[Z06] Carbon Fiber drive shaft.
#21
Race Director
Boy you got that right! I recently completed a TTiX job in a 08 Z and I upgraded all the parts from the flywheel back. That included a RPS triple billet carbon clutch, a 1000hp rated prop shaft, RPM supplied the urethan prop shaft couplers, RPM level 5 transmission, their rear diff with 300M output shafts,Quaife Differential and a set of Driveshaft shop 1000hp rated half shafts. There was a considerable increase in noise with this setup, not as bad as a old C4 that had its dual mass flywheel replaced with a single mass but definitely a very noticable increase in noise. I later installed a standard C6 shifter box which elminated some of noise but its still more than stock. But when then go fast pedal is mashed and 800hp hits the wheels you forget about the noise real fast
In the case of the Corvette there should be little to no increase in NVH. ACPT has a very good product and I have used a few of their products in various applications and never an increase in NVH. I have had project vehicles that went from minor drivetrain vibration at very high speed to absolutely NO vibration at the same speed and higher, though. Product speaks for itself... LG has great experience with them, so I would go with their recommendation on using a rubber isolater or not(or whatever CF supplier you choose).
#22
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Lodi California
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The increase in NVH in your set up has nothing to do with the CF shaft.
In the case of the Corvette there should be little to no increase in NVH. ACPT has a very good product and I have used a few of their products in various applications and never an increase in NVH. I have had project vehicles that went from minor drivetrain vibration at very high speed to absolutely NO vibration at the same speed and higher, though. Product speaks for itself... LG has great experience with them, so I would go with their recommendation on using a rubber isolater or not(or whatever CF supplier you choose).
In the case of the Corvette there should be little to no increase in NVH. ACPT has a very good product and I have used a few of their products in various applications and never an increase in NVH. I have had project vehicles that went from minor drivetrain vibration at very high speed to absolutely NO vibration at the same speed and higher, though. Product speaks for itself... LG has great experience with them, so I would go with their recommendation on using a rubber isolater or not(or whatever CF supplier you choose).
#23
Drifting
It doesn't use an isolator on either end. It eliminates both isolators and bolts directly to the input shaft and pinion. That is why it is lighter than the rest and since it has no isolators, has a much higher torque rating.
Gary
Gary
#24
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Lodi California
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would you then get more noise by not having the isolators compared to the LG shaft?
#25
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
The increase in NVH in your set up has nothing to do with the CF shaft.
In the case of the Corvette there should be little to no increase in NVH. ACPT has a very good product and I have used a few of their products in various applications and never an increase in NVH. I have had project vehicles that went from minor drivetrain vibration at very high speed to absolutely NO vibration at the same speed and higher, though. Product speaks for itself... LG has great experience with them, so I would go with their recommendation on using a rubber isolater or not(or whatever CF supplier you choose).
In the case of the Corvette there should be little to no increase in NVH. ACPT has a very good product and I have used a few of their products in various applications and never an increase in NVH. I have had project vehicles that went from minor drivetrain vibration at very high speed to absolutely NO vibration at the same speed and higher, though. Product speaks for itself... LG has great experience with them, so I would go with their recommendation on using a rubber isolater or not(or whatever CF supplier you choose).
#28
Drifting
Gary
#29
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Lodi California
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#31
Intermediate
CF Driveshaft Question
If CF driveshaft(s) are the same or greater weight, are the claims of reduced 60' times at the track accurate or bogus? If true, what would account for the decrease? Stronger doesn't usually equate to quicker in my limited experience
The following users liked this post:
Nosferatu333 (03-13-2016)
#34
Instructor
Mine broke at JMS motorsports during testing as I was about to fly down to pick up the car. It was in low boost setting (about 850 hp). Still honoring this replacement? The end separated from the CF tube as you can see.
Last edited by Przyojski; 08-19-2017 at 08:14 AM.
#36
Instructor
good to hear! I am trying to see if I can find a DSS one in stock somewhere. The lead time is so dang long. Otherwise RPM I can get one in ~ 3 wks. I don't wanna wait 😭😭😭