*** C6 Z06 N/A New personal best ***
10-18-2018, 12:10 AM
#61
Yup that sims are close to my calculation. Good to see that too. This is is for a perfect pass with no bug. I have a bug on launch who hurt my run at some point that i cannot ride of it . I'll try to figure it out but it's hard with the tire combo I'm using. My best 60' from the last week end was 1.319 with only a small bug. But as you should know clutch master cylinder said enough and I cannot shift the third gear. If I put the number together and that run was 100% granted a 9.12 / 9.13. This is very close to you're simulator run at 9.07 which is almost a perfect run. And way close enough for my liking anyway !!!
Thx to provide that info Victor
Seb
Thx to provide that info Victor
Seb
The following users liked this post:
Sébast19X (10-22-2018)
The following users liked this post:
Sébast19X (10-23-2018)
10-24-2018, 10:35 PM
#66
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,119
Received 2,054 Likes
on
1,306 Posts
Congrats, time to put a parachute on that NA beast!
The following users liked this post:
Sébast19X (11-03-2018)
11-03-2018, 12:29 PM
#68
Drifting
Thread Starter
Yes, but i just found something interesting last week .... I will switch back to my TR6060 setup.
As per ma datalog review, my TR6060 allow me a slighty better shift speed. This is probably due to better synchro design coupled with the full carbon blocker. It also allow for a little bit less shift effort too. After the tear down last week of both gearbox, the TR6060 show no visible sign of wear or fatigue. The T56 at that power level and with those shift speed show a relative wear on gear and synchro tooth after about 20 to 25 passes only. I'll bet it not hold very more than 50 passes synchro and synchro gear tooth wear speaking.
Seb
As per ma datalog review, my TR6060 allow me a slighty better shift speed. This is probably due to better synchro design coupled with the full carbon blocker. It also allow for a little bit less shift effort too. After the tear down last week of both gearbox, the TR6060 show no visible sign of wear or fatigue. The T56 at that power level and with those shift speed show a relative wear on gear and synchro tooth after about 20 to 25 passes only. I'll bet it not hold very more than 50 passes synchro and synchro gear tooth wear speaking.
Seb
Last edited by Sébast19X; 11-04-2018 at 12:30 PM.
The following users liked this post:
MickVette (11-05-2018)
The following users liked this post:
Sébast19X (11-05-2018)
11-05-2018, 08:24 PM
#70
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 1,078
Received 188 Likes
on
138 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Yes, but i just found something interesting last week .... I will switch back to my TR6060 setup.
As per ma datalog review, my TR6060 allow me a slighty better shift speed. This is probably due to better synchro design coupled with the full carbon blocker. It also allow for a little bit less shift effort too. After the tear down last week of both gearbox, the TR6060 show no visible sign of wear or fatigue. The T56 at that power level and with those shift speed show a relative wear on gear and synchro tooth after about 20 to 25 passes only. I'll bet it not hold very more than 50 passes synchro and synchro gear tooth wear speaking.
Seb
As per ma datalog review, my TR6060 allow me a slighty better shift speed. This is probably due to better synchro design coupled with the full carbon blocker. It also allow for a little bit less shift effort too. After the tear down last week of both gearbox, the TR6060 show no visible sign of wear or fatigue. The T56 at that power level and with those shift speed show a relative wear on gear and synchro tooth after about 20 to 25 passes only. I'll bet it not hold very more than 50 passes synchro and synchro gear tooth wear speaking.
Seb
