C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What's on the drawing board at Chevrolet, and a look at the REAL C7.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2009, 09:19 AM
  #41  
Tom/99
Team Owner
 
Tom/99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 1999
Location: Houston,Texas USA
Posts: 41,713
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts

Default

When I see it, I'll believe it.
Old 12-11-2009, 09:27 AM
  #42  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by niteriderc5
Well aren't you a negative Nancy...is there any legit reason why you'd even conjure an idea like that?

The world ending in 2012 is a better argument from keeping the next gen Corvette from being built. So I'd love to hear you thoughts on this
I'm not one to over react, but actually I think he does have a legit reason to conjure and idea like that. There is another thread going around right now - well, actually it might have been closed this morning, with sales figures for the month of November, and it included information on the past year sales.

As much as I don't like to be a "sky is falling" person, the sales numbers are really ugly and if they don't turn around in the next six months, I find it hard to imagine that GM can make a good business case to continue such a low volume car that the BG plant is totally dedicated to.

I personally think the Corvette will be around, but it does give legitimate reason for concern.
Old 12-11-2009, 09:29 AM
  #43  
iw172
Drifting
 
iw172's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Retired early,everyday is Saturday...Hocking Hills Ohio
Posts: 1,803
Received 136 Likes on 107 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by johnhayesjr
its nice to know thats its hard to replace a c6 with something better.

Be proud gentleman to own a car thats very hard if not impossible to make better (in production aspects).
I feel that way every time I'm seen in mine.
very proud.
Old 12-11-2009, 09:52 AM
  #44  
charliesvette
Heel & Toe
 
charliesvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default C7, Realy?

I could see Chevy doing this. Likely just a little cost to retool the cosmetic changes and some minor drivetrain changes. But don't call it a C7!!!!

Think about the changes from C1 to C2, to C3 to C4 to C5 then C6.

Those were real changes and each was different driver experience. The C7 is a new bumper and fiberglass change around the tail lights.

But I suspect we will see this as a flock of buyers would be expected in dealerships via the C7 designation.

BUT DON'T GET ME WRONG, IF IT DRIVES SALES CALL IT "THE BEST EVER C-INFINITE" AND GET SALES UP FOR GM.

Last edited by charliesvette; 12-11-2009 at 09:56 AM.
Old 12-11-2009, 10:02 AM
  #45  
vettedoogie
Le Mans Master
 
vettedoogie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 8,285
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JerriVette
I would hope GM installs a MCT type transmission or a Dual clutch...

otherwise I'll hold onto my 08 Coupe.

Power should be up about 8 percent with direct injection on the 6.2 ls3 as long as they don't downsize it to 5.5 liters..(on base coupe)
If we believe the info they put out about next season's C6R GT2 car, they are going to offer a 5.5. Other than that, who knows?

While it is unnecessary for a barely surviving company to build a C7 that has to do a 9 second 1/4 mile, neither does it make any sense to have a lineup of weak-kneed V6 or hybrid Corvettes. Some here have a great time taking their Vettes to the drag strip but that ain't the model that will help get the Corvette brand or GM back to profitability. That said, the small block V8 has a LOT more life with vast capability left to explore in almost every aspect. People who want to mod them to do that 9 sec. 1/4 should still be able to do so. So the real critical thing is to keep it a great, flexible platform so that people will be able to do what they want to with it.

The C6 lineup has had a great balance of quality, horsepower, torque, gas mileage, aerodynamics, and comfort. Building on those qualities will continue to reap benefits. The C7 must improve overall reliability (No more electrical/battery issues!), handling and interior quality and they need to build FEWER of them so they can actually SELL most or all that they make.
Old 12-11-2009, 10:17 AM
  #46  
Vette Suspension
Le Mans Master
 
Vette Suspension's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

C7 General discussion?
Old 12-11-2009, 12:45 PM
  #47  
TBIRD57
Race Director
 
TBIRD57's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Posts: 15,749
Received 235 Likes on 178 Posts

Default ?

Originally Posted by 70454


But...

What happened to the "Pelosi" engine lineup with smaller displacement for the Vette? Isn't this Govenment Motors we're talking about?? Was the last King the LS9 ZR1? I'm sure Pelosi would love to see the end of the Vette...or even better....a hybrid!
what does pelosi have to with this?
hybrids are going to be the future for all manufacturers with the next generation cafe mandates. the head of renault-nissan confirmed it in a wide ranging discussion on charlie rose.
the hybrid sports car will be the norm.
Old 12-11-2009, 01:15 PM
  #48  
Gman in NC
Melting Slicks
 
Gman in NC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Kernersville NC
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 75 Posts

Default

I think we'll see a twin clutch tranny in the C7. That's keeping up with the times for sure.
Old 12-11-2009, 02:05 PM
  #49  
Kent1999
Le Mans Master
 
Kent1999's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 6,483
Received 1,651 Likes on 825 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by niteriderc5
(snip)

- Price and practicality - Was always the strong point no arguing there. But lets not make that the Vette's strong hold or justification. Let that be the icing on the cake, cherry on top! Let's make sure its a fantastic car at any price point!
(snip)
I agree witht the rest of your points, but I couldn't disagree more with the one above.

An affordable price and a reasonable measure of practicality is *absolutely* crucial to the Corvettes' success.

The Corvette's mantra has *always* been, "the working man's sports car". Let the low volume elitist status-symbol cars continue to be the domain of the Porsche and Ferrari clubs, and give us the knock-out price/performance ratio that the C6 currently enjoys, besting the performance of cars that cost 2-3x as much.

The Viper is a GREAT car, but its $80,000 price point keeps it out of the hands of most enthusiasts, and the correspondingly low production volume has endangered its very existence. Similarly, if the C6 had an unusable trunk size (example: the pathetic malformed excuse that goes for 'luggage space' on the Solstice/Sky), I wouldn't have bought it.
Old 12-11-2009, 04:19 PM
  #50  
quick04Z06
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
quick04Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Springfield TN
Posts: 2,544
Received 600 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kent1999
I agree witht the rest of your points, but I couldn't disagree more with the one above.

An affordable price and a reasonable measure of practicality is *absolutely* crucial to the Corvettes' success.

The Corvette's mantra has *always* been, "the working man's sports car". Let the low volume elitist status-symbol cars continue to be the domain of the Porsche and Ferrari clubs, and give us the knock-out price/performance ratio that the C6 currently enjoys, besting the performance of cars that cost 2-3x as much.

The Viper is a GREAT car, but its $80,000 price point keeps it out of the hands of most enthusiasts, and the correspondingly low production volume has endangered its very existence. Similarly, if the C6 had an unusable trunk size (example: the pathetic malformed excuse that goes for 'luggage space' on the Solstice/Sky), I wouldn't have bought it.
I do not think there is a future in the "working-man's sports car" at the Corvette's real price point, which is 55K and up. Corvette should become a separate brand under the GM umbrella and it should strive to be what Porsche is--sophisticated, well-built, a good performer, and no "red neck" image. Vette's do not have to be super-expensive, but expensive enough to warrant first-rate interior materials, a dual clutch auto-manual, and a number of variants, like a factory club sport street/road racer (a Z06 w Brembos, roll bar, and pass through sport seats w adj suspension and lighter weight), and a real customer race car like the 911 GT3 Cup tailored to the several road racing series. Let the price go up so GM can make some money on the cars. Appeal to the up-market and get there and quit being viewed as a plastic toy.

Let the Camaro line be the working-man's sports car/toy. It has IRS--just add a solid axle version for the drag boys and make enough versions of it to keep everyone happy in the $25K-to-45K range.

If Corvette continues to sell mostly to the paycheck-to-paycheck crowd, when times are bad, you'll sell no cars (like now). Vettes need to appeal to the investment crowd, too. Vettes do have a chili-dog image; they need a Chateaubriand image. This will require pricing sufficient to stay alive.
Old 12-11-2009, 05:30 PM
  #51  
70454
Safety Car
 
70454's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TBIRD57
what does pelosi have to with this?
hybrids are going to be the future for all manufacturers with the next generation cafe mandates. the head of renault-nissan confirmed it in a wide ranging discussion on charlie rose.
the hybrid sports car will be the norm.
I just don't like her.
Old 12-11-2009, 05:55 PM
  #52  
vant
Burning Brakes
 
vant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by quick04Z06
I do not think there is a future in the "working-man's sports car" at the Corvette's real price point, which is 55K and up. Corvette should become a separate brand under the GM umbrella and it should strive to be what Porsche is--sophisticated, well-built, a good performer, and no "red neck" image. Vette's do not have to be super-expensive, but expensive enough to warrant first-rate interior materials, a dual clutch auto-manual, and a number of variants, like a factory club sport street/road racer (a Z06 w Brembos, roll bar, and pass through sport seats w adj suspension and lighter weight), and a real customer race car like the 911 GT3 Cup tailored to the several road racing series. Let the price go up so GM can make some money on the cars. Appeal to the up-market and get there and quit being viewed as a plastic toy.

Let the Camaro line be the working-man's sports car/toy. It has IRS--just add a solid axle version for the drag boys and make enough versions of it to keep everyone happy in the $25K-to-45K range.

If Corvette continues to sell mostly to the paycheck-to-paycheck crowd, when times are bad, you'll sell no cars (like now). Vettes need to appeal to the investment crowd, too. Vettes do have a chili-dog image; they need a Chateaubriand image. This will require pricing sufficient to stay alive.
Not really getting your point. If you want sophistication, exclusivity, and the snob-factor, then why don't you just buy a Porsche or Ferrari? That's why they exist - as an alternative to the "plastic toy".

I do agree with one thing that you said. I think the Vette will always have that "red neck" image as long as it is associated with Chevrolet and pickup trucks. After all, Ferrari, Aston Martin, Porsche, Lamborghini, Audi, etc - DO NOT build pickups. One thing that I have always wondered about was why the Corvette body has never displayed a Chevy bow tie, except for the microscopic one found in the crossflags. Maybe that was their way of distancing the Corvette brand slightly from the rest of the lineup.

But luckily I'm not easily influenced by what other people think about the car I drive. I chose the Corvette for its exceptional performance value. It accelerates corners and brakes better than anything that's close to this price. It's an incredibly balanced and well engineered car for the money. The rush I get from that driving experience supersedes anything else, including the grade of plastics used in the dash.

Oh, and what's wrong with chili dogs? Weiner!
Old 12-11-2009, 09:59 PM
  #53  
vettedoogie
Le Mans Master
 
vettedoogie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 8,285
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Red neck? That's never been my impression of the Corvette, except maybe this one...


Nascar, pickup trucks, and maybe these...



Old 12-16-2009, 10:38 PM
  #54  
jlbruggeman
Burning Brakes
 
jlbruggeman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2001
Location: Joplin, MO, USA
Posts: 1,127
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

They have been talking about making it lighter, then even 14HP would make it quicker. Looks pretty slick to me!
Old 01-09-2010, 09:38 PM
  #55  
JSB2008
Advanced
 
JSB2008's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago Burbs IL
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wayne O
I recall these C7 concept designs have been in the wild for a while now. If the Corvette achieves the numbers purported in the article (in the current political and economic climate) I'll be surprised...pleasantly surprised!



Ridiculously Idiotic Acronym...Rock Island Arsenal or Regulatory/Research Impact Analysis?
Yea a version of this design went around the car mags about a year ago already
Old 01-10-2010, 12:17 AM
  #56  
RedC7AZ
Race Director
 
RedC7AZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Posts: 16,854
Received 534 Likes on 334 Posts

Default

Why does it seem that at this point every rendition of what the C7 will look like seems to resemble a C6 "in disguise".

The C6 does not look aything like a C5 in disguise and the same can be said going back one generation at a time and comparing it to the previous generation.

Lets hope GM continues it's track record and uses more imagination than the folks offering these rendition.
Old 01-12-2010, 02:46 PM
  #57  
Aerovette
Team Owner
 
Aerovette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Posts: 45,003
Received 585 Likes on 265 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wase13
Pretty much BS. Who only ups power by 14HP on a next generation model? I think Accord andCamry get moe than that in power increase from generation to generation. 600HP Z06 seems OK. Now 850HP SS at $115K is laughable. They niether have tranny nor drivetrain to handle that power.
Up the HP by 14 and drop the weight and you accomplish a LOT.

Get notified of new replies

To What's on the drawing board at Chevrolet, and a look at the REAL C7.

Old 01-12-2010, 03:34 PM
  #58  
SCM_Crash
Le Mans Master
 
SCM_Crash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Um... I don't like it. I don't even think that design could grow on me. It's hard enough that the C6 isn't growing on me that fast. That C7 design looks awful IMO.
Old 01-12-2010, 06:50 PM
  #59  
Launched in '53
1st Gear
 
Launched in '53's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Dearborn MI
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

RIA = Retailer Installed Accessory
Refers to optional equipment developed and validated by GM, but installed at the dealer rather than at Bowling Green. This enables a wider range of options without increasing complexity and jeopardizing cost/quality at Bowling Green.
Old 01-12-2010, 07:29 PM
  #60  
2K14C7
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
2K14C7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: St. Peters MO
Posts: 5,676
Received 519 Likes on 321 Posts
C7 of Year Finalist (stock) 2019
2018 C7 of Year Finalist

Default

If I remember correctly this article and picture was out in 2007 before the 2008 models were out. It was thought at the time that the C7 would come out in 2010 as a 2011 model.

That obviously didn't happen and the 2008 model had a new LS-3 with 430/436 hp. Short of the speculated 450 hp in the article but not by much.

The SS mentioned turned out to be the ZR1. The picture is pure speculation and is just a computer rendition of a stylized C6. It was what "they" thought a C7 might look like.

We will only get a real idea of what the C7 will be when the actual spy pics of it being tested begin to surface. And who knows when that will be.

Last edited by 2K14C7; 01-15-2010 at 05:18 PM.


Quick Reply: What's on the drawing board at Chevrolet, and a look at the REAL C7.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.