C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

HELP. Fuel guage malfunction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2011, 07:35 PM
  #1  
flyinmedic
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
flyinmedic's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default HELP. Fuel guage malfunction

Ok so we replaced the intake pump with an aftermarket pump on my 06 ZO6. Everything works fine except the fuel gauge. WHen the car is filled up with fuel it only reads 3/4 tank. As it goes down it will hit the 1/2 -1/3 mark and immediatley go to empty with a service fuel system warning. I can reset it with HP tuners but then it will only go to 1/4 tank and no farther. Has anyone had this problem? Any suggestions? The car only has 25K miles on it. Thanks in advance.

Last edited by flyinmedic; 07-17-2011 at 07:43 PM.
Old 07-17-2011, 07:57 PM
  #2  
eboggs_jkvl
Moderator/Tech Contributor

 
eboggs_jkvl's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Jacksonville Florida BWO Dayton, Cincinnati, Bloomsbury NJ, Cincinnati
Posts: 18,190
Received 3,811 Likes on 2,058 Posts
2015 C7 of the Year Finalist

Default

I'm guessing the crossover pipe isn't seated properly. I'm not the tank expert so someone else needs to chime in on this one.

Elmer
Old 07-17-2011, 09:33 PM
  #3  
Motorhead-47
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Motorhead-47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,502
Received 57 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

I'm going to state the obvious....you mucked up something with the driver's side tank fuel sending unit when the new pump went in. The Vette has two fuel sending units, one in each tank. It expects the driver's side sending unit to read full until the passenger side tank empties and the passenger side sending unit shows the tank is empty. When the car reads 1/2 full your driver's side tank is full and the passenger side tank is empty.

Any combination of gauge readings other than the scenario above results in the "service fuel system" generic message. Typically there are other error codes you'll get pointing to the fuel sending unit error in the tank.

Sounds like you'll get to drop that tank again and recheck all of your work.
Old 07-18-2011, 09:06 AM
  #4  
taken19
Track Junky
 
taken19's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Orlando Area
Posts: 4,049
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
Tech Contributor

Default

Motorhead, I replaced my fuel pump with a walbro 255 unit and will be firing up the car for the first time later this week. The pump assembly came out a bit rough from the tank, but everything looked intact upon inspection. With regard to your statement above, would any of us see visible damage to the sending unit for the above symptoms, or is it internal damage? I even went so far to clean the wipe pattern with alcohol to be sure I wouldn't have issues.

Any history or personal experience may help someone attempt to diagnose the problem flyinmedic is having. Specifically, what could or should he be looking for if he drops the tank again?
Old 07-18-2011, 04:07 PM
  #5  
hydbyj
Instructor
 
hydbyj's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Deerfield Beach Florida
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it is next to impossible to get the fuel float hooked up to the sending unit on install when changing pumps. the pump measures close to the 4" hole it goes into, you need hemoststats like a surgeon would use during a heart transplant to try to snap the float properly into the sending unit. even experts have trouble with this one
Old 07-18-2011, 06:46 PM
  #6  
Motorhead-47
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Motorhead-47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,502
Received 57 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by taken19
Motorhead, I replaced my fuel pump with a walbro 255 unit and will be firing up the car for the first time later this week. The pump assembly came out a bit rough from the tank, but everything looked intact upon inspection. With regard to your statement above, would any of us see visible damage to the sending unit for the above symptoms, or is it internal damage? I even went so far to clean the wipe pattern with alcohol to be sure I wouldn't have issues.

Any history or personal experience may help someone attempt to diagnose the problem flyinmedic is having. Specifically, what could or should he be looking for if he drops the tank again?
Not knowing exactly what his replacement consisted of it is sort of hard to tell. There are 4 wires in the plug on the OEM pump. The two smaller gauge green wires are the fuel sending unit. If either of those two were damaged or if a terminal backed out of the harness on install (I've had this happen when I plugged that connector in on the bottom of the flange) then you'll get some very strange readings. I'd start with verifying that those wires are firmly inserted in the connector. Unfortunately that connection is on the bottom side of the flange.



I've seen a post some time ago that tells us what values should be on those two terminals when the tank is full and when the tank is empty. If we had those you could ohm out the connector while everything is still in the car and then you'd know for sure. Let me browse and see if I can find them.

Last edited by Motorhead-47; 07-18-2011 at 06:53 PM.
Old 07-18-2011, 09:16 PM
  #7  
flyinmedic
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
flyinmedic's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Motorhead-47
Not knowing exactly what his replacement consisted of it is sort of hard to tell. There are 4 wires in the plug on the OEM pump. The two smaller gauge green wires are the fuel sending unit. If either of those two were damaged or if a terminal backed out of the harness on install (I've had this happen when I plugged that connector in on the bottom of the flange) then you'll get some very strange readings. I'd start with verifying that those wires are firmly inserted in the connector. Unfortunately that connection is on the bottom side of the flange.



I've seen a post some time ago that tells us what values should be on those two terminals when the tank is full and when the tank is empty. If we had those you could ohm out the connector while everything is still in the car and then you'd know for sure. Let me browse and see if I can find them.

Thank you for the info, it would be great if you find those readings. The setup is an Aeomotive A1000 in tank pump and a DP 2000hp external pump. When the car is almost empty it will take over 13-14 gallons so hopefully it's something simple.
Old 07-18-2011, 09:44 PM
  #8  
Motorhead-47
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Motorhead-47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,502
Received 57 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

Out of my service manual....

Resistance

• Empty tank reading 247-253 ohms resistance

• Full tank reading 38.5-41.05 ohms resistance


I have not installed an A1000 but I believe it uses the stock fuel sending unit so those values should be good. The connector I spoke about above is NA in this case.


Last edited by Motorhead-47; 07-18-2011 at 09:52 PM.
Old 07-18-2011, 10:38 PM
  #9  
flyinmedic
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
flyinmedic's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: The Woodlands TX
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Motorhead-47
Out of my service manual....

Resistance

• Empty tank reading 247-253 ohms resistance

• Full tank reading 38.5-41.05 ohms resistance


I have not installed an A1000 but I believe it uses the stock fuel sending unit so those values should be good. The connector I spoke about above is NA in this case.

Thank you, gonna get it fixed (hopefully) first week of Aug. I'll update what we find.
Old 07-19-2011, 03:19 AM
  #10  
torquetube
Le Mans Master
 
torquetube's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: West coast CA
Posts: 5,151
Received 653 Likes on 472 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Motorhead-47
Out of my service manual....

Resistance

• Empty tank reading 247-253 ohms resistance

• Full tank reading 38.5-41.05 ohms resistance
GM inverted the sender's range in '07 or '08 so that a poor connection would cause the gauge to err on the empty side rather than full.

On the OP's '06 car, each sender should read 40 empty and 250 full.

To make certain that the float lever isn't hung up on anything after you've completely reassembled a tank, verify 40 ohms resistance with the tank right side up. Then hold it upside-down and check that the resistance has gone to 250.
Old 07-19-2011, 06:01 AM
  #11  
Motorhead-47
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Motorhead-47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,502
Received 57 Likes on 29 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by torquetube
GM inverted the sender's range in '07 or '08 so that a poor connection would cause the gauge to err on the empty side rather than full.

On the OP's '06 car, each sender should read 40 empty and 250 full.

To make certain that the float lever isn't hung up on anything after you've completely reassembled a tank, verify 40 ohms resistance with the tank right side up. Then hold it upside-down and check that the resistance has gone to 250.
Thanks for the correction..my service manual is for a 2009.

Question: If you walk into the dealership to buy a replacement fuel level sending unit for an earlier model car do you walk out the door with one that reads 40 empty and 250 full or 250 empty and 40 full?

Get notified of new replies

To HELP. Fuel guage malfunction




Quick Reply: HELP. Fuel guage malfunction



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM.