School me on TB sizing ...
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
School me on TB sizing ...
Have LT1, A8, BMS filter and Magnuson Heartbeat with stock 95mm pulley for warranty purposes.
Reading about 95 and 103mm TBs vs stock 87mm.
Currently 552whp and 562tq on Mustang in floor dyno.
What can one expect with the 95mm? Worthwhile or no?
Reading about 95 and 103mm TBs vs stock 87mm.
Currently 552whp and 562tq on Mustang in floor dyno.
What can one expect with the 95mm? Worthwhile or no?
Last edited by TSLAVette; 06-05-2019 at 11:25 PM.
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
ttt
By about any kind of set up in a motor build unless you are 100% all out race car you don't need no more than the 95 TB on a motor. Some of the 103 WILL GIVE A TUNER HELL ON GETTING IT TO WORK GOOD AROUND TOWN.. From I I have been reading in here the 95 from the zr1 is the way to go & runs out great on the car with no problems at all...I went with the 95 zr1 on my new build... Robert
#4
Melting Slicks
By about any kind of set up in a motor build unless you are 100% all out race car you don't need no more than the 95 TB on a motor. Some of the 103 WILL GIVE A TUNER HELL ON GETTING IT TO WORK GOOD AROUND TOWN.. From I I have been reading in here the 95 from the zr1 is the way to go & runs out great on the car with no problems at all...I went with the 95 zr1 on my new build... Robert
- For PD blowers and assuming max power is the goal, bigger TB is better. As Robert's comment references, assuming tuner can get it right.
- For blow thru, like centri SC or turbo...stock LT4 TB has proven plenty capable...my car made 1250+whp with time slips to backup most of the numbers. New combo, 388 and bigger turbo will again use the stock TB. I've seen multiple centri cars make 1300+ on stock tb.
#5
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
ttt
Question is indeed application specific:
- For PD blowers and assuming max power is the goal, bigger TB is better. As Robert's comment references, assuming tuner can get it right.
- For blow thru, like centri SC or turbo...stock LT4 TB has proven plenty capable...my car made 1250+whp with time slips to backup most of the numbers. New combo, 388 and bigger turbo will again use the stock TB. I've seen multiple centri cars make 1300+ on stock tb.
- For PD blowers and assuming max power is the goal, bigger TB is better. As Robert's comment references, assuming tuner can get it right.
- For blow thru, like centri SC or turbo...stock LT4 TB has proven plenty capable...my car made 1250+whp with time slips to backup most of the numbers. New combo, 388 and bigger turbo will again use the stock TB. I've seen multiple centri cars make 1300+ on stock tb.
#6
Drifting
Thread Starter
I agree 100% more so on what you are saying with a turbo set up. But OP here if you are running to get a number I wouldn't go no more than the 95 tb on any set up that the car will be used for a street machine also. I am saying the 95 tb due to the few more HP that ever one is saying they are seeing with it...If I had it to due over I would have done turbo due just to the fueling & this.. Robert
Last edited by TSLAVette; 06-06-2019 at 05:09 PM.
#7
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
Cajun @ edgevette vendor in here... Robert
Last edited by robert miller; 06-06-2019 at 05:45 PM.
The following users liked this post:
TSLAVette (06-07-2019)
#8
Melting Slicks
I went from the stock 87mm tb on my stage 2 Edelbrock E force to the new 95mm tb. With the 87mm tb my car made 9psi. With the 95mm tb it went to 10 psi. You will definitely need a tune adjustment or run higher octane. I picked up consistant 2* KR after the switch. Im now using Boostane 100/102 octane and it cleaned up the KR.if i want to go back to 93 octane ill reinstall the 87mm Tb.
#9
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
Ttt
I went from the stock 87mm tb on my stage 2 Edelbrock E force to the new 95mm tb. With the 87mm tb my car made 9psi. With the 95mm tb it went to 10 psi. You will definitely need a tune adjustment or run higher octane. I picked up consistant 2* KR after the switch. Im now using Boostane 100/102 octane and it cleaned up the KR.if i want to go back to 93 octane ill reinstall the 87mm Tb.
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
ttt
I cant make a remark on this one, BUT FOR SURE I know you can play with these T.B. and make them feel like you have made 20 r 30 more HP this is only by the feel of the car on how it is pulling out on you. I would really want to see the true RWHP gains from it.
If you look at the tuner in here are the vendor that goes by COW TUNING he does a lot of playing with that part of the car in the tuning of it that makes the car feel better of the line stuff.. Robert
If you look at the tuner in here are the vendor that goes by COW TUNING he does a lot of playing with that part of the car in the tuning of it that makes the car feel better of the line stuff.. Robert
The following users liked this post:
TSLAVette (06-07-2019)
#14
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 6,070
Received 280 Likes
on
213 Posts
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Wish I could have done a before/after with my 103 Katech TB. I have an F1A-94 setup. Course I think the problem is always centered around charge pipe sizing + intercooler flow rates. The hot side of my Race intercooler is 3" and cold side is 3" that makes no sense to me. I am TIG welding a larger 4" cold side out moving my MAF up closer with a honeycomb air straightener before it. So instead of my 3" cold side charge pipe stepping up to 4" right before my TB (which honestly won't probably make much difference), my entire cold side out the intercooler will be 4" all the way to my TB, which I KNOW will make a difference. How much, no idea...
#15
Supporting Vendor
Stock 95 mm, has 9.6% more flow area.
Soler 87 mm Modified, has 15% better flow coefficient.
We'd like to think we'll win it by 5% at WOT and by a larger margin at lower angles.
Search using the following keywords "flow through orifices", "discharge coefficient", "flow coefficient" and see how a smaller orifice can flow more than a larger one depending on how you shape the inlet/outlet.
Soler 87 mm Modified, has 15% better flow coefficient.
We'd like to think we'll win it by 5% at WOT and by a larger margin at lower angles.
Search using the following keywords "flow through orifices", "discharge coefficient", "flow coefficient" and see how a smaller orifice can flow more than a larger one depending on how you shape the inlet/outlet.
Last edited by Mike@SolerEngr; 06-07-2019 at 02:02 PM. Reason: typo
#17
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 6,070
Received 280 Likes
on
213 Posts
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Stock TB (Centri Blower):
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-a-c7-z06.html
PD Blower, different matter...
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-a-c7-z06.html
PD Blower, different matter...
LOL I sure talk like I know what I am saying
And yes I am more referring to BIG centris here not smaller setups. It would not be worth it on smaller setups or maybe street machines I agree. I have seen some HUGE piping on some F2/3 Prochargers on some Drag cars with ginormous TB's!!! At it's heart an engine is nothing but an air pump if you meet the air coming in with the right CAM/Heads/Intake/Headers + compression ratio (meaning able to handle the volume of air efficiently) why wouldn't a larger setup help on big centris/boost?
One thing I will say is Chris Crawford sure found a way to tune mine to idle like a swiss watch! I thought the 103mm TB was going to have some idle issues you hear about that a lot but it sits at 600rpm all day long.
Lastly, I am just super jealous Earl you have a mid-8-second badass car using that stock TB and here I am with a $600 103mm making less power haha . Pass some of that HP this way!!!
Last edited by C5-VERT; 06-07-2019 at 09:14 PM.
#18
Stock 95 mm, has 9.6% more flow area.
Soler 87 mm Modified, has 15% better flow coefficient.
We'd like to think we'll win it by 5% at WOT and by a larger margin at lower angles.
Search using the following keywords "flow through orifices", "discharge coefficient", "flow coefficient" and see how a smaller orifice can flow more than a larger one depending on how you shape the inlet/outlet.
Soler 87 mm Modified, has 15% better flow coefficient.
We'd like to think we'll win it by 5% at WOT and by a larger margin at lower angles.
Search using the following keywords "flow through orifices", "discharge coefficient", "flow coefficient" and see how a smaller orifice can flow more than a larger one depending on how you shape the inlet/outlet.
The following users liked this post:
Zan Dad (06-08-2019)
#20
I bet, congrats on all your early successes. I’m sure when it’s ready it’ll be a great product.
The following users liked this post:
Mike@SolerEngr (06-08-2019)