopwatch; it is the car that connects with the driver via the steering wheel, suspension, shift lever, and gas pedal. Does the chassis want to dance, and is the engine the life of the party? Power is just one, not the only, part of the vehicle's soul. How it works in concert with the other aspects of the vehicle significantly alters the experience of the car. Balance is key. This is a subjective thing but keep in mind Motor Trend had a panel of people drive all of these cars back to back, which is something we cannot do. Some people will think the ZR1 is the better driver's car, but this panel did not. To each his own... which is why we are all on a Corvette forum.
I didn't see any rhyme or reason to their car selection. Was it just a bunch of cars they had around at that moment? Cayman instead of a 911? And the lack of certain other cars that would definitely rate high on the 'feedback' scale (like a Lotus) makes no sense to me.
IIRC, they complained about how 'on edge' the ZR-1 got at the limit, and then I remember reading the praise they had for a Miata. Let's see, 640Hp vs. 170Hp.....mash on the gas petal and then set up for a corner....one of those will be going at lawn tractor speeds so we will call that more user-friendly? IMO, not a fair comparison. How about driving the ZR-1 at Miata capable speeds and tell us what it feels like. Of course, it would be tough not using the last 4 gears.
BTW - I am a Miata fan.
Last edited by LMB-C6; 09-11-2009 at 03:19 PM.
#16
Race Director
I don't really pay attention to the articles too much. Given the money to buy any of those cars on the list and I'm sure the ZR1 would win. Cayman has no styling, nothing new for sure. It just tells the rest of the world that you really wanted a 911 but you couldn't quite afford it.
#18