Notices
C6 Corvette ZR1 & Z06 General info about GM’s Corvette Supercar, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

[ZR1] Tire/Wheel Vibration - Acceptable Road Force Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2012, 04:43 PM
  #1  
Paul330
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Paul330's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: NH
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Tire/Wheel Vibration - Acceptable Road Force Results

Hi,

I have an '09 Z06 that has a slight shake at ~70 mph speed, particulary noticeable through the steering wheel. I've been reading the threads about similar ZR1 vibration, and wanted advice as to where to start troubleshooting. Seems like tire/wheel balance is the first step, then rotors & resonance next.

In order to rule out wheel/tire assembly balance as the cause, what Hunter road force reading is considered acceptable? My experience with other cars has been that a Hunter road force number below 10 lbs is good and is necessary. A number up around 20 lbs will cause an easily noticeable and annoying shake at hgihway speed. What have others experienced with this? Thanks for your input.

-Paul
Old 04-02-2012, 05:20 PM
  #2  
JTE
Melting Slicks
 
JTE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Coal Valley IL
Posts: 3,179
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
CI 4-7, 9 & 10 Veteran

Default

Have the wheels dynamically balanced. The road force balance is inadeguate.
Old 04-02-2012, 07:36 PM
  #3  
Glenn Quagmire
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Glenn Quagmire's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,342
Received 604 Likes on 283 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JTE
Have the wheels dynamically balanced. The road force balance is inadeguate.
What is the difference between the two...never heard this before?
Old 04-02-2012, 08:43 PM
  #4  
Streetk14
Melting Slicks
 
Streetk14's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara CA
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Glenn Quagmire
What is the difference between the two...never heard this before?
A Road Force balance (as in Hunter GSP9700) is a dynamic balance.

The difference between the Hunter machine and a regular tire balancer is it's ability to load the wheel/tire assembly and simulate the load one sees on a car driving down the road. In addition to measuring imbalance like most tire balancers, it can also measure wheel/tire assembly run-out and "road force".

To put it in simple terms, a tire's sidewall is like a spring. The problem is that tire stiffness varies as it rotates -- meaning some areas of a given tire are stiffer or softer than others. So going down the road at 70 mph, a perfectly balanced tire can still have vibration caused by this sidewall stiffness variation. The Hunter machine can detect this and help the operator compensate for it.

If any wheel/tire on your car has excessive road force readings, the GSP9700 can help you match the tire and rim so that you end up with the best possible match and lowest road force. This will make the car ride smoother than any regular balancer can.

And for what it's worth, Hunter's standard for passenger car tires is around 26 lbs or less of road force. I'd like to see 15 or so in my personal cars, but sometimes that isn't possible unless you want to start replacing wheels or tires.
Old 04-02-2012, 08:48 PM
  #5  
Streetk14
Melting Slicks
 
Streetk14's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara CA
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Some good reading for those who don't understand what road force is: http://www.gsp9700.com/technical/4127T/4127t.htm

Last edited by Streetk14; 04-02-2012 at 08:56 PM. Reason: url wrong
Old 04-02-2012, 09:58 PM
  #6  
Glenn Quagmire
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Glenn Quagmire's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,342
Received 604 Likes on 283 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Streetk14
A Road Force balance (as in Hunter GSP9700) is a dynamic balance.

The difference between the Hunter machine and a regular tire balancer is it's ability to load the wheel/tire assembly and simulate the load one sees on a car driving down the road. In addition to measuring imbalance like most tire balancers, it can also measure wheel/tire assembly run-out and "road force".

To put it in simple terms, a tire's sidewall is like a spring. The problem is that tire stiffness varies as it rotates -- meaning some areas of a given tire are stiffer or softer than others. So going down the road at 70 mph, a perfectly balanced tire can still have vibration caused by this sidewall stiffness variation. The Hunter machine can detect this and help the operator compensate for it.

If any wheel/tire on your car has excessive road force readings, the GSP9700 can help you match the tire and rim so that you end up with the best possible match and lowest road force. This will make the car ride smoother than any regular balancer can.

And for what it's worth, Hunter's standard for passenger car tires is around 26 lbs or less of road force. I'd like to see 15 or so in my personal cars, but sometimes that isn't possible unless you want to start replacing wheels or tires.
Thanks for the thorough explanation! I'm pretty familiar with the Hunter RF balancers, as I make sure that all of my aftermarket wheels are done. However, I'm not familiar with dynamic balancing, as JTE mentioned above. How is it different than the "inadequate" RF balancing?
Old 04-02-2012, 10:43 PM
  #7  
Streetk14
Melting Slicks
 
Streetk14's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara CA
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Glenn Quagmire
Thanks for the thorough explanation! I'm pretty familiar with the Hunter RF balancers, as I make sure that all of my aftermarket wheels are done. However, I'm not familiar with dynamic balancing, as JTE mentioned above. How is it different than the "inadequate" RF balancing?

I'm not sure what he was talking about -- and I'm not sure he did, either

There are 2 types of tire balance -- static and dynamic

Dynamic balancing just means the wheel/tire is balanced on 2 planes (usually one weight on the inside lip, one weight on the outside lip). The weight locations depend on the wheel design. The idea behind dynamic balancing is that it eliminates both "up and down" shimmy and "side to side" shimmy. In short, it makes for a smoother ride and has been the standard way to balance tires for YEARS.

Static balancing is old-school and just uses 1 weight in the center of the wheel. Static balancing can only eliminate certain frequencies and should be avoided.

I don't think JTE knows what the Hunter Road Force machine is or does, which is why I posted that. I think he meant that static balancing was inadequate, and I'd agree. The Road Force balance is the best thing out there and uses the type of technology that up until a few years ago was only used by tire manufacturers and OEM suppliers.

Oh, and pretty much any modern tire balancer can do either a static or dynamic balance, for what it's worth. A dynamic Road Force balance is the best you can get, just make sure whoever does your tires really knows how to use the GSP9700. Hope that clears it up!

Last edited by Streetk14; 04-02-2012 at 10:51 PM.
Old 04-02-2012, 11:21 PM
  #8  
Glenn Quagmire
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Glenn Quagmire's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,342
Received 604 Likes on 283 Posts

Default

I really appreciate you making sense of this for me. Now I can pretend like I know what I'm talking about.
Old 04-03-2012, 06:03 AM
  #9  
JTE
Melting Slicks
 
JTE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Coal Valley IL
Posts: 3,179
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
CI 4-7, 9 & 10 Veteran

Default

Originally Posted by Streetk14
I'm not sure what he was talking about -- and I'm not sure he did, either That was just plain rude.

I don't think JTE knows what the Hunter Road Force machine is or does, which is why I posted that. I think he meant that static balancing was inadequate, and I'd agree. The Road Force balance is the best thing out there and uses the type of technology that up until a few years ago was only used by tire manufacturers and OEM suppliers.
Not cool buddy. Not cool at all.

Last edited by JTE; 04-03-2012 at 06:51 AM.
Old 04-03-2012, 07:43 AM
  #10  
GOLD72
Race Director
 
GOLD72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Missouri City, TX
Posts: 10,070
Received 1,105 Likes on 718 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Streetk14
..............Static balancing is old-school and just uses 1 weight in the center of the wheel. ............
That's so old school that I have not seen a static (bubble) tire balancing fixture in a shop in many decades!!!! To call it a machine would be to disgrace the definition of machine.
Old 04-03-2012, 07:54 AM
  #11  
Reciprocal
Burning Brakes
 
Reciprocal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2010
Location: Aurora Colorado
Posts: 994
Received 30 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Maybe he meant dynamically balanced on the car. He never said. It's old school too, but they jack up the corner, use a motor to spin the tire up and a strobe light to freeze the position of the wheel where the weight goes. Tape a weight on, repeat, trial and error until you get the right amount of weight put on. It balances the rotor and axle together with the wheel.
Old 04-03-2012, 08:12 AM
  #12  
JTE
Melting Slicks
 
JTE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Coal Valley IL
Posts: 3,179
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
CI 4-7, 9 & 10 Veteran

Default

I was NOT referring to static balance. I was talking about making sure they are completely zeroed with a dynamic balance.
Old 04-03-2012, 09:58 AM
  #13  
Streetk14
Melting Slicks
 
Streetk14's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara CA
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JTE
I was NOT referring to static balance. I was talking about making sure they are completely zeroed with a dynamic balance.
Wasn't trying to be rude.... but it was obvious to me you aren't familiar with the most current systems of vibration control -- and that's what this is about.

A tire that is dynamic balanced at "zero" can still have a noticeable vibration. That is where road force and tire/rim matching comes in. It is something that CANNOT BE DETECTED on a regular balancer and makes a world of difference.
Old 04-03-2012, 10:07 AM
  #14  
Streetk14
Melting Slicks
 
Streetk14's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara CA
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JTE
Have the wheels dynamically balanced. The road force balance is inadeguate.

I'd also like to add, this is what I was originally responding to. It really makes no sense at all..... sorry.
Old 05-20-2013, 06:36 PM
  #15  
Glenn Hillhouse
Intermediate
 
Glenn Hillhouse's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the G M service manual explains it this way. Static out of balance causes bounce.
Dynamic out of balance causes waddle. We call it shimmy. I had both on my 2013
427. Michelin or G M would not help because of the after market wheels. after 6 weeks
of trial and error I had the rotors balanced which took care of 90% and then I balanced
the tires and wheels and rotors on the car . and now I have the perfect ride at 100 +.
I did try road force balance. It did not work for me.
Old 05-21-2013, 07:57 AM
  #16  
mirage2991
Safety Car
 
mirage2991's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 4,857
Received 250 Likes on 163 Posts

Default

post resurection is frawned uppon in this establishment
Old 10-03-2013, 07:44 AM
  #17  
dougelam
Intermediate
 
dougelam's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

A side from balance issues road force results help match tires to eliminate a tire pull condition. A radial tire pull condition will almost always pull to the good tire. A road force machine will show this by the amount of force it takes to compress the tire similar to the weight of the car. The more force it takes shows that the one tire is in a sense harder than one that has a lower force value. We all know that when we have a tire that is low on air it will pull that way alerting us that we need to pull over soon before destroying a good wheel.

On Corvettes a tire pull usually means new tires so road force measurements aren't as important but will reveal an out of round tire/wheel and as stated earlier irregularity in a tire.
Old 06-26-2014, 10:30 AM
  #18  
Streetk14
Melting Slicks
 
Streetk14's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara CA
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Glenn Hillhouse
the G M service manual explains it this way. Static out of balance causes bounce.
Dynamic out of balance causes waddle. We call it shimmy. I had both on my 2013
427. Michelin or G M would not help because of the after market wheels. after 6 weeks
of trial and error I had the rotors balanced which took care of 90% and then I balanced
the tires and wheels and rotors on the car . and now I have the perfect ride at 100 +.
I did try road force balance. It did not work for me.

With rotor balance issues on the ZR1, nothing you do to the tires will eliminate it. Normally, force-matching the wheel/tire on a Road Force machine will get you the smoothest ride possible. Being that a lot of these ZR1 vibration problems stem from the rotors, they tend to be a different animal all together.

And yeah.... this is an old thread.

Get notified of new replies

To Tire/Wheel Vibration - Acceptable Road Force Results




Quick Reply: [ZR1] Tire/Wheel Vibration - Acceptable Road Force Results



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 PM.