C7 Forced Induction/Nitrous C7 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Pulley Upgrades, Intercoolers, Wet and Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which Supercharger to put on a 2017 Grand Sport??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2017, 08:19 PM
  #41  
BrunoTheMellow
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
BrunoTheMellow's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,588
Received 1,396 Likes on 999 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW
Nobody ignored any questions.... There is no possible (sensible) way to compare the two blower types.

Roots blowers manufactured in the past 10 years simply fit better and provide much more utility and instant power than

centri designs..... No proof needed here..... General Motors Chose the roots blower for all of the same reasons listed above

and Companies like Lingenfelter and myself really don't offer centris because when it comes down to it they are just not

worth the headache..... Big peaky top end power.... for a sort time. and the trade offs are just not worth the headache

for most of us....

Kinda like a wife with the LARGEST fake breasts they make..... Might look cool short term....

But when she don't wanna sleep with you because her back is out...(from the over-sized ****) then they don't look

soooo cool any more....Do they??? Then they SAG....and the whole package gets traded in for a new one....

That's how I look at centris.... Instant gratification.... if you're willing to deal with all the crap that comes with them.....

It's just how I see it....
Chuck CoW
Dude. You just ignored the question again. I take my P1SC procharged z51 to the track in 100 degree texas weather multiple times a year (no other cooling or power mods). $5k, 570 rwhp 530 rwtq and I can run 20-30 minute sessions at near full tilt the entire time. IAT rarely goes over 130. That's I've had the kit for nearly 20k miles and I had 1 problem and that was right at install. My tensioner came seized, a little grease and good to go, no problems since. I BEAT on this car and it's been golden. Just change the oil at the same time as engine oil change, no belt adjustments needed.

Two ways to test:
1) Run 2 cars with similar HP, 1 PD base kit and 1 centri base kit, at the same track for 20 minutes and see what the IAT, ECT, EOT are at the end and the speeds achieved on straights.
2) Run 2 cars with similar HP at the drag strip or 1/2 mile and see which runs faster and the IAT, ECT, EOT at the end of each consecutive run.

Here's the facts:
Edelbrock will cost 30-50% more, HEX will severely block radiator airflow.

procharger, a&a, ecs, more top end power, less low end torque, mostly unblocked radiator.

If the edelbrock acts anything like the z06 blower, I already know the answer. Also despite everyone's comments, the dyno graphs I've seen show the edelbrock has very similar torque/power curves to the low boost centrifugal kits. Just slightly less peak hp.

Last edited by BrunoTheMellow; 10-31-2017 at 08:34 PM.
Old 11-01-2017, 08:02 AM
  #42  
Rkreigh
Le Mans Master
 
Rkreigh's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, USA VA
Posts: 9,777
Received 707 Likes on 543 Posts

Default

this blower is coming soon and I think it's a good alternative to the edlebrock

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...hipping-3.html

also a 2650 displacement rotor

the heartbeat blowers go 8-- hp with a warrenty on the yenko so I think the durability would be good, but I'm more of a turbo guy myself.

most people don't go max effort due to the fuel system and Chuck I'd like to hear your perspective on adding port injection and a dedicated ecm + fuel system to the c7

seems like the better way to go rather than messing with the limitations of the di and it keeps the valves clean

like to use a megasquirt MS3 pro to do this and use meth for the secondary fuel system.

a few tuners are going this route

if you want to "just go" 650 any of these solutions will work and the lt4 takeoff units are factory ready and proven at that hp level even though they aren't as good as some of these other solutions, it's a cheaper alternative.

or bring me the car and I'll hang some hair dryers on it and you can set the hp to where ever you're comfortable with and ramp it up on demand.

pays ya money, takes ya chances.
Old 11-01-2017, 09:24 AM
  #43  
BlueDevilZ51
Melting Slicks
 
BlueDevilZ51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 2,004
Received 389 Likes on 271 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BrunoTheMellow
Dude. You just ignored the question again. I take my P1SC procharged z51 to the track in 100 degree texas weather multiple times a year (no other cooling or power mods). $5k, 570 rwhp 530 rwtq and I can run 20-30 minute sessions at near full tilt the entire time. IAT rarely goes over 130. That's I've had the kit for nearly 20k miles and I had 1 problem and that was right at install. My tensioner came seized, a little grease and good to go, no problems since. I BEAT on this car and it's been golden. Just change the oil at the same time as engine oil change, no belt adjustments needed.

Two ways to test:
1) Run 2 cars with similar HP, 1 PD base kit and 1 centri base kit, at the same track for 20 minutes and see what the IAT, ECT, EOT are at the end and the speeds achieved on straights.
2) Run 2 cars with similar HP at the drag strip or 1/2 mile and see which runs faster and the IAT, ECT, EOT at the end of each consecutive run.

Here's the facts:
Edelbrock will cost 30-50% more, HEX will severely block radiator airflow.

procharger, a&a, ecs, more top end power, less low end torque, mostly unblocked radiator.

If the edelbrock acts anything like the z06 blower, I already know the answer. Also despite everyone's comments, the dyno graphs I've seen show the edelbrock has very similar torque/power curves to the low boost centrifugal kits. Just slightly less peak hp.
Bring your 570rwhp P1SC to New York and ill line up anytime with my Edelbrock stage 2 E force. Id have no fear of any centrifugal kit that was on the stock fuel system with no meth just like me.
You seem to think the Edelbrock has the same over heating issues as the Zo6, it doesnt! The LT4 1.74 blower has to spin to 22k to make its power. The 2300 in the E force doesnt have to spin near that RPM to make its power. It also has better intercoolers and heat exchanger then the LT4, in fact you'll see a lot of Zo6 guys adding the E force reservoir tank for more coolant.
Chuck Ill be in for one of your tunes in March after my Edelbrock warrenty expires.

Last edited by BlueDevilZ51; 11-01-2017 at 09:55 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Chuck CoW (11-01-2017)
Old 11-01-2017, 11:17 AM
  #44  
0Chuck CoW
Former Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,792
Received 243 Likes on 183 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14

Default Thanks for bringing some wisdom to the conversation.

Originally Posted by BlueDevilZ51
Bring your 570rwhp P1SC to New York and ill line up anytime with my Edelbrock stage 2 E force. Id have no fear of any centrifugal kit that was on the stock fuel system with no meth just like me.
You seem to think the Edelbrock has the same over heating issues as the Zo6, it doesnt! The LT4 1.74 blower has to spin to 22k to make its power. The 2300 in the E force doesnt have to spin near that RPM to make its power. It also has better intercoolers and heat exchanger then the LT4, in fact you'll see a lot of Zo6 guys adding the E force reservoir tank for more coolant.
Chuck Ill be in for one of your tunes in March after my Edelbrock warrenty expires.


Thanks for bringing some wisdom to the conversation! We need it here.

By the way.... Did you have to cut the structural part of your radiator with a sawz-all and break chunks out of it with a vice grips????

OH, wait... You got an EDELBROCK E-FORCE! I guess you didn't need to do that step....

Call me any time you're ready.
Chuck CoW
Old 11-01-2017, 11:32 AM
  #45  
DOUG @ ECS
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
DOUG @ ECS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Posts: 23,315
Received 1,085 Likes on 656 Posts

Default

There is a reason why every single stock bottom end record holding car has a centrifugal blower on it. And at one time, not sure if it is still this way, but everyone of those cars had an ECS kit on it. LS1-LS6-LS2-LS7-LT1.

Roots blowers are an easy bolt on blower yes, but those who actually want a fast car and drive them too, the roots blowers are not for you IMHO.
All the main supercharger companies are extremely close to reliability when you put them in the power range that the roots blowers would put you in.
We have many cars that have well over 100,000 miles on them completely trouble free supercharger wise. Way too many to count at this point.

That said I buy the take off roots blowers from the local dealer, why do they have them? Because something failed on it and GM only sends complete superchargers out for replacement and they often do not ask for the core back. They fail like any other part does, but it is not what I would consider a large amount of failures, same with centrifugal blowers.

There has been a lot of one sided opinion given in this thread that I simply do not agree with, but thankfully we live in a country where that's OK.

Old 11-01-2017, 11:57 AM
  #46  
robert miller
Team Owner
 
robert miller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes on 1,529 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DOUG @ ECS
There is a reason why every single stock bottom end record holding car has a centrifugal blower on it. And at one time, not sure if it is still this way, but everyone of those cars had an ECS kit on it. LS1-LS6-LS2-LS7-LT1.

Roots blowers are an easy bolt on blower yes, but those who actually want a fast car and drive them too, the roots blowers are not for you IMHO.
All the main supercharger companies are extremely close to reliability when you put them in the power range that the roots blowers would put you in.
We have many cars that have well over 100,000 miles on them completely trouble free supercharger wise. Way too many to count at this point.

That said I buy the take off roots blowers from the local dealer, why do they have them? Because something failed on it and GM only sends complete superchargers out for replacement and they often do not ask for the core back. They fail like any other part does, but it is not what I would consider a large amount of failures, same with centrifugal blowers.

There has been a lot of one sided opinion given in this thread that I simply do not agree with, but thankfully we live in a country where that's OK.

with you Doug yes I have had a top blower on a car & in these vette WILL NOT HAVE ONE AGAIN. Robert
Old 11-01-2017, 12:32 PM
  #47  
BlueDevilZ51
Melting Slicks
 
BlueDevilZ51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 2,004
Received 389 Likes on 271 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DOUG @ ECS
There is a reason why every single stock bottom end record holding car has a centrifugal blower on it. And at one time, not sure if it is still this way, but everyone of those cars had an ECS kit on it. LS1-LS6-LS2-LS7-LT1.


That said I buy the take off roots blowers from the local dealer, why do they have them? Because something failed on it and GM only sends complete superchargers out for replacement and they often do not ask for the core back. They fail like any other part does, but it is not what I would consider a large amount of failures, same with centrifugal blowers.

There has been a lot of one sided opinion given in this thread that I simply do not agree with, but thankfully we live in a country where that's OK.

Just curious on those roots blowers that fail, are the vast amount of them you're referring to the old LSA blowers? If so would the failure you're referring to be the coupler and not the blower itself?
Old 11-02-2017, 11:26 AM
  #48  
DOUG @ ECS
Premium Supporting Vendor
 
DOUG @ ECS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Posts: 23,315
Received 1,085 Likes on 656 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlueDevilZ51
Just curious on those roots blowers that fail, are the vast amount of them you're referring to the old LSA blowers? If so would the failure you're referring to be the coupler and not the blower itself?
Every type of failure, hell I cracked one in half years ago. We just had an Eforce in here that needed new guts, things happen. It's a mechanical part, they all have a failure rate, it's just not that high.
Old 11-02-2017, 03:05 PM
  #49  
thegame
Le Mans Master
 
thegame's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Bergen County NJ
Posts: 9,862
Received 491 Likes on 275 Posts

Default

Roots blowers are awful. More expensive/slower/overheat like a virgin on prom night. Screw that.

Centri > roots

I have had manyyyy centri set ups and never had any of the issues chuck was talking about.

Last edited by thegame; 11-02-2017 at 03:05 PM.
Old 11-02-2017, 06:03 PM
  #50  
BlueDevilZ51
Melting Slicks
 
BlueDevilZ51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 2,004
Received 389 Likes on 271 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thegame
Roots blowers are awful. More expensive/slower/overheat like a virgin on prom night. Screw that.

Centri > roots

I have had manyyyy centri set ups and never had any of the issues chuck was talking about.
Good point, thats why GM, Ford, Chrysler and most other automotive manufacturers use centrifugal superchargers......
Oh wait thats right they use roots.
Roots > centrifical
The following users liked this post:
Chuck CoW (11-03-2017)
Old 11-02-2017, 08:31 PM
  #51  
thegame
Le Mans Master
 
thegame's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Bergen County NJ
Posts: 9,862
Received 491 Likes on 275 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlueDevilZ51
Good point, thats why GM, Ford, Chrysler and most other automotive manufacturers use centrifugal superchargers......
Oh wait thats right they use roots.
Roots > centrifical
Sure if you want to be slower
Old 11-02-2017, 09:50 PM
  #52  
BlueDevilZ51
Melting Slicks
 
BlueDevilZ51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 2,004
Received 389 Likes on 271 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thegame
Sure if you want to be slower
Looks like we don't live that far apart, I'll run you anytime!

Last edited by BlueDevilZ51; 11-02-2017 at 09:54 PM.
Old 11-03-2017, 04:20 PM
  #53  
KenBrownfield
Heel & Toe
 
KenBrownfield's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2017
Location: MO
Posts: 22
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wveruner
Just bought a 2017 Grand sport didnt want to spend 15k more for a z06 didnt need 650hp. But now i am thinking I want a little more power. Chuck Cow will be doing engine/software tune after I hit 500 miles on my a8. What is a reasonable priced supercharger maybecan get good discount with a forum dealer. Something where kit is reasonable priced comeswith everythingaqndnot tons of money. I work for Bmw in service so I am sure I can have one of my techsinstall it. Thanks in advance for model and pro charger info. I am in orange county Ca do they also make smog legal supercharger? Or will I have to visit a smog person if you guys knowwhat I mean ?
I spent a lot of time researching superchargers prior to my install (centri and roots). I went with the A&A V3-Si kit with the 4 inch pulley (2016 z51 A8). So far this has been a really simple reliable way to ad big time performance to the car. You literally can't tell it is on the car in daily driving situations but the power is there when you want it. It's pretty cost affective and looks good on the car also... Not bashing any of the other choices I am sure there are many good ones but I'm really pleased with my choice for how I drive my car. I had a great installer and tuner as well.. That's a big deal in my opinion.
Old 11-03-2017, 07:03 PM
  #54  
0Chuck CoW
Former Vendor
 
Chuck CoW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Ossining New York
Posts: 11,792
Received 243 Likes on 183 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'12-'13-'14

Default Now we're talking.....!

Originally Posted by BlueDevilZ51
Good point, thats why GM, Ford, Chrysler and most other automotive manufacturers use centrifugal superchargers......
Oh wait thats right they use roots.
Roots > centrifical
Now we're talking.....!

Oh wait thats right they use roots.

Roots > centrifical

Chuck CoW
Old 11-03-2017, 07:34 PM
  #55  
BrunoTheMellow
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
BrunoTheMellow's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,588
Received 1,396 Likes on 999 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck CoW
Thanks for bringing some wisdom to the conversation! We need it here.

By the way.... Did you have to cut the structural part of your radiator with a sawz-all and break chunks out of it with a vice grips????

OH, wait... You got an EDELBROCK E-FORCE! I guess you didn't need to do that step....

Call me any time you're ready.
Chuck CoW
what?
Old 11-03-2017, 07:39 PM
  #56  
BrunoTheMellow
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
BrunoTheMellow's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,588
Received 1,396 Likes on 999 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlueDevilZ51
Bring your 570rwhp P1SC to New York and ill line up anytime with my Edelbrock stage 2 E force. Id have no fear of any centrifugal kit that was on the stock fuel system with no meth just like me.
You seem to think the Edelbrock has the same over heating issues as the Zo6, it doesnt! The LT4 1.74 blower has to spin to 22k to make its power. The 2300 in the E force doesnt have to spin near that RPM to make its power. It also has better intercoolers and heat exchanger then the LT4, in fact you'll see a lot of Zo6 guys adding the E force reservoir tank for more coolant.
Chuck Ill be in for one of your tunes in March after my Edelbrock warrenty expires.
Have you ran your car in an HPDE at 90 degree ambient? What about 100? Have you ran your car so hard that the transmission overheats (which should be the same time for any supercharger kit at the same power level)? At that time, what are your EOTs? ECTs? IATs? I have all that info. I've actually done real testing on my kit, not just talk.

Last edited by BrunoTheMellow; 11-10-2017 at 04:40 AM.
Old 11-03-2017, 07:43 PM
  #57  
BrunoTheMellow
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
BrunoTheMellow's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,588
Received 1,396 Likes on 999 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlueDevilZ51
Good point, thats why GM, Ford, Chrysler and most other automotive manufacturers use centrifugal superchargers......
Oh wait thats right they use roots.
Roots > centrifical
If we really think about it, the largest reasoning is likely because of "we've always done it that way". I work in automotive manufacturing and that is 99% of the reason why we haven't changed some stuff. Sure, there may be better alternatives but then we'd have to learn about them.

Get notified of new replies

To Which Supercharger to put on a 2017 Grand Sport??

Old 11-15-2017, 02:31 PM
  #58  
Dave_the_Dude
Instructor
 
Dave_the_Dude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2015
Posts: 160
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lrobe22
So you don't need 650 hp and just want a little more power? bare minimum $4500 in parts for a centrifugal, roots will be more. they'll all offer 100+hp. since you live in a communist state (smog), i would recommend just getting a z06 and not dealing with carb compliance. you'll also have a warrantied more robust car all around (clutch, prop shaft, cooling, engine) and better resale dollar for dollar compared to a supercharged gs.
I'm confused about posts like this. I keep seeing this stuff on this forum, so I actually called GM and asked them about it. I was mad because when I bought my GrandSport, they told me it was literally the exact same as a Z06 with the exception of the LT4.

GM told me there are literally no differences between the 17 Z06 and GS with the exception of the supercharger and associated parts (pulley, intake, etc). Same clutch, cooling, etc. They told me the GS had some improvements dealing with cooling and the issue with oil in the intake, and that the 2017 GS had some improvements from the 2016 Z06.

Where are people getting data that the GS has less cooling or a different clutch, or whatever? That is untrue according to GM.
Old 11-15-2017, 03:48 PM
  #59  
3 Z06ZR1
Team Owner
 
3 Z06ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: salem OR
Posts: 20,936
Received 900 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

I would go with Edelbrock or the Maggy heartbeat.
Stock reliability I see Chucks points!

I have done 3 centri Charger systems on 3 different Corvette's.
IMO The centri's are more trouble prone. Belts are longer more piping and clamps more to fail. My last Centri install experiment has been done. I took a beating on the car!
The engine tune is critical on any blower car.
The following users liked this post:
Chuck CoW (11-21-2017)
Old 11-15-2017, 03:52 PM
  #60  
3 Z06ZR1
Team Owner
 
3 Z06ZR1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: salem OR
Posts: 20,936
Received 900 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dave_the_Dude
I'm confused about posts like this. I keep seeing this stuff on this forum, so I actually called GM and asked them about it. I was mad because when I bought my GrandSport, they told me it was literally the exact same as a Z06 with the exception of the LT4.

GM told me there are literally no differences between the 17 Z06 and GS with the exception of the supercharger and associated parts (pulley, intake, etc). Same clutch, cooling, etc. They told me the GS had some improvements dealing with cooling and the issue with oil in the intake, and that the 2017 GS had some improvements from the 2016 Z06.

Where are people getting data that the GS has less cooling or a different clutch, or whatever? That is untrue according to GM.
The Z06 IMO will hold it's dollar best. Many less made.

Only 6800 2017's Z06's sold in the US even less 2018's
Hood is different and side grills. Nothing wrong with the GS!


Quick Reply: Which Supercharger to put on a 2017 Grand Sport??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.