When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Let's say an LS9 made 867whp with the stock cam at 23psi with a blower (ported 2300) ratio of 3.5....are you saying that if I changed to a well designed purpose built aftermarket cam that I'd see very little HP gain if I left the blower ratio at 3.5? What about porting the heads? Still very little gain without going with more blower speed? I don't think I care to spin this blower much faster but I do believe I've observed that many LS9 heads/cam builds make way more power than 867whp (some maybe 1000+?) while spinning a 2300 blower no faster than mine. What am I missing?
Let's say an LS9 made 867whp with the stock cam at 23psi with a blower (ported 2300) ratio of 3.5....are you saying that if I changed to a well designed purpose built aftermarket cam that I'd see very little HP gain if I left the blower ratio at 3.5? What about porting the heads? Still very little gain without going with more blower speed? I don't think I care to spin this blower much faster but I do believe I've observed that many LS9 heads/cam builds make way more power than 867whp (some maybe 1000+?) while spinning a 2300 blower no faster than mine. What am I missing?
Just trying to learn here.
You're not missing anything. You'd make more power with less boost and heat.
Let's say an LS9 made 867whp with the stock cam at 23psi with a blower (ported 2300) ratio of 3.5....are you saying that if I changed to a well designed purpose built aftermarket cam that I'd see very little HP gain if I left the blower ratio at 3.5? What about porting the heads? Still very little gain without going with more blower speed? I don't think I care to spin this blower much faster but I do believe I've observed that many LS9 heads/cam builds make way more power than 867whp (some maybe 1000+?) while spinning a 2300 blower no faster than mine. What am I missing?
Just trying to learn here.
According to the dyno testing, It could pick up anywhere from 4%, to if an ideal cam I guess 8% is possible according to the engine dyno testing. But remember on the engine dyno the operator has complete control over the power output, and we didn't see a curve in the video, and they had 1000hp intercooler and reduced friction inlet, and we don't know how much residual heat.
I am not against the mods I just don't see the reward for the risk is worth the effort and expense to gain maybe 50rwhp on a 700bhp setup like they did in the video? I am also skeptical of these type of tests where so many details are hidden. I stand by the thermodynamics of it, if there is any energy returned, it is due to reduced friction, remember it takes power drive one of those blowers, maybe 80hp 100hp just to drive the thing, probably gaining 20hp just by reducing the stress on the crank pulley. Its not a *bad* mod but its performance return doesn't match the expense and risk to me. If you can find an exact setup using the exact blower drive and mods you are interested in and copy it that would be best I think.