Anyone know what this is?
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Anyone know what this is?
I was under my 2008 C6 with F55 when I noticed this little arm hanging free under the drivers side (I think it's attached to the suspension control arm)...I think it's a tiny control arm for a sensor, but not sure what sensor to order...any help?
The sensor arm that this attaches to broke off.
The sensor arm that this attaches to broke off.
Last edited by joliett; 06-28-2017 at 02:36 PM.
The following users liked this post:
joliett (06-30-2017)
#3
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Omaha
Posts: 6,580
Received 2,261 Likes
on
1,184 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
Yep, you're F55 should be throwing codes is that is not connected. If it's not, you must not drive your car very hard. Seriously, I had that exact part break about a year into owning my GS, and it would be fine until I hit a big bump or took some aggressive turns, then I'd get a DIC message about the suspension.
The following users liked this post:
joliett (06-30-2017)
#4
Race Director
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
Posts: 16,555
Received 2,060 Likes
on
1,505 Posts
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Yep, you're F55 should be throwing codes is that is not connected. If it's not, you must not drive your car very hard. Seriously, I had that exact part break about a year into owning my GS, and it would be fine until I hit a big bump or took some aggressive turns, then I'd get a DIC message about the suspension.
The following users liked this post:
joliett (06-30-2017)
#6
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
I bought this one on ebay for $43:
Brand New Front Left Suspension Height Sensor For Chevrolet Corvette ER10035
If you look carefully at the photo, it apparently has the same manufacturer as the expensive ones.
It arrives tomorrow! Can't wait to install it!
Thanks to everyone who responded!
Brand New Front Left Suspension Height Sensor For Chevrolet Corvette ER10035
If you look carefully at the photo, it apparently has the same manufacturer as the expensive ones.
It arrives tomorrow! Can't wait to install it!
Thanks to everyone who responded!
#7
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
How do you know this? It doesn't seem correct... whatever position the sensor is in, the shock was designed to operate.
#8
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Omaha
Posts: 6,580
Received 2,261 Likes
on
1,184 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
Yes, it won't hurt the shock to run in whatever position it's in. If I remember correctly, when the system detects an issue it will set all the shocks to either full firm or full soft (can't remember which). It will also set a "max speed" (80MPH?).
The following users liked this post:
joliett (06-30-2017)
#9
Race Director
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
Posts: 16,555
Received 2,060 Likes
on
1,505 Posts
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
The 158 mph limitation is a fact for some other issues, such as TC on and failure of the electrical system to maintain sufficient voltage. The car will totally shut down at 9 volts. The 55 mph warning for flat tires is merely a warning, not a limitation.
#10
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Omaha
Posts: 6,580
Received 2,261 Likes
on
1,184 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
Couldn't remember for sure what the max speed was with service active handling. I thought 158 sounded more accurate, but saw another post that said 80. Anyway, speed limitation IS directly a result of service active handling issues, although it can also be caused by other things. Low tire pressure will cause some other serious issues, mainly around TC/AH kicking in during aggressive handling. Had a buddy that one of the TPMS sensors went bad while we were running Arkansas back roads and it really screwed with the handling.
Out of curiosity, how long was the connector off on your car (or how long were you getting the service message)? Mine was probably 500-700 miles and the shock was fine. It was also fixed under warranty, so if the connector being off was going to cause shock failure they would have changed the shock. I've never seen anyone else have this issue due to it being off, so I would guess your shock failure was coincidental. Of course, if it was off for like 5,000 miles I could see maybe that being an issue. Like I said before, I thought I remembered reading somewhere that the system will default to either the softest or stiffest setting if it detects a fault, but I could be thinking of the older F45/FX3 systems. I could see the shock not getting current from the system potentially causing it to fail if driven on, but I would think GM made the system smart enough to keep the shock energized even with one of the sensors failing.
Out of curiosity, how long was the connector off on your car (or how long were you getting the service message)? Mine was probably 500-700 miles and the shock was fine. It was also fixed under warranty, so if the connector being off was going to cause shock failure they would have changed the shock. I've never seen anyone else have this issue due to it being off, so I would guess your shock failure was coincidental. Of course, if it was off for like 5,000 miles I could see maybe that being an issue. Like I said before, I thought I remembered reading somewhere that the system will default to either the softest or stiffest setting if it detects a fault, but I could be thinking of the older F45/FX3 systems. I could see the shock not getting current from the system potentially causing it to fail if driven on, but I would think GM made the system smart enough to keep the shock energized even with one of the sensors failing.
#11
Race Director
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
Posts: 16,555
Received 2,060 Likes
on
1,505 Posts
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Couldn't remember for sure what the max speed was with service active handling. I thought 158 sounded more accurate, but saw another post that said 80. Anyway, speed limitation IS directly a result of service active handling issues, although it can also be caused by other things. Low tire pressure will cause some other serious issues, mainly around TC/AH kicking in during aggressive handling. Had a buddy that one of the TPMS sensors went bad while we were running Arkansas back roads and it really screwed with the handling.
Out of curiosity, how long was the connector off on your car (or how long were you getting the service message)? Mine was probably 500-700 miles and the shock was fine. It was also fixed under warranty, so if the connector being off was going to cause shock failure they would have changed the shock. I've never seen anyone else have this issue due to it being off, so I would guess your shock failure was coincidental. Of course, if it was off for like 5,000 miles I could see maybe that being an issue. Like I said before, I thought I remembered reading somewhere that the system will default to either the softest or stiffest setting if it detects a fault, but I could be thinking of the older F45/FX3 systems. I could see the shock not getting current from the system potentially causing it to fail if driven on, but I would think GM made the system smart enough to keep the shock energized even with one of the sensors failing.
Out of curiosity, how long was the connector off on your car (or how long were you getting the service message)? Mine was probably 500-700 miles and the shock was fine. It was also fixed under warranty, so if the connector being off was going to cause shock failure they would have changed the shock. I've never seen anyone else have this issue due to it being off, so I would guess your shock failure was coincidental. Of course, if it was off for like 5,000 miles I could see maybe that being an issue. Like I said before, I thought I remembered reading somewhere that the system will default to either the softest or stiffest setting if it detects a fault, but I could be thinking of the older F45/FX3 systems. I could see the shock not getting current from the system potentially causing it to fail if driven on, but I would think GM made the system smart enough to keep the shock energized even with one of the sensors failing.
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 46,100
Received 2,478 Likes
on
1,941 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
"In honor of jpee"
That is interesting. I didn't think the connector being off would ruin a shock, but now that you explain it, it makes sense.
#13
Race Director
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
Posts: 16,555
Received 2,060 Likes
on
1,505 Posts
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
I'm not 100% positive that's the cause, but from the evidence of internal damage/breakage, that appears to be the only logical reason. You can only attempt to push and pull a piston through dense fluid for so long until something gives up.
#14
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
The sensor was off my car for an undetermined amount of time. I changed the sensor today, and the suspension seemed to be more stiff on the softer setting.
Tip for changing the sensor is to use a 1/4" socket set.
Also the old sensor breaking did not throw any codes...It was found by my alignment shop.
Vroom, vroom, vroom...
Tip for changing the sensor is to use a 1/4" socket set.
Also the old sensor breaking did not throw any codes...It was found by my alignment shop.
Vroom, vroom, vroom...
Last edited by joliett; 07-02-2017 at 12:07 AM.
#15
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Just one more comment..that one suspension sensor affected the entire feel of the F55 magnetic shocks. I thought the shocks were wearing ouyt...softer ride, and I had to set it to the stiff settings to get the car to perform.
BUT, now that I found and changed the damaged suspension sensor, the car stiffened up and the suspension performs so much better. These F55 shocks are really fine. The suspension sensors feed road and suspension information to the magnetic shocks, adjusting the magnetic particles in the shocks in milliseconds. That's what an active suspension should be doing...
I have 140K miles on my baby, and the shocks feels like new....especially now combined with my new Michelin run-flat tires.
I think these cars would benefit from a yearly or so check with the GM scan tool to check that the sensors are all working properly. (Yes, the Scan Tool can check for the proper operation of all 4 suspension sensors.)
Lastly, the broken sensor did not throw any system trouble codes. The little arm that connects to the suspension was hanging down...and the sensor's face was sheared off.
BUT, now that I found and changed the damaged suspension sensor, the car stiffened up and the suspension performs so much better. These F55 shocks are really fine. The suspension sensors feed road and suspension information to the magnetic shocks, adjusting the magnetic particles in the shocks in milliseconds. That's what an active suspension should be doing...
I have 140K miles on my baby, and the shocks feels like new....especially now combined with my new Michelin run-flat tires.
I think these cars would benefit from a yearly or so check with the GM scan tool to check that the sensors are all working properly. (Yes, the Scan Tool can check for the proper operation of all 4 suspension sensors.)
Lastly, the broken sensor did not throw any system trouble codes. The little arm that connects to the suspension was hanging down...and the sensor's face was sheared off.
Last edited by joliett; 07-10-2017 at 04:54 PM.