C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GT500 has 662bhp for 54K, C7 450bhp for 60K?

Old 01-13-2013, 10:53 PM
  #21  
VRYALT3R3D
Drifting
 
VRYALT3R3D's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,695
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

I like the Shelby GT500, but they aren't even in the same ballpark.
Old 01-13-2013, 10:54 PM
  #22  
S'vette
Melting Slicks
 
S'vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Location: Tumwater, WA
Posts: 3,023
Received 73 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by acannell
True.

But how does it feel to see the rear of that shelby while you're in your new C7. Lame. That wasnt how it was in 2005
They will be side by side with the gt500 in the lead a bit but the 500 will get killed on a course.
Old 01-13-2013, 10:56 PM
  #23  
LS WON
Team Owner
 
LS WON's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco CA
Posts: 31,954
Received 271 Likes on 233 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by strawboss
this is the same reason i didnt like my SRT8 Challenger
Can I have your SRT8 Challenger? I need more room and would welcome a comfortable riding car
Old 01-13-2013, 10:58 PM
  #24  
acannell
Instructor
 
acannell's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VETTEMANN
While you're taking flack for this thread on the GT 500 comparison, the point might be better made that Ford now gets 420HP out of it's under $40K Mustang GT with a small 5.0L V8. How does Corvette's new ultra-advanced 450HP 6.2L V8 for $55K+ sound now?
yes..i forgot about this....

its really sad that VVT, DI, combustion rework...all of that adds up to 14hp?

good point
Old 01-13-2013, 10:58 PM
  #25  
02Z06EB
Racer
 
02Z06EB's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Z06LUST
And what is wrong with that....greatest Pony car ever built. (Pony car = 4 seats; Sports car - 2 seats. Totally different cars)

Some of you boys really need to get your inferority complex in check-a good shrink and proper meds can help you.
yea a lot of people here are really getting defensive with nothing of substance to say other than, "leave the board" or "go buy a mustang"

its called a discussion people, try it out.
Old 01-13-2013, 10:59 PM
  #26  
LS WON
Team Owner
 
LS WON's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco CA
Posts: 31,954
Received 271 Likes on 233 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by VRYALT3R3D
I like the Shelby GT500, but they aren't even in the same ballpark.
Mustang GT is the best buy of them all for the $$$$$. Priced right, easy to drive, easy clutch to engage and shift unlike GT-500 which is going to have a even stiffer ride and perhaps an unaceptable ride on real world streets.. That 5.0 32 valve in 6 spd. manual loves to rev. and it is fund to drive.
Old 01-13-2013, 10:59 PM
  #27  
acannell
Instructor
 
acannell's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S'vette
They will be side by side with the gt500 in the lead a bit but the 500 will get killed on a course.
wrong again

1 second slower than a 2011 Z07

http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/laguna_seca.html
Old 01-13-2013, 11:00 PM
  #28  
stealthy08
Racer
 
stealthy08's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 251
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
2018 C6 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by acannell
True.

But how does it feel to see the rear of that shelby while you're in your new C7. Lame. That wasnt how it was in 2005
Probably not too bad, because I would not be driving a base C7. You just may be watching my new nasty camaro styled rear end

Its all good though, American muscle rules.
Old 01-13-2013, 11:00 PM
  #29  
LS WON
Team Owner
 
LS WON's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco CA
Posts: 31,954
Received 271 Likes on 233 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by S'vette
They will be side by side with the gt500 in the lead a bit but the 500 will get killed on a course.
GT -500 cost too much even though it is a limited production car.
Old 01-13-2013, 11:01 PM
  #30  
1KUIK7
Advanced
 
1KUIK7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Walnut Creek Ca.
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The GT 500 is more in the ZR1 range and I'd rather have a Vette!!!
Old 01-13-2013, 11:03 PM
  #31  
Z06LUST
Drifting
 
Z06LUST's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Citrus Heights CA
Posts: 1,987
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

Originally Posted by RedZ4me
you fail to mention the weight........it needs those extra horses, I had one, I know
You had and already sold a 2013 GT500-WOW!

Note to forum: the GT500 has been though substantial changes over the past 6 years...including a shift to an alum engine block (over 100 lb lighter) as well as an increase from 500 to 662 HP, brake changes, weight reduction, suspension changes, torsen rearend, recaro seats...

Although a Sports car to Pony car comparison is dumb in my opinion..if your gonna compare a current Corrvette (C6) to a GT500 just make sure your compariing a CURRENT GT500 not one that was surpassed within Ford years ago.

As for the C7...new GT500 is due out in 14 months with the total redesign of the Mustang set for April 2014. THAT is the car you need to consider when comparing with the new C7 as both will be in production and on the street within 8 months of each other.
Old 01-13-2013, 11:04 PM
  #32  
Chrjones2
Instructor
 
Chrjones2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: Houston texas
Posts: 203
Received 71 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

Per the 30 minute car and driver video released on the c7... Video is on YouTube

Current gm estimates(not final yet)

0-60 3.9 seconds
1/4 12.3 @118
1g
70-0 155'

177" length
73.9 " width
48.6" height
3350 est curb weight
Old 01-13-2013, 11:06 PM
  #33  
RedZ4me
Le Mans Master
 
RedZ4me's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 5,051
Received 421 Likes on 256 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS WON
GT -500 cost too much even though it is a limited production car.
Limited ??? You're f'in joking right?? One of the reasons I got rid of mine......a car that Ford made a statement it was supposed to be a 2 year/3 year production car. It's on it's 7th year and the 2014 will be the 8th. hahaha......limited my a$$
Old 01-13-2013, 11:06 PM
  #34  
WICKEDFRC
Race Director

 
WICKEDFRC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 16,270
Received 1,652 Likes on 738 Posts

Default

To each his/her own.....

There are many vehicles out there on the road that can be stomped by a 66 Nova with 600 Hp, or a 2008 Cobra with 700 Hp, etc.....

Then take a look at the underpowered exotics like Porsche GT2 around 450 HP, or the 2005/2006 Audi R8 at 450 HP. Some people just don't care about HP as they do the vehicle itself. My C5 was smoking these cars in Germany. Even got props from some spirited British guy romping his Ferrari F430 to 180+ with me and another guy gave me the thumbs up when he backed off his 2006 BMW M6 as we peaked over 188 mph. I hit 191 in my Forged C5. Who cares....Their cars were 5x the cost of mine and gorgeous rides no doubt. Its not always about horsepower.

That M6 can haul ***! And, a 4-seater to boot!!!

Ferrari F430? My dream car. I smoked him. But, the truth is, I can't afford one and it is an entirely different class than a Corvette.

So is a Mustang.

Last edited by WICKEDFRC; 01-13-2013 at 11:10 PM.
Old 01-13-2013, 11:07 PM
  #35  
Toilets
Drifting
 
Toilets's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,259
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by acannell
wrong again

1 second slower than a 2011 Z07

http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/laguna_seca.html
Correct! Not sure why people don't give the 500 respect... If Tadge was correct in saying the performance of the c7 is slighter better than the C6 GS, then our c7 will fall at its own game (roadcourse) to the gt500
Old 01-13-2013, 11:07 PM
  #36  
RedZ4me
Le Mans Master
 
RedZ4me's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 5,051
Received 421 Likes on 256 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z06LUST
You had and already sold a 2013 GT500-WOW!

Note to forum: the GT500 has been though substantial changes over the past 6 years...including a shift to an alum engine block (over 100 lb lighter) as well as an increase from 500 to 662 HP, brake changes, weight reduction, suspension changes, torsen rearend, recaro seats...

Although a Sports car to Pony car comparison is dumb in my opinion..if your gonna compare a current Corrvette (C6) to a GT500 just make sure your compariing a CURRENT GT500 not one that was surpassed within Ford years ago.

As for the C7...new GT500 is due out in 14 months with the total redesign of the Mustang set for April 2014. THAT is the car you need to consider when comparing with the new C7 as both will be in production and on the street within 8 months of each other.
no...not the 2013 but mine did have dyno'd 659 rwhp. Useless when you can't put it down..........and forget that 100lb weight reduction with the 2011 alum block, the car gradually gained weight here and there and was always around at the low end 3850+ lbs, same as it was in 2007
Old 01-13-2013, 11:07 PM
  #37  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z06LUST

As for the C7...new GT500 is due out in 14 months with the total redesign of the Mustang set for April 2014. THAT is the car you need to consider when comparing with the new C7 as both will be in production and on the street within 8 months of each other.
No need to compare. The next Camaro will take on the Mustang just fine.

The Corvette isn't a competitor of those cars.

Get notified of new replies

To GT500 has 662bhp for 54K, C7 450bhp for 60K?

Old 01-13-2013, 11:08 PM
  #38  
S'vette
Melting Slicks
 
S'vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Location: Tumwater, WA
Posts: 3,023
Received 73 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by acannell
wrong again

1 second slower than a 2011 Z07

http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/laguna_seca.html
We shall see. But if it bugs you that much then go buy a GT500 and be happy. And I will get my friends beatup WRX and kill your GT500. So what does that prove? Like they said you are comparing apple to oranges as far as what the cars were designed for.
Old 01-13-2013, 11:08 PM
  #39  
Da_Whistler
Racer
 
Da_Whistler's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2011
Location: Jerzee
Posts: 292
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kaneda
Am i missing something here? I get the Vette will run circles around the Stang on a track, but line up the side view mirrors on a highway and the Stang will run away from the C7.

Given both Dodge and Chevy had no clue Ford would screw both them over with the bang-for-buck in the Shelby, but the bar was raised, and Chevy didn't really show us anything that was WOW with regards to power.

Funny how LOW 450bhp sounds now isn't it?
I'm a Mustang nut having owned 20 before buying my Vette. That's just stupid comparison. A GT coupe vs a 2 seat sports car. Apples and oranges indeed
Old 01-13-2013, 11:09 PM
  #40  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

If you're driving a C7, better give up the donuts.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: GT500 has 662bhp for 54K, C7 450bhp for 60K?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 AM.