Notices
C6 Corvette ZR1 & Z06 General info about GM’s Corvette Supercar, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

[Z06] Who makes the BEST rocker arms for the LS7?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2018, 09:17 AM
  #21  
Must_Have_Z
Drifting
 
Must_Have_Z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Kaukauna WI
Posts: 1,771
Received 139 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

If you don't use stock, which are perfectly fine, you're just paying for a fancy name. Stick with OEM.
Old 02-12-2018, 09:57 AM
  #22  
AzDave47
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AzDave47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,226
Received 4,498 Likes on 2,592 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

I had a rocker arm bearing failure on a completely stock untouched 2006 ls7 with 74,000 miles on it out of factory warrantie by time not mileage ! I’m beginning to think Katech is in bed with gm on these sort of things seem like any people that have problems with the ls7 related to valve train failure Katech is the first to say there’s no problem there when clearly it failed I’d say that’s a problem ! Second of all I have never heard anyone open come to a conclusions on why the valve guide wear in these engines prematurely Katech just seems to never admit gm has any wrong doing in any of this so what is the problem it’s not normal for an engine to wear valve guides out under 100,000 Miles
do the oem rocker arms have rocker arm sweep on a stock cam and if not at what lift do they ?
How did the rocker arm bearing fail? If the end clips fatigued and the needles fell out, that is the known "07" failure mode. I think, maybe incorrectly, that was a warranty item.

Katech is very familiar with the valve guide problem and has seen that problem on many engines that came to them as has WCCH, where Katech sends the heads for new valve guides. They are one of the data sources for Hib Halverson's article on LS7s that discusses valve train failure and other problems. See the current thread https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ty-issues.html Post 11 for the link.

Last edited by AzDave47; 02-12-2018 at 09:57 AM.
Old 02-12-2018, 12:34 PM
  #23  
MTPZ06
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
MTPZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 35,883
Received 1,592 Likes on 1,335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

I had a rocker arm bearing failure on a completely stock untouched 2006 ls7 with 74,000 miles on it out of factory warrantie by time not mileage ! I’m beginning to think Katech is in bed with gm on these sort of things seem like any people that have problems with the ls7 related to valve train failure Katech is the first to say there’s no problem there when clearly it failed I’d say that’s a problem ! Second of all I have never heard anyone open come to a conclusions on why the valve guide wear in these engines prematurely Katech just seems to never admit gm has any wrong doing in any of this so what is the problem it’s not normal for an engine to wear valve guides out under 100,000 Miles
do the oem rocker arms have rocker arm sweep on a stock cam and if not at what lift do they ?
Wow...blast from the past.

As to rocker arms...sometimes things just break. Nothing is indestructible. But in general, OE rockers are very reliable outside of a bad batch in 2007. At least a rocker arm failure doesnt trash a $15K motor...count your blessings, and make sure your heads are set up right.

Guide wear...one word "concentricity". **** poor machining at Linamar, GM's subcontractor for cylinder heads. Guide to seat runout can be way beyond tolerance even on brand new heads sitting on GM parts shelves...this eventually leads to premature guide wear. Can there be other contributing factors here...sure, but everything compounds off of improper machining/assembly from the beginning.

As for OE rocker arm sweep...with properly set up heads (guide to seat concentricity), keeping the lift below ~.630, one can achieve an ideal wipe pattern with OE rockers. OE cam lift is .591/.591, so yes an ideal wipe pattern can exist in a bone stock car, provided the heads were competently machined.

Last edited by MTPZ06; 02-12-2018 at 12:36 PM.
Old 02-12-2018, 01:20 PM
  #24  
MikeOC
Racer
 
MikeOC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2014
Location: OC CA
Posts: 482
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unreal
Doubt it. I still agree with Katech. Stock work great for almost everyone, with Jessel/T&D/Crower for solid roller crazy race setups. If you can swing the high end Jessels at $4500 then go for it.
Sorry, it was late and I was far too vague and I worded it poorly. I know Katech still recommends the stock rockers most of the time.

I should have said something like, maybe Katech has some new thoughts on the service life of the stock rocker bearings or that there is a slightly wider range of production run that is the effected by the bearing failure. Since it's 9 years after they posted that, my main point being it seems to be a bit unfair to just jump right to "Katech is covering for GM!"
Old 02-12-2018, 01:35 PM
  #25  
AzDave47
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AzDave47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,226
Received 4,498 Likes on 2,592 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeOC
Sorry, it was late and I was far too vague and I worded it poorly. I know Katech still recommends the stock rockers most of the time.

I should have said something like, maybe Katech has some new thoughts on the service life of the stock rocker bearings or that there is a slightly wider range of production run that is the effected by the bearing failure. Since it's 9 years after they posted that, my main point being it seems to be a bit unfair to just jump right to "Katech is covering for GM!"
When I did my HCI build in 2016, I had WCCH do my heads based on Katech recommendation, which included new OEM exhaust valves, PSI 1511 springs and OEM rocker arms, so Katech was still happy with the OEM rocker arms in 2016.
Old 02-12-2018, 01:41 PM
  #26  
MikeOC
Racer
 
MikeOC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2014
Location: OC CA
Posts: 482
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AzDave47
When I did my HCI build in 2016, I had WCCH do my heads based on Katech recommendation, which included new OEM exhaust valves, PSI 1511 springs and OEM rocker arms, so Katech was still happy with the OEM rocker arms in 2016.
I'm (attempting) to say to have a rocker bearing failure on an '06 with 74k mi and then say therefore Katech is covering for GM is a bit of a reach in my opinion.
Old 02-12-2018, 01:45 PM
  #27  
MTPZ06
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
MTPZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 35,883
Received 1,592 Likes on 1,335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeOC
I'm (attempting) to say to have a rocker bearing failure on an '06 with 74k mi and then say therefore Katech is covering for GM is a bit of a reach in my opinion.
Agreed...quite a leap.
Old 02-12-2018, 02:40 PM
  #28  
Spzany
Advanced
 
Spzany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 65
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MikeOC
I'm (attempting) to say to have a rocker bearing failure on an '06 with 74k mi and then say therefore Katech is covering for GM is a bit of a reach in my opinion.
ok so to clarify things here Katech has never admitted to the ls7 having rocker arm failure nore have they ever stated what the actual problem is that is causing valve guidewear and or how to fix it , because if they do such a thing that will admit negligence on the part of gm and Katech was paid by gm to investigate this issue Katech always seem to defend well some one goofed up some where ! As for the rocker arm bearings they fail have been known for failure ! If they didn aftermarket company’s wouldn’t have spent the money on r&d for trunnion up grade products ?
Old 02-12-2018, 02:45 PM
  #29  
MTPZ06
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
MTPZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 35,883
Received 1,592 Likes on 1,335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

ok so to clarify things here Katech has never admitted to the ls7 having rocker arm failure nore have they ever stated what the actual problem is that is causing valve guidewear and or how to fix it , because if they do such a thing that will admit negligence on the part of gm and Katech was paid by gm to investigate this issue Katech always seem to defend well some one goofed up some where ! As for the rocker arm bearings they fail have been known for failure ! If they didn aftermarket company’s wouldn’t have spent the money on r&d for trunnion up grade products ?
Actually they have...open their article posted in this thread: https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...post1594982862
Old 02-12-2018, 02:50 PM
  #30  
AzDave47
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AzDave47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,226
Received 4,498 Likes on 2,592 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

ok so to clarify things here Katech has never admitted to the ls7 having rocker arm failure nore have they ever stated what the actual problem is that is causing valve guidewear and or how to fix it , because if they do such a thing that will admit negligence on the part of gm and Katech was paid by gm to investigate this issue Katech always seem to defend well some one goofed up some where ! As for the rocker arm bearings they fail have been known for failure ! If they didn aftermarket company’s wouldn’t have spent the money on r&d for trunnion up grade products ?
Even GM admits the the rocker arm bearing failure problem in '07's and ?? maybe late 06's. I don't have the specific GM TIL that specified that as I have an 09. That failure has not happened (as far as I know from being on this forum for 7 years) on 2008 or newer OEM rocker arms.

Katech knows the guide failure issue is a vendor machining issue and have customer heads sent to WCCH for proper guide replacement. They are smart enough businessmen not to call GM out publicly, but make sure their customers get the heads fixed properly.
Old 02-12-2018, 02:50 PM
  #31  
Spzany
Advanced
 
Spzany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2017
Posts: 65
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MTPZ06
Wow...blast from the past.

As to rocker arms...sometimes things just break. Nothing is indestructible. But in general, OE rockers are very reliable outside of a bad batch in 2007. At least a rocker arm failure doesnt trash a $15K motor...count your blessings, and make sure your heads are set up right.

Guide wear...one word "concentricity". **** poor machining at Linamar, GM's subcontractor for cylinder heads. Guide to seat runout can be way beyond tolerance even on brand new heads sitting on GM parts shelves...this eventually leads to premature guide wear. Can there be other contributing factors here...sure, but everything compounds off of improper machining/assembly from the beginning.

As for OE rocker arm sweep...with properly set up heads (guide to seat concentricity), keeping the lift below ~.630, one can achieve an ideal wipe pattern with OE rockers. OE cam lift is .591/.591, so yes an ideal wipe pattern can exist in a bone stock car, provided the heads were competently machined.
So what changed in or after 2007 about the rocker arms ? What did gm do to fix this as your saying theremore reliable ! Thank you for the info Concerning rockerarm sweep the .630 info is the # I was looking for ! as for concentricity I agree Is part of the story but i. Still think there is more to the story than that !
Old 02-12-2018, 02:53 PM
  #32  
MikeOC
Racer
 
MikeOC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2014
Location: OC CA
Posts: 482
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

ok so to clarify things here Katech has never admitted to the ls7 having rocker arm failure nore have they ever stated what the actual problem is that is causing valve guidewear and or how to fix it , because if they do such a thing that will admit negligence on the part of gm and Katech was paid by gm to investigate this issue Katech always seem to defend well some one goofed up some where ! As for the rocker arm bearings they fail have been known for failure ! If they didn aftermarket company’s wouldn’t have spent the money on r&d for trunnion up grade products ?
MTPZ06 linked you the head discussion and as far about the rocker bearings, Katech mentioned it in this very thread.

If you would really like answers (if I had a failure I sure would too) it might be better to ask if the rocker bearing failure could have made it into some '06s or if new failures had made themselves known over the past 9 years rather than a more acquisitory tone, people will respond better.
Old 02-12-2018, 02:57 PM
  #33  
Katech_Zach
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Katech_Zach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Clinton Township MI
Posts: 13,988
Received 966 Likes on 528 Posts
C7 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

I had a rocker arm bearing failure on a completely stock untouched 2006 ls7 with 74,000 miles on it out of factory warrantie by time not mileage ! I’m beginning to think Katech is in bed with gm on these sort of things seem like any people that have problems with the ls7 related to valve train failure Katech is the first to say there’s no problem there when clearly it failed I’d say that’s a problem ! Second of all I have never heard anyone open come to a conclusions on why the valve guide wear in these engines prematurely Katech just seems to never admit gm has any wrong doing in any of this so what is the problem it’s not normal for an engine to wear valve guides out under 100,000 Miles
do the oem rocker arms have rocker arm sweep on a stock cam and if not at what lift do they ?
I'm not sure where you're getting your information. I wrote an article about the valve guide wear problem that was published in The Shop magazine. It actually shows some findings that contradict GM's claims of affected model years.
Attached Images
File Type: pdf
TheSHOPMag_7-17.pdf (1.82 MB, 186 views)
__________________

Contact:
(e) zach@katechengines.com
The following 2 users liked this post by Katech_Zach:
AzDave47 (02-12-2018), CTYANK2 (03-01-2018)
Old 02-12-2018, 03:03 PM
  #34  
AzDave47
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AzDave47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,226
Received 4,498 Likes on 2,592 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

So what changed in or after 2007 about the rocker arms ? What did gm do to fix this as your saying theremore reliable ! Thank you for the info Concerning rockerarm sweep the .630 info is the # I was looking for ! as for concentricity I agree Is part of the story but i. Still think there is more to the story than that !
GM changed how the needle bearings were held in or changed materials. I may be wrong, but I believe the needle bearing failure was covered by GM under warranty for cars in that 2007 era. I presume they were replaced by the newer units that are in all the later model cars.

Also regarding valve train issues, GM also did a running change on the two-piece sodium exhaust valves at some unspecified time during 2008 production. They have not been particularly forthcoming on what and when the changes were made to limit customer claims (not great customer service for us).

And since you are somewhat new to the forum, many members do not believe the current OEM C6Z exhaust valves are good and decide to go to stainless solid or hollow exhaust valves and stronger springs when they have the heads done to take care of the valve guide issue. Others of us do believe the current OEM exhaust valves are good and prefer the light weight valve train for our LS7s. Arguing one side or the other will get no one any further than the argument for run-flat tires or non- runflat tires or what is the best/fastest Z06 color..
Old 02-12-2018, 03:04 PM
  #35  
Katech_Zach
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
Katech_Zach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Clinton Township MI
Posts: 13,988
Received 966 Likes on 528 Posts
C7 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

ok so to clarify things here Katech has never admitted to the ls7 having rocker arm failure nore have they ever stated what the actual problem is that is causing valve guidewear and or how to fix it , because if they do such a thing that will admit negligence on the part of gm and Katech was paid by gm to investigate this issue Katech always seem to defend well some one goofed up some where ! As for the rocker arm bearings they fail have been known for failure ! If they didn aftermarket company’s wouldn’t have spent the money on r&d for trunnion up grade products ?
Actually, we did in 2012. https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...cker-arms.html
Old 02-12-2018, 03:13 PM
  #36  
AzDave47
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AzDave47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,226
Received 4,498 Likes on 2,592 Posts

Default

Thank you, Jason. I had not seen that article, but having done business directly with you, I understood that was Katech's position and have tried to accurately portray that in this thread (and a few others). I will be running my HCI build at the Mojave Magnum April 15.
Old 02-12-2018, 03:48 PM
  #37  
MTPZ06
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
MTPZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 35,883
Received 1,592 Likes on 1,335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

So what changed in or after 2007 about the rocker arms ? What did gm do to fix this as your saying theremore reliable ! Thank you for the info Concerning rockerarm sweep the .630 info is the # I was looking for ! as for concentricity I agree Is part of the story but i. Still think there is more to the story than that !
Pretty sure it was a bearing retainer cap issue, but it just affected a ~6 month date range. Beyond that though, anything can fail...but certainly nothing of epidemic proportions with respect to OE rockers outside of that early-to-mid 2007 date range.

Get notified of new replies

To Who makes the BEST rocker arms for the LS7?

Old 02-12-2018, 03:51 PM
  #38  
Unreal
Team Owner
 
Unreal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posts: 24,035
Received 2,313 Likes on 1,793 Posts

Default

Everything can fail, and has failures. The failure rate of OEM rocker arms is crazy low compared to aftermarket ones. So if you want good, reliable, light, and good valve control, stick with stock.
Old 02-13-2018, 08:07 AM
  #39  
Michael_D
Safety Car
 
Michael_D's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,478
Received 361 Likes on 270 Posts

Default

There's no way I'd use anything but stock, UNLESS I had reasons that demanded a roller-tipped rocker, or I needed a lash adjuster. Out of all the different brands available, I prefer the Crower system. I do not like aluminum. Too many broken rockers over the years, and guys don't like losing races because their car won't run. I've never seen a broke steel rocker.

If it's ain't broke, don't fix it.
The following users liked this post:
HP RESEARCH (02-17-2018)
Old 02-13-2018, 08:52 AM
  #40  
long_tall_texan
Pro
 
long_tall_texan's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: DFW Metro TX
Posts: 525
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Spzany

Second of all I have never heard anyone open come to a conclusions on why the valve guide wear in these engines prematurely
Spzany, hope this helps give you a bit better understanding of the overall issue...

Here is the most thorough explanation of the big picture of several factors that lead to the guide wear problem. It is a lengthy read, but it pretty much covers all of the known failure/wear points.

https://www.corvetteactioncenter.com...-engine17.html

After a lot of research myself, and pouring over tons of forum discussions on the subject, I decided on a plan for my 2007 Z06.

1. Replace all 16 guides
2. Have new valve seats cut in heads that are concentric with new giudes
3. (might as well mill the heads 0.030" wile I've got them at the shop. A little free HP never hurts, right?)
4. Replace all exhaust valves. (2006 and 2007 models had a potential failure where the tip of the valve is welded on. Better safe than sorry.) I chose to use Ferrea F2042P hollow stem exhaust valves.
5. Replace LS7 rockers with Yella Terra YT6670 roller tipped rockers.
- Roller tipped rockers eliminate any side loading of valve, which could cause increased guide wear.
- LS7 rockers with trunion upgrade likely would have been fine, but I chose to eliminate side loading as much as possible, regardless of how small that side load may be with OEM rockers.
- Yella Terras come with an extra thick valve cover gasket to offset valve covers just enough to clear the rockers. Or you can add an aluminum valve cover spacer. I chose the aluminum spacer.
6. Replace all Valve springs. YT rockers are heavier than OEM LS7 rockers, so stronger springs are needed. I went with PSI 1511.

BTW, I kept the stock LS7 Cam, but would have
​chosen the same path with a cam with 0.630 or less lobes. Above that, may have had to make a different spring choice.

Edited 2/20/18 - corrected the exhaust valve part number that I used.

Last edited by long_tall_texan; 02-20-2018 at 06:51 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Str8bad (05-24-2021)


Quick Reply: [Z06] Who makes the BEST rocker arms for the LS7?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 AM.