Notices
C6 Corvette ZR1 & Z06 General info about GM’s Corvette Supercar, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

[Z06] Which exhaust valve to get...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2013, 01:48 PM
  #21  
BgBoost1
Drifting
 
BgBoost1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Posts: 1,636
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I have used both the REV Replacement 1pc SS Valve and the one from Ferrea. I have to admit that the Ferrea Valves look a little better in person (Cosmetic wise), but I use more of the Rev Valves as I have heard that they are both made in the same factory in Argentina, and the Rev Valves are considerably cheaper. I have seen both at 10-15K miles and they wear almost exactly the same.

If $$ is no object I would go with the Katech Ti Exhaust Valve. I have yet to work with a set of them, but everything Katech puts out is always top notch! I would only assume that these would be the same!

Like others are telling you please find a reputable head shop with experience replacing guides on LS7 heads and have them do the work for you. Installing the guides, the valve job, quality of the guides and the final honing process are all very important. You will not want to try and save any money on this process. Pay WCCH, LPE or someone highly capable to do a good job so you will sleep well at night!
Old 02-15-2013, 01:49 PM
  #22  
RedZ4me
Le Mans Master
 
RedZ4me's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 5,052
Received 422 Likes on 257 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mark200X
What is their failure rate?

Are they failing because they are two piece?

Are they failing because they are hollow?

This would be excellent information for those contemplating a valve change to know
.
Wow !! again?..... really ??
Old 02-15-2013, 01:52 PM
  #23  
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mark200X
What is their failure rate?
Higher than what it should be.

Originally Posted by Mark200X
Are they failing because they are two piece?
When you have a hole in your block, and you're loooking at a $17k repair, due to one of them failing, who cares?

Originally Posted by Mark200X
Are they failing because they are hollow?
Again, should one of them result in you having a windowed engine block, what does it matter?

Originally Posted by Mark200X
This would be excellent information for those contemplating a valve change to know
.
All that really need be known, is that they have a long record of failure in these cars.

That alone is enough for many to discard them.

Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; 02-15-2013 at 02:34 PM.
Old 02-15-2013, 02:02 PM
  #24  
toxin440
Melting Slicks
 
toxin440's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 3,003
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Mark200X
First order of business is to check your heads and see if you have any excessive wear (wiggle test). If none, you are unlikely to have a problem.

Here is the procedure for the 'wiggle test':

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/1582871091-post151.html

You might want to read that entire thread.

And as MTPZ06 said, if you're going to track the car or modify it for significantly more horsepower than there are several upgrades to the OEM parts that you may want to undertake.
That's what I had done -- I paid a visit to LG Motorsports in North Dallas and had them do a wiggle test on my 08 Z06 - 23K miles.

They came back and told me "i'm good - recommend a re-check in 10 to 20K miles" For 275 they did the wiggle test on a few valves... little pricey for just that little bit of work, but I know they are a top tier shop, and it's worth the extra bit to me knowing if LG thinks they are good, then I know they are good.

If LG looked at my valves and says I'm good, I'm quite a bit more confident driving it. Warranty expires in 2 months. I would REALLY love to get a basic head/port/valve job... sadly I don't have the tools or experience to do the labor myself. And more importantly I don't have the extra cash sitting around at the moment. If anyone wants to drop $3k in my coffee cup haha that would be super
Old 02-15-2013, 02:48 PM
  #25  
Mark2009
Safety Car
 
Mark2009's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Location: KY
Posts: 4,706
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by '06 Quicksilver Z06
Higher than what it should be.

When you have a hole in your block, and you're loooking at a $17k repair, due to one of them failing, who cares?

Again, should one of them result in you having a windowed engine block, what does it matter? [...]
The typical low information response, intended to promote fear instead of understanding. Translated, it says: "Do what you're told and don't ask questions (because we don't have any answers)".
Old 02-15-2013, 03:02 PM
  #26  
Mark2009
Safety Car
 
Mark2009's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Location: KY
Posts: 4,706
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by '06 Quicksilver Z06
[...] All that really need be known, is that they have a long record of failure in these cars. [...]
You were just asked to describe just how long that record of failure was (failure rate) and you refused to provide an answer... but you instead repeat the same claim. Don't you know the answer? If not, why do you keep making the claim?
Old 02-15-2013, 03:18 PM
  #27  
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mark200X
The typical low information response, intended to promote fear instead of understanding. Translated, it says: "Do what you're told and don't ask questions (because we don't have any answers)".
When looking at this situation, one has to weigh advantages and disadvantages of the stock valves, vs the solid stemmed stainless valves typically used in their place.

Many, when going about it this way, many, when considering sticking with the stock exhaust valves, determine that the disadvantages of them out weigh any potential practical advantages which they may offer.

Some of the quickest and fastest C6 Z06s on this board, run the "heavier than stock" solid stainless exhaust valve.

So there has not been any practical performance penalty. And their durability in this application has been stellar.

So before anyone hollers "lighter valve train", well that may be true, but at what cost? So one has a "lighter valve train" with the stock stuff. So what?

The "cost", is being still eligible for a seat at the broken exhaust valve table. Where there seems to always be room for one more, and where no one who has ever simply insisted on sitting there, has been turned away.

The original poster's question was:

Originally Posted by CHIWS6
I just picked up a 08 z06 2 weeks ago and im thinking of just replacing the valves and guides soon. so my question is what kind of valves are u guys using? valve guides? is there a sponsor i can get them from? I Dont want to replace the heads right now with aftermarket, i just want to fix the main problem with these heads. Any info is really appreciated. Thanks fellas!
We're telling him, solid stemmed stainless, whatever brands the top cylinder head shops discussed on this forum recommend, have used, and have had success with. And we're telling him why.

The guy just got his car, and doesn't want to be next on the dropped stock OEM exhaust valve list, a list which continues to grow, just as fast as it ever has, and I, for one, don't blame him.

Why some of you guys get so upset, when someone says, "No, I will not be next", is interesting.

Originally Posted by BgBoost1
I have used both the REV Replacement 1pc SS Valve and the one from Ferrea. I have to admit that the Ferrea Valves look a little better in person (Cosmetic wise), but I use more of the Rev Valves as I have heard that they are both made in the same factory in Argentina, and the Rev Valves are considerably cheaper. I have seen both at 10-15K miles and they wear almost exactly the same.

If $$ is no object I would go with the Katech Ti Exhaust Valve. I have yet to work with a set of them, but everything Katech puts out is always top notch! I would only assume that these would be the same!

Like others are telling you please find a reputable head shop with experience replacing guides on LS7 heads and have them do the work for you. Installing the guides, the valve job, quality of the guides and the final honing process are all very important. You will not want to try and save any money on this process. Pay WCCH, LPE or someone highly capable to do a good job so you will sleep well at night!
Sage advice.

Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; 02-16-2013 at 04:30 PM.
Old 02-15-2013, 04:18 PM
  #28  
Mark2009
Safety Car
 
Mark2009's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Location: KY
Posts: 4,706
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by '06 Quicksilver Z06
We're telling him, solid stemmed stainless, whatever brands the top cylinder head shops discussed on this forum recommend, have used, and have had success with. And we're telling him why.
No, you're not.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates that the OEM valves are 2 piece, implying -- with no facts -- that is bad. He is not being told that their is no evidence that the valves are breaking because of that.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates that the solid stainless valves are 1 piece, implying -- with no facts -- that is better. He is not being told that their is no evidence that a 1 piece valve would not also break if subjected to the same conditions as the OEM valve.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates that the OEM valves are hollow, implying -- with no facts -- that is bad. He is not being told that their is no evidence that the valves are breaking because of that.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates -- with no facts -- that the OEM valves have a high failure rate. He is not being told that this rate is about 15-20 valves out of about 240,000 valves in use (LS7 only).

He's not being told by solid stainless advocates that the most likely reason the valves are failing is due to extremely worn exhaust guides.

He's not being told by solid stainless advocates to check his guide wear to see if he even has a problem.

He's not being told by solid stainless advocates that a very respected shop advises the OEM valves are fine as long as the guides are checked.

So, the only things he is being told by solid stainless advocates are things to convince him to join their club; things that are not supported by any logical assemblage of facts, other than 'some OEM valves break but we don't know -- or care -- why'. Anything that may exonerate the OEM valve is withheld. Such biased, one-sided, and unsubstantiated proselytizing is simply not right, so that's where I come in
Old 02-15-2013, 04:25 PM
  #29  
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mark200X
No, you're not.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates that the OEM valves are 2 piece, implying -- with no facts -- that is bad. He is not being told that their is no evidence that the valves are breaking because of that.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates that the solid stainless valves are 1 piece, implying -- with no facts -- that is better. He is not being told that their is no evidence that a 1 piece valve would not also break if subjected to the same conditions as the OEM valve.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates that the OEM valves are hollow, implying -- with no facts -- that is bad. He is not being told that their is no evidence that the valves are breaking because of that.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates -- with no facts -- that the OEM valves have a high failure rate. He is not being told that this rate is about 15-20 valves out of about 240,000 valves in use (LS7 only).

He's not being told by solid stainless advocates that the most likely reason the valves are failing is due to extremely worn exhaust guides.

He's not being told by solid stainless advocates to check his guide wear to see if he even has a problem.

He's not being told by solid stainless advocates that a very respected shop advises the OEM valves are fine as long as the guides are checked.

So, the only things he is being told by solid stainless advocates are things to convince him to join their club; things that are not supported by any logical assemblage of facts, other than 'some OEM valves break but we don't know -- or care -- why'. Anything that may exonerate the OEM valve is withheld. Such biased, one-sided, and unsubstantiated proselytizing is simply not right, so that's where I come in
You know, I just don't understand, why some of you guys, especially you guys still in warranty, get so upset, downright nasty even, when a fellow forum member makes an attempt to extricate himself from the "Dropped Stock Exhaust Valve Derby", and the expense which goes along with it. A "derby" which has resulted in much financial hardship for way too many members of this forum. Especially those whose cars might not be paid for, because they financed them.

Having to replace a motor, for these people, could result in them having to sell the car as a "roller" altogether.

But some of you guys, simply do not care about that.

It would seem, that you would be glad, that someone else was joining you in protecting themselves against calamity.

You have a warranty. They don't. Your *** is covered. Their's isn't.

They're doing the best that they can to protect themselves. You, need do nothing.

You'd rather argue, instead of helping show them, how they need not continue to be at such a big risk.

But I guess arguing, in an attempt to prove that your position is "right" is more important than any satisfaction you would get out of knowing that you won't be reading about someone else suffering a valve failure.

You don't care about these people in here Mark, and the risk they are under and exposed to. Seriously, we both know it. You could not care less about them. You are in warranty. And you don't track your car. In fact, your car, you say, has never seen redline. You care about only one thing and one thing only. Arguing. That's it. You don't care about these people, and the hard decisions they are faced with. You simply love to argue. For you, this is a game. A game where you have nothing at stake. Because you are in warranty.

Aside from your arguing, where are your contributions to this forum? Where are your technical write-ups, your pictures, what have you contributed?

Well, I'm done arguing with you. I'm going to do my best, to help this membership when it comes to this matter. And that means pointing them in the right direction, when it comes to minimizing their risk and exposure to the LS7 valve train issue.

Seriously, you got pissed, when myself and others, scoffed at "the tool" and that geometry exercise..

Now, apparently no longer able to argue that position, I don't hear you talking much about the measuring block to evaluate "geometry", no, now, you are advocating some "wiggle test".

A "test" that most GM dealers have likely never heard of, and the ones who have, probably cannot perform it with any degree of accuracy or repeatability.

Nobody, planning on driving hard, tracking, or looking at this over the long haul, is going to put any faith in any "wiggle test" at "Mr Goodwrench", which may or may not be performed correctly". Nobody using their car in this manner, is going to "bet" that the good results of their "wiggle test", are going to save them from a mishap. And well they shouldn't.

Hard decisions have to be made when it comes to actually protecting yourself in this matter. Some will make those hard decisions. Others, many of whom are not at any risk whatsoever, like yourself, because exactly like you, their cars never have, and perhaps never will see redline, and are in warranty, will continue to argue.

Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; 02-16-2013 at 04:31 PM.
Old 02-15-2013, 04:45 PM
  #30  
BgBoost1
Drifting
 
BgBoost1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Posts: 1,636
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mark200X
No, you're not.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates that the OEM valves are 2 piece, implying -- with no facts -- that is bad. He is not being told that their is no evidence that the valves are breaking because of that.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates that the solid stainless valves are 1 piece, implying -- with no facts -- that is better. He is not being told that their is no evidence that a 1 piece valve would not also break if subjected to the same conditions as the OEM valve.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates that the OEM valves are hollow, implying -- with no facts -- that is bad. He is not being told that their is no evidence that the valves are breaking because of that.

He's being told by solid stainless advocates -- with no facts -- that the OEM valves have a high failure rate. He is not being told that this rate is about 15-20 valves out of about 240,000 valves in use (LS7 only).

He's not being told by solid stainless advocates that the most likely reason the valves are failing is due to extremely worn exhaust guides.

He's not being told by solid stainless advocates to check his guide wear to see if he even has a problem.

He's not being told by solid stainless advocates that a very respected shop advises the OEM valves are fine as long as the guides are checked.

So, the only things he is being told by solid stainless advocates are things to convince him to join their club; things that are not supported by any logical assemblage of facts, other than 'some OEM valves break but we don't know -- or care -- why'. Anything that may exonerate the OEM valve is withheld. Such biased, one-sided, and unsubstantiated proselytizing is simply not right, so that's where I come in
...............I like Turtles.
Old 02-15-2013, 04:45 PM
  #31  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,087
Received 8,927 Likes on 5,332 Posts

Default

The situation is that nobody really knows why the valves fail. It could be the guides, it could be the valves, it could be a combination of both. We don't know. What we do know is at this point people who have had their heads redone with bronze guides and stainless valves haven't had a failure yet (whether there was a geometry issue with any of those heads is unknown). We also know the few people who have followed Katech's advice to use bronze guides and stock valves haven't had any failures to date. We do not know if you just changed to solid stainless valves your worry's would go away since there haven't been any reports of people taking a head with good guides and installing new solid stainless valves. We do know some stock engines go many thousands of miles without dropping a valve.

Here is what makes sense: Check the valve guides first because you may not need to do anything (that will cost you ~ $1K at a dealership). If the guides are bad and GM doesn't pick up the cost of repair then choose from the following: 1) Do the guides and go with solid stainless or; 2) Do the guides and go with stock. The one gets rid of both suspected sources of the problem, the second assumes the guides are the issue and since the same types of valves were used successfully in the LS6 and are going to be used in the new LT1 that they aren't a concern since GM doesn't seem to have any worries about them going into the future.

You pay your dues and you take your chances.

Bill
Old 02-15-2013, 04:58 PM
  #32  
Michael_D
Safety Car
 
Michael_D's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,478
Received 361 Likes on 270 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by '06 Quicksilver Z06
You know, I just don't understand, why some of you guys, especially you guys still in warranty, get so upset, downright nasty even, when a fellow forum member makes an attempt to extricate himself from the "Dropped Stock Exhaust Valve Derby", and the expense which goes along with it. A "derby" which has resulted in much financial hardship for way too many members of this forum. Especially those whose cars might not be paid for, because they financed them.

Having to replace a motor, for these people, could result in them having to sell the car as a "roller" altogether.

But some of you guys, simply do not care about that.

It would seem, that you would be glad, that someone else was joining you in protecting themselves against calamity.

You have a warranty. They don't. Your *** is covered. Their's isn't.

They're doing what they can do protect themselves. You, need do nothing.

You'd rather argue, instead of helping show them, how they need not continue to be at such a big risk.

But I guess arguing, in an attempt to prove that your position is "right" is more important than any satisfaction you would get out of knowing that you won't be reading about someone else suffering a valve failure.

You don't care about these people in here Mark, and the risk they are under. You care about only one thing and one thing only. Arguing. That's it.

Well, I'm done arguing with you. I'm going to do my best, to help this membership. And that means pointing them in the right direction, when it comes to minimizing their risk and exposure to the LS7 valve train issue.
I do not have warranty. That went out the window the moment I tuned the car. I had a VERY REPUTABLE cylinder head guru CNC cut and hand port my OEM heads. He also addressed out of spec guides and seats. He uses OEM valves - all of them, on all but the most extreme race engines. Last time I was BS'ing with him, he had 8 sets of LS7 heads on the shelf, waiting surgery. They were all going to his customers, for RACE applications. And yes, they were all getting those ****** OEM valves.

I have had numerous conversations with a project manager for GM Racing Powertrains and Special Projects. The topic was our darling LS7. They use a bunch of them. Guess what, they use OEM valves. Now do you really think a corporate RACE TEAM would use a component that is known to fail??

If you REALLY did want to help this membership, you would give them factual information without the drama.

The only relevant fact that you have provided, is two engine failures where they had rebuilt heads and OEM exh valves. That piece of information is quite valuable, but it is also incomplete. I would like to know more about the work that was performed.

So why don't you start a sister thread to your Solid Stem exh vlv thread??? Throw it out there and find out how many are running OEM valves with REBUILT heads. Get the information from these folks to compliment your other thread....

And by the way, I'm not pissed. I do however get a bit irritated when facts are replaced with speculation. And you can believe me when I say that I can not afford a 17K engine failure. I would dearly love to know more about these valve failures - but only in the form of comprehensive and controlled failure analysis.
Old 02-15-2013, 05:25 PM
  #33  
Les
Race Director
 
Les's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Sierra Foothills CA
Posts: 10,831
Received 961 Likes on 571 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bill Dearborn
The situation is that nobody really knows why the valves fail. It could be the guides, it could be the valves, it could be a combination of both. We don't know. What we do know is at this point people who have had their heads redone with bronze guides and stainless valves haven't had a failure yet (whether there was a geometry issue with any of those heads is unknown). We also know the few people who have followed Katech's advice to use bronze guides and stock valves haven't had any failures to date. We do not know if you just changed to solid stainless valves your worry's would go away since there haven't been any reports of people taking a head with good guides and installing new solid stainless valves. We do know some stock engines go many thousands of miles without dropping a valve.

Here is what makes sense: Check the valve guides first because you may not need to do anything (that will cost you ~ $1K at a dealership). If the guides are bad and GM doesn't pick up the cost of repair then choose from the following: 1) Do the guides and go with solid stainless or; 2) Do the guides and go with stock. The one gets rid of both suspected sources of the problem, the second assumes the guides are the issue and since the same types of valves were used successfully in the LS6 and are going to be used in the new LT1 that they aren't a concern since GM doesn't seem to have any worries about them going into the future.

You pay your dues and you take your chances.

Bill

Originally Posted by Michael_D
I do not have warranty. That went out the window the moment I tuned the car. I had a VERY REPUTABLE cylinder head guru CNC cut and hand port my OEM heads. He also addressed out of spec guides and seats. He uses OEM valves - all of them, on all but the most extreme race engines. Last time I was BS'ing with him, he had 8 sets of LS7 heads on the shelf, waiting surgery. They were all going to his customers, for RACE applications. And yes, they were all getting those ****** OEM valves.

I have had numerous conversations with a project manager for GM Racing Powertrains and Special Projects. The topic was our darling LS7. They use a bunch of them. Guess what, they use OEM valves. Now do you really think a corporate RACE TEAM would use a component that is known to fail??

If you REALLY did want to help this membership, you would give them factual information without the drama.

The only relevant fact that you have provided, is two engine failures where they had rebuilt heads and OEM exh valves. That piece of information is quite valuable, but it is also incomplete. I would like to know more about the work that was performed.

So why don't you start a sister thread to your Solid Stem exh vlv thread??? Throw it out there and find out how many are running OEM valves with REBUILT heads. Get the information from these folks to compliment your other thread....

And by the way, I'm not pissed. I do however get a bit irritated when facts are replaced with speculation. And you can believe me when I say that I can not afford a 17K engine failure. I would dearly love to know more about these valve failures - but only in the form of comprehensive and controlled failure analysis.
Old 02-15-2013, 05:48 PM
  #34  
lt1z
Melting Slicks
 
lt1z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,569
Received 170 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

I use Tungsten exhaust valves. My extensive conversations with GM power train engineers led to this decision.
Old 02-15-2013, 06:10 PM
  #35  
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

I read with great interest your post below Michael_D. I'll respond to some of it's finer points.

Originally Posted by Michael_D
I do not have warranty. That went out the window the moment I tuned the car. I had a VERY REPUTABLE cylinder head guru CNC cut and hand port my OEM heads. He also addressed out of spec guides and seats. He uses OEM valves - all of them, on all but the most extreme race engines. Last time I was BS'ing with him, he had 8 sets of LS7 heads on the shelf, waiting surgery. They were all going to his customers, for RACE applications. And yes, they were all getting those ****** OEM valves.

I have had numerous conversations with a project manager for GM Racing Powertrains and Special Projects. The topic was our darling LS7. They use a bunch of them. Guess what, they use OEM valves. Now do you really think a corporate RACE TEAM would use a component that is known to fail??
To your parts in bold, and bold red, I'd point out that "corporate RACE TEAMS, and what they are able to do, is quite different from what the average owner and weekender struggling to make his monthly payments is able to do.

Professional corporate sponsored race teams are able to catalogue every part, and it's duty cycle, and replace everything they feel that they need to replace after 40hrs of track use. Less if they feel the need to.

They are able to completely rebuild their engines, replace parts, valves and all, and will do so, after so many duty cycles, so many hours of track use.

The average guy in here, can't do that.

Furthermore, it is said that the heavier solid stemmed stainless valve won't let the engine run up to red line as quickly as a lighter valve will.

Well, for a professional driver, who earns his living driving, and whose lap times are consistent down into the tenths, or hundredths even, where every fraction of a second counts, and can mean the difference of thousands of dollars in prize money and the difference in being able to continue to race for the remainder of that season, well that's one thing.

Besides, his engine is going to be rebuilt at a given hours of use interval, anyway.

But for the guy just looking to do a few HPDE's, and whose driving is nowhere near as consistent as a professional's is, and really could not tell you how fast his engine is spooling up, well his needs, and budget, are entirely different.

It's that guy who I'm concerned with.

Lets face it. He doesn't have the budget, nor the skills of the drivers that those on those pro race teams you reference have.

In fact, in many cases, he really shouldn't even be out there, because if he nails the wall, his insurance won't cover it, and if he blows a motor, he doesn't have the money to cover it.

It's that guy I'm concerned about.

He should go out there with some protection in the form of a stronger valve train because he cannot afford the amenities that a corporate sponsored pro race team can.

And his driving is not to the point to where solid stainless valves vs hollow stem sodium filled valves, is going to make a difference in his lap times or quarter mile times.

Originally Posted by Michael_D
If you REALLY did want to help this membership, you would give them factual information without the drama.

The only relevant fact that you have provided, is two engine failures where they had rebuilt heads and OEM exh valves. That piece of information is quite valuable, but it is also incomplete. I would like to know more about the work that was performed.

So why don't you start a sister thread to your Solid Stem exh vlv thread??? Throw it out there and find out how many are running OEM valves with REBUILT heads. Get the information from these folks to compliment your other thread....

And by the way, I'm not pissed. I do however get a bit irritated when facts are replaced with speculation. And you can believe me when I say that I can not afford a 17K engine failure. I would dearly love to know more about these valve failures - but only in the form of comprehensive and controlled failure analysis.
With regard to your part in bold, in the first post of my thread I have indeed included those which I know of who are currently running stock valves in redone heads.

I did so awhile back, when it was initially set up.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...st-valves.html

Confused garage and musicmankeb
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...st-valves.html

FNBAD is going on when his car is done.

What I did not do in that listing, and made it a point not to do, however is list the people in here on redone heads, who stuck with the stock valves and had those valves later fail.

Scuba_steve and VRed

I didn't want to run the risk of appearing biased and showing them in a negative light, in the midst of such an overwhelming number of redone heads using solid stainless stemmed valves.

Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; 02-16-2013 at 04:48 PM.
Old 02-15-2013, 06:18 PM
  #36  
383vett
Race Director
 
383vett's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Location: moraga ca
Posts: 17,570
Received 1,541 Likes on 1,042 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lt1z
I use Tungsten exhaust valves. My extensive conversations with GM power train engineers led to this decision.
Titanium?
Old 02-15-2013, 06:28 PM
  #37  
lt1z
Melting Slicks
 
lt1z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,569
Received 170 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 383vett
Titanium?
No. I was joking because these threads are so ridiculous with arguing that an SS valve may be too heavy, I figured I would go all the way to the other end...

My heads have a Rev hollow stem intake and SS exhaust.

Get notified of new replies

To Which exhaust valve to get...

Old 02-15-2013, 07:25 PM
  #38  
CHIWS6
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
CHIWS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,497
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

wow! i was not expecting all this , lol. I guess i should take the valve covers first and do the wiggle test and go from there.
Old 02-15-2013, 07:27 PM
  #39  
CHIWS6
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
CHIWS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 1,497
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

btw any have any links where i can get the ss vlaves and bronze guides?
Old 02-15-2013, 07:36 PM
  #40  
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CHIWS6
btw any have any links where i can get the ss vlaves and bronze guides?
WCCH. Google them.

West Coast Cylinder Heads. They are many of the people's choice here and elsewhere and do excellent work.


Quick Reply: [Z06] Which exhaust valve to get...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 PM.