New leak on jalopnik!
#41
Melting Slicks
#42
Team Owner
#44
Safety Car
Pretty sure it's not going to look EXACTLY like a 599 so don't go jumping off the bridge just yet. However, anytime you can get a 'Vette looking close to something that costs 5x more than it that's a good thing as far as I'm concerned.
#45
Team Owner
Takes you back to 1963, except the 63 had two(non functional) vents. Both have the "vents" located in a recessed area, not just stuck on top of the hood like the renderings show.
#46
Sr.Random input generator
#47
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Rockland County NY
Posts: 2,182
Received 470 Likes
on
145 Posts
2020 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2016 C5 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '12, '14
Last edited by jd_black_00; 12-17-2012 at 05:54 PM. Reason: wanted to add picture
#49
Le Mans Master
Like it!
#50
Burning Brakes
Looking better, it does have a little bit of the 599. Ok, GM, just show us the car, we have been waiting and you have done an awful job of keeping it under wraps! No surprise since the jalopnik came out months ago...
#51
#53
Drifting
I was going to post the same comments when I read your post. The lights are different and the intake is more aggressive, but the general shape is still C6. Earlier renderings showed a much lower front profile.
The more C6 like it gets the better it looks.
#55
Burning Brakes
#56
Instructor
Member Since: May 2012
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can someone compare this drawing to the latest C&D rendering showing the differences? not sure I see what everyone is crowing about w/ this version looking so much better
#58
#59
Melting Slicks