C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Be grateful for GM engineering

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2015, 08:04 PM
  #41  
speedlink
Safety Car
 
speedlink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Southeast, WI
Posts: 4,531
Received 599 Likes on 373 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by W88fixer
Gee, wow, China may put a man on the moon in 2020, only 51 yrs after us, how impressive. Don
Then China will be polluting the moon, as well as the rest of the earth!!!
Old 05-24-2015, 08:37 PM
  #42  
TBRDS
Racer

 
TBRDS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2014
Posts: 368
Received 164 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

On the subject of batteries, I have a nine-year-old Prius, with 185,000+ miles, and not only have I not replaced the traction high voltage battery, I have never replaced the small 12 volt battery "starter" battery either, even though I have accidentally discharged it twice! Strange!
Old 05-24-2015, 08:47 PM
  #43  
kcbc
Instructor
 
kcbc's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: houston tx
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default moon

Originally Posted by speedlink
Then China will be polluting the moon, as well as the rest of the earth!!!




hah hah ...that's funny...good point
Old 05-24-2015, 09:24 PM
  #44  
Joe B.
Melting Slicks
 
Joe B.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Westmont Il.
Posts: 2,749
Received 48 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ratman6161
So better add Japan, China, the EU countries and soon...North Korea. Of all those I just listed, all except North Korea launch their own satellites and could send a human to the moon if they wanted to. North Korea coming soon except you know what they want to put on top of their launch vehicles...
Maybe, but will they come back?
Old 05-24-2015, 11:42 PM
  #45  
Thrill6
Burning Brakes
 
Thrill6's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Columbia Maryland
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS3 MN6
The "average" new car has a battery warranty rate of just under 50% (meaning that just under 50% of batteries die within 3 years). Some car lines (Jeep Grand Cherokees were bad for a while) have a 70% warranty rate.

The reason isn't poor engineering, the reason is WE HAVE TOO MUCH ELECTRICAL STUFF IN THE CAR!

It's a 12V battery with LIMITED AMP support. Cold cranking amps are only for the start, once running the amperage drops a lot. Add to that your car basically needs your alternator to power the system (it raises the cars voltage to 14.7 or sometimes 15.3 volts to lower amperage draw!) The alternator also puts parasitic drain on the engine so "intelligent" power management systems (which all new cars have) attempt to use the alternator only when the BATTERY can't support the 14.7 volts!

How do they do all this, overcharging the battery during use, mind you again that your battery is being pummeled by the car, and it is slow to react, the alternator doesn't just charge the battery it tries to handle dynamic transient loads (like when you make a quick maneuver with your electric steering and you draw 60-100 amps from the system for 500 ms).

I could go on all day about batteries, alternators, amp usage, and the like in cars. But one thing needs to be said, until we move to a 42 volt (36 + 6 volt margin) or a true 48 volt system we are going to have significant issues in this regard.

You know what type of car doesn't have battery issues.... A HYBRID. That's it, everyone else is boned.
Obviously you failed getting your Electrical Engineering degree because your explanation of how a car's electrical system (or any DC power system) works is completely wrong and your analysis of car battery failure is also completely wrong.

Car batteries aren't failing more often because of the load when the car is running, but because there is a load when they AREN'T running.
Things like keyless entry systems, alarms, OnStar, etc. run all the time which causes the battery to slowly discharge. When a lead-acid battery isn't fully charged it suffers from battery sulfation which is a chemical reaction which eventually requires the battery to be replaced. Between the current draw when the car isn't running and that the car must be running longer to charge it back to full capacity means that the battery sufation occurs for much longer periods which leads to shorter life. The deeper the discharge the faster (exponentially) sulfation occurs which is why a deep discharge of a regular car battery can kill it. (Deep-cycle batteries have slightly different lead-acid chemistry which reduces sulfation when deeply discharged but also reduces the how fast the battery can discharge power (it's CCA rating).)
Before all the electronics in cars, when you parked your car the battery was FULLY charged and didn't suffer battery sulfation as quickly because it remained fully charged. Period.

Hybrids use Nickel-Metal-Hydride or Lithium-Ion batteries which are much more expensive and have different battery characteristics than lead-acid batteries.
Old 05-26-2015, 07:33 AM
  #46  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,339
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Thrill6
Obviously you failed getting your Electrical Engineering degree because your explanation of how a car's electrical system (or any DC power system) works is completely wrong and your analysis of car battery failure is also completely wrong.

Car batteries aren't failing more often because of the load when the car is running, but because there is a load when they AREN'T running.
Things like keyless entry systems, alarms, OnStar, etc. run all the time which causes the battery to slowly discharge. When a lead-acid battery isn't fully charged it suffers from battery sulfation which is a chemical reaction which eventually requires the battery to be replaced. Between the current draw when the car isn't running and that the car must be running longer to charge it back to full capacity means that the battery sufation occurs for much longer periods which leads to shorter life. The deeper the discharge the faster (exponentially) sulfation occurs which is why a deep discharge of a regular car battery can kill it. (Deep-cycle batteries have slightly different lead-acid chemistry which reduces sulfation when deeply discharged but also reduces the how fast the battery can discharge power (it's CCA rating).)
Before all the electronics in cars, when you parked your car the battery was FULLY charged and didn't suffer battery sulfation as quickly because it remained fully charged. Period.

Hybrids use Nickel-Metal-Hydride or Lithium-Ion batteries which are much more expensive and have different battery characteristics than lead-acid batteries.
While you are right in regards to currents when they are off being a problem. The fact that they are NOW also a problem when the car is on exacerbates the problem.

You can't sufficiently charge a battery when the car is on, to have it survive the drain when it's off.

Seriously, you don't have to believe me, but this is how cut throat it is on the battery side. We have undersized alternators and "intelligent" charging systems to loading the engine due to fuel economy.

At some point we just need to put more power into the car.

And actually I didn't fail anything in EE I just don't have time to write an entire backstory on the existence of things, and I assume the average person can connect the dots. But thanks for explaining the more boring stuff so I don't have to.

Also my point with hybrids wasn't related to battery chemistry, but rather storage capacity. They have more capacity than a regular 12V system (and via a DC/DC converter they keep the 12V side and lead acid battery better charged).

Last edited by LT1 Z51; 05-26-2015 at 07:38 AM.
Old 05-26-2015, 07:36 AM
  #47  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,339
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kcbc
you are wrong !!!!!!!
Actually I'm not. Airbags historically have been connected to "ignition hot" circuits and not "always hot" circuits. This has started to change, and I think in the next 5 years will become the obsolete method. But that doesn't change the fact that pretty much all cars from 1985 (or whenever the first airbag was launched) until 2010 (or later) have this type of setup.
Old 05-26-2015, 07:46 AM
  #48  
Walt White Coupe
Race Director
 
Walt White Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Phila Suburbs 2023 C8 & 2013 650ix
Posts: 10,414
Received 2,223 Likes on 1,140 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kcbc
you are wrong !!!!!!!
.
Old 05-26-2015, 08:00 AM
  #49  
kcbc
Instructor
 
kcbc's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: houston tx
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default u are wrong more !!!!!

Originally Posted by LS3 MN6
Actually I'm not. Airbags historically have been connected to "ignition hot" circuits and not "always hot" circuits. This has started to change, and I think in the next 5 years will become the obsolete method. But that doesn't change the fact that pretty much all cars from 1985 (or whenever the first airbag was launched) until 2010 (or later) have this type of setup.

standard 7 series BMW 2011 and up equipped with 2 batteries and 1 of em is over 1000 cold cranking amps.....
it is not the running time that drain battery.Most computer wont turn off when the key is off because module like EVap sys now are design to run the monitor when the key is off


Also GM keys came outta the ignition is not becuz of design...Nissan,toyota and others too....it is because people put tooo many keys together in the key chain ,dangling on ignition sw. and wore out the sw......I know it cuz I've seen too many times in and outta the shop.....the government pick on GM because they are easier just like the saddle tank on the pu' last time
Old 05-26-2015, 08:17 AM
  #50  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,339
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kcbc
standard 7 series BMW 2011 and up equipped with 2 batteries and 1 of em is over 1000 cold cranking amps.....
it is not the running time that drain battery.Most computer wont turn off when the key is off because module like EVap sys now are design to run the monitor when the key is off


Also GM keys came outta the ignition is not becuz of design...Nissan,toyota and others too....it is because people put tooo many keys together in the key chain ,dangling on ignition sw. and wore out the sw......I know it cuz I've seen too many times in and outta the shop.....the government pick on GM because they are easier just like the saddle tank on the pu' last time
Everything is either off or in sleep mode when the key is off. A lot of modules are in sleep mode (with a drain current) but the airbag hasn't historically been one of those modules. They powered down the circuits to make them "safe" for service.

I agree the key problem is one of "unintended" usage of having a bazillion keys on a key ring. However even without the ignition issue, a person could turn off a key and disable their own airbags. However I'm sure most people didn't know that, they assume vehicle is moving therefore my airbag (and power steering, and other things) should be working, when this was not the case (or the design intent).

Unfortunately in todays day and age we have to engineer to the lowest common denominator. I have to assume people will do things like turn off the ignition while driving, or take their hands off the wheel.
Old 05-26-2015, 08:35 AM
  #51  
kcbc
Instructor
 
kcbc's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: houston tx
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default fixing...

Originally Posted by LS3 MN6
Everything is either off or in sleep mode when the key is off. A lot of modules are in sleep mode (with a drain current) but the airbag hasn't historically been one of those modules. They powered down the circuits to make them "safe" for service.

I agree the key problem is one of "unintended" usage of having a bazillion keys on a key ring. However even without the ignition issue, a person could turn off a key and disable their own airbags. However I'm sure most people didn't know that, they assume vehicle is moving therefore my airbag (and power steering, and other things) should be working, when this was not the case (or the design intent).

Unfortunately in todays day and age we have to engineer to the lowest common denominator. I have to assume people will do things like turn off the ignition while driving, or take their hands off the wheel.
Actually not......most of the manufactures on last 3 yrs production already done and expire ignition...the key is only merely establish an identification verification for immobilizer so it will wake up the ECU and hand shake with other modules for the startup ..a 2010 avenger from Chrysler already have no ignition sw......ign sw is a bad idea anyway .....cuz it pwr up almost anything and too much current running thru acting like a dist center ....that should be the jobs of multiple relay to divide and deliver power but not on 1 central on and off sw.
of course when u look at the foreign design ..its already push button sw. ....such as the C6 vette
Old 05-26-2015, 09:50 AM
  #52  
Barry Hanna
Instructor
 
Barry Hanna's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta Georgia
Posts: 121
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

My personal experience with batteries has been good. I always start them out with a good charge state by connecting to a CTEK charger. Many vehicles start out with a low-charge state after sitting in transport and dealer inventory and never get up to "snuff" until a fair amount of driving. It's always been my belief that a good initial charge state is important. Having said that, I always replace batteries at 5 years max and tires the same irrespective of miles. If my Corvette would be sitting for more than 3 or 4 days I would usually plug in the CTEK. I did a hard-mount so it was easy to do.
Old 05-26-2015, 12:36 PM
  #53  
RocketGuy3
Burning Brakes
 
RocketGuy3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 933
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeLsx
I truly believe Europe engineering WAS better. But times have changed lately.

overall though, i think German luxury is best. if you want a luxury car.
Disagree. I think Lexus is unbeatable if your top priority is luxury.

You go with Germany if you want luxury with more sportiness and are willing to sacrifice some reliability and cheap maintenance.

... Although I think Lexus has been making some pretty fun cars lately, too. At least as fun as a luxury car with a slushbox can be.
Old 05-26-2015, 02:38 PM
  #54  
Eppieguy
Melting Slicks
 
Eppieguy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Somerville New Jersey
Posts: 2,162
Received 49 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slickstick
Don't have my C7 yet but the C6 isn't much better... For a lot of people they eat up batteries every couple of years.
My C6 still has the original battery, car was born 10/24/08.
Old 05-27-2015, 07:01 AM
  #55  
LT1 Z51
Corvette Enthusiast
Support Corvetteforum!
 
LT1 Z51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Troy & Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 5,339
Received 917 Likes on 610 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kcbc
Actually not......most of the manufactures on last 3 yrs production already done and expire ignition...the key is only merely establish an identification verification for immobilizer so it will wake up the ECU and hand shake with other modules for the startup ..a 2010 avenger from Chrysler already have no ignition sw......ign sw is a bad idea anyway .....cuz it pwr up almost anything and too much current running thru acting like a dist center ....that should be the jobs of multiple relay to divide and deliver power but not on 1 central on and off sw.
of course when u look at the foreign design ..its already push button sw. ....such as the C6 vette
A 2010 Avenger has an RF Gateway Module which is the replacement for the WIN (Wireless Ignition Node), which is an Ignition Module. Unlike GM and Ford who use the BCM (Body Controller) for such things. However, when I say ignition I refer to the CAN signal that says I am in run, accessory, crank, or off; as well as the "ignition hot" lines that one awaken when the BCM sends 12V on the line (based on if it thinks the car is in ignition "run")

C6 and C7 Vette work the same way, the fact you have a button doesn't remove ignition states from the logic equation. They in fact still exist.
Old 05-27-2015, 07:49 AM
  #56  
SRQStingray
Melting Slicks
 
SRQStingray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: Sarasota Florida
Posts: 2,398
Received 204 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slickstick
Don't have my C7 yet but the C6 isn't much better... For a lot of people they eat up batteries every couple of years.
My C6 battery lasted five years in Florida where the heat really affects battery life. Of course, my C6 was a daily driver. I suspect that is a factor.
Old 05-27-2015, 08:09 AM
  #57  
ratman6161
Pro
 
ratman6161's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: Buffalo Minnesota
Posts: 704
Received 119 Likes on 57 Posts
Default Battery not fully charged after driving.

One thing I've noticed since this discussion started is that the battery on my C7 doesn't seem to be fully charged, even after a drive of more than an hour. I recently hardwired a connection for my battery tender to the battery to make it easy to plug in and started using the battery tender any time I'm not going to drive the car for a couple of days.

When first plugged in, the battery tender goes through three modes. First the light is red, indicating charging. When it hits 85% the red light stays on but the green light is flashing. When its fully charged, it goes into maintenance mode whit the red light off and the green light on steady. It will cycle through all three modes even if the battery is fully charged...in which case it would all happen quickly.

This is the same unit I was using on my C5 up until April when I traded it in. On the C5, if I came back from a drive and plugged in the tender, it would cycle through to maintenance mode pretty quickly.

On the C7, same scenario, I came back 24 hours later and it was still flashing green meaning it still had not made it to full charge. It took several more hours to get to maintenance mode. Granted its only .75 amps but I would have expected that after driving the battery would already be fully charged. The length of time its taking to get to maintenance mode seems to be telling me that it is really somewhere above 85% but less than full charge.

Just an observation. I'm not claiming to know why this is. But given that its not really fully charged just from driving it, my strategy of putting the tender on it when its going to sit for a couple of days seems reasonable.



Quick Reply: Be grateful for GM engineering



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 AM.