[Z06] Heads and big cam....RWHP???
#21
Advanced
Thread Starter
I'm at work right now, but as soon as I can get an answer I will let you know.
I am hoping we can get all this rain behind us, and I can get out there in the next day or so to see for myself.
I am hoping we can get all this rain behind us, and I can get out there in the next day or so to see for myself.
#22
Le Mans Master
Numbers are starting to look about right. Hopefully you got a good tuner so drivability doesn't suck (bucking, surging, idle hunting). I had horrible drivability from an inexperienced tuner with just a mild cam (Ragin' Racin' Lethal that wasn't initially installed and tuned by them).
#23
Safety Car
Actually Katech dyno'd both the halltech and the K&N, and they were statistically equal. You may be thinking of the Airaid, it was down about 10 hp from the above two.
#24
Advanced
Thread Starter
The original Cam was bigger than this one and I had to replace it.....it was way to much for what I wanted.
Well, you're going to need to wait a couple of days for that to happen.
Numbers are starting to look about right. Hopefully you got a good tuner so drivability doesn't suck (bucking, surging, idle hunting). I had horrible drivability from an inexperienced tuner with just a mild cam (Ragin' Racin' Lethal that wasn't initially installed and tuned by them).
Numbers are starting to look about right. Hopefully you got a good tuner so drivability doesn't suck (bucking, surging, idle hunting). I had horrible drivability from an inexperienced tuner with just a mild cam (Ragin' Racin' Lethal that wasn't initially installed and tuned by them).
#26
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: millstone NJ
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#28
Burning Brakes
I did the same type of build (vette tube) Mustang At7k Thing is minutes before tear down a baseline dyno was done.At the time i had no idea how many dyno arguements it would avoid. It told me exactly what my drivetrain loss was(421 =16.5%-505) (521.4=642) and for the last 3kmi.its been trouble free. A safe tune is what i wanted so i would have something left to go further with.Good luck. Make sure you have real 1.8 cam lobe lift numbers instead of comps 1.7 specs.
#29
Advanced
Thread Starter
The base line on the Mustang Dyno was 399 RWHP
I did the same type of build (vette tube) Mustang At7k Thing is minutes before tear down a baseline dyno was done.At the time i had no idea how many dyno arguements it would avoid. It told me exactly what my drivetrain loss was(421 =16.5%-505) (521.4=642) and for the last 3kmi.its been trouble free. A safe tune is what i wanted so i would have something left to go further with.Good luck. Make sure you have real 1.8 cam lobe lift numbers instead of comps 1.7 specs.
#31
Drifting
OP. Let us know the torque numbers too.
#37
Le Mans Master
Does it run right? Feel strong? Don't get too wrapped up in dyno numbers as they all read differently. Plus, I've had so many customers read online that so-n-so made such-n-such HP on the same combo, but be down by 30-40 HP....only to run .5 seconds quicker on the track. Dyno's are tools to measure...and all calibrated differently.
#38
Does it run right? Feel strong? Don't get too wrapped up in dyno numbers as they all read differently. Plus, I've had so many customers read online that so-n-so made such-n-such HP on the same combo, but be down by 30-40 HP....only to run .5 seconds quicker on the track. Dyno's are tools to measure...and all calibrated differently.
It's a tool to measure how cool a person is on a forum, scientifically proven by scientists......
Ha of course, but it was out of curiosity. His car seems strong!
Btw were those SAE numbers?
#39
Burning Brakes
100-120 rwhp heads cam intake system and exhaust is what you get. More then that is fooling yourself. And clutch time.