C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lateral G force-Z51 vs non Z51

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2015, 06:50 PM
  #1  
sting64
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
sting64's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Lateral G force-Z51 vs non Z51

Chevy data shows the same maximum lateral g force for the z51 and non z51 at 1.03. With all the z51 additions, you would expect a difference between the two. Does anyone have real world data confirming or disputing this?
Old 08-21-2015, 06:58 PM
  #2  
Walt White Coupe
Race Director
 
Walt White Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Phila Suburbs 2023 C8 & 2013 650ix
Posts: 10,413
Received 2,221 Likes on 1,139 Posts

Default

I don't believe that's true. 1 G for non Z51 and 1.03 for the Z51. Anyway it's not much of a difference.
Old 08-21-2015, 07:01 PM
  #3  
Steve_R
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Steve_R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Anger Island
Posts: 45,940
Received 3,288 Likes on 1,399 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

GM probably does or they wouldn't say it.

I have no idea how accurate the lateral G display in the HUD is but I've had my non-Z51 right at 1. Not sure how much more I'd want to push beyond that.
Old 08-21-2015, 07:03 PM
  #4  
LIStingray
Melting Slicks
 
LIStingray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 2,299
Received 461 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

I have read both 1.06g & 1.03g for the Z51and base; and 1.03g & 1.00g for the Z51 and base in two different places - either way the difference is 0.03g.
That being said, anywhere but a race track, I have a really hard time consistently seeing above 0.90g on my C7 - mostly because I guess I just don't seem to push it hard enough.
Old 08-21-2015, 08:50 PM
  #5  
stevebz06
Melting Slicks
 
stevebz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,075
Received 304 Likes on 205 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LIStingray
I have read both 1.06g & 1.03g for the Z51and base; and 1.03g & 1.00g for the Z51 and base in two different places - either way the difference is 0.03g.
That being said, anywhere but a race track, I have a really hard time consistently seeing above 0.90g on my C7 - mostly because I guess I just don't seem to push it hard enough.
I is going to depend on the tires more than any other factor as to which car can pull the most G, but as far as the absolute numbers go, the surface you're driving on is going to create big differences from what the factory claims. GM is probably basing those numbers on a clean, grippy surface so don't worry about it if you can't duplicate them.
Old 08-21-2015, 08:55 PM
  #6  
owc6
Team Owner
 
owc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Posts: 24,543
Received 4,186 Likes on 2,679 Posts

Default

To say nothing of temp. You will be able to get more grip when it's hot. You could push it more now, than, say November...
Old 08-21-2015, 09:19 PM
  #7  
themonk
Team Owner
 
themonk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary, AB. There's a reason why white was the only color offered on every year Corvette. Proud Canadian German Jamaican!
Posts: 97,155
Received 1,456 Likes on 799 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09, '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Originally Posted by owc6
To say nothing of temp. You will be able to get more grip when it's hot. You could push it more now, than, say November...
not right now in Calgary you can't.....snow today just west of us.
Old 08-21-2015, 10:13 PM
  #8  
nmvettec7
Safety Car
 
nmvettec7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,548
Received 850 Likes on 493 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sting64
Chevy data shows the same maximum lateral g force for the z51 and non z51 at 1.03. With all the z51 additions, you would expect a difference between the two. Does anyone have real world data confirming or disputing this?
Run your C7 on a real road racing track at 170 MPH and will you get some real G-Force.

1G is nothing to write home about. Compare that to a F1 (3 to 5g), Indycar (2 to 3g) or Nascar (3 to 4g) race car and those guys experince much greater G-Force.

The G-force gage is useless in the C7 but looks cool only.
Old 08-22-2015, 06:49 AM
  #9  
Walt White Coupe
Race Director
 
Walt White Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Phila Suburbs 2023 C8 & 2013 650ix
Posts: 10,413
Received 2,221 Likes on 1,139 Posts

Default

1G is nothing to write home about.

It is for a street car on a road with no banking which is what a skid pad number is.


Last edited by Walt White Coupe; 08-22-2015 at 07:05 AM.
Old 08-22-2015, 12:18 PM
  #10  
RedC7AZ
Race Director
 
RedC7AZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Posts: 16,854
Received 534 Likes on 334 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nmvettec7
Run your C7 on a real road racing track at 170 MPH and will you get some real G-Force.

1G is nothing to write home about. Compare that to a F1 (3 to 5g), Indycar (2 to 3g) or Nascar (3 to 4g) race car and those guys experince much greater G-Force.

The G-force gage is useless in the C7 but looks cool only.
NASCAR 3-4Gs is nothing to write home about compared to a rocket lsunch.
Old 08-22-2015, 01:22 PM
  #11  
Walt White Coupe
Race Director
 
Walt White Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Phila Suburbs 2023 C8 & 2013 650ix
Posts: 10,413
Received 2,221 Likes on 1,139 Posts

Default

NASCAR never sees 3-4 G's unless it's on a highly banked turn.
Old 08-22-2015, 05:55 PM
  #12  
nmvettec7
Safety Car
 
nmvettec7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,548
Received 850 Likes on 493 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by [B
RedC7AZ[/B];1590324069]NASCAR 3-4Gs is nothing to write home about compared to a rocket lsunch.
You are 100% correct.... That's one hell of a ride.

Originally Posted by [B
Walt White Coupe[/B];1590324412]NASCAR never sees 3-4 G's unless it's on a highly banked turn.
Do some research on NASCAR G-Force data....it's out there. Easy to find.

Many of the shorter tracks are high banked.
Old 08-22-2015, 05:56 PM
  #13  
nmvettec7
Safety Car
 
nmvettec7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,548
Received 850 Likes on 493 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by [B
RedC7AZ[/B];1590324069]NASCAR 3-4Gs is nothing to write home about compared to a rocket lsunch.
You are 100% correct.... That's one hell of a ride.

Originally Posted by [B
Walt White Coupe[/B];1590324412]NASCAR never sees 3-4 G's unless it's on a highly banked turn.
Do some research on NASCAR G-Force data....it's out there. Easy to find.

Many of the shorter tracks are high banked.

Many of the oval tracks at 200+ MPH will create 3+ G's for the drivers, not the straights but the corners.
Old 08-22-2015, 06:08 PM
  #14  
Walt White Coupe
Race Director
 
Walt White Coupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Phila Suburbs 2023 C8 & 2013 650ix
Posts: 10,413
Received 2,221 Likes on 1,139 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nmvettec7
You are 100% correct.... That's one hell of a ride.



Do some research on NASCAR G-Force data....it's out there. Easy to find.

Many of the shorter tracks are high banked.

Many of the oval tracks at 200+ MPH will create 3+ G's for the drivers, not the straights but the corners.
And they are banked, skid pads have no banking.
Old 08-22-2015, 06:16 PM
  #15  
MikeLsx
Drifting
 
MikeLsx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Location: MI
Posts: 1,630
Received 200 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

doesnt matter what the Gs say. IMO it comes down to feel. the Z51 feels better because it has more handling stuff. period.

people are so caught up with lap times, 0-60 numbers, G numbers etc... it amazes me.

the OP probably has a non Z51 or is thinking about getting a non Z51 and trying to make himself feel better it. by bring up a small difference in the G numbers.

i would never buy a non z51 because they are to soft, and i am not 70 years old.

Last edited by MikeLsx; 08-22-2015 at 06:18 PM.
Old 08-22-2015, 09:59 PM
  #16  
Richard Ames
Drifting
 
Richard Ames's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Posts: 1,498
Received 204 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeLsx
doesnt matter what the Gs say. IMO it comes down to feel. the Z51 feels better because it has more handling stuff. period.

people are so caught up with lap times, 0-60 numbers, G numbers etc... it amazes me.

the OP probably has a non Z51 or is thinking about getting a non Z51 and trying to make himself feel better it. by bring up a small difference in the G numbers.

i would never buy a non z51 because they are to soft, and i am not 70 years old.
I am 70 years old and like the Z51 what does age have to do with it?
Old 08-23-2015, 12:20 AM
  #17  
sycraft
Burning Brakes
 
sycraft's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Katy Texas
Posts: 873
Received 85 Likes on 67 Posts

Default

I have done 1.29 Gs in my non-mag Z51 on the track...just playing around, learning the car a little when new

Last edited by sycraft; 08-23-2015 at 12:54 AM.

Get notified of new replies

To Lateral G force-Z51 vs non Z51

Old 08-26-2015, 08:36 AM
  #18  
RedC7AZ
Race Director
 
RedC7AZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Posts: 16,854
Received 534 Likes on 334 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeLsx
doesnt matter what the Gs say. IMO it comes down to feel. the Z51 feels better because it has more handling stuff. period.

people are so caught up with lap times, 0-60 numbers, G numbers etc... it amazes me.

the OP probably has a non Z51 or is thinking about getting a non Z51 and trying to make himself feel better it. by bring up a small difference in the G numbers.

i would never buy a non z51 because they are to soft, and i am not 70 years old.
Sounds more like you are justifying your purchase of a C7 with Z51 option.
Old 08-26-2015, 09:10 AM
  #19  
Crossed Flags Fan
Melting Slicks
 
Crossed Flags Fan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Land of the free, home of the brave...
Posts: 3,174
Received 493 Likes on 276 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedC7AZ
Sounds more like you are justifying your purchase of a C7 with Z51 option.
yup
Old 08-26-2015, 10:13 AM
  #20  
tomlink
Pro
 
tomlink's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: League City Texas
Posts: 674
Received 221 Likes on 124 Posts

Default

A few years ago, I was at a Vette club track event and had the chance to drive both my C5 Z51 and a non-Z51 C5. The main difference was control and predictability near the edge. Throttle oversteer was simple and controlled on the Z51 while the base car would break away without much warning - and it was a little hairier when it happened. While very few of us will push these kinds of limits on the street, the Z51 gave me confidence I wouldn't have had with the base model after the experience of driving both.

While my new C7 (Nov. museum delivery) will be primarily a DD, it was a no-brainer to order the Z51 option.

Last edited by tomlink; 08-26-2015 at 10:27 AM.


Quick Reply: Lateral G force-Z51 vs non Z51



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 PM.