2012 LS3 Stock Dyno Numbers?
#41
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Tampa FL (formerly Justinjor)
Posts: 5,022
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
9 Posts
Tech Contributor
St. Jude Donor '11-'12-'13-'14
1 3/4 has been shown to provide more than enough flow for a bolt-on LS3 meaning that there is no restriction in the exhaust track that could be a source of more power.
There is no need for the larger 1 7/8 unless you really start pushing out some exhaust with forced induction of some kind.
I expected to have a cam and possibly either a blower, turbo, or nitrous setup in the future so I planned accordingly and went with the 1 7/8 knowing that I would be giving up a little bit until the extra flow was needed.
My cam is installed and nitrous should be on the car soon
There is no need for the larger 1 7/8 unless you really start pushing out some exhaust with forced induction of some kind.
I expected to have a cam and possibly either a blower, turbo, or nitrous setup in the future so I planned accordingly and went with the 1 7/8 knowing that I would be giving up a little bit until the extra flow was needed.
My cam is installed and nitrous should be on the car soon
#42
Burning Brakes
I've read lots of reports of motors getting stronger as they age.
Yes if they are broken in according to GM recommendations, if not your engine will have slightly less power.
Douglas in Green Bay
Yes if they are broken in according to GM recommendations, if not your engine will have slightly less power.
Douglas in Green Bay
#43
Melting Slicks
I have dyno'd my car on three different dyno jets all with SEA correcton and smoothing set to 5.
With a little ove 1K on the clock I got 391/389.
Then after about 3500 miles at the same shop and dmn close to the same conditions. 399 and I think 392.
Then at another shop before the tune and exhaust. I got 401/394.
With LS7 complete exhaust 410/404.
DJ
With a little ove 1K on the clock I got 391/389.
Then after about 3500 miles at the same shop and dmn close to the same conditions. 399 and I think 392.
Then at another shop before the tune and exhaust. I got 401/394.
With LS7 complete exhaust 410/404.
DJ
#44
Safety Car
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Los Alamitos California
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09
I have dyno'd my car on three different dyno jets all with SEA correcton and smoothing set to 5.
With a little ove 1K on the clock I got 391/389.
Then after about 3500 miles at the same shop and dmn close to the same conditions. 399 and I think 392.
Then at another shop before the tune and exhaust. I got 401/394.
With LS7 complete exhaust 410/404.
DJ
With a little ove 1K on the clock I got 391/389.
Then after about 3500 miles at the same shop and dmn close to the same conditions. 399 and I think 392.
Then at another shop before the tune and exhaust. I got 401/394.
With LS7 complete exhaust 410/404.
DJ
I'm not saying new cars don't gain some power after breakin. I'm just saying without back-to-back dynos on the same dyno (not the same model) with like conditions it's a crapshoot.
San
#45
Track Junky
I have dyno'd my car on three different dyno jets all with SEA correcton and smoothing set to 5.
With a little ove 1K on the clock I got 391/389.
Then after about 3500 miles at the same shop and dmn close to the same conditions. 399 and I think 392.
Then at another shop before the tune and exhaust. I got 401/394.
With LS7 complete exhaust 410/404.
DJ
With a little ove 1K on the clock I got 391/389.
Then after about 3500 miles at the same shop and dmn close to the same conditions. 399 and I think 392.
Then at another shop before the tune and exhaust. I got 401/394.
With LS7 complete exhaust 410/404.
DJ
Regardless of the discussions about back to back dyno runs and temp/humidity runs, this is exactly the data that supports an increase in Hp with engine breakin.
Thanks for posting
#46
Race Director
I have dyno'd my car on three different dyno jets all with SEA correcton and smoothing set to 5.
With a little ove 1K on the clock I got 391/389.
Then after about 3500 miles at the same shop and dmn close to the same conditions. 399 and I think 392.
Then at another shop before the tune and exhaust. I got 401/394.
With LS7 complete exhaust 410/404.
DJ
With a little ove 1K on the clock I got 391/389.
Then after about 3500 miles at the same shop and dmn close to the same conditions. 399 and I think 392.
Then at another shop before the tune and exhaust. I got 401/394.
With LS7 complete exhaust 410/404.
DJ
Over how much time and how many miles? And only a 10 RWHP difference? Regardless of miles or time that's not much difference. 2-3% variation is possible with 3 different dyno runs on the same Dyno on the same day.
#47
Melting Slicks
You mean SAE and all dynos (even the same model) are different. Not to mention different temperature/humidity on different days.
I'm not saying new cars don't gain some power after breakin. I'm just saying without back-to-back dynos on the same dyno (not the same model) with like conditions it's a crapshoot.
San
I'm not saying new cars don't gain some power after breakin. I'm just saying without back-to-back dynos on the same dyno (not the same model) with like conditions it's a crapshoot.
San
Back to back on one dyno jet would be the best way, just didn't work out that way.
DJ
#48
Melting Slicks
DJ
#49
Instructor
My bone stock 09 a6 put down 403hp 399tq on dyno jet. Best et 11.79. Swapped in bone stock new LS7 over 18 months ago,have never dynoed new engine but did go 11.091@126 3 weeks ago.
#54
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Tampa FL (formerly Justinjor)
Posts: 5,022
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
9 Posts
Tech Contributor
St. Jude Donor '11-'12-'13-'14
Most people dont use STD correction. My car put down 528whp STD corrected with my current setup but SAE put it at 517.
And no, , axle back wouldn't give that much hp. Given that the best run was the first one, I'd assume the other 2 were back to back pulls and the signs of heat soak are present.
And no, , axle back wouldn't give that much hp. Given that the best run was the first one, I'd assume the other 2 were back to back pulls and the signs of heat soak are present.
#56
Burning Brakes
Most people dont use STD correction. My car put down 528whp STD corrected with my current setup but SAE put it at 517.
And no, , axle back wouldn't give that much hp. Given that the best run was the first one, I'd assume the other 2 were back to back pulls and the signs of heat soak are present.
And no, , axle back wouldn't give that much hp. Given that the best run was the first one, I'd assume the other 2 were back to back pulls and the signs of heat soak are present.
Last edited by Dendk; 04-30-2012 at 12:39 AM.
#59