A "427" c7?
#61
Burning Brakes
You mean a batch of cars with issues over a finite span of model years for the Z06. What's the most recent m/y Z06 to have an issue? 2010? 2011? It's a bummer for those car owners, with a QC issue for some of the heads built over those years, but the LS7 is still an awesome engine overall.
#62
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,754
Received 536 Likes
on
279 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'08-'10-'11-'12-'13 '14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19
You mean a batch of cars with issues over a finite span of model years for the Z06. What's the most recent m/y Z06 to have an issue? 2010? 2011? It's a bummer for those car owners, with a QC issue for some of the heads built over those years, but the LS7 is still an awesome engine overall.
And the valve issues aren't the only thing. This car had oiling issues, fixed, it has clutch issues. Probably a few others though not substantial in number.
Don't get me wrong, I LOVED my Z06, but the financial implications were more than I could handle.
#63
Burning Brakes
I don't think GM wants those low production volumes of $100K+ cars.
Even the higher MSRP vettes, aren't really selling near MSRP.
GM is smart enough to know that aside from some diehards (like me) who are snatching up the remaining 427s, the high-priced vettes are really NOT a winning business proposition. I'm guessing the ZR1 is a money loser too, against the investment made to develop that car.
For the record, I also think the Camaro ZL1 is a dud. The market for cars that deliver mpg of only 14 city - 19 hwy are soon to be over. My money is betting that there will be no Shelby GT500 with the new 2014 Mustang either.
IMHO: I'm guessing the future holds lots of quick but smaller engined, profitable $60K-$80K vettes, and that the 'super-vette' will mostly soon be a thing of the past.
IMHO
#64
Burning Brakes
How so and where? And any more evidence? You didn't provide any. It's all conjecture at this point, but most signs point to 6.2L remaining, with versions of the Gen V also having 5.3L displacement, likely as a "base v8" truck engine to slot between the 6 cyl and the 6.2L
However, there have been many articles citing the goal of significantly higher MPG - many written about the new 2014 Tahoe/Yukon/Trucks - and then other articles citing the Corvette, Camaro, Tahoe & Yukon will all be running the same new V8 engine. ...So you need to read the SUV & Truck stories too to track what being said about the new GM engines...
#66
Drifting
Fair question. Motor Trend wrote the story suggesting the 5.5L. But I've seen the 5.3L & 6.2L speculation too.
However, there have been many articles citing the goal of significantly higher MPG - many written about the new 2014 Tahoe/Yukon/Trucks - and then other articles citing the Corvette, Camaro, Tahoe & Yukon will all be running the same new V8 engine. ...So you need to read the SUV & Truck stories too to track what being said about the new GM engines...
However, there have been many articles citing the goal of significantly higher MPG - many written about the new 2014 Tahoe/Yukon/Trucks - and then other articles citing the Corvette, Camaro, Tahoe & Yukon will all be running the same new V8 engine. ...So you need to read the SUV & Truck stories too to track what being said about the new GM engines...
For what it's worth, sources I personally trust (but could be wrong!) are saying 6.2L LT1, but that much of the new advancements were eaten up by the stretch for higher fuel economy, so a "modest" (unclarified) gain only for the 6.2L. If the 3.6L V6 got ~19% gain from DI, is a "modest" gain 10%? That would put a 6.2L right in line with 475-480hp.
My thoughts are that advances in DI and VVT, possibly VVL (available on the new Impala's 3.6L v6) could still probably return impressive fuel economy in a car as light and aerodynamic as a Corvette even with a larger 6.2L. Plus the 7 speed manual leaves plenty of space for a crazy overdrive still. Corvettes, while fairly high volume for a sports car, are still a pretty small percentage of GM's total fleet, I personally believe (hope?) that they can meet a reasonable fuel economy figure without resorting to 5.3L downsizing.
I'm hearing new revamped 4.3L (possibly based off of Gen V V8s) v6, 5.3L V8, and 6.2L V8 for the truck engines, btw.
Last edited by CPhelps; 09-29-2012 at 07:09 PM.