C6 Scan & Tune Onboard Diagnostics, Service Advice, Dyno Tuning, and Fuel Management for the Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

06 LS2 to LS7 MAF conversion. HP Tuner File

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2016, 09:50 AM
  #21  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes on 1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

If in 2500 row it says -5.2 then that means you need to reduce the 2500hz cell of your MAF table by 5.2%.

You can copy the 1000 to 5800hz section of this graph, then paste special-->multiply by % into your low MAF curve in your tune. Same for 5800hz and above once you get to that area.

Take trends that you see and apply them to the rest of the MAF curve that you don't have data for yet. For example, your last log the fuel trim values are going further negative the higher in the MAF curve you get.. so I would reduce the 4150 and up cells by 5-6%. Don't just blindly copy/paste special like most people do.

Also you need to be aware that for the first 10-15 mins after you flash a new tune the data you get will not be any good. It takes some time for things to settle down, so don't just start flashing/recording/flashing/recording back to back. Drive for 10-15 mins BEFORE you start logging data that you want to actually use for corrections.









Last edited by schpenxel; 07-08-2016 at 09:51 AM.
Old 07-08-2016, 10:22 AM
  #22  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
If in 2500 row it says -5.2 then that means you need to reduce the 2500hz cell of your MAF table by 5.2%.

You can copy the 1000 to 5800hz section of this graph, then paste special-->multiply by % into your low MAF curve in your tune. Same for 5800hz and above once you get to that area.

Take trends that you see and apply them to the rest of the MAF curve that you don't have data for yet. For example, your last log the fuel trim values are going further negative the higher in the MAF curve you get.. so I would reduce the 4150 and up cells by 5-6%. Don't just blindly copy/paste special like most people do.

Also you need to be aware that for the first 10-15 mins after you flash a new tune the data you get will not be any good. It takes some time for things to settle down, so don't just start flashing/recording/flashing/recording back to back. Drive for 10-15 mins BEFORE you start logging data that you want to actually use for corrections.








This is great info. Do I want to turn my Long term fuel trims off when doing this? I was concerned that if my maf was so far off that my long term fuel trims might make a new base line for 0 percent. If this was the case would it show me under the LTFT chart that it was or would i not be able to tell because it set oa new base 0 line in the computer?
Also if i need to turn off my ltft while tuning the maf, where do i go for that in the editor?

Thank you,
Mike
Old 07-08-2016, 12:23 PM
  #23  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes on 1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Read my posts.

Originally Posted by schpenxel
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showth...er-V3&p=419231

No need to disable LTFT's. HPT has a parameter built in that combines STFT and LTFT's together, so just use that (shown in DIY)

Last edited by schpenxel; 07-08-2016 at 12:23 PM.
Old 07-08-2016, 12:35 PM
  #24  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
Read my posts.


So helpful
thank you
Old 07-08-2016, 10:04 PM
  #25  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
Read my posts.
This all worked out great.

Can you share any info if I can do the same type of thing for the virtual VE tables and if so How?

Also I have a wideband so any info on how I could WOT tune my MAF with the wideband.

Than You
Old 07-08-2016, 10:08 PM
  #26  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes on 1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Post current log/tune/layout and I'll give you some basics.
Old 07-08-2016, 11:29 PM
  #27  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
Post current log/tune/layout and I'll give you some basics.


That is a very generous and exciting offer. I will update my log tonight with the maf and fuel trim changes. Then I will post the tune and log and layout.
Old 07-09-2016, 04:02 PM
  #28  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
Post current log/tune/layout and I'll give you some basics.
Hi I setup my MAF ERR Graph and have it using the wideband. I noticed there error percent is really hight at around 1000 rpm's

I will post a my next log I take today so you can take a look at what i am talking about, but is there anyway that you can explain what i am suppose to do with this data, Do I change the maf tables with it the same way i did it with the fuel trims? The fuel trim data doesn't show theses errors so i didn't want to just change them without asking the sequence.
Old 07-09-2016, 04:04 PM
  #29  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes on 1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

If it's showing high error when using the WB at 1,000 RPM's then something is setup wrong. It should be close to zero there as it's in closed loop so fuel trims are already correcting for any fueling error.

Post layout file with log.

Last edited by schpenxel; 07-09-2016 at 04:04 PM.
Old 07-09-2016, 04:09 PM
  #30  
sevinn
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
sevinn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Baton Rouge LA
Posts: 3,753
Received 189 Likes on 175 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14, '16

Default

Originally Posted by orripid
Hi I setup my MAF ERR Graph and have it using the wideband. I noticed there error percent is really hight at around 1000 rpm's

I will post a my next log I take today so you can take a look at what i am talking about, but is there anyway that you can explain what i am suppose to do with this data, Do I change the maf tables with it the same way i did it with the fuel trims? The fuel trim data doesn't show theses errors so i didn't want to just change them without asking the sequence.
If you're running a closed loop tune you only really need to worry about wideband data that you see when the car exits closed loop (enters PE). Look at the cells above where you have fuel trim data in your other maf graph. Try setting up a filter so that you only see data when you're over 50% throttle.
The following 2 users liked this post by sevinn:
orripid (07-09-2016), SoDiezl350 (04-19-2023)
Old 07-09-2016, 07:40 PM
  #31  
Unreal
Team Owner
 
Unreal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posts: 24,035
Received 2,313 Likes on 1,793 Posts

Default

Agreed. Don't tune part throttle off wideband, otherwise you just land up fighting the ECU. Unless you make it open loop only.
The following users liked this post:
orripid (07-09-2016)
Old 07-09-2016, 09:07 PM
  #32  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sevinn
If you're running a closed loop tune you only really need to worry about wideband data that you see when the car exits closed loop (enters PE). Look at the cells above where you have fuel trim data in your other maf graph. Try setting up a filter so that you only see data when you're over 50% throttle.
So I any tips on how to make that filter you mentioned?
Also are you saying I can go out and open throttle and the just use my wideband err chart to make changes to the maf tables the same way i would from the fuel trim logs?

If so this should be pretty easy. Also do I have to worry about breaking my motor in WOT ?

Thanks
Old 07-09-2016, 09:31 PM
  #33  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes on 1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Yes there is a parameter in HPT that compares wideband AFR vs. Commanded AFR and gives a % error. So if it's commanding 12.5:1 and actual is 13:1 then it'd show ~4%. Then it's the same as the fuel trim graph you were working with earlier. Increase that cell of MAF table 4%.

As long as commanded AFR is ~14.7 then you use the fuel trim one

As soon as commanded AFR changes away from that then you have to use the wideband one

You can setup filters to make it do it automatically.

If you'll post a log/layout then I'll show you how to do it.

Last edited by schpenxel; 07-09-2016 at 09:32 PM.
Old 07-09-2016, 10:22 PM
  #34  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
Yes there is a parameter in HPT that compares wideband AFR vs. Commanded AFR and gives a % error. So if it's commanding 12.5:1 and actual is 13:1 then it'd show ~4%. Then it's the same as the fuel trim graph you were working with earlier. Increase that cell of MAF table 4%.

As long as commanded AFR is ~14.7 then you use the fuel trim one

As soon as commanded AFR changes away from that then you have to use the wideband one

You can setup filters to make it do it automatically.

If you'll post a log/layout then I'll show you how to do it.
Thank you.
I'll go create a log right now and upload it.
Old 07-09-2016, 11:10 PM
  #35  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
Yes there is a parameter in HPT that compares wideband AFR vs. Commanded AFR and gives a % error. So if it's commanding 12.5:1 and actual is 13:1 then it'd show ~4%. Then it's the same as the fuel trim graph you were working with earlier. Increase that cell of MAF table 4%.

As long as commanded AFR is ~14.7 then you use the fuel trim one

As soon as commanded AFR changes away from that then you have to use the wideband one

You can setup filters to make it do it automatically.

If you'll post a log/layout then I'll show you how to do it.

Here is my log and layout,
My AFR Er at 1000 rpm went away after I added a clamp to the intake hose.
I'm really interested to see how this is done.

I added this filter to my wideband MAF ERR graph
([50090.156] > 50) AND ([50090.156.avg(500)] > 50) AND ([50090.156.avg(-500)] > 50)
Attached Files
File Type: hpl
7_9 tune.hpl (4.40 MB, 106 views)
File Type: xml
Main Tunning.Layout.xml (19.6 KB, 58 views)

Last edited by orripid; 07-10-2016 at 12:16 AM.
Old 07-09-2016, 11:56 PM
  #36  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes on 1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Try this layout. I made your charts a bit more useful and added some graphs for AFR error. Also added one that shows commanded AFR and one that shows the average WB reading for the heck of it.

The AFR error ones willl only show data if commanded AFR is richer than 14.6 (which never happened in this last log so that is why it's showing up blank).

There are other ways to do it but that seemed like the simplest for the time being. Also fixed the spark timing table so it will match up with your tune better

You aren't logging knock retard so that is why that one is showing up blank. Add knock retard to your channels list and it should start working.
Attached Files

Last edited by schpenxel; 07-09-2016 at 11:57 PM.
Old 07-10-2016, 01:15 PM
  #37  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
Try this layout. I made your charts a bit more useful and added some graphs for AFR error. Also added one that shows commanded AFR and one that shows the average WB reading for the heck of it.

The AFR error ones willl only show data if commanded AFR is richer than 14.6 (which never happened in this last log so that is why it's showing up blank).

There are other ways to do it but that seemed like the simplest for the time being. Also fixed the spark timing table so it will match up with your tune better

You aren't logging knock retard so that is why that one is showing up blank. Add knock retard to your channels list and it should start working.
Thank You,
The filter makes sense (AFR cmd greater or less than 14.6)
After this is all tuned in would it be beneficial to do a filter that monitors 70% or higher throttle?

Also you have a guide for VE vs Fuel Trims. Would this work for PE tuning if I changed the parameter from fuel trims to my wideband?
And if so should I use the same afr less than filter you showed me or should I use a percentage of throttle? or both


Also If I have both fuel trim data for under PE and AFR data for PE for the same tables what do I do? Do I put in the fuel trim data first then drive a new log and when that is at zero then start PE table MAF changes?
Thank you

Last edited by orripid; 07-10-2016 at 01:48 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To 06 LS2 to LS7 MAF conversion. HP Tuner File

Old 07-10-2016, 02:06 PM
  #38  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes on 1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

You can play with the filters and see what works best for you. I don't have a great way of doing it--some guys use formulas that filter out a certain amount of time before/after going into PE and all kinds of other stuff but I've found a little common sense and looking at both the graphs and charts to see what is going on can help as much as anything.

I've added a fuel trim error vs. VE table and a wideband AFR error vs. VE table in the attached layout for tuning VE.

Before messing with the MAF table you really should set it to MAF only mode.

Airflow-->dynamic, set disable to 200 RPM's and re-enable to 100 RPM's

For turning VE, you'll want to disable the MAF by going to engine diag-->airflow. Set the MAF fail freq high to something really low like 1hz
Attached Files
Old 07-10-2016, 02:21 PM
  #39  
orripid
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
orripid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Posts: 98
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
You can play with the filters and see what works best for you. I don't have a great way of doing it--some guys use formulas that filter out a certain amount of time before/after going into PE and all kinds of other stuff but I've found a little common sense and looking at both the graphs and charts to see what is going on can help as much as anything.

I've added a fuel trim error vs. VE table and a wideband AFR error vs. VE table in the attached layout for tuning VE.

Before messing with the MAF table you really should set it to MAF only mode.

Airflow-->dynamic, set disable to 200 RPM's and re-enable to 100 RPM's

For turning VE, you'll want to disable the MAF by going to engine diag-->airflow. Set the MAF fail freq high to something really low like 1hz
Great Info. So are you saying its a choice on weather to use the AFR err maf data or the fuel trim maf data because they both are correct?

Here is the data Im talking about.
Attached Files
File Type: hpl
7101.hpl (3.92 MB, 73 views)

Last edited by orripid; 07-10-2016 at 03:55 PM.
Old 07-10-2016, 03:04 PM
  #40  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes on 1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

I'm saying they are both correct for different circumstances. In closed loop use fuel trims. In open loop (I.e. WOT) use the AFR error ones.

And.. As stated earlier, apply common sense.. Look at the chart vs. Time and you can get a bit better visual idea of what's going on.. I put the commanded AFR and actual AFR right on top of each other so you can see if it's lean or rich. It will always bounce around some.

I'll look at the log in a bit

Post the tune also--I think there are some PE settings that could use adjusting but can't be sure without seeing it

Looking at the charts will also help you see what areas are actually lean or rich and what areas are just the WB being slow. If you look at 13:32:945 you'll see what I mean.. it looks really lean right there but I bet it's just the WB being slow to react

Last edited by schpenxel; 07-10-2016 at 03:11 PM.


Quick Reply: 06 LS2 to LS7 MAF conversion. HP Tuner File



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.