When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Please post the differences betwen a regular C6 and Z51, I don't see major differences, but I may be wrong.
Guys buying a Z51 think they are buying a different car , they don't think they have a C6 but a Z51 and that they belong to another "league", like a ZO6. I can see the differences on a ZO6.
Please post the differences betwen a regular C6 and Z51, I don't see major differences, but I may be wrong.
Guys buying a Z51 think they are buying a different car , they don't think they have a C6 but a Z51 and that they belong to another "league", like a ZO6. I can see the differences on a ZO6.
There are notable differences between the two packages but they certainly does NOT make them different cars LOL.
What many people fail to realize is that there are a few positives/advantages to having a base suspension C6 (other than the obvious $1700.00 cost savings) as well.
I have a 2006 Z51 and except for the larger braking surfaces; the oil, power steering and transmission coolers; the improved transmission ratios through 1-4 gears; the larger diameter sway bars; the heavier duty bushing on the suspension; and better gripping supercar tires, it is basically another C6. Still the best $1500 upgrade available by GM.
Of course I'm stuck with a performance suspension since I can't switch to the cushy mode, but then I can drive my Mercedes.
Last edited by peterpeter211; Mar 4, 2008 at 01:17 AM.
...What many people fail to realize is that there are a few positives/advantages to having a base suspension C6 (other than the obvious $1700.00 cost savings)...
If one plans on modifying performance well beyond what the Z51 package offers, then it is silly to waste the money on it.
That $1700.00 can be put towards coilovers, bushings, adjustable anti-sway bars, rear gears, brake upgrade, etc.
From: DFW This user does not support or recommend the product or service displayed in the ad to the right
Originally Posted by peterpeter211
I have a 2006 Z51 and except for the larger braking surfaces; the oil, power steering and transmission coolers; the improved transmission ratios through 1-4 gears; the larger diameter sway bars; the heavier duty bushing on the suspension; and better gripping supercar tires, it is basically another C6. Still the best $1500 upgrade available by GM.
Of course I'm stuck with a performance suspension since I can't switch to the cushy mode, but then I can drive my Mercedes.
Actually the base model has bettter transmission ratios if you look at the gear splits. The Z51 is a gymkhana/autocross package where speeds are generally not above80mph Z51 has shorter gearing in gears 1-2-3 but the 3-4 split sucks for road racing. And actually if you consider the holes in the Z51 rotors the braking surfaces are nearly identical.
I agree on all the other points.
I'm well aware of all those differences when compared to a base C6, but I see guys asking: "what kind of CAI for my Z51", or "I have a Z51 so waht kind of headres should buy....."
My LS2 or a LS3 is the same one on a Z51
I'm well aware of all those differences when compared to a base C6, but I see guys asking: "what kind of CAI for my Z51", or "I have a Z51 so waht kind of headres should buy....."
My LS2 or a LS3 is the same one on a Z51
True, they probably should word their questions a little better maybe, perhaps something along the lines of: "what kind of CAI for my C6 LS2 (or LS3), oh and by the way it has the Z51 package if that matters at all" maybe.
Because on the LS3 the Z51 packages get the front mounted oil cooler(HUGE positive and if you have ever tried to put an aftermarket front mount oil cooler on your car before, you would appreciate a factory installed unit) and certain intakes like the Vararam require a different bracket for the lower mounting position.
Actually the base model has bettter transmission ratios if you look at the gear splits. The Z51 is a gymkhana/autocross package where speeds are generally not above80mph Z51 has shorter gearing in gears 1-2-3 but the 3-4 split sucks for road racing. And actually if you consider the holes in the Z51 rotors the braking surfaces are nearly identical.
I agree on all the other points.
With a top speed in excess of 100mph in 3rd, my streets aren't long enough to even consider going to 4th. Most times its over by the time 2nd approaches redline, and and I'm just driving hard through an on ramp to the freeway when 3rd approaches red line. 1-3 are close though and typically when driving around town for transportation, I shift 1, 3 6 and never go to 2,4 or 5
Please post the differences betwen a regular C6 and Z51, I don't see major differences, but I may be wrong.
Guys buying a Z51 think they are buying a different car , they don't think they have a C6 but a Z51 and that they belong to another "league", like a ZO6. I can see the differences on a ZO6.
Z51 is a performance package and does change the overall stats of the car (track #'s). It's the reason when an LS2/LS3 C6 are tested in competition (mag reviews/comparisons), the Z51 option is always used since it gives the best performance for the basic C6.
I always state I have a C6, but if someone asks for some more detail I always mention the Z51 package. I don't consider myself in some other "league" but I do consider that the Z51 option will outperform the base suspension....just the way it is.
On the other hand there are some people on this forum who can't stand the Z51, question it's worthiness, think GM is flat out LYING about the performance difference, and consider it a waste of $, and believe the base suspension is never tested in comparisons because it would expose that the Z51 offers no benefit. Those are the people that imo, have the real "Z51" issue.
From: NJ..."the way I saw it, everyone takes a beating sometimes."
These threads are amusing. I honestly don't care either way but here is a quote of mine from a previous thread and I stand by it until proven wrong.
Originally Posted by k0bun
....The only truely unfortunate thing is that with the 3 suspension options comes a subliminal brainwashing put into the minds of shoppers that the "Base" is somehow bad or not good enough to be in a Vette. This is rediculous. I'm glad everyone is proud of what they chose/own. That is really all that's important. However do you really think your Z51 is that much better than someone elses F55? Or that the Base suspension doesn't even count? Show me one, ONE documented example of when a C6 lost out to another C6, in any type of driving/racing event, soley because of the suspension option. GM's supposed testing for the car doesn't count. I want real results from real drivers. Because most who aggressively compete with their cars on a regular basis will change out the suspension to aftermarket parts anyway.
These threads are amusing. I honestly don't care either way but here is a quote of mine from a previous thread and I stand by it until proven wrong.
I see this thread getting locked right about.....
The base suspension package isn't all that great, unless you like body roll, less grippy tires, and a vette that will need to cut back on hotlaps due to running too hot.
If you honestly think a suspension package makes no difference in a cars track abilities you must also believe just slapping in an LS7 will make a base vette hang with a Z06 on a track........
From: NJ..."the way I saw it, everyone takes a beating sometimes."
Originally Posted by Silver05GTO
The base suspension package isn't all that great, unless you like body roll, less grippy tires, and a vette that will need to cut back on hotlaps due to running too hot.
If you honestly think a suspension package makes no difference in a cars track abilities you must also believe just slapping in an LS7 will make a base vette hang with a Z06 on a track........
Of course suspension makes a difference at the track. But we're not talking about the track. How many C6 owners actually race their cars? Like I posted, most who will competively race their cars will make their own alterations to the suspension anyway. On the street where 99% of C6 owners drive their cars 99% of the time. Your car's performance will most likely not be effected by the suspension in a way that will make you lose to a different optioned C6. Even just a straight run will come down more to the driver than the Z51 vs... I'm not putting down the Z51, I'm just saying people put too much thought into what it will do.
Get what you want and what you can afford. Just don't think it's THAT much better than the others.
The base suspension package isn't all that great, unless you like body roll, less grippy tires, and a vette that will need to cut back on hotlaps due to running too hot.
Excuse me, but when the temps drop below 50 degrees, you'll find the Z51 "Supercar" tires got lots LESS grip than the Base FE1 tires. Unless you like washboard ride, the Base FE1 handles choppy surfaces much better. Z51 vette might have to cut back on hot lapping too when the cross drilled rotors start cracking, especially if you use race pads.