BlueOx

I believe he was making a joke!

RC000E

I think people need to look a little closer. I will not deny, there is certainly some validity to the Jalopnik photo...they definitely are part of a security breach that will change how GM does things. The accuracy is there....to a point.

I do believe, I see some differences, which have nothing to do with the fact it's a vert.

For one, I think this bumper on this vert reveals very large out brake ducts, which are no part of the Jalopnik rendering. The side mirrors are also different, very clearly. Also, the leading edge of the front bumper has somewhat of a "kink" in it. It's not a smooth leading edge I don't think.

If you look at the Aventador, there is a bit of a break in the leading edge of the front bumper, that I swear appears to be beneath this camo. I believe the Jalopnik has validity, but I do not think this is an exact representation of what we're gonna see in January.

BWF07

The hood does not look the same to me. The spy photo car it appears to drop off sharper the the Jalopnik rendering. Because this spy photo is a roadster and not a coupe it is hard to say much more,

BlueOx

You may be looking at a ZR1 vs a base car also...

CaryKen

He was.

important

Reminds me of the GTR.

dmaxx3500

that conv top looks way to smooth,could it be fake to hide the power folding hard top?

BlueOx

I think that it looks too smooth/thin to be covering a retractible hard top. I would also think they would have just covered it with camo if that was the case.