DRY vs WET shots
05-29-2014, 01:55 AM
#42
Burning Brakes
Bringing this one back to life. Is there any solution for a pre-01 PCM which does not have the IAT vs IFR modifier table? I have a 2000 and use HPT.
Is there an OS update? Do i have to physically swap to a newer PCM like from an 01 or 02?
Any help is appreciated. Thank you
Jack
Is there an OS update? Do i have to physically swap to a newer PCM like from an 01 or 02?
Any help is appreciated. Thank you
Jack
06-03-2014, 11:09 PM
#43
Burning Brakes
Another idea I had:
Could this same theory be applied using the ECT adder (since I have that one) ? I would have to change all of my adders in the 284* ECT tables, (spark, etc), but the end result could be the same, right?
Jack
Could this same theory be applied using the ECT adder (since I have that one) ? I would have to change all of my adders in the 284* ECT tables, (spark, etc), but the end result could be the same, right?
Jack
06-22-2014, 08:36 PM
#44
Tech Contributor
Thread Starter
They're both thermisters so it would work barring adverse issues with other tuning tables that use ECT vs XYZ
08-02-2014, 05:30 PM
#45
Heel & Toe
Member Since: Jul 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is a great way to make a safe and effective dry shot. I am making about 110 rwhp with this method, and my car makes power VERY smooth doing it this way. There is NO risk of fuel puddling like a wet shot.
If you are on the fence about doing this....don't be.
Thanks Spin!!
If you are on the fence about doing this....don't be.
Thanks Spin!!
