Will an aluminum framed base C7 bring back the old 't-tops'?
#1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Will an aluminum framed base C7 bring back the old 't-tops'?
I was just thinking about this earlier today. There is some talk/speculation that the 2014 might actually have an aluminum frame much like the current C6 Z06 and C6 ZR1 does as a way of saving weight/increasing fuel economy/adding more performance all at the same time.
But that open targa/top might create some engineering hurdles with an aluminum frame (Z06s/ZR1s are 'fixed roof only' of course).
So I was thinking that if they did go to the lighter frame that perhaps they might go back to a 'two piece' removable roof design with a (small, thin, unobtrusive) bar that runs from the halo to the windshield header for added strength/stability maybe?
Or even keep the panel as a one piece/targa roof but still have the bar there?
Something like that could solve a dilemma and wouldn't really be in the way or block the openess or sun too much if it's small enough.
Of course then there's the convertible model. They won't have two different frame structures for coupe and convertible and the only to brace/strengthen that car would be to do it underneath and add substantial weight in the process which they likely won't want to do...and that sort of throws a wrench in my whole question/idea making this thread sort of moot I suppose LOL.
Just wanted to put it out there in case something like that actually happens and then I'll look like a genius for breaking the news/story on it first.
But that open targa/top might create some engineering hurdles with an aluminum frame (Z06s/ZR1s are 'fixed roof only' of course).
So I was thinking that if they did go to the lighter frame that perhaps they might go back to a 'two piece' removable roof design with a (small, thin, unobtrusive) bar that runs from the halo to the windshield header for added strength/stability maybe?
Or even keep the panel as a one piece/targa roof but still have the bar there?
Something like that could solve a dilemma and wouldn't really be in the way or block the openess or sun too much if it's small enough.
Of course then there's the convertible model. They won't have two different frame structures for coupe and convertible and the only to brace/strengthen that car would be to do it underneath and add substantial weight in the process which they likely won't want to do...and that sort of throws a wrench in my whole question/idea making this thread sort of moot I suppose LOL.
Just wanted to put it out there in case something like that actually happens and then I'll look like a genius for breaking the news/story on it first.
#2
I think you are just baiting us now.
I really have no idea what they will do as new alloys are being developed that could make the C7 vert lighter and stronger vs aluminum. I really look forward to the C7 chassis design as I think this will be a major advancement in Corvette engineering/technology.
That and the AWD, of course.
#3
Team Owner
Thread Starter
If they even go to an aluminum frame across the entire line (I personally don't think they will) I'm sure by now that the engineers have figured out a way to do it while still safely/structurally retaining (fully) open roof coupe and convertible models.
#4
Safety Car
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: SouthEast PA
Posts: 3,966
Received 1,293 Likes
on
722 Posts
Unmodified C8 of the Year 2021 Finalist
2018 C7 of Year Finalist
Even though it is much easier to handle removing/replacing a two piece t-top, I think it would be a step backward in design. Along with that, they will never return to a less ridged structure with noticeable flexing where the doors meet the rear quarter panel in both the coupe and the vert.
So frame weight reduction will not be incorporated at the expense of what we have come to expect in coupe/vert Corvettes. Solid as a rock! A new alloy could offer a solution changing all that however.
So frame weight reduction will not be incorporated at the expense of what we have come to expect in coupe/vert Corvettes. Solid as a rock! A new alloy could offer a solution changing all that however.
#5
Safety Car
I'm willing to bet that the current C6 hardtops are structurally stiff enough to have an open top but for the intended purpose (sports car) the extra stiffness is best.
I bet the C7 will have an aluminum frame maybe a different kinda of aluminum alloy.
The C4 was supposed to be a T-Top then some top executive at the last minute (cough, cough Lloyd Ruess) decided he had to have a targa. Well it was too late to redo the structure. So we got a flexible chassis.
I think T-Tops are gone for good. No reason to go back. Dave McLellan did such a good job on the C5's structure that the targa is just fine on all that have come since.
I hope they never offer AWD. If you want it, maybe as an option, but you'll pay with weight. I am a firm believer in adding lightness. Stay RWD and offer a proper manual gear box as standard. This is a sports car. If it ain't broke don't fix it.
I bet the C7 will have an aluminum frame maybe a different kinda of aluminum alloy.
The C4 was supposed to be a T-Top then some top executive at the last minute (cough, cough Lloyd Ruess) decided he had to have a targa. Well it was too late to redo the structure. So we got a flexible chassis.
I think T-Tops are gone for good. No reason to go back. Dave McLellan did such a good job on the C5's structure that the targa is just fine on all that have come since.
I hope they never offer AWD. If you want it, maybe as an option, but you'll pay with weight. I am a firm believer in adding lightness. Stay RWD and offer a proper manual gear box as standard. This is a sports car. If it ain't broke don't fix it.
Last edited by 93Rubie; 05-28-2012 at 07:27 PM.
#6
Melting Slicks
Interesting subject.
From an aesthetic standpoint, no, I don't want T-tops again.
However, I do agree that the C7 needs to be more rigid, and yet lighter weight. Engineering, computer analysis and possibly aluminum alloy or high-strength steel should combine to produce a lighter, stiffer frame without T-tops.
As an aside, my fourth gen 2002 Camaro SS has an incredibly rigid frame. Yes, it's a T-top. The ragtops of that generation were wobbly goblins, though. There are many aftermarket products to strengthen the 4th gen frame for ragtops. The T-tops are fine as-is.
From an aesthetic standpoint, no, I don't want T-tops again.
However, I do agree that the C7 needs to be more rigid, and yet lighter weight. Engineering, computer analysis and possibly aluminum alloy or high-strength steel should combine to produce a lighter, stiffer frame without T-tops.
As an aside, my fourth gen 2002 Camaro SS has an incredibly rigid frame. Yes, it's a T-top. The ragtops of that generation were wobbly goblins, though. There are many aftermarket products to strengthen the 4th gen frame for ragtops. The T-tops are fine as-is.
#7
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Doubt t-tops are coming back. The targa is a lot less work and I doubt that Chevy wants to tell their customers they're going to make things difficult again.
The truth is that even if the frame is made out of aluminum, the fame can be made stiff still to support plenty of torque and power. It's not like that fixed roof is the game changer. The frame itself is engineered for the purpose. It's not an after-though, but it's one of the first things considered in the engineering of the car. The C5 chassis was designed as a roadster chassis so that no matter what body/trim they put on it, it would be stiff enough so that they could simply use one chassis for everything. And it's quite stout while GM saved a lot of money having 1 assembly.
With the C6, GM managed to spend more money on the chassis having more than variation. Now, to save money there will be just one again, and to save weight, it will be aluminum. That means they'll do just as they did with the C5 and build it to support everything. It will be rigid and light and yet still cost less than creating lots of different chassis variants.
The truth is that even if the frame is made out of aluminum, the fame can be made stiff still to support plenty of torque and power. It's not like that fixed roof is the game changer. The frame itself is engineered for the purpose. It's not an after-though, but it's one of the first things considered in the engineering of the car. The C5 chassis was designed as a roadster chassis so that no matter what body/trim they put on it, it would be stiff enough so that they could simply use one chassis for everything. And it's quite stout while GM saved a lot of money having 1 assembly.
With the C6, GM managed to spend more money on the chassis having more than variation. Now, to save money there will be just one again, and to save weight, it will be aluminum. That means they'll do just as they did with the C5 and build it to support everything. It will be rigid and light and yet still cost less than creating lots of different chassis variants.
#8
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Interesting subject.
From an aesthetic standpoint, no, I don't want T-tops again.
However, I do agree that the C7 needs to be more rigid, and yet lighter weight. Engineering, computer analysis and possibly aluminum alloy or high-strength steel should combine to produce a lighter, stiffer frame without T-tops.
As an aside, my fourth gen 2002 Camaro SS has an incredibly rigid frame. Yes, it's a T-top. The ragtops of that generation were wobbly goblins, though. There are many aftermarket products to strengthen the 4th gen frame for ragtops. The T-tops are fine as-is.
From an aesthetic standpoint, no, I don't want T-tops again.
However, I do agree that the C7 needs to be more rigid, and yet lighter weight. Engineering, computer analysis and possibly aluminum alloy or high-strength steel should combine to produce a lighter, stiffer frame without T-tops.
As an aside, my fourth gen 2002 Camaro SS has an incredibly rigid frame. Yes, it's a T-top. The ragtops of that generation were wobbly goblins, though. There are many aftermarket products to strengthen the 4th gen frame for ragtops. The T-tops are fine as-is.
Sub-frames = fail.
#9
I can't imagine that anyone would even want t-tops these days. I certainly wouldn't want the C7 Vette to have that old '70s look that were a pain then and would be a pain now. They have enough trouble making a single that doesn't creak, leak or fly off!
Next you'll be talking about fine Corinthian leather (read Naugahyde)!
Next you'll be talking about fine Corinthian leather (read Naugahyde)!
#11
Former Vendor
Well since a titanium dirt bike axle is about $300 and a frame is 1000 times bigger and more complex I wouldn't hold your breath on that one.
#12
Former Vendor
I was just thinking about this earlier today. There is some talk/speculation that the 2014 might actually have an aluminum frame much like the current C6 Z06 and C6 ZR1 does as a way of saving weight/increasing fuel economy/adding more performance all at the same time.
But that open targa/top might create some engineering hurdles with an aluminum frame (Z06s/ZR1s are 'fixed roof only' of course).
So I was thinking that if they did go to the lighter frame that perhaps they might go back to a 'two piece' removable roof design with a (small, thin, unobtrusive) bar that runs from the halo to the windshield header for added strength/stability maybe?
Or even keep the panel as a one piece/targa roof but still have the bar there?
Something like that could solve a dilemma and wouldn't really be in the way or block the openess or sun too much if it's small enough.
Of course then there's the convertible model. They won't have two different frame structures for coupe and convertible and the only to brace/strengthen that car would be to do it underneath and add substantial weight in the process which they likely won't want to do...and that sort of throws a wrench in my whole question/idea making this thread sort of moot I suppose LOL.
Just wanted to put it out there in case something like that actually happens and then I'll look like a genius for breaking the news/story on it first.
But that open targa/top might create some engineering hurdles with an aluminum frame (Z06s/ZR1s are 'fixed roof only' of course).
So I was thinking that if they did go to the lighter frame that perhaps they might go back to a 'two piece' removable roof design with a (small, thin, unobtrusive) bar that runs from the halo to the windshield header for added strength/stability maybe?
Or even keep the panel as a one piece/targa roof but still have the bar there?
Something like that could solve a dilemma and wouldn't really be in the way or block the openess or sun too much if it's small enough.
Of course then there's the convertible model. They won't have two different frame structures for coupe and convertible and the only to brace/strengthen that car would be to do it underneath and add substantial weight in the process which they likely won't want to do...and that sort of throws a wrench in my whole question/idea making this thread sort of moot I suppose LOL.
Just wanted to put it out there in case something like that actually happens and then I'll look like a genius for breaking the news/story on it first.
Dang, what are we going to do when cars don't rust anymore?
#13
Le Mans Master
#14
Team Owner
Thread Starter
#15
The Consigliere
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,243
Received 5,431 Likes
on
2,268 Posts
Ts would be a step back.
I'd be surprised if they did that.
I'd be surprised if they did that.
#16
The truth is that even if the frame is made out of aluminum, the fame can be made stiff still to support plenty of torque and power. It's not like that fixed roof is the game changer. The frame itself is engineered for the purpose. It's not an after-though, but it's one of the first things considered in the engineering of the car. The C5 chassis was designed as a roadster chassis so that no matter what body/trim they put on it, it would be stiff enough so that they could simply use one chassis for everything. And it's quite stout while GM saved a lot of money having 1 assembly.
With the C6, GM managed to spend more money on the chassis having more than variation. Now, to save money there will be just one again, and to save weight, it will be aluminum. That means they'll do just as they did with the C5 and build it to support everything. It will be rigid and light and yet still cost less than creating lots of different chassis variants.
With the C6, GM managed to spend more money on the chassis having more than variation. Now, to save money there will be just one again, and to save weight, it will be aluminum. That means they'll do just as they did with the C5 and build it to support everything. It will be rigid and light and yet still cost less than creating lots of different chassis variants.
#19
Team Owner
Thread Starter
And even Porsche still had a 4 speed manual (on the 911 Turbo) well into the mid-late '80s.
#20
Melting Slicks