[Z06] About to buy a Z06 - should I reconsider?
#41
Pro
Thread Starter
I saw a red C7 on I-75 northbound just north of Lima Sunday afternoon. It looked awesome.
#42
Instructor
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GUYS! It's a VERY small # of Z06's with this issue
Hi All. I just read the sticky on this issue and the GM Response says that it is a VERY small number of engines with this issue: The peak total was 6.5 bad engines per 1,000 engines produced. That is less than 1%.
They also said that if it doesn't show up as a problem early in the engine life that the engine will be fine.
I also was considering buying a newer used GS (2011 or 2012) VS. a 2009 or 2010 Z06. I will simply look for a good, clean Z06 with around 15K to 20K miles on it, pay less than I would for one with fewer miles, and go for it.
The valve guide issue is a problem with a very small number of engines. This is NOT the end of the world!
Over and out,
Desert Dog
They also said that if it doesn't show up as a problem early in the engine life that the engine will be fine.
I also was considering buying a newer used GS (2011 or 2012) VS. a 2009 or 2010 Z06. I will simply look for a good, clean Z06 with around 15K to 20K miles on it, pay less than I would for one with fewer miles, and go for it.
The valve guide issue is a problem with a very small number of engines. This is NOT the end of the world!
Over and out,
Desert Dog
#43
Go for it
I don't think the valve issues have been blown out of proportion but the cost to be proactive and fix the problem up front is minimal on a used C6 Z06. I recently bought an '08 Z06 and the first thing I had done was WCCH heads, cam upgrade and exhaust. Cheap insurance if you ask me. Even after all of that it's a lot of bang for the buck. This is my 4th vette and this is by far the best yet. It will only get better with the C7 but a new loaded C7 will be pushing 75-80k similar to a new C6 Z06. At 40-50k an '08 or '09 Z06 is still a bargain IMO. What a fantastic car! I say go for it and don't look back.
#44
Drifting
Hi All. I just read the sticky on this issue and the GM Response says that it is a VERY small number of engines with this issue: The peak total was 6.5 bad engines per 1,000 engines produced. That is less than 1%.
They also said that if it doesn't show up as a problem early in the engine life that the engine will be fine.
I also was considering buying a newer used GS (2011 or 2012) VS. a 2009 or 2010 Z06. I will simply look for a good, clean Z06 with around 15K to 20K miles on it, pay less than I would for one with fewer miles, and go for it.
The valve guide issue is a problem with a very small number of engines. This is NOT the end of the world!
Over and out,
Desert Dog
They also said that if it doesn't show up as a problem early in the engine life that the engine will be fine.
I also was considering buying a newer used GS (2011 or 2012) VS. a 2009 or 2010 Z06. I will simply look for a good, clean Z06 with around 15K to 20K miles on it, pay less than I would for one with fewer miles, and go for it.
The valve guide issue is a problem with a very small number of engines. This is NOT the end of the world!
Over and out,
Desert Dog
#45
Team Owner
Hi All. I just read the sticky on this issue and the GM Response says that it is a VERY small number of engines with this issue: The peak total was 6.5 bad engines per 1,000 engines produced. That is less than 1%.
They also said that if it doesn't show up as a problem early in the engine life that the engine will be fine.
I also was considering buying a newer used GS (2011 or 2012) VS. a 2009 or 2010 Z06. I will simply look for a good, clean Z06 with around 15K to 20K miles on it, pay less than I would for one with fewer miles, and go for it.
The valve guide issue is a problem with a very small number of engines. This is NOT the end of the world!
Over and out,
Desert Dog
They also said that if it doesn't show up as a problem early in the engine life that the engine will be fine.
I also was considering buying a newer used GS (2011 or 2012) VS. a 2009 or 2010 Z06. I will simply look for a good, clean Z06 with around 15K to 20K miles on it, pay less than I would for one with fewer miles, and go for it.
The valve guide issue is a problem with a very small number of engines. This is NOT the end of the world!
Over and out,
Desert Dog
#46
Instructor
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well.....no....I've discovered that Santa likes a large Johnny Walker Black Label with a splash of soda.
But seriously folks! If the GM data in the sticky is correct....and I trust the Moderator is not making this stuff up.....then this is an issue, but one that only a small percentage of folks will experience.
In addition, those that experience it will do so early on during ownership so they will be covered via the warranty. If you make major mods, you lose out, of course.
This tells me that people buying a used Z06 with, say, 20K miles on it are probably just fine.
Again....this is based on the data provided by GM through their analysis of Z06 engines with this issue. If this data is wrong, then someone needs to show the "real" numbers.
What I think is going on here is that this has been blown out of proportion due to the fact that people accessing this forum are a very dedicated bunch of car guys and gals but represent a very small percentage of total Z06 owners.
Just my 2 cents.
Desert Dog
But seriously folks! If the GM data in the sticky is correct....and I trust the Moderator is not making this stuff up.....then this is an issue, but one that only a small percentage of folks will experience.
In addition, those that experience it will do so early on during ownership so they will be covered via the warranty. If you make major mods, you lose out, of course.
This tells me that people buying a used Z06 with, say, 20K miles on it are probably just fine.
Again....this is based on the data provided by GM through their analysis of Z06 engines with this issue. If this data is wrong, then someone needs to show the "real" numbers.
What I think is going on here is that this has been blown out of proportion due to the fact that people accessing this forum are a very dedicated bunch of car guys and gals but represent a very small percentage of total Z06 owners.
Just my 2 cents.
Desert Dog
#47
Race Director
DD, I think you're being optimistic to rely on GM's statement as "the last word" on the matter. There are quite a few reports
here on the CF of LS7 engines built either before 2008, or after the February 2011 date, that have had partial or complete failures.
Many here, including me, believe that GM is simply trying to financially manage the "LS7 problem" and limit their cost-exposure
to unmodified LS7s that remain-in-warranty.
But, it can also be gleaned from all the CF reading that a basic valve-train/heads fix should only cost about $2K--$3K,
so factor that into your total costs and you should be fine. Knowing the latter, it's more about the inconvenience
and aggravation factor, primarily.
[IMO]
here on the CF of LS7 engines built either before 2008, or after the February 2011 date, that have had partial or complete failures.
Many here, including me, believe that GM is simply trying to financially manage the "LS7 problem" and limit their cost-exposure
to unmodified LS7s that remain-in-warranty.
But, it can also be gleaned from all the CF reading that a basic valve-train/heads fix should only cost about $2K--$3K,
so factor that into your total costs and you should be fine. Knowing the latter, it's more about the inconvenience
and aggravation factor, primarily.
[IMO]
Last edited by Gary '09 C6; 07-30-2013 at 11:30 PM. Reason: sp
#48
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,754
Received 536 Likes
on
279 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'08-'10-'11-'12-'13 '14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19
Having owned a Z06, and spending way to much time on the Z06 forum, I can pretty much tell that most of you who are naysaying the valve train issues on the LS7 haven't spent much time over there.
The GM statement has been pretty much negated by all the negative occurrences of LS7 engines blowing. While DesertDog makes some good points, there are other statements, his and other posters, that have me chuckling.
I wouldn't buy another Z06 unless it had the heads reworked by a respected aftermarket shop. Period. But that is only one person's opinion, mine.
For folks thinking about a Z06, they are wonderful cars, truly the poor mans supercar. But DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK!!!!!!!!!! Don't rely on other posters opinions, including my own. Spend time on the Z06 forum then decide.
You have been advised.
The GM statement has been pretty much negated by all the negative occurrences of LS7 engines blowing. While DesertDog makes some good points, there are other statements, his and other posters, that have me chuckling.
I wouldn't buy another Z06 unless it had the heads reworked by a respected aftermarket shop. Period. But that is only one person's opinion, mine.
For folks thinking about a Z06, they are wonderful cars, truly the poor mans supercar. But DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK!!!!!!!!!! Don't rely on other posters opinions, including my own. Spend time on the Z06 forum then decide.
You have been advised.
#49
Pro
Thread Starter
Having owned a Z06, and spending way to much time on the Z06 forum, I can pretty much tell that most of you who are naysaying the valve train issues on the LS7 haven't spent much time over there.
The GM statement has been pretty much negated by all the negative occurrences of LS7 engines blowing. While DesertDog makes some good points, there are other statements, his and other posters, that have me chuckling.
I wouldn't buy another Z06 unless it had the heads reworked by a respected aftermarket shop. Period. But that is only one person's opinion, mine.
For folks thinking about a Z06, they are wonderful cars, truly the poor mans supercar. But DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK!!!!!!!!!! Don't rely on other posters opinions, including my own. Spend time on the Z06 forum then decide.
You have been advised.
The GM statement has been pretty much negated by all the negative occurrences of LS7 engines blowing. While DesertDog makes some good points, there are other statements, his and other posters, that have me chuckling.
I wouldn't buy another Z06 unless it had the heads reworked by a respected aftermarket shop. Period. But that is only one person's opinion, mine.
For folks thinking about a Z06, they are wonderful cars, truly the poor mans supercar. But DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK!!!!!!!!!! Don't rely on other posters opinions, including my own. Spend time on the Z06 forum then decide.
You have been advised.
#50
Instructor
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One last thought (or two)
I just looked at the total Z06 production numbers..(2006 to 2013). The total comes to 27,996.
Now, if the GM defect stats are correct, then we are looking at under 300 Z06's with this problem.
Only 300 maximum. I know many of you will flame me and say that number is crazy....but I am not necessarily endorsing it. I'm just pointing out that it's the only data I have seen.
I have no idea how many folks on this forum have posted about having this problem, but it seems to me to be well under 300. Maybe 35 or 40? Does anyone have a real handle on the quantity?
I guess my point is that I haven't seen any statistical analysis done on the actual numbers of failures reported on this forum....(and I apologize if it exists...please point me to the data).
All I have read is "lots of people" and "many", etc..
But 300 defects, even if major, out of 28K total is not that huge, and most would have been covered by the warranty.
Bottom line: Until I see some data that shows me that the chances of me purchasing a used Z06 with this problem is well above 1%, then I will not be deterred from my quest for a good used 2009 or 2010 Z06.
Desert Dog
Now, if the GM defect stats are correct, then we are looking at under 300 Z06's with this problem.
Only 300 maximum. I know many of you will flame me and say that number is crazy....but I am not necessarily endorsing it. I'm just pointing out that it's the only data I have seen.
I have no idea how many folks on this forum have posted about having this problem, but it seems to me to be well under 300. Maybe 35 or 40? Does anyone have a real handle on the quantity?
I guess my point is that I haven't seen any statistical analysis done on the actual numbers of failures reported on this forum....(and I apologize if it exists...please point me to the data).
All I have read is "lots of people" and "many", etc..
But 300 defects, even if major, out of 28K total is not that huge, and most would have been covered by the warranty.
Bottom line: Until I see some data that shows me that the chances of me purchasing a used Z06 with this problem is well above 1%, then I will not be deterred from my quest for a good used 2009 or 2010 Z06.
Desert Dog
#51
Pro
Thread Starter
I just looked at the total Z06 production numbers..(2006 to 2013). The total comes to 27,996.
Now, if the GM defect stats are correct, then we are looking at under 300 Z06's with this problem.
Only 300 maximum. I know many of you will flame me and say that number is crazy....but I am not necessarily endorsing it. I'm just pointing out that it's the only data I have seen.
I have no idea how many folks on this forum have posted about having this problem, but it seems to me to be well under 300. Maybe 35 or 40? Does anyone have a real handle on the quantity?
I guess my point is that I haven't seen any statistical analysis done on the actual numbers of failures reported on this forum....(and I apologize if it exists...please point me to the data).
All I have read is "lots of people" and "many", etc..
But 300 defects, even if major, out of 28K total is not that huge, and most would have been covered by the warranty.
Bottom line: Until I see some data that shows me that the chances of me purchasing a used Z06 with this problem is well above 1%, then I will not be deterred from my quest for a good used 2009 or 2010 Z06.
Desert Dog
Now, if the GM defect stats are correct, then we are looking at under 300 Z06's with this problem.
Only 300 maximum. I know many of you will flame me and say that number is crazy....but I am not necessarily endorsing it. I'm just pointing out that it's the only data I have seen.
I have no idea how many folks on this forum have posted about having this problem, but it seems to me to be well under 300. Maybe 35 or 40? Does anyone have a real handle on the quantity?
I guess my point is that I haven't seen any statistical analysis done on the actual numbers of failures reported on this forum....(and I apologize if it exists...please point me to the data).
All I have read is "lots of people" and "many", etc..
But 300 defects, even if major, out of 28K total is not that huge, and most would have been covered by the warranty.
Bottom line: Until I see some data that shows me that the chances of me purchasing a used Z06 with this problem is well above 1%, then I will not be deterred from my quest for a good used 2009 or 2010 Z06.
Desert Dog
#52
Burning Brakes
I just looked at the total Z06 production numbers..(2006 to 2013). The total comes to 27,996.
Now, if the GM defect stats are correct, then we are looking at under 300 Z06's with this problem.
Only 300 maximum. I know many of you will flame me and say that number is crazy....but I am not necessarily endorsing it. I'm just pointing out that it's the only data I have seen.
I have no idea how many folks on this forum have posted about having this problem, but it seems to me to be well under 300. Maybe 35 or 40? Does anyone have a real handle on the quantity?
I guess my point is that I haven't seen any statistical analysis done on the actual numbers of failures reported on this forum....(and I apologize if it exists...please point me to the data).
All I have read is "lots of people" and "many", etc..
But 300 defects, even if major, out of 28K total is not that huge, and most would have been covered by the warranty.
Bottom line: Until I see some data that shows me that the chances of me purchasing a used Z06 with this problem is well above 1%, then I will not be deterred from my quest for a good used 2009 or 2010 Z06.
Desert Dog
Now, if the GM defect stats are correct, then we are looking at under 300 Z06's with this problem.
Only 300 maximum. I know many of you will flame me and say that number is crazy....but I am not necessarily endorsing it. I'm just pointing out that it's the only data I have seen.
I have no idea how many folks on this forum have posted about having this problem, but it seems to me to be well under 300. Maybe 35 or 40? Does anyone have a real handle on the quantity?
I guess my point is that I haven't seen any statistical analysis done on the actual numbers of failures reported on this forum....(and I apologize if it exists...please point me to the data).
All I have read is "lots of people" and "many", etc..
But 300 defects, even if major, out of 28K total is not that huge, and most would have been covered by the warranty.
Bottom line: Until I see some data that shows me that the chances of me purchasing a used Z06 with this problem is well above 1%, then I will not be deterred from my quest for a good used 2009 or 2010 Z06.
Desert Dog
#53
Instructor
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, all I can say is my 2006 had crap heads, and I didn't learn about it until it had 38,000 miles. By then it was out of warranty by time (36 months on a 2006), and GM told me there was nothing they could/would do. I'm betting the defective heads can be found in virtually all LS7 engines. Some are just luckier than others as to when the symptoms present themselves. You roll the dice if you want. I had my heads replaced, and will forever remember the crap heads that GM refused to stand behind. If I backed my work like GM, I'd be out of business. Come to think of it, GM actually DID go bankrupt, didn't they!!! Wonder why!!! Not surprising with their lack of committment to quality.
There may very well be some defects in most LS7's, but we don't know the details on the total number, or causes.....at least I haven't seen the data. If someone has it please send a link! I think it would be very helpful.
#55
Team Owner
I just looked at the total Z06 production numbers..(2006 to 2013). The total comes to 27,996.
Now, if the GM defect stats are correct, then we are looking at under 300 Z06's with this problem.
Only 300 maximum. I know many of you will flame me and say that number is crazy....but I am not necessarily endorsing it. I'm just pointing out that it's the only data I have seen.
I have no idea how many folks on this forum have posted about having this problem, but it seems to me to be well under 300. Maybe 35 or 40? Does anyone have a real handle on the quantity?
I guess my point is that I haven't seen any statistical analysis done on the actual numbers of failures reported on this forum....(and I apologize if it exists...please point me to the data).
All I have read is "lots of people" and "many", etc..
But 300 defects, even if major, out of 28K total is not that huge, and most would have been covered by the warranty.
Bottom line: Until I see some data that shows me that the chances of me purchasing a used Z06 with this problem is well above 1%, then I will not be deterred from my quest for a good used 2009 or 2010 Z06.
Desert Dog
Now, if the GM defect stats are correct, then we are looking at under 300 Z06's with this problem.
Only 300 maximum. I know many of you will flame me and say that number is crazy....but I am not necessarily endorsing it. I'm just pointing out that it's the only data I have seen.
I have no idea how many folks on this forum have posted about having this problem, but it seems to me to be well under 300. Maybe 35 or 40? Does anyone have a real handle on the quantity?
I guess my point is that I haven't seen any statistical analysis done on the actual numbers of failures reported on this forum....(and I apologize if it exists...please point me to the data).
All I have read is "lots of people" and "many", etc..
But 300 defects, even if major, out of 28K total is not that huge, and most would have been covered by the warranty.
Bottom line: Until I see some data that shows me that the chances of me purchasing a used Z06 with this problem is well above 1%, then I will not be deterred from my quest for a good used 2009 or 2010 Z06.
Desert Dog
#56
Race Director
both types of defects/failures need to be included, as both are manifestations of the problem that is being
focused on here...the one (excessive valve guide wear) is believed to precede the other (valve breakage).
focused on here...the one (excessive valve guide wear) is believed to precede the other (valve breakage).
#58
Instructor
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm going out on a limb here....but I would read that to mean that some folks had the LS7 blow, (obvious problem); and others had "excessive valve train noise" and took it in to be inspected. The dealer then pulled the heads and found the issue.
That is the way I read it. If that is the case, then it covers not just obviously destroyed engines, but those with a propensity to do so.
I could be wrong! But that is the way I read it.
Below is what is on the sticky from GM on this subject:
Desert Dog
Originally Posted by Chevy Cust Svc View Post
Hello all,
LS7 Valve guide issue summary:
• Affects a small, number of '08, 09 ’10 and ’11 Z06’s
• GM discovered the condition through our cylinder head warranty data involving a very small percentage of our vehicles.
• Through inspection of returned heads, it was determined that a machining error in the valve guide had occurred at our head supplier.
• The quality issue has been contained as of Feb 2011 with 100% inspection of all heads.
• The most common customer complaint has been excessive valve train noise.
However if the condition is not addressed, it could result in engine failure. To date, where this condition has been observed, it has occurred early in the vehicle life.
What customers need to know: They should drive and enjoy their vehicles without fear. If their car demonstrates this condition, they are likely to hear unusual valve train noise first. If you have a concern regarding this issue on your personal vehicle feel free to contact me through private message on this forum and we will work to assist in resolving your concern. Feel free to contact me through Socialmedia@gm.com please put attention Evan in the subject. As always, vehicles that have modifications to the powertrain or the calibrations, are no longer covered by GM's warranty.
Sincerely,
Evan, Chevrolet Customer Service
#59
Safety Car
Desert Dog, I expect your analysis of the numbers is as good as anything else we have.
As scary as it gets, it only costs $3k to fix. Spend that on an extended warranty or spend that on new heads. Or roll the dice and go with that (I am going to wildly speculate here) that 200 to 1 chance (0.5%) that you will be just fine.
I bought one and love it.
My solution was to leave it stock and use the GMPP warranty as my insurance. You get to pick which of the 3 choices you are most comfortable with.
As scary as it gets, it only costs $3k to fix. Spend that on an extended warranty or spend that on new heads. Or roll the dice and go with that (I am going to wildly speculate here) that 200 to 1 chance (0.5%) that you will be just fine.
I bought one and love it.
My solution was to leave it stock and use the GMPP warranty as my insurance. You get to pick which of the 3 choices you are most comfortable with.
#60
Instructor
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Desert Dog, I expect your analysis of the numbers is as good as anything else we have.
As scary as it gets, it only costs $3k to fix. Spend that on an extended warranty or spend that on new heads. Or roll the dice and go with that (I am going to wildly speculate here) that 200 to 1 chance (0.5%) that you will be just fine.
I bought one and love it.
My solution was to leave it stock and use the GMPP warranty as my insurance. You get to pick which of the 3 choices you are most comfortable with.
As scary as it gets, it only costs $3k to fix. Spend that on an extended warranty or spend that on new heads. Or roll the dice and go with that (I am going to wildly speculate here) that 200 to 1 chance (0.5%) that you will be just fine.
I bought one and love it.
My solution was to leave it stock and use the GMPP warranty as my insurance. You get to pick which of the 3 choices you are most comfortable with.
I owned a C-5 and C-6 (both coupes) so it's time to get a Z06 and keep it a long time.
Desert Dog