GM, Please redesign the rear end on the C7
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
GM, Please redesign the rear end on the C7
I don't know if I'm the only c6 owner that hates the rear end of this car, but I sure hope GM does something a little more tasteful with the C7. The flat *** on the C6 sure leaves a lot to be desired and just seems so plain looking from the rear. That huge flat section just is not appealing to me at all. It needs some curves or shape to it and the rear end has gotten way too big. And personally, I would like to see the pop up headlights brought back as well.
#4
Race Director
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: BOOMER SOONER Big 12 Champions 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 - 2008, 2010, 2012, 2015 - 2020.....
Posts: 14,857
Received 914 Likes
on
527 Posts
GM, please do not listen to Fred H. and carry on with the flat rear end & fixed headlamps.
No offense Fred btw
Actually GM, please build the Stingray concept from Transformers, but please fix the front and rear of the car and make it more appealing to those of us who will probably buy it. Also, please make it more powerful than the LS3 w/o sacrificing cubic inches or fuel economy. While we are at it, please make the interior much better and lets keep the price around what the current car is, or less.
No offense Fred btw
Actually GM, please build the Stingray concept from Transformers, but please fix the front and rear of the car and make it more appealing to those of us who will probably buy it. Also, please make it more powerful than the LS3 w/o sacrificing cubic inches or fuel economy. While we are at it, please make the interior much better and lets keep the price around what the current car is, or less.
#5
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,451
Received 4,375 Likes
on
2,066 Posts
The pop-up headlights are not returning. I don't believe they will fit with the European safety regulations. They are dead and gone, get over it.
The "flat" backend, is not as others have pointed out. Also it serves significant aerodynamic purposes. It will likely stay in some form.
The "flat" backend, is not as others have pointed out. Also it serves significant aerodynamic purposes. It will likely stay in some form.
#6
Instructor
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Basingstoke England
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The pop-up headlights are not returning. I don't believe they will fit with the European safety regulations. They are dead and gone, get over it.
The "flat" backend, is not as others have pointed out. Also it serves significant aerodynamic purposes. It will likely stay in some form.
The "flat" backend, is not as others have pointed out. Also it serves significant aerodynamic purposes. It will likely stay in some form.
#7
Advanced
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Grass Valley California
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just look at the Prius. It's shaped like that for a reason. It too has somewhat of a flat back, and abrupt edge/spoiler.
#8
Le Mans Master
I could see a retro-styled sports car affecting popups -- something small and wedgy perhaps -- but not Corvette. Corvettes draw inspiration from their past but they remain inherently modern.
I suppose it's possible to come up with a modern rendition of popups, but in Corvette's case I don't think they'll ever get past the concept sketch or perhaps an outre-retro show car. They're a packaging and reliability and cost problem.
I really like hidden headlamps, and I still strongly dislike C6's uninspired bug-eyes, but I know GM's never going back. I just hope they'll throw the C6 design out and not limit C7 to some evolutionary design for continuity or identity's sake.
.Jinx
I suppose it's possible to come up with a modern rendition of popups, but in Corvette's case I don't think they'll ever get past the concept sketch or perhaps an outre-retro show car. They're a packaging and reliability and cost problem.
I really like hidden headlamps, and I still strongly dislike C6's uninspired bug-eyes, but I know GM's never going back. I just hope they'll throw the C6 design out and not limit C7 to some evolutionary design for continuity or identity's sake.
.Jinx
#9
Team Owner
The high, "flat" rear end delivers low lift and decent drag without the the need for a rear wing. If you want to see what can happen with a "curvy" rear end, just check out the original Audi TT which used to fall off the road on fast curves until Audi retro-fitted a wing. It's also why you'll see fancy self-raising wings on the rear of most modern Porsches.
Audi had some problems because the back end was lifting up at speed.
#10
Melting Slicks
#12
Drifting
#14
Successful Plumber
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Top of the hill, 3rd mailbox on the right. Texas
Posts: 43,830
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
6 Posts
CF NCM Ambassador
CI 6-7-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10
NCM Member '09
Fred -
Somewhere there's a C4 out there with your name on it.
Somewhere there's a C4 out there with your name on it.
#15
#18
Safety Car
Agreed. If you want a flat butt then there are plenty of 1984 to 1990 Vettes with flat butts like my 86. You can get a more evocative design with todays headlight design that can give the Vette a new face. hPop headlights are too heavy, complicated, and troublesome to ever come back in this era of ever stricter CAFE regulations. Don't get me wrong, I like pop headlights, thats why I own an 85 and 93 Trans Am in addition to my 86 Vette, but that era is long gone. Hell even the supercars don't use them anymore. I think GM did a great job with the C6 given their limitations.
#20
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: North shore,Ma./Naples Florida
Posts: 3,059
Received 272 Likes
on
144 Posts
I think the C6 is by far the best looking Vette yet. My belief is the C7 will be a slightly downsized version of the C6 but with some new angles but still reminiscent of the C6. I doubt it will be a radical departure. But pop up headlight? Yikes, they are downright embarrassing,especially when they are up, and belong back in the 70's and 80's. They are the main reason I sold my C5.
Last edited by Frankie2blue; 09-24-2010 at 10:30 AM.