Eaton 2650 vs Procharger F1x series
11-25-2016, 11:38 PM
#21
Cruising
Member Since: Oct 2016
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Comparison testing has already been completed and there are compressor maps for both units. Below is a summary from the SEMA show.
Attachment 48039883
Attachment 48039883
John
11-30-2016, 06:29 PM
#23
Can't remember the last time I saw figures from a positive-displacement blower setup and was actually impressed. If you're going through the effort of adding or replacing a blower, there aren't many reasons NOT to go centrifugal.
12-06-2016, 11:09 AM
#24
Drifting
I am shocked but the numbers.. the car has to b on meth too.. 300 more horsepower with those mods.. idk.. 2400 to 2650 blower swap.. seems like a huge difference in power.. the power curve looks manageable.. it almost looks like a centrifugal blower curve in my opinion.. I hate to be one of the first to try something new like this.. procharger has been creating monster z 06s lately.. and my car reclines now at 7400.. I want to make my power up top not fall off with a PD blower.. I am still leaning towards procharger..
12-08-2016, 07:41 PM
#25
12-18-2016, 05:28 PM
#26
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
In these corvettes and to say a blower set that you could still drive as a daily driver the F1X is it. To go any larger to me the car would have to be a full race car are track car.For what ever reason a top mount blower just don't do as good on these cars as some other car out on the market. Yes it will make really great tq numbers down really low. But that only makes a good tire burner. If you are spinning you are not winning. Robert