C6 Forced Induction/Nitrous C6 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Pulley Upgrades, Intercoolers, Wet and Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Whipple 2.9 vs Magnuson 2650.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2018, 12:59 PM
  #21  
lt1z
Melting Slicks
 
lt1z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,569
Received 170 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

Its about IC efficiency. The LS valley is much smaller then a Coyote or Hemi. So on a truck you can push the blower up to make room for a larger IC. On limited hood clearance applications you can't. So they developed the heartbeat style which is similar to how the factory GM blowers are. These work better but still not as well a with the larger brick that the other engines can run with these type of blowers. That is why you see far more centrifugals on GM engines making bigger numbers. The Magnuson 2650 prototype on that camaro was pushed out the hood to make room for a larger brick. Would make a decent race system but not so much for the street. With that said the production 2650 will be a good option for those looking to make in the 800-1000whp range with a super reliable setup. If you want 1200whp look elsewhere.
The following users liked this post:
CI GS (03-02-2019)
Old 03-12-2018, 01:25 PM
  #22  
400ci94mm
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
400ci94mm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lt1z
Its about IC efficiency. The LS valley is much smaller then a Coyote or Hemi. So on a truck you can push the blower up to make room for a larger IC. On limited hood clearance applications you can't. So they developed the heartbeat style which is similar to how the factory GM blowers are. These work better but still not as well a with the larger brick that the other engines can run with these type of blowers. That is why you see far more centrifugals on GM engines making bigger numbers. The Magnuson 2650 prototype on that camaro was pushed out the hood to make room for a larger brick. Would make a decent race system but not so much for the street. With that said the production 2650 will be a good option for those looking to make in the 800-1000whp range with a super reliable setup. If you want 1200whp look elsewhere.
I may just buy a Harrop 2650. It fits under my factory cowl and factory hood.

Should make over 1,000 RWHP. Its pricey at $9,000 shipped to Florida......but still just a litrle more $$$ than the smaller, less powerful 2300 Heartbeat. Then I can sell my complete single turbo kit....which is gonna be a complex mess under the hood...and HEAT.

And we can fit a huge heat exchanger up into our front bumper with a Killer Chiller installed too....1998-2002 Trans Am.

A guy local to me is having one installed right now, should be done in a couple weeks and on the road. I'll check his out, then make a decision.

Last edited by 400ci94mm; 03-12-2018 at 01:40 PM.
Old 03-12-2018, 04:40 PM
  #23  
Cordes Performance Racing
Supporting Vendor
 
Cordes Performance Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 4,222
Received 1,227 Likes on 774 Posts

Default

the maggie build is on our facebook page. no dyno tricks or secrets about it. Just a well put together combo
__________________
Cordes Performance Racing aka "CPR"
Owner of AZ's premier LSX/LTX motorsports shop
http://cordesperformanceracing.com/
www.facebook.com/cordesperformanceracing.com
joe@cordesperformanceracing.com
480-359-5914


Old 03-12-2018, 04:51 PM
  #24  
old motorhead
Le Mans Master
 
old motorhead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 6,504
Received 1,339 Likes on 947 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Joe@CPR
the maggie build is on our facebook page. no dyno tricks or secrets about it. Just a well put together combo
For those of us that don't do FaceBook, how 'bout regurgitating it here?
The following users liked this post:
SaberOne (03-06-2019)
Old 03-12-2018, 05:32 PM
  #25  
Cordes Performance Racing
Supporting Vendor
 
Cordes Performance Racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 4,222
Received 1,227 Likes on 774 Posts

Default

since it's a business page should still pull up like a website.

Facebook Post

408, brodix heads ported by lme, my spec cam, 10:1 compression, hydraulic cam, 2'' headers, 102 tb, 5'' cai, e85, 4l80, 9'' rear end. 980 rwhp, 925 rwtq.
Old 03-13-2018, 08:09 AM
  #26  
400ci94mm
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
400ci94mm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joe@CPR
since it's a business page should still pull up like a website.

https://www.facebook.com/Cordesperfo...6111833860506/

408, brodix heads ported by lme, my spec cam, 10:1 compression, hydraulic cam, 2'' headers, 102 tb, 5'' cai, e85, 4l80, 9'' rear end. 980 rwhp, 925 rwtq.
934 RWHP.......on only SC'er....Nice power......getting closer to that 1,000 mark. I'm sure someone will get there one day.
Is that with a full custom exhaust?

This is more supporting evidence though, that the Whipple is really a crappy SC'er. They can't make that kind of power with the larger 2.9L Whipple.

So a couple 2300 SC'ers on CTS-Vs, one at 907 RWHP and Cordes at 934 RWHP....without using ICE...........thats cool.......

.
Old 03-13-2018, 10:43 AM
  #27  
old motorhead
Le Mans Master
 
old motorhead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 6,504
Received 1,339 Likes on 947 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 400ci94mm
934 RWHP.......on only SC'er....Nice power......getting closer to that 1,000 mark. I'm sure someone will get there one day.
Replace that 4L80 with a manual transmission and I bet it would be damn close to a thousand.
Old 03-13-2018, 02:40 PM
  #28  
400ci94mm
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
400ci94mm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by old motorhead
Replace that 4L80 with a manual transmission and I bet it would be damn close to a thousand.
True....but then the car will be slower in the 1/4 mile.....

.
Old 03-13-2018, 04:26 PM
  #29  
old motorhead
Le Mans Master
 
old motorhead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 6,504
Received 1,339 Likes on 947 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 400ci94mm
True....but then the car will be slower in the 1/4 mile.....

.
Ha! No doubt. I couldn't even imagine trying to stay ahead of that kind of Hp and tq with a manual tranny. You'd have to be one smooth/slick/quick shifting **** to even attempt it.
Old 03-13-2018, 07:53 PM
  #30  
ysb02
Drifting
 
ysb02's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,399
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

I think the highest whipple 2.9 on a ls was a 3rd gen ctsv Gforce. Their intakes aren’t the same design as the mustangs. It took a 3L+ whipple or kB on a friends mustang to make 1000+ rwhp
Old 03-13-2018, 09:20 PM
  #31  
Petraszewsky
Racer
 
Petraszewsky's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2009
Posts: 257
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default Whippl

Check out Borowski Race and Wegner Motorsports....they both do a lot of Whipple builds and have one that made 1,010HP on a engine dunk with Pump Gas and Meth Injection. They also built a 427 with Whipple 4.5 that’s made 1435 with C16 and Nitrous and 1123HP on Pump gas/meth injection.
Old 03-14-2018, 07:49 AM
  #32  
400ci94mm
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
400ci94mm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petraszewsky
Check out Borowski Race and Wegner Motorsports....they both do a lot of Whipple builds and have one that made 1,010HP on a engine dunk with Pump Gas and Meth Injection. They also built a 427 with Whipple 4.5 that’s made 1435 with C16 and Nitrous and 1123HP on Pump gas/meth injection.
I spoke in depth about these types of set ups with Borowski......they said forget making 1,000 RWHP on anything with a Whipple 2.9. It just can't do it.

Borowski built just about the most expensive LS 427ci you can build....best of everything. $30,000 set up. The Whipple 2.9 got nowhere near 1,000 RWHP. Maybe 785 RWHP. If they just used a much smaller Heartbeat 2300 they would have made about 150-200 more HP.

They had to use a HUGE 4.0L Whipple to make 1,155 on the engine dyno..using the same extreme badass 427ci build....which would relate to about 959 RWHP.....

Whipple = TERRIBLE SC'ers....compared to other smaller SC'ers.

I'd still like to have that 1,155 FWHP set up in my car though.....but the SC'er would stick out of my hood.

.
Old 02-26-2019, 02:30 AM
  #33  
chevyfanatic
Racer
 
chevyfanatic's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: san jose ca
Posts: 353
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Petraszewsky
I don’t think you’ll get 1000RWHP out of the 2.9. 1000hp crank yes...I’m trying to push my 427 w/ Whipple 2.9 to 850-900 Rwhp on E85 and over 1000rwhp with nitrous.

easy 826 whp here on my tiny 2.3 with 900 lbs of torque. mild cam n cats too.
Old 02-26-2019, 09:18 AM
  #34  
CI GS
Le Mans Master
 
CI GS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,375
Received 1,110 Likes on 780 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chevyfanatic
easy 826 whp here on my tiny 2.3 with 900 lbs of torque. mild cam n cats too.
Tell us more...
Is this on a Vette? Size/type of motor? Which blower? Fuel, Meth/E85? M6/A6/A4? Mods?
Because making 900 ft.lbs. at the wheels on a 2.3L TVS, especially in a Vette, is no mean feat, unless you’re spraying it with nitrous, of course.
Old 02-26-2019, 09:28 AM
  #35  
chevyfanatic
Racer
 
chevyfanatic's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: san jose ca
Posts: 353
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CI GS
Tell us more...
Is this on a Vette? Size/type of motor? Which blower? Fuel, Meth/E85? M6/A6/A4? Mods?
Because making 900 ft.lbs. at the wheels on a 2.3L TVS, especially in a Vette, is no mean feat, unless you’re spraying it with nitrous, of course.
lt4 cam/headers/heads/dual meth/low side fuel/103 mm tb/17psi

thanks
The following users liked this post:
schpenxel (02-26-2019)
Old 02-26-2019, 03:02 PM
  #36  
CI GS
Le Mans Master
 
CI GS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,375
Received 1,110 Likes on 780 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chevyfanatic
lt4 cam/headers/heads/dual meth/low side fuel/103 mm tb/17psi

thanks
Okay, it’s a C7/LT motor. I thought for a second that you had the most powerful C6/2300 TVS setup on the planet.
If only we could somehow get 17psi out of one of these blowers on a C6...
Old 02-27-2019, 12:28 PM
  #37  
chuntington101
Melting Slicks
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,141
Received 113 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CI GS
Okay, it’s a C7/LT motor. I thought for a second that you had the most powerful C6/2300 TVS setup on the planet.
If only we could somehow get 17psi out of one of these blowers on a C6...
what boost do the ZR1s get upto? How come they can make big power but the HBs can’t?
Old 02-27-2019, 12:44 PM
  #38  
Garymorris
Instructor
 
Garymorris's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 134
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuntington101
what boost do the ZR1s get upto? How come they can make big power but the HBs can’t?
The LS3 c6 is extremely pulley limited...you are stuck with a 10% OD damper and 81mm upper pulley plus potential belt slip issues when at the limit. Not likely to get anything over 12psi at sea level. LS9 drive system is different.

Last edited by Garymorris; 02-27-2019 at 12:45 PM.
Old 02-27-2019, 02:20 PM
  #39  
CI GS
Le Mans Master
 
CI GS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,375
Received 1,110 Likes on 780 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Garymorris
The LS3 c6 is extremely pulley limited...you are stuck with a 10% OD damper and 81mm upper pulley plus potential belt slip issues when at the limit. Not likely to get anything over 12psi at sea level. LS9 drive system is different.


Spot on. What he said^^^^



Quick Reply: Whipple 2.9 vs Magnuson 2650.......



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 PM.