Spark retard holding down torque
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Spark retard holding down torque
Getting spark retard coming in around 650 ft/lbs. Don't see any spark retard in the channels or charts but it's surely there in the scan. Spark should be climbing up to 3000 rpm. This is 2nd gear which is set to 780 ft/lb max in the tune.
EDIT: Found Spark retard was being logged and shows 6* being pulled @ 700 ft/lbs. Proof positive 20 ft/lbs is lost for every degree of retard. No knock so might be something in torque management
EDIT: Found Spark retard was being logged and shows 6* being pulled @ 700 ft/lbs. Proof positive 20 ft/lbs is lost for every degree of retard. No knock so might be something in torque management
Last edited by NJ_phil; 12-19-2016 at 06:34 PM.
#2
Race Director
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes
on
1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
Log total knock retard and see if it shows up there. Plain knock retard is just retard from knock, total knock retard includes burst KR and a bunch of other stuff
That looks like burst KR to me
That looks like burst KR to me
#3
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
It does show up as 6* of "Total Knock Retard" in the channels but 0* for "Knock Retard". (The actual sensor, not Spark Retard). I'll log Burst knock the next time but usually that starts off high and decays step by step, not like this. Burst decays at crank cycles and this looks like it's adjusting every 100ms if that means anything.
#4
Race Director
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes
on
1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
Makes sense, at least it isn't real knock then
If it isn't burst KR then search for any available channels with the word retard or advance in the name and log them all, you'll find it pretty quick then
If it isn't burst KR then search for any available channels with the word retard or advance in the name and log them all, you'll find it pretty quick then
Last edited by schpenxel; 12-19-2016 at 06:48 PM.
#5
Le Mans Master
I wouldn't focus on the torque number there. That is a calculated torque and not like torque measured on the dyno.
Focus more on what spark you are asking for at that rpm and airmass, and look for any table that might be pulling it there. I would log Kr, and IATs at a minimum, and burst knock to see if its just that.
Focus more on what spark you are asking for at that rpm and airmass, and look for any table that might be pulling it there. I would log Kr, and IATs at a minimum, and burst knock to see if its just that.
#6
Burning Brakes
do you have a wide band? Your commanded AFR is 11.3 but what is the engine really doing?
You need to log AFR error. that will tell you if you are running lean. Also need to log burst knock. either can cause your timing to drop. Were you spinning with traction control on?
You need to log AFR error. that will tell you if you are running lean. Also need to log burst knock. either can cause your timing to drop. Were you spinning with traction control on?
#7
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Canuk: I was thinking the ECM is using that torque number in it's torque management system and agree that's not going to the wheels. The base table has about 14* for that RPM and airmass. No IAT pulling spark for sure
Russ: I'm logging WB, just not shown on that scan. Car is still on a safety tune and running pig rich under PE. AFR was in the low 10s during that quick pull
EDIT. No wheel spin, TCS off
Russ: I'm logging WB, just not shown on that scan. Car is still on a safety tune and running pig rich under PE. AFR was in the low 10s during that quick pull
EDIT. No wheel spin, TCS off
Last edited by NJ_phil; 12-19-2016 at 06:59 PM.
#8
Race Director
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes
on
1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
Bouncing up and down like that is almost for sure burst KR or torque management, everything else should be smoother than that
#9
Le Mans Master
Canuk: I was thinking the ECM is using that torque number in it's torque management system and agree that's not going to the wheels. The base table has about 14* for that RPM and airmass. No IAT pulling spark for sure
Russ: I'm logging WB, just not shown on that scan. Car is still on a safety tune and running pig rich under PE. AFR was in the low 10s during that quick pull
EDIT. No wheel spin, TCS off
Russ: I'm logging WB, just not shown on that scan. Car is still on a safety tune and running pig rich under PE. AFR was in the low 10s during that quick pull
EDIT. No wheel spin, TCS off
There are a bunch of tables that can pull timing. Maybe post up the tune. If a few of us look at it we might catch something.
#10
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Forgot to mention I never plugged in the MAF sensor during that test....
I have to upload the tune from the car, been changing so much crap I don't know what's in there.
I have to upload the tune from the car, been changing so much crap I don't know what's in there.
#11
Le Mans Master
I noticed the MAF on the graph. That could be an issue right there if you didn't fail it and lower when VE kicks in.
#12
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Could be. I was flipping back and forth between MAF/SD and Hybrid mode around Thanksgiving and forget what's in there now. Also just checked what I thought was the latest tune and see only 620 ft/lbs max so I probably messed it up.
#14
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: CA.
Posts: 5,255
Likes: 0
Received 281 Likes
on
258 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13-'14-'15
There are several other tables in your E38 ECM that pulls timing------Besides KNOCK RETARD--
If you have the ability to data log KR----an example would be
Say in your tune you are commanding or asking for 24* timing at 5000 RPM's---the data logger shows you have NO knock retard but are ending up with only 19*
So you need to find out where the timing deducts are coming from
1 1st look at your IAT temperature---If for example it is reading 130*---then look a your tune and see hoe much timing is being removed at 130* IAT in the 5000 RPM range
2 Look at your Coolant temp---again look and see in the data logger what your coolant temps is and then look in your tune to see if any timing is being removed due to high coolant temps as well
So lets say you are commanding 24* at WOT
the IAT deducts are 4 *
the ECT deducts are 1*
So you should be ending up on your data logger with 19* total timing( again assuming you have NO KR)
NOW if you have LESS than 19* total timing the deducts are coming from even somewhere's else!
In your TQ management tables there are several tables that REMOVE TIMING as part of the TQ management system----You will notice that TQ management is controlled by 3 things------- 1. SPARK-------2. Throttle----3. Fuel----
I always eliminate ALL the SPARK deducts in the TQ Control /management part of the tune-- This makes it so much easier to have your commanded timing the same or very close or easier to see WHERE the timing deducts are coming from--Hence making your eng easier to tune without any surprises in timing
If you have the ability to data log KR----an example would be
Say in your tune you are commanding or asking for 24* timing at 5000 RPM's---the data logger shows you have NO knock retard but are ending up with only 19*
So you need to find out where the timing deducts are coming from
1 1st look at your IAT temperature---If for example it is reading 130*---then look a your tune and see hoe much timing is being removed at 130* IAT in the 5000 RPM range
2 Look at your Coolant temp---again look and see in the data logger what your coolant temps is and then look in your tune to see if any timing is being removed due to high coolant temps as well
So lets say you are commanding 24* at WOT
the IAT deducts are 4 *
the ECT deducts are 1*
So you should be ending up on your data logger with 19* total timing( again assuming you have NO KR)
NOW if you have LESS than 19* total timing the deducts are coming from even somewhere's else!
In your TQ management tables there are several tables that REMOVE TIMING as part of the TQ management system----You will notice that TQ management is controlled by 3 things------- 1. SPARK-------2. Throttle----3. Fuel----
I always eliminate ALL the SPARK deducts in the TQ Control /management part of the tune-- This makes it so much easier to have your commanded timing the same or very close or easier to see WHERE the timing deducts are coming from--Hence making your eng easier to tune without any surprises in timing
#15
Le Mans Master
That's why I said there are a bunch of tables that effect timing.
There are others than what's mentioned, I just don't have the patience to type that much.
There are others than what's mentioned, I just don't have the patience to type that much.
#16
Race Director
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes
on
1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
No one should read what he types anyways
#18
Race Director
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes
on
1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
Haha, the other guy, not you!
#19
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Here's the tune if anyone cares to take a look. Looks like it switched into MAF mode at 3000 but the MAF was unplugged so possibly that's what caused it. Let the wife drive to Walmart earlier and it ran like it just came off the showroom floor. Pretty happy with the "tame side" of the tune, idle, CL, etc...
tblu92. IAT and ECT didn't pull and spark with this cold weather for sure.. Thanks for the tips..Most people bypass torque management all together but I'm not ready to disable it yet.
tblu92. IAT and ECT didn't pull and spark with this cold weather for sure.. Thanks for the tips..Most people bypass torque management all together but I'm not ready to disable it yet.
#20
Race Director
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,193 Likes
on
1,052 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
After looking at that tune I'm like 99% sure that's burst KR that you're seeing