C6 wheel weight
#2
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,937
Received 2,051 Likes
on
1,362 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
#3
Thanks for the info. I'm looking at a set of vossen wheels, cast unfortunately bc I'm on a budget. It looks like they're gonna weigh about 3lbs more than the stock ones per wheel. Do you think I'll be able to tell a difference in the cars performanc due to the extra unsprung weight?
#4
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,937
Received 2,051 Likes
on
1,362 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
I'm not aware of any comparison test on ride and handling. My guess is that a bumpy surface would give a little more skitter because the heavier wheel/tire assembly would have a tougher time following the pavement contour. But how much more???
I've heard it said that 1 lb of rotating weight is about equal to 4 lbs of fixed weight. So, 12 lbs of extra wheels would be about equal to 48 lbs in the trunk.
I don't like spending big bucks for wheels that are inferior, performance wise, to the inexpensive stock wheels.
I've heard it said that 1 lb of rotating weight is about equal to 4 lbs of fixed weight. So, 12 lbs of extra wheels would be about equal to 48 lbs in the trunk.
I don't like spending big bucks for wheels that are inferior, performance wise, to the inexpensive stock wheels.
#5
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Bergen County, NJ Sarasota, FL
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Thanks for the info. I'm looking at a set of vossen wheels, cast unfortunately bc I'm on a budget. It looks like they're gonna weigh about 3lbs more than the stock ones per wheel. Do you think I'll be able to tell a difference in the cars performanc due to the extra unsprung weight?
For general use, you probaly won't notice any difference.
If you take it on a sports car track, it's a different story.
#6
Pro
But if you have full tank of gas when at the track and gasoline weighs about 8 lbs per gallon that's 144 lbs of extra weight or a small co-pilot. So I don't think 3lbs per wheel adds up to much. IMHO
The following users liked this post:
GMC262 (07-10-2022)
#8
Pro
#9
Race Director
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
Posts: 16,555
Received 2,061 Likes
on
1,505 Posts
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...ght-tests.html
#10
Here's some weight testing I did in the Spring. It appears that there is little, if any, factor when comparing static to rotating weight. I plan to do more testing on the rotating weight aspect before the end of the year.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...ght-tests.html
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...ght-tests.html
#11
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,937
Received 2,051 Likes
on
1,362 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Here's some weight testing I did in the Spring. It appears that there is little, if any, factor when comparing static to rotating weight. I plan to do more testing on the rotating weight aspect before the end of the year.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...ght-tests.html
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...ght-tests.html
As I read it, the relationship of fixed weight to ET is proving out well. But the rotating weight issue still seems a bit under-explored. Hopefully, you'll be able to extend your testing so we can know instead of guessing.
As mentioned in your thread, the location of the rotating weight is probably significant. Center caps made of lead probably would be right at 1 to 1. Tires made of lead would probably be a different story.
Since we now know the effect of 100 lbs of fixed weight, can someone do the math to figure out the rotational velocity of a certain spot on the wheel at about 110 mph and work from there?
Keep up the good work!