C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Corvette c7 spotted

Old 04-12-2012, 11:01 PM
  #21  
LS1LT1
Team Owner
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Short Hills, NJ
Posts: 27,067
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mitchydkid
I almost did not click on this link because I was expecting to get "rick rolled."




OMG look, the new Corvette C7!:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

Old 04-12-2012, 11:37 PM
  #22  
CMCvette
Racer
 
CMCvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Thanks for the post-- any updates/new photos & info is appreciated. So does the nose on that thing look longer than C6? The C6s (especially in GS garb) are already too wide & long -- Chevy, can't we get back to the roots of this car as a small, light weight, monster-engined beast (tho with an audi-esque interior!)? I'm really hoping the "smaller footprint" comment I've heard about the C7 is true.
Old 04-13-2012, 12:40 AM
  #23  
LS1LT1
Team Owner
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Short Hills, NJ
Posts: 27,067
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CMCvette
Chevy, can't we get back to the roots of this car as a small, light weight, monster-engined beast? I'm really hoping the "smaller footprint" comment I've heard about the C7 is true.
Smaller is better, sports cars should be relatively small and light in my opinion.
Old 04-13-2012, 01:29 AM
  #24  
niteriderc5
Safety Car
 
niteriderc5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1




OMG look, the new Corvette C7!:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

i clicked ...
Old 04-13-2012, 09:24 AM
  #25  
thebrander
Burning Brakes
 
thebrander's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,000
Received 40 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by niteriderc5
i clicked ...
me too

Old 04-13-2012, 11:54 AM
  #26  
LS1LT1
Team Owner
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Short Hills, NJ
Posts: 27,067
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by niteriderc5
i clicked ...
Originally Posted by thebrander
me too

C'mon guys, you gotta follow the whole sequence, I clearly quoted 'mitchydkid' about the whole 'RickRolled' thing so I thought I was being obvious there, and note the smilies and winks as well LOL.
Old 04-13-2012, 12:36 PM
  #27  
gatti-man
Melting Slicks
 
gatti-man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: round rock tx
Posts: 2,490
Received 62 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Looks like a c6 not sure if that's good or bad.
Old 04-13-2012, 07:28 PM
  #28  
thebrander
Burning Brakes
 
thebrander's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,000
Received 40 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
C'mon guys, you gotta follow the whole sequence, I clearly quoted 'mitchydkid' about the whole 'RickRolled' thing so I thought I was being obvious there, and note the smilies and winks as well LOL.
Nope, well played. That's what I get for being lazy (RickRolled, that is).
Old 04-13-2012, 07:51 PM
  #29  
McGirk94LT1
Drifting
 
McGirk94LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Coatesville PA
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CMCvette
Thanks for the post-- any updates/new photos & info is appreciated. So does the nose on that thing look longer than C6? The C6s (especially in GS garb) are already too wide & long -- Chevy, can't we get back to the roots of this car as a small, light weight, monster-engined beast (tho with an audi-esque interior!)? I'm really hoping the "smaller footprint" comment I've heard about the C7 is true.
Yeah that idea went out the window pretty quick it seems. All you gotta do is look at the c6/c7 test mules seen awhile ago. The wheels sit farther apart then where they normally would on a c6. Then check the c7 photos and from some angles the overhangs almost look worse then the c6. I know the "visually smaller" idea was supposedly pretty important to win over potential customers, but seems that got thrown out the window. The spy photos definitely look bigger to me, and the hood looks noticeably longer too.
Old 04-13-2012, 08:44 PM
  #30  
mtrainer
Racer
 
mtrainer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Geneva, IL USA
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

After waiting so many years, I would have throught we'd see a bigger change in at least the design of the car. Its proportions essentially look like a slightly tweaked C6. I had hoped for more, after all look at how much the new Camero changed. It's as if they took the safe route and just changed up a few things.

I admit that we haven't seen the final car and I will reserve final judgement until then.

Hoping the C8 will mix it up a bit more.

Mark
Old 04-13-2012, 10:39 PM
  #31  
Xanthophyll
Pro
 
Xanthophyll's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: North Mankato MN
Posts: 638
Received 58 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

I agree. Tweaking a 8+ yr old design isn't going to sell cars.

But right, still it's only speculation and guess we'll have to wait awhile to be sure.
Old 04-13-2012, 10:44 PM
  #32  
rcallen484
Race Director
 
rcallen484's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Porsche has been tweaking the 911 since its beginning. Sometimes a design is so classic it deserves same. C5 tweaked into C6 is pretty damn classic IMHO.
Old 04-13-2012, 10:45 PM
  #33  
LS1LT1
Team Owner
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Short Hills, NJ
Posts: 27,067
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mtrainer
After waiting so many years, I would have throught we'd see a bigger change in at least the design of the car. Its proportions essentially look like a slightly tweaked C6. I had hoped for more, after all look at how much the new Camero changed. It's as if they took the safe route and just changed up a few things.
There's probably a very good reason for that...the C6 is just that good.
It's almost like a diamond engagement ring...you can alter a few little things about it such as the shape/size of the diamond with a baguette here or there but the bottom line is your woman wants the classic ring with a diamond on top of it because the original system just works (marriage itself doesn't necessarily work of course, but the ring does LOL ).
If it's not broken, don't fix it.

Porsche has built almost their entire street car reputation on doing that very same thing.
Old 04-13-2012, 11:02 PM
  #34  
TommyV
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
TommyV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Sandy Eggo Calif.
Posts: 5,254
Received 49 Likes on 38 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12, '16

Default

Ya think those are 19/20's?
Old 04-14-2012, 02:47 AM
  #35  
The Highlander
Drifting
 
The Highlander's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,696
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Drivetrain will be what makes or breaks this car... And what will set it apart.... if it does.
Old 04-14-2012, 10:11 AM
  #36  
texvette2
Race Director
 
texvette2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: 96598
Posts: 14,860
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mtrainer
After waiting so many years, I would have throught we'd see a bigger change in at least the design of the car. Its proportions essentially look like a slightly tweaked C6. I had hoped for more, after all look at how much the new Camero changed. It's as if they took the safe route and just changed up a few things.

I admit that we haven't seen the final car and I will reserve final judgement until then.

Hoping the C8 will mix it up a bit more.

Mark
Camaro changed -- No it didn't. They copied the
old one. No gm brainstorm, not smart enough
for that. The one looks like the old one thats
been eating too many Big mac's
Old 04-15-2012, 06:05 AM
  #37  
obxchartercaptain
Safety Car
 
obxchartercaptain's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Tarpon Springs FL
Posts: 4,446
Received 308 Likes on 198 Posts
FL Events Coordinator

Default

Originally Posted by HighlanderX
Drivetrain will be what makes or breaks this car... And what will set it apart.... if it does.
...And from what I have read, it's "supposed" to have a Dual Clutch setup, a better interior with "modern" electronics.

Get notified of new replies

To Corvette c7 spotted

Old 04-15-2012, 09:34 AM
  #38  
BlueOx
Race Director
 
BlueOx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,776
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by texvette2
Camaro changed -- No it didn't. They copied the
old one. No gm brainstorm, not smart enough
for that. The one looks like the old one thats
been eating too many Big mac's
Please...the Camaro is completely different. It just has a few of the styling cues of the '69 model. It is a completely better car than the old ones ever thought about being.

BTW, looking at sales compared to the Mustang, GM made brilliant choices. Just imagine what GM overall U.S. sales would be without the Camaro.
Old 04-15-2012, 09:56 AM
  #39  
Racer X
Le Mans Master
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,445
Received 4,371 Likes on 2,064 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlueOx
Please...the Camaro is completely different. It just has a few of the styling cues of the '69 model. It is a completely better car than the old ones ever thought about being.

BTW, looking at sales compared to the Mustang, GM made brilliant choices. Just imagine what GM overall U.S. sales would be without the Camaro.
While I agree it is completely different, but with many styling cues from the 1969 model. It is not a completely better car because it is ~600 pounds heavier. If it were even on pound light than the 1969 model, I would agree with you and the performance of the new would be dramatically better than it is.
Old 04-15-2012, 10:52 AM
  #40  
thebrander
Burning Brakes
 
thebrander's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,000
Received 40 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Racer X
While I agree it is completely different, but with many styling cues from the 1969 model. It is not a completely better car because it is ~600 pounds heavier. If it were even on pound light than the 1969 model, I would agree with you and the performance of the new would be dramatically better than it is.
Are you sure the 5th gen doesn't out handle the 1st gen despite the extra weight? (i.e. lateral g's, braking distance, slalom, lap times, etc.)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Corvette c7 spotted



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM.