2011 Base or 2012 GS?
#41
Melting Slicks
GS looks a little better. Not A lot IMO. Not a big fan of the double gills on the side. Or the way the rear wheel air damn is soo small. I do like the wide body and front splitter. Just nit picking... but I wouldnt pay 4-5k more for a GS. I dont track my car soo.. For the same price Id def go Z06.
I don't want to turn this thread into a pissing match over the Z06 vs GS. Just curious why the OP wasn't checking out Z06s.
Last edited by Frankie15; 07-01-2017 at 12:02 AM.
#42
#43
Melting Slicks
There are no arguments from me regarding the GS looking better than the base. I think most of us can agree wide body > narrow body. I just feel like if I spent 32-34k on a GS, I would later regret not spending just a couple grand more for a Z06. The price gap between the base and the GS is pretty significant. The price gap between a Z06 and ZR1 is even more significant. The GS and a Z06 are so close in price that I just don't get why some wouldn't consider a Z06 if they were okay with what I mentioned above.
#44
Definitely a great deal.
There are no arguments from me regarding the GS looking better than the base. I think most of us can agree wide body > narrow body. I just feel like if I spent 32-34k on a GS, I would later regret not spending just a couple grand more for a Z06.
There are no arguments from me regarding the GS looking better than the base. I think most of us can agree wide body > narrow body. I just feel like if I spent 32-34k on a GS, I would later regret not spending just a couple grand more for a Z06.
I was in a similar position looking at LS2 C6s. If i got the LS2, Id always regret not spending a few more thousand on a LS3. But my budget was 28k. So I couldnt reelly go for GS or Z06. My plan is to enjoy this C6 LS3 for 6-8 years then upgrade to a C8.
#45
Melting Slicks
Agreed wide body looks better.
I was in a similar position looking at LS2 C6s. If i got the LS2, Id always regret not spending a few more thousand on a LS3. But my budget was 28k. So I couldnt reelly go for GS or Z06. My plan is to enjoy this C6 LS3 for 6-8 years then upgrade to a C8.
I was in a similar position looking at LS2 C6s. If i got the LS2, Id always regret not spending a few more thousand on a LS3. But my budget was 28k. So I couldnt reelly go for GS or Z06. My plan is to enjoy this C6 LS3 for 6-8 years then upgrade to a C8.
Last edited by Frankie15; 07-01-2017 at 12:29 AM.
#46
Oh, I totally get you. I know I would have regretted not getting the LS3 as well over the LS2. That was the only real option I had with my budget at the time (along with wanting the 3LT and Z51 package). Not everyone can afford the GS or Z06 so it makes sense to get the base as it's the only real option. It's when you can afford a GS that I don't understand why someone wouldn't spend another couple grand for a Z06. The ZR1 is way more expensive than the GS and Z06 so it makes sense for people to pass on the ZR1. Otherwise, we would all get the ZR1
#47
I love my 2008 base, but I LOVE the wide body GS. When I upgrade, I'm either going 2013 GS or Z06, or 2014+ Stingray.
#48
they are not that hard to find, but you have to look outside your local area. Some with higher miles in the $29K range....
I would not be so sure they will not come down more. You have not presented an offer, so to them, you are not yet even a buyer. Why would you not offer less????? Man, all they can say is "no".
Even if they only come down to $35, you have saved $500.
I would not be so sure they will not come down more. You have not presented an offer, so to them, you are not yet even a buyer. Why would you not offer less????? Man, all they can say is "no".
Even if they only come down to $35, you have saved $500.
As far as cheaper GSs I've looked pretty much all over the country and maybe a super high mileage one can be found for under 30 but they all seem to be consistently in the 35-40k range. I would love to be proven wrong though. I'm also picky in that it has to be a manual transmission so that limits my options substantially as well.
#49
Le Mans Master
Get the GS if it's in good shape. It will be a lot cheaper than buying the base, realizing later you wished you had the GS, and trading in the base for the GS.
Resale will be much better on the GS too.
Resale will be much better on the GS too.
#50
Instructor
OK,
Looking for some opinions. I'm scheduled to go look at a 2011 base tomorrow in cyber gray. It has 17k miles and is going for 32k.
Just a few minutes ago, a local dealer who has been looking out for me let me know of a 2012 GS in Supersonic Blue that just came in that has 25k miles going for about 35,500.
Both cars look great and have the same options (1lt, dual mode exhaust and that's pretty much it.)
Since the 2011 is at carmax I can get a warranty whereas the 2012 is "as is" and has more miles (not sure the difference between 17k and 25k miles is significant.)
I was all set with my decision until just now. Part of me thinks just save the 3-4k since I rarely even drive (maybe about 20 miles a week tops). The other part of me says to go ahead and spend the extra and get the GS since I do like the wide body look.
Any thoughts?
Looking for some opinions. I'm scheduled to go look at a 2011 base tomorrow in cyber gray. It has 17k miles and is going for 32k.
Just a few minutes ago, a local dealer who has been looking out for me let me know of a 2012 GS in Supersonic Blue that just came in that has 25k miles going for about 35,500.
Both cars look great and have the same options (1lt, dual mode exhaust and that's pretty much it.)
Since the 2011 is at carmax I can get a warranty whereas the 2012 is "as is" and has more miles (not sure the difference between 17k and 25k miles is significant.)
I was all set with my decision until just now. Part of me thinks just save the 3-4k since I rarely even drive (maybe about 20 miles a week tops). The other part of me says to go ahead and spend the extra and get the GS since I do like the wide body look.
Any thoughts?
I like the GS and I have a Base.
#51
Team Owner
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: Outside the Quick Stop N.J.
Posts: 30,426
Received 1,596 Likes
on
1,074 Posts
I appreciate this opinion and it actually is something I've been wondering. How much exactly does it cost to replace brakes and tires on a GS vs the base? I've actually never owned a car long enough (atleast since high school) where I've had to have the brakes or tires changed. I'm curious to know what a routine brake job and tire change cost becuase, since this is used, I will most likely need to have that done.
As far as tracking or not tracking, I don't see the GS as a track car. I see the Z06 as a track car and even then, I doubt more than 50% of owners track them if that. The GS to me is a base with an appearance package. Sure it handles better but that's not why most people are (were) buying them.
Thanks again.
As far as tracking or not tracking, I don't see the GS as a track car. I see the Z06 as a track car and even then, I doubt more than 50% of owners track them if that. The GS to me is a base with an appearance package. Sure it handles better but that's not why most people are (were) buying them.
Thanks again.
As far as tires go, someone else mentioned that there are no all season options for the widebodies, and finding a matched set is getting harder as well. When my OE Goodyears were shot @ 12.5k I went with non RF's, but it still cost me almost $1,500.
The GS is a lot more than an appearance package, think more along the lines of a Z06 suspension/brake/cooling/trans/rear on a base frame with a LS3.
If you really want the widebody look then by all means, get a GS, but do not sell the base model short, especially if the right one comes up.
#52
Grand Sport! try to get the price down a bit of course.
I'll be honest. When i bought my 2011 GS last year I didn't even know the differences between a base and a GS. I just knew that it looked different than a base model and awesome.
I get comps all the time with people saying "now THAT looks good"! Most say it looks better than a c7.
Its the wide body, slightly lower ride height and the gills that really make a GS stand out. Not to mention the fat tires and the wide mean look coming at you from the front.
I'll be honest. When i bought my 2011 GS last year I didn't even know the differences between a base and a GS. I just knew that it looked different than a base model and awesome.
I get comps all the time with people saying "now THAT looks good"! Most say it looks better than a c7.
Its the wide body, slightly lower ride height and the gills that really make a GS stand out. Not to mention the fat tires and the wide mean look coming at you from the front.
#54
Instructor
Maine's only Corvette dealer had an add on their web site for exactly what I was looking for in color, options and mileage but it was in a Grand Sport. I was totally sold on the car within minutes of seeing it. After driving it I was completely hooked. What a difference in handling!
Pictures do not do the Grand Sport justice. In person they are far more aggressive looking than in pictures. Maybe it's because they are 3 dimensional and pictures are 2 dimensional, IDK. But for most Corvette people, to see GS's close up and in person is to love them.
-Mark
Last edited by MarkB3; 07-01-2017 at 10:23 AM.
The following users liked this post:
sober30 (03-18-2023)
#55
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: lake havasu city arizona
Posts: 7,011
Received 982 Likes
on
711 Posts
I live in Arizona, a state that's not so stupid as to try and turn a desert into lush green foliage as Mexifornia has done, and in the meantime sucking all the water out of the Colorado River and surrounding water table, that's what happened. We landscape like it should be, and use very little water, plus I don't have to MOW THE LAWN or should I say "rocks"
NSF
NSF
The following users liked this post:
carl3989 (03-15-2023)
#56
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jan 2016
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 8,055
Received 2,683 Likes
on
1,408 Posts
2018 C6 of Year Finalist
I wouldn't let the garbage Carmax warranty factor in the decision at all.
Although I personally don't prefer them, I'd recommend the GS only for future resale purposes. Narrow bodies from the GS era are much less desirable IMO.
Edited because I almost caused someone to stroke out.
Although I personally don't prefer them, I'd recommend the GS only for future resale purposes. Narrow bodies from the GS era are much less desirable IMO.
Edited because I almost caused someone to stroke out.
Last edited by 919cw313; 07-01-2017 at 02:29 PM.
#57
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jan 2017
Location: Morris County New Jersey
Posts: 5,372
Received 1,636 Likes
on
1,121 Posts
I live in Arizona, a state that's not so stupid as to try and turn a desert into lush green foliage as Mexifornia has done, and in the meantime sucking all the water out of the Colorado River and surrounding water table, that's what happened. We landscape like it should be, and use very little water, plus I don't have to MOW THE LAWN or should I say "rocks"
NSF
NSF
Yard looks great! I'm jealous. My landscaping and yard (in NJ) desire a lot of attention and time that I just don't have the time and energy for. It costs me a good penny to pay someone else for upkeep. My next yard will be like my Vette, low maintenance.
To the OP, GS all the way!!! A Corvette should only come in widebody, and then we wouldn't need to have this discussion.
The following users liked this post:
Not So Fast (07-01-2017)
#59
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jan 2017
Location: Morris County New Jersey
Posts: 5,372
Received 1,636 Likes
on
1,121 Posts
To the OP, is this the GS you are looking at? At Criswell Chrysler? If so, it looks pretty good in the pictures.
http://www.criswellchryslerjeepdodge...c00a1741d4.htm
http://www.criswellchryslerjeepdodge...c00a1741d4.htm
#60
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jan 2016
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 8,055
Received 2,683 Likes
on
1,408 Posts
2018 C6 of Year Finalist
But if it makes you feel better, they are much less desirable, coveted,
sought after, in demand, etc. Whatever you want to call it.
Last edited by 919cw313; 07-01-2017 at 02:22 PM.